5..............
AS5400 (with np60) and VoIP
aalejo - MAGENTA COMPUTACION S.A.
Aug 22, 2003, 5:06pm PST
Do I need an special configuration to use np60 module to an E1 for VOIP?
bwilmoth
Aug 28, 2003, 2:24pm PST
You acn refer the following document for the configuration. No special configuration is needed for NP 60 module
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc ... 5350/sw_conf/53swcg
6................
Cisco ATA 186 Problem
whamri
Aug 14, 2003, 2:30am PST
Hi. I have some problems with VoIP
I use csico186 to connect telephones to router. As you know I can connect two telephones lines to the same Cisco ATA 186. So,
these two lines will have the same IP.
The problem:
Line 1: 222 333 888
Line 2: 222 333 999
When any body dial the first number the call will received in the first line or the second line randomly
irisrios
Aug 20, 2003, 8:13am PST
Have the destination pattern being configured as wildcard or an exact match? Hope the wild card is not matching to both the
numbers. The dial peers have to be configured separately for both the destination patterns. And the voice ports have to be
configured under respective dial peer.
whamri
Aug 23, 2003, 4:50am PST
The destination pattern configured as exact match
7.................
AS5350 Caller Name
jason.ewing - NETWORK MANAGEMENT TECHNICIAN, USAF
Aug 18, 2003, 6:47pm PST
Does anybody know if Caller ID Name is supported with the AS5350 Sip gateway terminating PRI to a Class 5 Switch. If so,
which IOS, and how is it configured? Thanks
bwilmoth
Aug 22, 2003, 8:14am PST
AS 5350 supports caller ID information. Use debug isdn q931 to troubleshoot if you face any problems.
8...............
Quality of service for prioritizing Voice by limiting Bandwidth
bsvijay - GRADUATE STUDENT, VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC AND STATE UNIVERSITY
Aug 15, 2003, 10:47pm PST
Dear Members,
I am trying to give priority to voice over other traffic by setting up a below test bed in my lab.
Voice receiver
Background receiver ---- Ethernet E0---- Router 1------Ethernet E 1----- Background traffic generator
Voice generator
Here Voice receiver, Background receiver and router 1?? EO interface forms one Ethernet segment.
(Actually I am using three routers. But for easy debugging presently I am working with one router)
Router 1?? E1 interface, Voice generator and background traffic generator form other Ethernet LAN.
I am limiting bandwidth of router E0 interface to 48kbps by below commands:
***********
I am sniffing at the interface E0 using Ethereal sniffer-protocol analyzer. But I am unable to get better results for voice
application over background traffic. For both Testing without QoS and with QoS I am getting the same results.
FOR EVERY VOICE PACKET I GET ONE BACKGROUND PACKET- SAME RESULTS FOR BOTH WITH AND WITHOUT QOS DEPLOYED
***********
The voice application is generating at 32 kbps with packet size frame size of 876 bytes.
It uses UDP port no 60600. It uses TCP port# 8896 for connection activeness. I am using these details in my QoS
configurations.
For initial testing, I am also generating background traffic also with 32kbps rate and frame size of 876 bytes.
Since total net traffic voice + background = 32 + 32 = 64 Kbps, so I am reducing the bandwidth of the interface using ??
raffic shape??and ??ate-limit??commands.
Router 1:
Option 1:
Conf t
int e 0
rate-limit output 48000 6000 6000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
Option 2:
Conf t
int e 0
traffic-shape rate 48000 6000 6000 1000
I think with the above configuration, all traffic above 48000 bps are dropped.
So there are good chances that 24000 bps of both voice and data are sent, and remaining s 8000bps for both voice and
background are dropped. So, therefore QoS does not come into picture because now total traffic is 48 but NOW actual interface
bandwidth is 10 Mbps after the ??ate-limit??or ??raffic-shape??phase.
IS THERE OTHER WAY TO REDUCE THE BANDWIDTH OF THE ETHERnet
InTERFACE.?
My router configs for Priority queuing and class based weighted fair queuing
My Full router configuration:
Policy : Priority Queuing
ONE#show run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1279 bytes
!
hostname ONE
!
enable password xxxx
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
!
!
!
!
!
interface Ethernet0
ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
rate-limit output 48000 6000 6000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
priority-group 1
!
interface Ethernet1
ip address 10.10.0.1 255.255.255.0
!
!
ip classless
ip route 10.20.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2
ip route 10.30.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2
no ip http server
ip pim bidir-enable
!
priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 8896
priority-list 1 protocol ip high udp 60600
no cdp run
!
!
line con 0
escape-character BREAK
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
no login
!
end
+++++++++++
CLASS BASED WEIGTED FAIR QUEUING
ONE#show run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1279 bytes
!
hostname ONE
!
enable password xxxx
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
!
!
class-map match-all voice
match access-group 101
!
!
policy-map catalyst
class voice
priority 36
class class-default
fair-queue 16
!
!
!
!
interface Ethernet0
ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
rate-limit output 48000 6000 6000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
service-policy output catalyst
!
interface Ethernet1
ip address 10.10.0.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial0
ip address 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial1
ip address xx.xx.xx.22 255.0.0.0
!
ip classless
ip route 10.20.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2
ip route 10.30.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2
no ip http server
ip pim bidir-enable
!
access-list 101 permit udp any any eq 60600
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 8896
no cdp run
!
!
line con 0
escape-character BREAK
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
no login
!
end
++++
Please explain me possible changes in my config/testbed and any suggestion.
Thanks in Advance,
Vijay
wong34539@yahoo.com - ADMIN
