Cisco资深专家在线解决全世界用户voip问题集锦-连载二

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

5..............

AS5400 (with np60) and VoIP

aalejo - MAGENTA COMPUTACION S.A.

Aug 22, 2003, 5:06pm PST

Do I need an special configuration to use np60 module to an E1 for VOIP?

bwilmoth

Aug 28, 2003, 2:24pm PST

You acn refer the following document for the configuration. No special configuration is needed for NP 60 module

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc ... 5350/sw_conf/53swcg

6................

Cisco ATA 186 Problem

whamri

Aug 14, 2003, 2:30am PST

Hi. I have some problems with VoIP

I use csico186 to connect telephones to router. As you know I can connect two telephones lines to the same Cisco ATA 186. So,

these two lines will have the same IP.

The problem:

Line 1: 222 333 888

Line 2: 222 333 999

When any body dial the first number the call will received in the first line or the second line randomly

irisrios

Aug 20, 2003, 8:13am PST

Have the destination pattern being configured as wildcard or an exact match? Hope the wild card is not matching to both the

numbers. The dial peers have to be configured separately for both the destination patterns. And the voice ports have to be

configured under respective dial peer.

whamri

Aug 23, 2003, 4:50am PST

The destination pattern configured as exact match

7.................

AS5350 Caller Name

jason.ewing - NETWORK MANAGEMENT TECHNICIAN, USAF

Aug 18, 2003, 6:47pm PST

Does anybody know if Caller ID Name is supported with the AS5350 Sip gateway terminating PRI to a Class 5 Switch. If so,

which IOS, and how is it configured? Thanks

bwilmoth

Aug 22, 2003, 8:14am PST

AS 5350 supports caller ID information. Use debug isdn q931 to troubleshoot if you face any problems.

8...............

Quality of service for prioritizing Voice by limiting Bandwidth

bsvijay - GRADUATE STUDENT, VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC AND STATE UNIVERSITY

Aug 15, 2003, 10:47pm PST

Dear Members,

I am trying to give priority to voice over other traffic by setting up a below test bed in my lab.

Voice receiver

Background receiver ---- Ethernet E0---- Router 1------Ethernet E 1----- Background traffic generator

Voice generator

Here Voice receiver, Background receiver and router 1鈥檚 EO interface forms one Ethernet segment.

(Actually I am using three routers. But for easy debugging presently I am working with one router)

Router 1鈥檚 E1 interface, Voice generator and background traffic generator form other Ethernet LAN.

I am limiting bandwidth of router E0 interface to 48kbps by below commands:

***********

I am sniffing at the interface E0 using Ethereal sniffer-protocol analyzer. But I am unable to get better results for voice

application over background traffic. For both Testing without QoS and with QoS I am getting the same results.

FOR EVERY VOICE PACKET I GET ONE BACKGROUND PACKET- SAME RESULTS FOR BOTH WITH AND WITHOUT QOS DEPLOYED

***********

The voice application is generating at 32 kbps with packet size frame size of 876 bytes.

It uses UDP port no 60600. It uses TCP port# 8896 for connection activeness. I am using these details in my QoS

configurations.

For initial testing, I am also generating background traffic also with 32kbps rate and frame size of 876 bytes.

Since total net traffic voice + background = 32 + 32 = 64 Kbps, so I am redUCing the bandwidth of the interface using 鈥榯

raffic shape鈥?and 鈥榬ate-limit鈥?commands.

Router 1:

Option 1:

Conf t

int e 0

rate-limit output 48000 6000 6000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

Option 2:

Conf t

int e 0

traffic-shape rate 48000 6000 6000 1000

I think with the above configuration, all traffic above 48000 bps are dropped.

So there are good chances that 24000 bps of both voice and data are sent, and remaining s 8000bps for both voice and

background are dropped. So, therefore QoS does not come into picture because now total traffic is 48 but NOW actual interface

bandwidth is 10 Mbps after the 鈥榬ate-limit鈥?or 鈥榯raffic-shape鈥?phase.

IS THERE OTHER WAY TO REDUCE THE BANDWIDTH OF THE ETHERnet

InTERFACE.?

My router configs for Priority queuing and class based weighted fair queuing

My Full router configuration:

Policy : Priority Queuing

ONE#show run

Building configuration...

Current configuration : 1279 bytes

!

hostname ONE

!

enable passWord xxxx

!

ip subnet-zero

no ip domain-lookup

!

!

!

!

!

interface Ethernet0

ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0

rate-limit output 48000 6000 6000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

priority-group 1

!

interface Ethernet1

ip address 10.10.0.1 255.255.255.0

!

!

ip classless

ip route 10.20.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2

ip route 10.30.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2

no ip http server

ip pim bidir-enable

!

priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 8896

priority-list 1 protocol ip high udp 60600

no cdp run

!

!

line con 0

escape-character BREAK

line aux 0

line vty 0 4

no login

!

end

+++++++++++

CLASS BASED WEIGTED FAIR QUEUING

ONE#show run

Building configuration...

Current configuration : 1279 bytes

!

hostname ONE

!

enable password xxxx

!

ip subnet-zero

no ip domain-lookup

!

!

class-map match-all voice

match Access-group 101

!

!

policy-map catalyst

class voice

priority 36

class class-default

fair-queue 16

!

!

!

!

interface Ethernet0

ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0

rate-limit output 48000 6000 6000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop

service-policy output catalyst

!

interface Ethernet1

ip address 10.10.0.1 255.255.255.0

!

interface Serial0

ip address 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.0

!

interface Serial1

ip address xx.xx.xx.22 255.0.0.0

!

ip classless

ip route 10.20.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2

ip route 10.30.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2

no ip http server

ip pim bidir-enable

!

access-list 101 permit udp any any eq 60600

access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 8896

no cdp run

!

!

line con 0

escape-character BREAK

line aux 0

line vty 0 4

no login

!

end

++++

Please eXPlain me possible changes in my config/testbed and any suggestion.

Thanks in Advance,

Vijay

wong34539@yahoo.com - ADMINISTRATOR, AFT CONSULTING

Aug 22, 2003, 7:53am PST

You can verify the configuration accurateness with the examples given in the support pages given below:

Voice Quality

http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Su ... ce:QoS&viewall=true

QoS (Quality of Service)

http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Su ... Technologies&f=1387

right"(出处:http://www.vipcn.com)

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有  導航