RFC655 - Telnet output formfeed disposition option

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

TELNET OUTPUT FORMFEED DISPOSITION OPTION

RFC655, NIC 31158 (Oct. 25, 1974)

D. Crocker (UCLA-NMC)

Online file: [ISI]<DCROCKER>NAOFFD.TXT

TELNET OUTPUT FORMFEED DISPOSITION OPTION

1. Command name and code

NAOFFD - 13

(Negotiate About Output Formfeed Disposition)

2. Command meanings

In the following, we are discussing a simplex connection, as described in

the NAOL and NAOP Telnet Options specifications.

IAC DO NAOFFD

The data sender requests or agrees to negotiate about output

formfeed disposition with the data receiver. In the case

where agreement has been reached and in the absence of

further subnegotiations, the data receiver is assumed to be

handling output formfeeds.

IAC DON'T NAOFFD

The data sender refuses to negotiate about output formfeed

disposition with the data receiver, or demands a return to

the unnegotiated default mode.

IAC WILL NAOFFD

The data receiver requests or agrees to negotiate about

output formfeed disposition with the sender. In the case

where agreement has been reached and in the absence of

further subnegotiations, the data receiver alone is assumed

to be handling output formfeeds.

IAC WON'T NAOFFD

The data receiver refuses to negotiate about output formfeed

disposition, or demands a return to the unnegotiated default

mode.

IAC SB NAOFFD DS <8-bit value> IAC SE

The data sender specifies, with the 8-bit value, which party

should handle formfeeds and what their disposition should be.

The code for DS is 1.

IAC SB NAOFFD DR <8-bit value> IAC SE

The data receiver specifies, with the 8-bit value, which

party should handle formfeeds and what their disposition

should be. The code for DR is 0.

3. Default

DON'T NAOFFD/WON'T NAOFFD

In the default absence of negotiations concerning which party, data

sender or data receiver, is handling output formfeeds, neither party

is required to handle formfeeds and neither party is prohibited from

handling them; but it is appropriate if at least the data receiver

handles formfeed considerations, albeit primitively.

4. Motivation for the Option

Please refer to section 4 of the NAOL and of the NAOFFD Telnet option

descriptions.

5. Description of the Option

The data sender and the data receiver use the 8-bit value along with the

DS and DR SB commands as follows:

8-bit value Meaning

0 Command sender suggests that he alone will handle

formfeeds, for the connection.

1 to 250 Command sender suggests that the other party alone

should handle formfeeds, but suggests that the

indicated value be used. The value is the number

of character-times to wait or number of NULs to

insert in the data stream before sending the next

data character.

251 Command sender suggests that the other party alone

handle formfeeds, but suggests that each

occurrence of the character be replaced by

carriage-return/line-feed.

252 Command sender suggests that the other party alone

handle formfeeds, but suggests that they be

discarded.

253 Command sender suggests that the other party alone

should handle formfeeds, but suggests that

formfeeds be simulated.

254 Command sender suggests that the other party alone

should handle output formfeeds but suggests

waiting for a character to be transmitted (on the

other simplex connection) before sending more

data. Note that, due to the assynchrony of the two

simplex connections, phase problems can occur with

this option.

255 Command sender suggests that the other party alone

should handle output formfeeds and suggests

nothing about how it should be done.

The guiding rules are that:

1) if neither data receiver nor data sender wants to handle output

formfeeds, the data receiver must do it, and

2) if both data receiver and data sender want to handle output

formfeeds, the data sender gets to do it.

The reasoning for the former rule is that if neither wants to do

it, then the default in the NAOFFD option dominates. If both want

to do it, the sender, who is presumed to have special knowledge

about the data, should be allowed to do it, taking into account any

suggestions the receiver may make. Simulation is defined as the

replacement of the formfeed character by enough line-feeds (only)

to advance the paper (or line-pointer) to the top of the next page

(or to the top of the terminal screen). Note that delays,

controlled by the data sender, must consist of NUL characters

inserted immediately after the formfeed character. This is

necessary due to the assynchrony of network transmission. As with

all option negotiations, neither party should suggest a state

already in effect except to refuse to negotiate; changes should be

acknowledged; and once refused, an option should not be resuggested

until "something changes" (e.g., another process starts). At any

time, either party can disable further negotiation by giving the

appropriate WON'T NAOFFD or DON'T NAOFFD command.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航