RFC736 - Telnet SUPDUP option

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

NWG/RFC# 736 MRC 31-OCT-77 23:28 42213

Telnet SUPDUP Option

Network Working Group Mark Crispin

Request for Comments 736 SU-AI

NIC 42213 31 October 1977

TELNET SUPDUP Option

1. Command name and code.

SUPDUP 21

2. Command meanings.

IAC WILL SUPDUP

The sender of this command REQUESTS permission to, or confirms

that it will, use the SUPDUP display protocol

IAC WON'T SUPDUP

The sender of this command REFUSES to use the SUPDUP protocol.

IAC DO SUPDUP

The sender of this command REQUESTS that the receiver use, or

grants the receiver permission to use, the SUPDUP protocol.

IAC DON'T

The sender of this command DEMANDS that the receiver not use the

SUPDUP protocol.

3. Default.

WON'T SUPDUP

DON'T SUPDUP

i.e., the SUPDUP display protocol is not in use.

Mark Crispin [page 1]

NWG/RFC# 736 MRC 31-OCT-77 23:28 42213

Telnet SUPDUP Option

4. Motivation for the option.

Since the publication of RFC734, I have been requested to design

an option to the TELNET protocol to provide for SUPDUP service.

This option allows a host to provide SUPDUP service on the normal

TELNET socket (27 octal) instead of 137 (octal) which is the normal

SUPDUP ICP socket.

5. Description of the option.

A user TELNET program which wishes to use the SUPDUP display

protocol instead of the NVT terminal service should send an IAC DO

SUPDUP. If the server is willing to use the SUPDUP display

protocol, it should respond with IAC WILL SUPDUP; otherwise it

should refuse with IAC WONT SUPDUP.

For hosts which normally provide SUPDUP terminal services, the

server can send IAC WILL SUPDUP upon ICP which the user may then

accept or refuse.

If the SUPDUP option is in effect, no further TELNET negotiations

are allowed. They are meaningless, since SUPDUP has its own

facilities to perform the functions that are needed. Hence, octal

377 will become an ordinary transmitted character (in this case an

invalid %TD code) instead of an IAC.

Following the mutual acceptance of the SUPDUP option, the SUPDUP

negotiation proceeds as described in RFC734.

Mark Crispin [page 2]

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航