分享
 
 
 

RFC792 - Internet Control Message Protocol

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group J. Postel

Request for Comments: 792 ISI

September 1981

Updates: RFCs 777, 760

Updates: IENs 109, 128

INTERNET CONTROL MESSAGE PROTOCOL

DARPA INTERNET PROGRAM

PROTOCOL SPECIFICATION

IntrodUCtion

The Internet Protocol (IP) [1] is used for host-to-host datagram

service in a system of interconnected networks called the

Catenet [2]. The network connecting devices are called Gateways.

These gateways communicate between themselves for control purposes

via a Gateway to Gateway Protocol (GGP) [3,4]. Occasionally a

gateway or destination host will communicate with a source host, for

example, to report an error in datagram processing. For such

purposes this protocol, the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP),

is used. ICMP, uses the basic support of IP as if it were a higher

level protocol, however, ICMP is actually an integral part of IP, and

must be implemented by every IP module.

ICMP messages are sent in several situations: for example, when a

datagram cannot reach its destination, when the gateway does not have

the buffering capacity to forward a datagram, and when the gateway

can direct the host to send traffic on a shorter route.

The Internet Protocol is not designed to be absolutely reliable. The

purpose of these control messages is to provide feedback about

problems in the communication environment, not to make IP reliable.

There are still no guarantees that a datagram will be delivered or a

control message will be returned. Some datagrams may still be

undelivered without any report of their loss. The higher level

protocols that use IP must implement their own reliability procedures

if reliable communication is required.

The ICMP messages typically report errors in the processing of

datagrams. To avoid the infinite regress of messages about messages

etc., no ICMP messages are sent about ICMP messages. Also ICMP

messages are only sent about errors in handling fragment zero of

fragemented datagrams. (Fragment zero has the fragment offeset equal

zero).

[Page 1]

September 1981

RFC792

Message Formats

ICMP messages are sent using the basic IP header. The first octet of

the data portion of the datagram is a ICMP type field; the value of

this field determines the format of the remaining data. Any field

labeled "unused" is reserved for later extensions and must be zero

when sent, but receivers should not use these fields (except to

include them in the checksum). Unless otherwise noted under the

individual format descriptions, the values of the internet header

fields are as follows:

Version

4

IHL

Internet header length in 32-bit Words.

Type of Service

0

Total Length

Length of internet header and data in octets.

Identification, Flags, Fragment Offset

Used in fragmentation, see [1].

Time to Live

Time to live in seconds; as this field is decremented at each

machine in which the datagram is processed, the value in this

field should be at least as great as the number of gateways which

this datagram will traverse.

Protocol

ICMP = 1

Header Checksum

The 16 bit one's complement of the one's complement sum of all 16

bit words in the header. For computing the checksum, the checksum

field should be zero. This checksum may be replaced in the

future.

[Page 2]

September 1981

RFC792

Source Address

The address of the gateway or host that composes the ICMP message.

Unless otherwise noted, this can be any of a gateway's addresses.

Destination Address

The address of the gateway or host to which the message should be

sent.

[Page 3]

September 1981

RFC792

Destination Unreachable Message

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Code Checksum

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

unused

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data Datagram

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

IP Fields:

Destination Address

The source network and address from the original datagram's data.

ICMP Fields:

Type

3

Code

0 = net unreachable;

1 = host unreachable;

2 = protocol unreachable;

3 = port unreachable;

4 = fragmentation needed and DF set;

5 = source route failed.

Checksum

The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's

complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.

For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.

This checksum may be replaced in the future.

Internet Header + 64 bits of Data Datagram

The internet header plus the first 64 bits of the original

[Page 4]

September 1981

RFC792

datagram's data. This data is used by the host to match the

message to the appropriate process. If a higher level protocol

uses port numbers, they are assumed to be in the first 64 data

bits of the original datagram's data.

Description

If, according to the information in the gateway's routing tables,

the network specified in the internet destination field of a

datagram is unreachable, e.g., the distance to the network is

infinity, the gateway may send a destination unreachable message

to the internet source host of the datagram. In addition, in some

networks, the gateway may be able to determine if the internet

destination host is unreachable. Gateways in these networks may

send destination unreachable messages to the source host when the

destination host is unreachable.

If, in the destination host, the IP module cannot deliver the

datagram because the indicated protocol module or process port is

not active, the destination host may send a destination

unreachable message to the source host.

Another case is when a datagram must be fragmented to be forwarded

by a gateway yet the Don't Fragment flag is on. In this case the

gateway must discard the datagram and may return a destination

unreachable message.

Codes 0, 1, 4, and 5 may be received from a gateway. Codes 2 and

3 may be received from a host.

[Page 5]

September 1981

RFC792

Time Exceeded Message

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Code Checksum

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

unused

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data Datagram

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

IP Fields:

Destination Address

The source network and address from the original datagram's data.

ICMP Fields:

Type

11

Code

0 = time to live exceeded in transit;

1 = fragment reassembly time exceeded.

Checksum

The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's

complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.

For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.

This checksum may be replaced in the future.

Internet Header + 64 bits of Data Datagram

The internet header plus the first 64 bits of the original

datagram's data. This data is used by the host to match the

message to the appropriate process. If a higher level protocol

uses port numbers, they are assumed to be in the first 64 data

bits of the original datagram's data.

Description

If the gateway processing a datagram finds the time to live field

[Page 6]

September 1981

RFC792

is zero it must discard the datagram. The gateway may also notify

the source host via the time exceeded message.

If a host reassembling a fragmented datagram cannot complete the

reassembly due to missing fragments within its time limit it

discards the datagram, and it may send a time exceeded message.

If fragment zero is not available then no time exceeded need be

sent at all.

Code 0 may be received from a gateway. Code 1 may be received

from a host.

[Page 7]

September 1981

RFC792

Parameter Problem Message

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Code Checksum

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Pointer unused

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data Datagram

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

IP Fields:

Destination Address

The source network and address from the original datagram's data.

ICMP Fields:

Type

12

Code

0 = pointer indicates the error.

Checksum

The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's

complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.

For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.

This checksum may be replaced in the future.

Pointer

If code = 0, identifies the octet where an error was detected.

Internet Header + 64 bits of Data Datagram

The internet header plus the first 64 bits of the original

datagram's data. This data is used by the host to match the

message to the appropriate process. If a higher level protocol

uses port numbers, they are assumed to be in the first 64 data

bits of the original datagram's data.

[Page 8]

September 1981

RFC792

Description

If the gateway or host processing a datagram finds a problem with

the header parameters such that it cannot complete processing the

datagram it must discard the datagram. One potential source of

such a problem is with incorrect arguments in an option. The

gateway or host may also notify the source host via the parameter

problem message. This message is only sent if the error caused

the datagram to be discarded.

The pointer identifies the octet of the original datagram's header

where the error was detected (it may be in the middle of an

option). For example, 1 indicates something is wrong with the

Type of Service, and (if there are options present) 20 indicates

something is wrong with the type code of the first option.

Code 0 may be received from a gateway or a host.

[Page 9]

September 1981

RFC792

Source Quench Message

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Code Checksum

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

unused

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data Datagram

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

IP Fields:

Destination Address

The source network and address of the original datagram's data.

ICMP Fields:

Type

4

Code

0

Checksum

The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's

complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.

For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.

This checksum may be replaced in the future.

Internet Header + 64 bits of Data Datagram

The internet header plus the first 64 bits of the original

datagram's data. This data is used by the host to match the

message to the appropriate process. If a higher level protocol

uses port numbers, they are assumed to be in the first 64 data

bits of the original datagram's data.

Description

A gateway may discard internet datagrams if it does not have the

buffer space needed to queue the datagrams for output to the next

network on the route to the destination network. If a gateway

[Page 10]

September 1981

RFC792

discards a datagram, it may send a source quench message to the

internet source host of the datagram. A destination host may also

send a source quench message if datagrams arrive too fast to be

processed. The source quench message is a request to the host to

cut back the rate at which it is sending traffic to the internet

destination. The gateway may send a source quench message for

every message that it discards. On receipt of a source quench

message, the source host should cut back the rate at which it is

sending traffic to the specified destination until it no longer

receives source quench messages from the gateway. The source host

can then gradually increase the rate at which it sends traffic to

the destination until it again receives source quench messages.

The gateway or host may send the source quench message when it

approaches its capacity limit rather than waiting until the

capacity is exceeded. This means that the data datagram which

triggered the source quench message may be delivered.

Code 0 may be received from a gateway or a host.

[Page 11]

September 1981

RFC792

Redirect Message

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Code Checksum

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Gateway Internet Address

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Internet Header + 64 bits of Original Data Datagram

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

IP Fields:

Destination Address

The source network and address of the original datagram's data.

ICMP Fields:

Type

5

Code

0 = Redirect datagrams for the Network.

1 = Redirect datagrams for the Host.

2 = Redirect datagrams for the Type of Service and Network.

3 = Redirect datagrams for the Type of Service and Host.

Checksum

The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's

complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.

For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.

This checksum may be replaced in the future.

Gateway Internet Address

Address of the gateway to which traffic for the network specified

in the internet destination network field of the original

datagram's data should be sent.

[Page 12]

September 1981

RFC792

Internet Header + 64 bits of Data Datagram

The internet header plus the first 64 bits of the original

datagram's data. This data is used by the host to match the

message to the appropriate process. If a higher level protocol

uses port numbers, they are assumed to be in the first 64 data

bits of the original datagram's data.

Description

The gateway sends a redirect message to a host in the following

situation. A gateway, G1, receives an internet datagram from a

host on a network to which the gateway is attached. The gateway,

G1, checks its routing table and oBTains the address of the next

gateway, G2, on the route to the datagram's internet destination

network, X. If G2 and the host identified by the internet source

address of the datagram are on the same network, a redirect

message is sent to the host. The redirect message advises the

host to send its traffic for network X directly to gateway G2 as

this is a shorter path to the destination. The gateway forwards

the original datagram's data to its internet destination.

For datagrams with the IP source route options and the gateway

address in the destination address field, a redirect message is

not sent even if there is a better route to the ultimate

destination than the next address in the source route.

Codes 0, 1, 2, and 3 may be received from a gateway.

[Page 13]

September 1981

RFC792

Echo or Echo Reply Message

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Code Checksum

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Identifier Sequence Number

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Data ...

+-+-+-+-+-

IP Fields:

Addresses

The address of the source in an echo message will be the

destination of the echo reply message. To form an echo reply

message, the source and destination addresses are simply reversed,

the type code changed to 0, and the checksum recomputed.

IP Fields:

Type

8 for echo message;

0 for echo reply message.

Code

0

Checksum

The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's

complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.

For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.

If the total length is odd, the received data is padded with one

octet of zeros for computing the checksum. This checksum may be

replaced in the future.

Identifier

If code = 0, an identifier to aid in matching echos and replies,

may be zero.

Sequence Number

[Page 14]

September 1981

RFC792

If code = 0, a sequence number to aid in matching echos and

replies, may be zero.

Description

The data received in the echo message must be returned in the echo

reply message.

The identifier and sequence number may be used by the echo sender

to aid in matching the replies with the echo requests. For

example, the identifier might be used like a port in TCP or UDP to

identify a session, and the sequence number might be incremented

on each echo request sent. The echoer returns these same values

in the echo reply.

Code 0 may be received from a gateway or a host.

[Page 15]

September 1981

RFC792

Timestamp or Timestamp Reply Message

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Code Checksum

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Identifier Sequence Number

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Originate Timestamp

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Receive Timestamp

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Transmit Timestamp

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

IP Fields:

Addresses

The address of the source in a timestamp message will be the

destination of the timestamp reply message. To form a timestamp

reply message, the source and destination addresses are simply

reversed, the type code changed to 14, and the checksum

recomputed.

IP Fields:

Type

13 for timestamp message;

14 for timestamp reply message.

Code

0

Checksum

The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's

complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.

For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.

This checksum may be replaced in the future.

Identifier

[Page 16]

September 1981

RFC792

If code = 0, an identifier to aid in matching timestamp and

replies, may be zero.

Sequence Number

If code = 0, a sequence number to aid in matching timestamp and

replies, may be zero.

Description

The data received (a timestamp) in the message is returned in the

reply together with an additional timestamp. The timestamp is 32

bits of milliseconds since midnight UT. One use of these

timestamps is described by Mills [5].

The Originate Timestamp is the time the sender last touched the

message before sending it, the Receive Timestamp is the time the

echoer first touched it on receipt, and the Transmit Timestamp is

the time the echoer last touched the message on sending it.

If the time is not available in miliseconds or cannot be provided

with respect to midnight UT then any time can be inserted in a

timestamp provided the high order bit of the timestamp is also set

to indicate this non-standard value.

The identifier and sequence number may be used by the echo sender

to aid in matching the replies with the requests. For example,

the identifier might be used like a port in TCP or UDP to identify

a session, and the sequence number might be incremented on each

request sent. The destination returns these same values in the

reply.

Code 0 may be received from a gateway or a host.

[Page 17]

September 1981

RFC792

Information Request or Information Reply Message

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Code Checksum

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Identifier Sequence Number

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

IP Fields:

Addresses

The address of the source in a information request message will be

the destination of the information reply message. To form a

information reply message, the source and destination addresses

are simply reversed, the type code changed to 16, and the checksum

recomputed.

IP Fields:

Type

15 for information request message;

16 for information reply message.

Code

0

Checksum

The checksum is the 16-bit ones's complement of the one's

complement sum of the ICMP message starting with the ICMP Type.

For computing the checksum , the checksum field should be zero.

This checksum may be replaced in the future.

Identifier

If code = 0, an identifier to aid in matching request and replies,

may be zero.

Sequence Number

If code = 0, a sequence number to aid in matching request and

replies, may be zero.

[Page 18]

September 1981

RFC792

Description

This message may be sent with the source network in the IP header

source and destination address fields zero (which means "this"

network). The replying IP module should send the reply with the

addresses fully specified. This message is a way for a host to

find out the number of the network it is on.

The identifier and sequence number may be used by the echo sender

to aid in matching the replies with the requests. For example,

the identifier might be used like a port in TCP or UDP to identify

a session, and the sequence number might be incremented on each

request sent. The destination returns these same values in the

reply.

Code 0 may be received from a gateway or a host.

[Page 19]

September 1981

RFC792

Summary of Message Types

0 Echo Reply

3 Destination Unreachable

4 Source Quench

5 Redirect

8 Echo

11 Time Exceeded

12 Parameter Problem

13 Timestamp

14 Timestamp Reply

15 Information Request

16 Information Reply

[Page 20]

September 1981

RFC792

References

[1] Postel, J. (ed.), "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet Program

Protocol Specification," RFC791, USC/Information Sciences

Institute, September 1981.

[2] Cerf, V., "The Catenet Model for Internetworking," IEN 48,

Information Processing Techniques Office, Defense Advanced

Research Projects Agency, July 1978.

[3] Strazisar, V., "Gateway Routing: An Implementation

Specification", IEN 30, Bolt Beranek and Newman, April 1979.

[4] Strazisar, V., "How to Build a Gateway", IEN 109, Bolt Beranek

and Newman, August 1979.

[5] Mills, D., "DCNET Internet Clock Service," RFC778, COMSAT

Laboratories, April 1981.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有