分享
 
 
 

RFC907 - Host Access Protocol specification

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

HOST Access PROTOCOL SPECIFICATION

July 1984

prepared for

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

1400 Wilson Boulevard

Arlington, Virginia 22209

by

Bolt Beranek and Newman Laboratories

10 Moulton Street

Cambridge, Massachusetts 02238

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

Preface (Status of this Memo)

This document specifies the Host Access Protocol (HAP).

Although HAP was originally designed as the network-access level

protocol for the DARPA/DCA sponsored Wideband Packet Satellite

Network, it is intended that it evolve into a standard interface

between hosts and packet-switched satellite networks sUCh as

SATNET and TACNET (aka MATNET) as well as the Wideband Network.

The HAP specification presented here is a minor revision of, and

supercedes, the specification presented in Chapter 4 of BBN

Report No. 4469, the "PSAT Technical Report". As such, the

details of the current specification are still most closely

matched to the characteristics if the Wideband Satellite Network.

Revisions to the specification in the "PSAT Technical Report"

include the definition of three new control message types

(Loopback Request, Link Going Down, and NOP), a "Reason" field in

Restart Request control messages, new Unnumbered Response codes,

and new values for the setup codes used to manage streams and

groups.

HAP is an eXPerimental protocol, and will undergo further

revision as new capabilities are added and/or different satellite

networks are supported. Implementations of HAP should be

performed in coordination with satellite network development and

operations personnel.

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

Table of Contents

1 Introduction.......................................... 1

2 Overview.............................................. 3

3 Datagram Messages..................................... 8

4 Stream Messages...................................... 14

5 Flow Control Messages................................ 17

6 Setup Level Messages................................. 24

6.1 Stream Setup Messages.............................. 32

6.2 Group Setup Messages............................... 44

7 Link Monitoring...................................... 58

8 Initialization....................................... 62

9 Loopback Control..................................... 68

10 Other Control Messages.............................. 72

i

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

FIGURES

DATAGRAM MESSAGE.......................................... 9

STREAM MESSAGE........................................... 15

ACCEPTANCE/REFUSAL Word.................................. 19

ACCEPTANCE/REFUSAL MESSAGE............................... 21

UNNUMBERED RESPONSE...................................... 22

SETUP MESSAGE HEADER..................................... 26

NOTIFICATION MESSAGE..................................... 29

SETUP ACKNOWLEDGMENT..................................... 31

STREAM EXAMPLE........................................... 33

CREATE STREAM REQUEST.................................... 35

CREATE STREAM REPLY...................................... 37

CHANGE STREAM PARAMETERS REQUEST......................... 39

CHANGE STREAM PARAMETERS REPLY........................... 41

DELETE STREAM REQUEST.................................... 42

DELETE STREAM REPLY...................................... 43

GROUP EXAMPLE............................................ 45

CREATE GROUP REQUEST..................................... 47

CREATE GROUP REPLY....................................... 48

JOIN GROUP REQUEST....................................... 50

JOIN GROUP REPLY......................................... 52

LEAVE GROUP REQUEST...................................... 53

LEAVE GROUP REPLY........................................ 55

DELETE GROUP REQUEST..................................... 56

DELETE GROUP REPLY....................................... 57

STATUS MESSAGE........................................... 59

HAP LINK RESTART STATE DIAGRAM........................... 64

RESTART REQUEST.......................................... 65

RESTART COMPLETE......................................... 67

LOOPBACK REQUEST......................................... 71

LINK GOING DOWN.......................................... 73

NO OPERATION (NOP)....................................... 75

ii

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

1 Introduction

The Host Access Protocol (HAP) specifies the network-access

level communication between an arbitrary computer, called a host,

and a packet-switched satellite network. The satellite network

provides message delivery services for geographically separated

hosts: Messages containing data which are meaningful to the hosts

are submitted to the network by an originating (source) host, and

are passed transparently through the network to an indicated

destination host. To utilize such services, a host interfaces to

the satellite network via an access link to a dedicated packet-

switching computer, known as a Satellite Interface Message

Processor (Satellite IMP or SIMP). HAP defines the different

types of control messages and (host-to-host) data messages that

may be exchanged over the access link connecting a host and a

SIMP. The protocol establishes formats for these messages, and

describes procedures for determining when each type of message

should be transmitted and what it means when one is received.

The term "Interface Message Processor" originates in the

ARPANET, where it refers to the ARPANET's packet-switching nodes.

SIMPs differ from ARPANET IMPs in that SIMPs form a network via

connections to a common multiaccess/broadcast satellite channel,

whereas ARPANET IMPs are interconnected by dedicated point-to-

point terrestrial communications lines. This fundamental

difference between satellite-based and ARPANET-style networks

results in different mechanisms for the delivery of messages from

source to destination hosts and for internal network

coordination. Additionally, satellite networks tend to offer

different type of service options to their connected hosts than

do ARPANET-style networks. These options are included in the

Host Access Protocol presented here.

Several types of Satellite IMPs have been developed on a

variety of processors for the support of three different packet-

switched satellite networks. The original SIMP was employed in

the Atlantic Packet Satellite Network (SATNET). It was developed

from one of the models of ARPANET IMP, and was implemented on a

Honeywell 316 minicomputer. The 316 SIMPs were succeeded in

SATNET by SIMPs based on BBN C/30 Communications Processor

hardware. The C/30 SIMPs have also been employed in the Mobile

1

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

Access Terminal Network (MATNET). The SATNET and MATNET SIMPs

implement a network-access level protocol known as Host/SATNET

Protocol. Host/SATNET Protocol is the precursor to HAP and is

documented in Internet Experiment Note (IEN) No. 192. The

Wideband Satellite Network, like SATNET, has undergone an

evolution in the development of its SIMP hardware and software.

The original Wideband Network SIMP is known as the Pluribus

Satellite IMP, or PSAT, having been implemented on the BBN

Pluribus Multiprocessor. Its successor, the BSAT, is based on

the BBN Butterfly Multiprocessor. Both the PSAT and the BSAT

communicate with their connected network hosts via HAP.

Section 2 presents an overview of HAP. Details of HAP

formats and message exchange procedures are contained in Sections

3 through 10. Further explanation of many of the topics

addressed in this HAP specification can be found in BBN Report

No. 4469, the "PSAT Technical Report".

The protocol used to provide sufficiently reliable message

exchange over the host-SIMP link is assumed to be transparent to

the network-access protocol defined in this document. Examples

of such link-level protocols are ARPANET 1822 local and distant

host, ARPANET VDH protocol, and HDLC.

2

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

2 Overview

HAP can be characterized as a full duplex nonreliable

protocol with an optional flow control mechanism. HAP messages

flow simultaneously in both directions between the SIMP and the

host. Transmission is nonreliable in the sense that the protocol

does not provide any guarantee of error-free sequenced delivery.

To the extent that this functionality is required on the access

link (e.g., non-collocated SIMP and host operating over a

communication circuit), it must be supported by the link-level

protocol below HAP. The flow control mechanism operates

independently in each direction except that enabling or disabling

the mechanism applies to both sides of the interface.

HAP supports host-to-host communication in two modes

corresponding to the two types of HAP data messages, datagram

messages and stream messages. Each type of message can be up to

approximately 16K bits in length. Datagram messages provide the

basic transmission service in the satellite network. Datagram

messages transmitted by a host experience a nominal two satellite

hop end-to-end network delay. (Note that this delay, of about 0.6

sec excluding access link delay, is associated with datagram

transmission between hosts on different SIMPs. The transmission

delay between hosts on the same SIMP will be much smaller

assuming the destination is not a group address. See Section 3

and 6.2.) A datagram control header, passed to the SIMP by the

host along with message text, determines the processing of the

message within the satellite network independent of any previous

exchanges.

Stream messages provide a one satellite hop delay

(approximately 0.3 sec) for volatile traffic, such as speech,

which cannot tolerate the delay associated with datagram

transmission. Hosts may also use streams to support high duty

cycle applications which require guaranteed channel bandwidth.

Host streams are established by a setup message exchange between

the host and the network prior to the commencement of data flow.

Although established host streams can have their characteristics

modified by subsequent setup messages while they are in use, the

fixed allocation properties of streams relative to datagrams

impose rather strict requirements on the source of the traffic

3

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

using the stream. Stream traffic arrivals must match the stream

allocation both in interarrival time and message size if

reasonable efficiency is to be achieved. The characteristics and

use of datagrams and streams are described in detail in Sections

3 and 4 of this document.

Both datagram and stream transmission in the satellite

network use logical addressing. Each host on the network is

assigned a permanent 16-bit logical address which is independent

of the physical port on the SIMP to which it is attached. These

16-bit logical addresses are provided in all Host-to-SIMP and

SIMP-to-Host data messages.

Hosts may also be members of groups. Group addressing is

provided primarily to support the multi-destination delivery

required for conferencing applications. Like streams, group

addresses are dynamically created and deleted by the use of setup

messages exchanged between a host and the network. Membership in

a group may consist of an arbitrary subset of all the permanent

network hosts. A message addressed to a group address is

delivered to all hosts that are members of that group.

Although HAP does not guarantee error-free delivery, error

control is an important ASPect of the protocol design. HAP error

control is concerned with both local transfers between a host and

its local SIMP and transfers from SIMP-to-SIMP over the satellite

channel. The SIMP offers users a choice of network error

protection options based on the network's ability to selectively

send messages over the satellite channel at different coding

rates. These forward error correction (FEC) options are referred

to as reliability levels. Three reliability levels (low, medium,

and high) are available to the host.

In addition to forward error correction, a number of

checksum mechanisms are employed in the satellite network to add

an error detection capability. A host has an opportunity when

sending a message to indicate whether the message should be

delivered to its destination or discarded if a data error is

detected by the network. Each message received by a host from

the network will have a flag indicating whether or not an error

was detected in that particular message. A host can decide on a

4

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

per-message basis whether or not it wants to accept or discard

transmissions containing data errors.

For connection of a host and SIMP in close proximity, error

rates due to external noise or hardware failures on the access

circuit may reasonably be expected to be much smaller than the

best satellite channel error rate. Thus for this case, little is

gained by using error detection and retransmission on the access

circuit. A 16-bit header checksum is provided, however, to

insure that SIMPs do not act on incorrect control information.

For relatively long distances or noisy connections,

retransmissions over the access circuit may be required to

optimize performance for both low and high reliability traffic.

It is expected that link-level error control procedures (such as

HDLC) will be used for this purpose.

Datagram and stream messages being presented to the network

by a host may not be accepted for a number of reasons: priority

too low, destination dead, lack of buffers in the source SIMP,

etc. The host faces a similar situation with respect to handling

messages from the SIMP. To permit the receiver of a message to

inform the sender of the local disposition of its message, an

acceptance/refusal (A/R) mechanism is implemented. The mechanism

is the external manifestation of the SIMP's (or host's) internal

flow and congestion control algorithm. If A/Rs are enabled, an

explicit or implicit acceptance or refusal for each message is

returned to the host by the SIMP (and conversely). This allows

the host (or SIMP) to retry refused messages at its discretion

and can provide information useful for optimizing the sending of

subsequent messages if the reason for refusals is also provided.

The A/R mechanism can be disabled to provide a "pure discard"

interface.

Each message submitted to the SIMP by a host is marked as

being in one of four priority classes, from priority 3 (highest)

through priority 0 (lowest). The priority class is used by the

SIMP for arbitrating contention for scarce network resources

(e.g., channel time). That is, if the network cannot deliver all

of the offered messages, high priority messages will be delivered

in preference to low priority messages. In the case of

datagrams, priority level is used by the SIMP for ordering

5

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

satellite channel reservation requests at the source SIMP and

message delivery at the destination SIMP. In the case of

streams, priority is associated with the ability of one stream to

preempt another stream of lower priority at setup time.

While the A/R mechanism allows control of individual message

transfers, it does not facilitate regulation of priority flows.

Such regulation is handled by passing advisory status information

(GOPRI) across the Host-SIMP interface indicating which

priorities are currently being accepted. As long as this

information, relative to the change in priority status, is passed

frequently, the sender can avoid originating messages which are

sure to be refused.

HAP defines both data messages (datagram messages and stream

messages) and control messages. Data messages are used to send

information between network hosts. Control messages are

exchanged between a host and the network to manage the local

access link. HAP can also be viewed in terms of two distinct

protocol layers, the message layer and the setup layer. The

message layer is associated with the transmission of individual

datagram messages and stream messages. The setup layer protocol

is associated with the establishment, modification, and deletion

of streams and groups. Setup layer exchanges are actually

implemented as datagrams transmitted between the user host and an

internal SIMP "service host."

Every HAP message consists of an integral number of 16-bit

words. The first several words of the message always contain

control information and are referred to as the message header.

The first word of the message header identifies the type of

message which follows. The second word of the message header is

a checksum which covers all header information. Any message

whose received header checksum does not match the checksum

computed on the received header information must be discarded.

The format of the rest of the header depends on the specific

message type.

The formats and use of the individual message types are

detailed in the following sections. A common format description

is used for this purpose. Words in a message are numbered

6

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

starting at zero (i.e., zero is the first word of a message

header). Bits within a word are numbered from zero (least

significant) to fifteen (most significant). The notation used to

identify a particular field location is:

<WORD#>{-<WORD#>} [ <BIT#>{-<BIT#>} ] <description>

where optional elements in {} are used to specify the (inclusive)

upper limit of a range. The reader should refer to these field

identifiers for precise field size specifications. Fields which

are common to several message types are defined in the first

section which uses them. Only the name of the field will usually

appear in the descriptions in subsequent sections.

Link-level protocols used to support HAP can differ in the

order in which they transmit the bits constituting HAP messages.

For HDLC and ARPANET VDH, each word of a HAP message is

transmitted starting with the least significant bit (bit 0) and

ending with the most significant bit (bit 15). The words of the

message are transmitted from word 0 to word N. For ARPANET 1822

local and distant host interfaces, the order of bit transmission

within each word is the reverse of that for HDLC and VDH, i.e.,

the transmission is from bit 15 to bit 0.

7

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

3 Datagram Messages

Datagram messages are one of the two types of message level

data messages used to support host-to-host communication. Each

datagram can contain up to 16,384 bits of user data. Datagram

messages transmitted by a host to a host on a remote SIMP

experience a nominal two satellite hop end-to-end network delay

(about 0.6 sec), excluding delay on the access links. This

network delay is due to the reservation per message scheduling

procedure for datagrams which only allocates channel time to the

message for the duration of the actual transfer. Since datagram

transfers between permanent hosts on the same SIMP do not require

satellite channel scheduling prior to data transmission, the

network delay in this case will be much smaller and is determined

strictly by SIMP processing time. Datagrams sent to group

addresses are treated as if they were addressed to remote hosts

and are always sent over the satellite channel. It is expected

that datagram messages will be used to support the majority of

computer-to-computer and terminal-to-computer traffic which is

bursty in nature.

The format of datagram messages and the purpose of each of

the header control fields is described in Figure 1.

8

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0 0LBGOPRI XXXX F MESSAGE NUMBER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 HEADER CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

2 A/R

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

3 0IL D E TTL PRI RLY RLEN

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

4 DESTINATION HOST ADDRESS

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

5 SOURCE HOST ADDRESS

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6-N DATA

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 1 . DATAGRAM MESSAGE

0[15] Message Class. This bit identifies the message as a

data message or a control message.

0 = Data Message

1 = Control Message

0[14] Loopback Bit. This bit allows the sender of a message

to determine if its own messages are being looped back.

The host and the SIMP each use different settings of

this bit for their transmissions. If a message arrives

with the loopback bit set equal to its outgoing value,

then the message has been looped.

0 = Sent by Host

1 = Sent by SIMP

9

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

0[12-13] Go-Priority. In SIMP-to-Host messages, this field

provides advisory information concerning the lowest

priority currently being accepted by the SIMP. The

host may optionally choose to provide similar priority

information to the SIMP.

0 = Low Priority

1 = Medium-Low Priority

2 = Medium-High Priority

3 = High Priority

0[9-11] Reserved.

0[8] Force Channel Transmission Flag. This flag can be set

by the source host to force the SIMP to transmit the

message over the satellite channel even if the message

contains permanent destination and source host

addresses corresponding to hosts which are physically

connected to the same SIMP.

0 = Normal operation

1 = Force channel transmission

0[0-7] Message Number. This field contains the identification

of the message used by the acceptance/refusal (A/R)

mechanism (when enabled). If the message number is

zero, A/R is disabled for this specific message. See

Section 5 for a detailed description of the A/R

mechanism.

1[0-15] Header Checksum. This field contains a checksum which

covers words 0-5. It is computed as the negation of

the 2's-complement sum of words 0-5 (excluding the

checksum word itself).

2[0-15] Piggybacked A/R. This field may contain an

acceptance/refusal word providing A/R status on traffic

flowing in the opposite direction. Its inclusion may

eliminate the need for a separate A/R control message

(see Section 5). A value of zero for this word is used

to indicate that no piggybacked A/R information is

10

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

present.

3[15] Data Message Type. This bit identifies whether the

message is a datagram message or a stream message.

0 = Datagram Message

1 = Stream Message

3[14] Internet/Local Flag. This flag is set by a source host

to specify to a destination host whether the data

portion of the message contains a standard DoD Internet

header. This field is passed transparently by the

source and destination SIMPs for traffic between

external satellite network hosts. This field is

examined by internal SIMP hosts (e.g., the network

service host) in order to support Internet operation.

0 = Internet

1 = Local

3[13] Discard Flag. This flag allows a source host to

instruct the satellite network (including the

destination host) what to do with the message when data

errors are detected (assuming the header checksum is

correct).

0 = Discard message if data errors detected.

1 = Don't discard message if data errors detected.

The value of this flag, set by the source host, is

passed on to the destination host.

3[12] Data Error Flag. This flag is used in conjunction with

the Discard Flag to indicate to the destination host

whether any data errors have been detected in the

message prior to transmission over the SIMP-to-Host

access link. It is used only if Discard Flag = 1. It

should be set to zero by the source host.

11

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

0 = No Data Errors Detected

1 = Data Errors Detected

3[10-11] Time-to-Live Designator. The source host uses this

field to specify the maximum time that a message

should be allowed to exist within the satellite network

before being deleted. Messages may be discarded by the

network prior to this maximum elapsed time.

0 = 1 seconds

1 = 2 seconds

2 = 5 seconds

3 = 10 seconds

The Time-to-Live field is undefined in messages sent

from a SIMP to a host.

3[8-9] Priority. The source host uses this field to specify

the priority with which the message should be handled

within the network.

0 = Low Priority

1 = Medium-Low Priority

2 = Medium-High Priority

3 = High Priority

The priority of each message is passed to the

destination host by the destination SIMP.

3[6-7] Reliability. The source host uses this field to

specify the basic bit error rate requirement for the

data portion of this message. The source SIMP uses

this field to determine the satellite channel

transmission parameters required to provide that bit

error rate.

0 = Low Reliability

1 = Medium Reliability

12

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

2 = High Reliability

3 = Reserved

The Reliability field is undefined in messages sent

from a SIMP to a host.

3[0-5] Reliability Length. This source host uses this field

to specify a portion of the user data which should be

transmitted at the highest reliability level (lowest

bit error rate). Both the six message header words and

the first Reliability Length words of user data will be

transmitted at Reliability=2 while the remainder of the

user data will be transmitted at whatever reliability

level is specified in field 3[6-7]. The reliability

length mechanism gives the user the ability to transmit

private header information (e.g., IP and TCP headers)

at a higher reliability level than the remainder of the

data. The Reliability Length field is undefined in

messages sent from a SIMP to a host.

4[0-15] Destination Host Address. This field contains the

satellite network logical address of the destination

host.

5[0-15] Source Host Address. This field contains the satellite

network logical address of the source host.

6-N Data. This field contains up to 16,384 bits (1024 16-

bit words) of user data.

13

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

4 Stream Messages

Stream messages are the second type of message level data

messages. As noted in Section 2, streams exist primarily to

provide a one satellite hop delay for volatile traffic such as

speech. Hosts may also use streams to support high duty cycle

applications which require guaranteed channel bandwidth.

Streams must be created before stream messages can flow from

host to host. The protocol to accomplish stream creation is

described in Section 6.1. Once established, a stream is

associated with a recurring channel allocation within the

satellite network. This fixed allocation imposes rather strict

requirements on the host using the stream if efficient channel

utilization is to be achieved. In particular, stream messages

must match the stream allocation both in terms of message size

and message interarrival time.

Within the bounds of its stream allocation, a host is

permitted considerable flexibility in how it may use a stream.

Although the priority, reliability, and reliability length of

each stream message is fixed at stream creation time, the

destination logical address can vary from stream message to

stream message. A host can, therefore, multiplex a variety of

logical flows onto a single host stream. The format of stream

messages is described in Figure 2.

14

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0 0LBGOPRI XXXX MESSAGE NUMBER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 HEADER CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

2 A/R

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

3 1IL D E TTL HOST STREAM ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

4 DESTINATION HOST ADDRESS

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

5 SOURCE HOST ADDRESS

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6-N DATA

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 2 . STREAM MESSAGE

0[15] Message Class = 0 (Data Message).

0[14] Loopback Bit.

0[12-13] Go-Priority.

0[8-11] Reserved.

0[0-7] Message Number. This field serves the same purpose as

the message number field in the datagram message.

Moreover, a single message number sequence is used for

both datagram and stream messages (see Section 5).

1[0-15] Header Checksum. Covers Words 0-5.

2[0-15] Piggybacked A/R.

15

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

3[15] Data Message Type = 1 (Stream).

3[14] Internet/Local Flag.

3[13] Discard Flag.

3[12] Data Error Flag.

3[10-11] Time-to-live Designator.

0 = Reserved

1 = 1 second

2 = Reserved

3 = Reserved

3[0-9] Host Stream ID. The service host uses this field to

identify the host stream over which the message is to

be sent by the SIMP. Host stream IDs are established

at stream creation time via host exchanges with their

network service host (see Section 6.1).

4[0-15] Destination Host Address.

5[0-15] Source Host Address.

6-N Data. This field contains up to 16,000 bits of user

data (multiple of 16-bits).

16

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

5 Flow Control Messages

The SIMP supports an acceptance/refusal (A/R) mechanism in

each direction on the host access link. The A/R mechanism is

enabled for the link by the host by setting a bit in the Restart

Complete control message (see Section 8). Each datagram and

stream message contains an 8-bit message number used to identify

the message for flow control purposes. Both the host and the

SIMP increment this number modulo 256 in successive messages they

transmit. Up to 127 messages may be outstanding in each

direction at any time. If the receiver of a message is unable to

accept the message, a refusal indication containing the message

number of the refused message and the reason for the refusal is

returned. The refusal indication may be piggybacked on data

messages in the opposite direction over the link or may be sent

in a separate control message in the absence of reverse traffic.

Acceptance indications are returned in a similar manner,

either piggybacked on data messages or in a separate control

message. An acceptance is returned by the receiver to indicate

that the identified message was not refused. Acceptance

indications returned by the SIMP do not, however, imply a

guarantee of delivery or even any assurance that the message will

not be intentionally discarded by the network at a later time.

They are sent primarily to facilitate buffer management in the

host.

To reduce the number of A/R messages exchanged, a single A/R

indication can be returned for multiple (lower numbered)

previously unacknowledged messages. Explicit acceptance of

message number N implies implicit acceptance of outstanding

messages with numbers N-1, N-2, etc., according to the

definition of acceptance outlined above. (Note that explicit

acceptance of message number N does not imply that all of the

unacknowledged outstanding messages have been received.) An

analogous interpretation of refusal message number allows the

receiver of a group of messages to reject them as a group

assuming that they all are being refused for the same reason. As

a further efficiency measure, HAP permits a block of A/R

indications to be aggregated into a single A/R control message.

Such a message might be used, for example, to reject a group of

17

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

messages where the refusal code on each is different.

In some circumstances the overhead associated with

processing A/R messages may prove unattractive. For these cases,

it is possible to disable the A/R mechanism and operate the HAP

interface in a purely discard mode. The ability to effect this

on a link basis has already been noted (see Sections 2 and 8).

In addition, messages with sequence number zero are taken as

messages for which the A/R mechanism is selectively disabled. To

permit critical feedback, even when operating in discard mode,

HAP defines an "Unnumbered Response" control message.

The format shown in Figure 3 is used both for piggybacking

A/R indications on data messages (word 2), and for providing A/R

information in separate control messages. When separate control

messages are used to transmit A/R indications, the format shown

in Figure 4 applies. Flow control information and other

information which cannot be sent as an A/R indication is sent in

an Unnumbered Response control message. The format of this type

of message is illustrated in Figure 5.

18

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

AR REFUSAL CODE A/R MESSAGE NUMBER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 3 . ACCEPTANCE/REFUSAL WORD

[15] Acceptance/Refusal Type. This field identifies whether

A/R information is an acceptance or a refusal.

0 = Acceptance

1 = Refusal

[8-14] Refusal Code. When the Acceptance/Refusal Type = 1,

this field gives the Refusal Code.

0 = Priority not being accepted

1 = Source SIMP congestion

2 = Destination SIMP congestion

3 = Destination host dead

4 = Destination SIMP dead

5 = Illegal destination host address

6 = Destination host access not allowed

7 = Illegal source host address

8 = Message lost in access link

9 = Nonexistent stream ID

10 = Illegal source host for stream ID

11 = Message length too long

12 = Stream message too early

13 = Illegal control message type

14 = Illegal refusal code in A/R

15 = Illegal reliability value

16 = Destination host congestion

[0-7] A/R Message Number. This field contains the number of

19

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

the message to which this acceptance/refusal refers.

It also applies to all outstanding messages with

earlier numbers. Note that this field can never be

zero since a message number of zero implies that the

A/R mechanism is disabled.

20

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0 1LBGOPRI XXXX LENGTH 1

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 HEADER CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

2 A/R

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

. . ... .

. . ... .

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

N A/R

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 4 . ACCEPTANCE/REFUSAL MESSAGE

0[15] Message Class = 1 (Control Message).

0[14] Loopback Bit.

0[12-13] Go-Priority.

0[8-11] Reserved.

0[4-7] Message Length. This field contains the total length

of this message in words (N+1).

0[0-3] Control Message Type = 1 (Acceptance/Refusal).

1[0-15] Header Checksum. The checksum covers words 0-N.

2[0-15] Acceptance/Refusal Word.

3-N Additional Acceptance/Refusal Words (optional).

21

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0 1LBGOPRI XXXX RES-CODE 5

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 HEADER CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

2 RESPONSE INFO

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

3 RESPONSE INFO

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 5 . UNNUMBERED RESPONSE

0[15] Message Class = 1 (Control Message).

0[14] Loopback Bit.

0[12-13] Go-Priority.

0[8-11] Reserved.

0[4-7] Response Code.

3 = Destination unreachable

5 = Illegal destination host address

7 = Illegal source host address

9 = Nonexistent stream ID

10 = Illegal stream ID

13 = Protocol violation

15 = Can't implement loop

0[0-3] Control Message Type = 5 (Unnumbered Response).

1[0-15] Header Checksum. Covers words 0-3.

22

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

2[0-15] Response Information. If Response Code is:

3, Destination Host Address

5, Destination Host Address

7, Source Host Address

9, Stream ID (right justified)

10, Stream ID (right justified)

13, Word 0 of offending message

15, Word 0 of Loopback Request message

3[0-15] Response Information. If Response Code is:

3,5,7, or 9. Undefined

10, Source Host Address

13, Word 3 of offending message, or zero if

no word 3

15, Word 2 of Loopback Request message

23

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

6 Setup Level Messages

Setup level protocol is provided to support the

establishment, modification, and deletion of groups and streams

in the packet satellite network. A host wishing to perform one

of these generic operations interacts with the network service

host (logical address zero). The service host causes the

requested action to be carried out and serves as the intermediary

between the user and the rest of the network. In the process of

implementing the requested action, various network data bases are

updated to reflect the current state of the referenced group or

stream.

The communication between the host and the service host is

implemented via special-purpose datagrams called setup messages.

Each interaction initiated by a host involves a 3-way exchange

where: (1) the user host sends a Request to the service host, (2)

the service host returns a Reply to the user host, and (3) the

user host returns a Reply Acknowledgment to the service host.

This procedure is used to insure reliable transmission of

requests and replies. In order to allow more than one setup

request message from a host to be outstanding, each request is

assigned a unique Request ID. The associated Reply and

subsequent Reply Acknowledgment are identified by the Request ID

that they contain. Hosts should generally expect a minimum delay

of about two satellite round-trip times between the transmission

of a setup Request to the SIMP and the receipt of the associated

Reply. (Note that the Join Group Request and the Leave Group

Request require only local communication between a host and its

SIMP. The response time for these requests, therefore, is

dependent solely on SIMP processing time and should be

considerably shorter than two round-trip times.) This delay

establishes a maximum rate at which changes can be processed by

the SIMP. The user should receive a reply to a setup request

requiring global communication within 2 seconds and to a setup

request requiring local communication within 1 second. The host

should respond to a SIMP Reply with a Reply Acknowledgment within

1 second.

24

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

Setup exchanges can also be initiated by the SIMP. SIMP-

initiated setup messages are used to notify a host of changes in

the status of an associated group or stream. Each notification

involves a 2-way exchange where: (1) the service host sends a

Notification to the user host, and (2) the user host returns a

Notification Acknowledgment to the service host. In order to

allow more than one Notification to be outstanding, each is

assigned a unique Notification ID. The Notification

Acknowledgment returned by the user host to the service host must

contain the Notification ID.

The general format of every setup message is:

<DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER>

<OPTIONAL INTERNET HEADER>

<SETUP MESSAGE HEADER>

<SETUP MESSAGE BODY>

The service host accepts setup requests in either Internet or

non-Internet format. Replies from the service host will be in

the same form as the request, that is, Internet requests get

Internet replies, and non-Internet requests get non-Internet

replies.

The format of the combined datagram message header and setup

message header is illustrated in Figure 6. The body of the setup

messages depends on the particular setup message type. Stream

request and reply messages are described in Section 6.1. Group

request and reply messages are described in Section 6.2. To

simplify the presentation in both of these sections, the setup

messages are assumed to be exchanged between a local host and

SIMP even though Internet group and stream setups are supported

(see Figure 6). The format of notifications, which consists of

only a single word beyond the basic setup header, is shown in

Figure 7. Since the SIMP does not retain the optional Internet

header information that can be included in setup requests,

Internet notifications are not supported. The format of

acknowledgment messages associated with request/reply and

notification setups is illustrated in Figure 8.

25

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6-N <OPTIONAL INTERNET HEADER>

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

N+1 SETUP TYPE SETUP CODE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

N+2 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

N+3 SETUP ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 6 . SETUP MESSAGE HEADER

0-5 Datagram Message Header. Each setup message begins

with the six word datagram message header (see Section

3).

6-N Internet Header (Optional). These fields, when

present, conform to the DoD Standard Internet Protocol

(IP). The Internet header size is a minimum of 10

words but can be longer depending on the use of

optional IP facilities. (Internet notification

messages are not supported.)

N+1[8-15] Setup Type. This field determines the type of setup

message.

0 = Acknowledgment

1 = Request

2 = Reply

3 = Notification

N+1[0-7] Setup Code. For requests, this field identifies the

26

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

Request Type.

1 = Create group address

2 = Delete group address

3 = Join group

4 = Leave group

5 = Create stream

6 = Delete stream

7 = Change stream parameters

8 = Reserved

For Replies, this field provides the Reply Code. Some

of the Reply Codes can be returned to any setup

request and others are request specific.

0 = Group or stream created

1 = Group or stream deleted

2 = Group joined

3 = Group left

4 = Stream changed

5 = Reserved

6 = Bad request type

7 = Reserved

8 = Network trouble

9 = Bad key

10 = Group address/stream ID nonexistent

11 = Not member of group/creator of stream

12 = Stream priority not being accepted

13 = Reserved

14 = Reserved

15 = Illegal interval

16 = Reserved

17 = Insufficient network resources

18 = Requested bandwidth too large

19 = Reserved

20 = Reserved

21 = Maximum messages per slot not consistent with

slot size

22 = Reply lost in network

23 = Illegal reliability value

27

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

For Notifications, this field contains the

Notification Type.

0 = Stream suspended

1 = Stream resumed

2 = Stream deleted

3 = Group deleted by host

4 = Group deleted by SIMP

5 = All streams deleted

6 = All groups deleted

For Acknowledgments, this field contains the

Acknowledgment Type.

0 = Reply acknowledgment

1 = Notification acknowledgment

N+2[0-15] Setup Checksum. The checksum covers the three setup

message header words and the setup message body data

words. Setups received with bad checksums must be

discarded.

N+3[0-15] Setup ID. This field is assigned by the host to

uniquely identify outstanding requests (Request ID)

and by the service host to uniquely identify

outstanding notifications (Notification ID).

28

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 3 NOTIFICATION TYPE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 NOTIFICATION ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

9 NOTIFICATION INFO

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 7 . NOTIFICATION MESSAGE

0-5 Datagram Message Header (see Section 3).

6[8-15] Setup Type = 3 (Notification).

6[0-7] Notification Type.

0 = Stream suspended

1 = Stream resumed

2 = Stream deleted

3 = Group deleted by host

4 = Group deleted by SIMP

5 = All streams deleted

6 = All groups deleted

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-9.

8[0-15] Notification ID.

9[0-15] Notification Information. This field contains the

16-bit group address in the case of a group

29

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

notification (types 3 and 4) and the 10-bit host

stream ID (right justified) in the case of a stream

notification (types 0-2). This field is zero for

Notification Types 5 and 6, which pertain to ALL

streams and groups, respectively.

30

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 0 ACK TYPE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 SETUP ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 8 . SETUP ACKNOWLEDGMENT

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 0 (Acknowledgment).

6[0-7] Acknowledgment Type.

0 = Reply acknowledgment

1 = Notification acknowledgment

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-8.

8[0-15] Setup ID. This is either a Request ID or a

Notification ID.

31

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

6.1 Stream Setup Messages

Hosts use streams to support high duty cycle applications

and applications requiring a one satellite hop network

transmission delay. Host streams must be set up before stream

data messages can flow. The stream setup messages defined by HAP

are Create Stream Request, Create Stream Reply, Delete Stream

Request, Delete Stream Reply, Change Stream Parameters Request,

and Change Stream Parameters Reply. The use of these messages is

illustrated in the scenario of exchanges between a host and its

local SIMP shown in Figure 9 where the host establishes a stream,

sends some data, modifies the stream characteristics, sends some

more data, and finally closes down the stream.

It is worthwhile noting that the setup exchanges in Figure 9

are completely between the host originating the stream and its

local SIMP. Other SIMPs and hosts are essentially unaware of the

existence of the stream. Stream messages received by a

destination host are, therefore, processed identically to

datagram messages. (All SIMPs must, of course, be aware of the

channel allocation associated with a host stream in order to

perform satellite channel scheduling.) Not illustrated, but

implicit in this scenario, are the optional A/R indications

associated with each of the stream setup messages.

32

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

Host SIMP

Create Stream Request ------>

Create Stream Reply <------

Reply Acknowledgment ------>

Stream Message ------>

.

.

Stream Message ------>

Change Stream Parameters Request ------>

Change Stream Parameters Reply <------

Reply Acknowledgment ------>

Stream Message ------>

.

.

Stream Message ------>

Delete Stream Request ------>

Delete Stream Reply <------

Reply Acknowledgment ------>

Figure 9 . STREAM EXAMPLE

Host streams have six characteristic properties which are

selected at stream setup time. These properties, which apply to

every message transmitted in the stream, are: (1) slot size, (2)

interval, (3) reliability, (4) reliability length, (5) priority,

and (6) maximum messages per slot. To establish a stream, the

host sends the Create Stream Request message illustrated in

Figure 10 to the SIMP. After the satellite network has processed

the Create Stream Request, the SIMP will respond to the host with

a Create Stream Reply message formatted as shown in Figure 11.

Assuming that the reply code in the Create Stream Reply is zero

indicating that the stream has been created successfully, the

host may proceed to transmit stream data messages after sending a

33

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

Reply Acknowledgment.

During the lifetime of a stream, the host which created it

may decide that some of its six characteristic properties should

be modified. All of the properties except the stream interval

can be modified using the Change Stream Parameters Request

message. The format of this command is illustrated in Figure 12.

After the network has processed the Change Stream Parameters

Request, the SIMP will respond by sending a Change Stream

Parameters Reply to the host with the format shown in Figure 13.

A host requesting a reduced channel allocation should decrease

its sending rate immediately without waiting for receipt of the

Change Stream Parameters Reply. A host requesting an increased

allocation should not proceed to transmit according to the new

set of parameters without first having received a Reply Code of 4

indicating that the requested change has taken effect.

When the host which created the host stream determines that

the stream is no longer needed and the associated satellite

channel allocation can be freed up, the host sends its local SIMP

a Delete Stream Request message formatted as indicated in Figure

14. After the network has processed the Delete Stream Request,

the SIMP will respond by sending a Delete Stream Reply to the

host with the format shown in Figure 15.

34

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 1 5

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

9 MAX MES INT PRI RLY RLEN

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

10 SLOT SIZE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 10 . CREATE STREAM REQUEST

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 1 (Request).

6[0-7] Request Type = 5 (Create Stream).

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-10.

8[0-15] Request ID.

9[12-15] Maximum Messages Per Slot. This field specifies the

the maximum number of stream messages that will ever

be delivered to the SIMP by the host for transmission

in one stream slot.

9[10-11] Interval. This field specifies the interval, in

number of 21.2 ms frames, between stream slots.

35

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

0 = 1 frame

1 = 2 frames

2 = 4 frames

3 = 8 frames

As an example, an interval of 4 frames corresponds to

an allocation of Slot Size words every 85 ms.

9[8-9] Priority. This field specifies the priority at which

all messages in the host stream should be handled.

0 = Low priority

1 = Medium Low Priority

2 = Medium High Priority

3 = High Priority

9[6-7] Reliability. This field specifies the basic bit-

error rate requirement for the data portion of all

messages in the host stream.

0 = Low Reliability

1 = Medium Reliability

2 = High Reliability

3 = Reserved

9[0-5] Reliability Length. This field specifies how many

words beyond the stream message header should be

transmitted at maximum reliability for all messages

in the host stream.

10[0-15] Slot Size. This field specifies the slot size in

16-bit words of stream message text. Stream message

header words are excluded from this count. The host

can partition this allocation on a slot-by-slot basis

among a variable number of messages as long as the

maximum number of messages per slot does not exceed

MAX MES.

36

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 2 REPLY CODE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

9 XXXXX HOST STREAM ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 11 . CREATE STREAM REPLY

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 2 (Reply).

6[0-7] Reply Code.

0 = Stream created

8 = Network trouble

12 = Stream priority not being accepted

17 = Insufficient network resources

18 = Requested bandwidth too large

21 = Maximum messages per slot not consistent

with slot size

22 = Reply lost in network

23 = Illegal reliability value

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-9.

8[0-15] Request ID.

37

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

9[10-15] Reserved.

9[0-9] Host Stream ID. This field contains a host stream

ID assigned by the network. It must be included in

all stream data messages sent by the host to allow

the SIMP to associate the message with stored stream

characteristics and the reserved satellite channel

time.

38

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 1 7

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

9 XXXXX HOST STREAM ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

10 MAX MES INT PRI RLY RLEN

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

11 SLOT SIZE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 12 . CHANGE STREAM PARAMETERS REQUEST

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 1 (Request).

6[0-7] Request Type = 7 (Change Stream Parameters).

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-11.

8[0-15] Request ID.

9[10-15] Reserved.

9[0-9] Host Stream ID.

10[12-15] New Maximum Messages Per Slot.

39

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

10[10-11] Interval. This field must specifiy the same

interval as was specified in the Create Stream

Request message for this stream.

10[8-9] New Priority.

10[6-7] New Reliability.

10[0-5] New Reliability Length.

11[0-15] New Slot Size.

40

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 2 REPLY CODE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 13 . CHANGE STREAM PARAMETERS REPLY

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 2 (Reply).

6[0-7] Reply Code.

4 = Stream changed

8 = Network trouble

10 = Stream ID nonexistent

11 = Not creator of stream

12 = Stream priority not being accepted

15 = Illegal interval

17 = Insufficient network resources

18 = Requested bandwidth too large

21 = Maximum messages per slot not consistent with

slot size

22 = Reply lost in network

23 = Illegal reliability value

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-8.

8[0-15] Request ID.

41

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 1 6

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

9 XXXXX HOST STREAM ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 14 . DELETE STREAM REQUEST

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 1 (Request).

6[0-7] Request Type = 6 (Delete Stream).

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-9.

8[0-15] Request ID.

9[10-15] Reserved.

9[0-9] Host Stream ID.

42

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 2 REPLY CODE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 15 . DELETE STREAM REPLY

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 2 (Reply).

6[0-7] Reply Code.

1 = Stream deleted

8 = Network trouble

10 = Stream ID nonexistent

11 = Not creator of stream

17 = Insufficient network resources

22 = Reply lost in network

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-8.

8[0-15] Request ID.

43

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

6.2 Group Setup Messages

Group addressing allows hosts to take advantage of the

broadcast capability of the satellite network and is primarily

provided to support the multi-destination delivery required for

conferencing applications. Group addresses are dynamically

created and deleted via setup messages exchanged between hosts

and the network. Membership in a group may consist of an

arbitrary subset of all the permanent network hosts. A datagram

message or stream message addressed to a group is always sent

over the satellite channel and delivered to all hosts that are

members of that group. The group setup messages are Create Group

Request, Create Group Reply, Delete Group Request, Delete Group

Reply, Join Group Request, Join Group Reply, Leave Group Request,

and Leave Group Reply.

The use of group setup messages is shown in Figure 16. The

figure illustrates a scenario of exchanges between two hosts and

their local SIMPs. In the scenario one host, Host A, creates a

group which is joined by a second host, Host B. After the two

hosts have exchanged some data mesages addressed to the group,

Host B decides to leave the group and Host A decides to delete

the group. As in the scenario in Section 6.1, A/R indications

have been omitted for clarity.

Part of the group creation procedure involves the service

host returning a 48-bit key along with a 16-bit group address to

the host creating the group. The creating host must pass the key

along with the group address to the other hosts which it wants as

group members. These other hosts must supply the key along with

the group address in their Join Group Requests. The key is used

by the network to authenticate these operations and thereby

minimize the probability that unwanted hosts will deliberately or

inadvertently become members of the group. The procedure used by

a host to distribute the group address and key is not within the

scope of HAP.

44

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

Host SIMP SIMP Host

A A B B

Create Group Request ------>

Create Group Reply <------

Reply Acknowledgment ------>

.

.

>>Group Address,Key>>

.

.

Join Group Request <------

Join Group Reply ------>

Reply Acknowledgment <------

Data Message 1 ------>

Data Message 1 <------ ------>

Data Message 2 <------

Data Message 2 <------ ------>

Leave Group Request <------

Leave Group Reply ------>

Reply Acknowledgment <------

Delete Group Request ------>

Delete Group Reply <------

Reply Acknowledgment ------>

Figure 16 . GROUP EXAMPLE

Any host no longer wishing to participate in a group may

choose to drop out. This can be accomplished by either a Leave

or a Delete. Both Leave and Delete operations are authenticated

using the 48-bit key. Leave is a local operation between a host

and its SIMP which removes the requesting host from the group

membership list but does not alter the global existence of the

45

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

group. A Delete, on the other hand, expunges all knowledge of

the group from every SIMP in the network. HAP will permit any

member of a group to delete the group at any time. Thus, group

addresses can be deleted even if the host which originally

created the group has left the group or has crashed. Moreover,

groups may exist for which there are currently no members because

each member has executed a Leave while none has executed a

Delete. It is the responsibility of the hosts to coordinate and

manage the use of groups.

The Create Group Request message sent to the service host to

establish a group address is illustrated in Figure 17. After the

network has processed the Create Group Request, the service host

will respond by sending a Create Group Reply to the host as

illustrated in Figure 18.

A host may become a member of a group once it knows the

address and key associated with the group by sending the service

host the Join Group Request message shown in Figure 19. The

service host will respond to the Join Group Request with a Join

Group Reply formatted as indicated in Figure 20. The host which

creates a group automatically becomes a member of that group

without any need for an explicit Join Group Request.

At any time after becoming a member of a group, a host may

choose to drop out of the group. To effect this the host sends

the service host a Leave Group Request formatted as shown in

Figure 21. The service host will respond to the Leave Group

Request with a Leave Group Reply formatted as shown in Figure 22.

Any member of a group can request that the service host

delete an existing group via a Delete Group Request. The format

of the Delete Group Request setup message is illustrated in

Figure 23. After the network has processed the Delete Group

Request, the service host will respond to the host with a Delete

Group Reply formatted as illustrated in Figure 24.

46

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 1 1

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 17 . CREATE GROUP REQUEST

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 1 (Request).

6[0-7] Request Type = 1 (Create Group).

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-8.

8[0-15] Request ID.

47

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 2 REPLY CODE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

9 GROUP ADDRESS

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

10 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

11 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

12 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 18 . CREATE GROUP REPLY

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 2 (Reply).

6[0-7] Reply Code.

0 = Group created

8 = Network trouble

17 = Insufficient network resources

22 = Reply lost in network

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-12.

8[0-15] Request ID.

48

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

9[0-15] Group Address. This field contains a 16-bit logical

address assigned by the network which may be used by

the host as a group address.

10-12 Key. This field contains a 48-bit key assigned by the

network which is associated with the group address.

It must be provided for subsequent Join, Leave, and

Delete requests which reference the group address.

49

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 1 3

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

9 GROUP ADDRESS

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

10 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

11 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

12 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 19 . JOIN GROUP REQUEST

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 1 (Request).

6[0-7] Request Type = 3 (Join Group).

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-12.

8[0-15] Request ID.

9[0-15] Group Address. This is the logical address of the

group that the host wishes to join.

10-12 Key. This is the key associated with the group

50

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

address.

51

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 2 REPLY CODE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 20 . JOIN GROUP REPLY

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 2 (Reply).

6[0-7] Reply Code.

2 = Group joined

9 = Bad key

10 = Group address nonexistent

17 = Insufficient network resources

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-8.

8[0-15] Request ID.

52

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 1 4

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

9 GROUP ADDRESS

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

10 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

11 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

12 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 21 . LEAVE GROUP REQUEST

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 1 (Request).

6[0-7] Request Type = 4 (Leave Group).

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-12.

8[0-15] Request ID.

9[0-15] Group Address. This is the logical address of the

group that the host wishes to leave.

10-12 Key. This is the key associated with the group

53

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

address.

54

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 2 REPLY CODE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 22 . LEAVE GROUP REPLY

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 2 (Reply).

6[0-7] Reply Code.

3 = Group left

9 = Bad key

10 = Group address nonexistent

11 = Not member of group

17 = Insufficient network resources

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-8.

8[0-15] Request ID.

55

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 1 2

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

9 GROUP ADDRESS

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

10 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

11 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

12 KEY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 23 . DELETE GROUP REQUEST

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 1 (Request).

6[0-7] Request Type = 2 (Delete Group).

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-12.

8[0-15] Request ID.

9[0-15] Group Address.

10-12 Key.

56

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0-5 DATAGRAM MESSAGE HEADER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 2 REPLY CODE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 SETUP CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 REQUEST ID

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 24 . DELETE GROUP REPLY

0-5 Datagram Message Header.

6[8-15] Setup Type = 2 (Reply).

6[0-7] Reply Code.

1 = Group deleted

8 = Network trouble

9 = Bad key

10 = Group address nonexistent

11 = Not member of group

17 = Insufficient network resources

22 = Reply lost in network

7[0-15] Setup Checksum. Covers words 6-8.

8[0-15] Request ID.

57

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

7 Link Monitoring

While the access link is operating, statistics on traffic

load and error rate are maintained by the host and SIMP. The

host and SIMP must exchange status messages once a second.

Periodic exchange of status messages permits both ends of the

link to monitor flows in both directions. Status messages are

required to support monitoring by the Network Operations Center

(NOC).

The link restart procedure (see Section 8) initializes all

internal SIMP counts and statistics for that link to zero. As

data and control messages are processed, counts are updated to

reflect the total number of messages sent, messages received

correctly, and messages received with different classes of errors

since the last link restart. Whenever a status message arrives,

a snapshot is taken of the local SIMP counts. The local receive

counts, in conjunction with a sent count contained in the

received status message, permits the computation of traffic

statistics in the one second update interval assuming that the

set of counts at the time of the previous monitoring report have

been saved. By including in the status message sent (in the

opposite direction) the receive counts and the received sent

count that was used with them, the transmitting end of the access

link as well as the receiving end can determine the link

performance from sender to receiver. The format of the Status

control message is illustrated in Figure 25.

58

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0 1LBGOPRI XXXXX 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 HEADER CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

2 MOST RECENT A/R SENT

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

3 STREAM CAPACITY

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

4 TIMESTAMP

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

5 SBU

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

6 STU

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

7 RNE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

8 RWE

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

9 BHC

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

10 HEI

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 25 . STATUS MESSAGE

0[15] Message Class = 1 (Control Message).

0[14] Loopback Bit.

0[12-13] Go-Priority.

0[4-11] Reserved.

59

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

0[0-3] Control Message Type = 0 (Status).

1[0-15] Header Checksum. Covers words 0-10.

2[0-15] Most Recent A/R Sent. This field is a duplicate of the

most recent acceptance/refusal word. It is included in

the periodic status message in case previous

transmissions containing A/R information were lost.

3[0-15] Stream Capacity. When sent by the SIMP, this field

indicates how much stream capacity is unused, in units

of data bits per frame. Since available capacity

depends directly on a variety of parameters that can be

selected by the user, the value of this field is the

maximum capacity that could be achieved if existing

host streams were expanded at low reliability. This

field is undefined in messages sent from the host to

the SIMP.

4[0-15] Timestamp. This field indicates the time that the

status message was generated. When sent by a SIMP, the

time is in units of seconds since the last link

restart. The host should also timestamp its messages

in units of seconds.

5[0-15] Sent By Us. Count of messages sent by us since the last

link restart (not including this one).

6[0-15] Sent To Us. Count of messages sent to us since the

last link restart. This is the count from word 5 of

the last status message received.

7[0-15] Received, No Errors. This is the count of messages

received without errors (since the last link restart)

at the time that the last status message was received.

8[0-15] Received With Errors. This is the count of messages

received with errors (since the last link restart) at

the time the last status message was received.

9[0-15] Bad Header Checksums. This is the count of messages

60

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

received with bad header checksums (since the last link

restart) at the time the last status message was

received.

10[0-15] Hardware Error Indication. This is the count of

messages received with hardware CRC errors or hardware

interface error indications (since the last link

restart) at the time the last status message was

received.

61

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

8 Initialization

The Host Access Protocol uses a number of state variables

that must be initialized in order to function properly. These

variables are associated with the send and receive message

numbers used by the acceptance/refusal mechanism and the

statistics maintained to support link monitoring. Link

initialization should be carried out when a machine is initially

powered up, when it does a system restart, when the ON state (see

below) times out, when a loopback condition times out (see

Section 9), or whenever the link transitions from non-operational

to operational status.

Initialization is accomplished by the exchange of Restart

Request (RR) and Restart Complete (RC) messages between a host

and a SIMP. The state diagram in Figure 26 shows the sequence of

events during initialization. Both SIMP and host must implement

this state diagram if deadlocks and oscillations are to be

avoided. This particular initialization sequence requires both

sides to send and receive the Restart Complete message. Because

this message is a reply (to a Restart Request or Restart

Complete), its receipt guarantees that the physical link is

operating in both directions. Five states are identified in the

state diagram:

OFF Entered upon recognition of a requirement to

restart. The device can recognize this

requirement itself or be forced to restart by

receipt of an RR message from the other end while

in the ON state.

INIT Local state variables have been initialized and

local counters have been zeroed but no restart

control messages have yet been sent or received.

RR-SNT A request to reinitialize (RR) has been sent to

the other end but no restart control messages have

yet been received.

RC-SNT A reply (RC) has been sent to the other end in

response to a received reinitialization request

62

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

(RR). The device is waiting for a reply (RC).

ON Reply (RC) messages have been both sent and

received. Data and control messages can now be

exchanged between the SIMP and host.

All states have 10-second timeouts (not illustrated) which

return the protocol to the OFF state. The occurrence of any

events other than those indicated in the diagram are ignored.

The Restart Request control message illustrated in Figure 27

is sent by either a host or a SIMP when it wishes to restart a

link. The Restart Request causes all the monitoring statistics

to be reset to zero and stops all traffic on the link in both

directions. The Restart Complete message illustrated in Figure

28 is sent in response to a received Restart Request or Restart

Complete to complete link initialization. The Restart Complete

carries a field used by the host to enable or disable the

acceptance/refusal mechanism for the link being restarted (see

Section 5). After the Restart Complete is processed, traffic may

flow on the link.

63

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

-------

Any Timeout or -----> OFF <-----------------------------

Device Down -------

Device Up

Initialize Variables

V

---------

INIT

---------

Rcv RR Snd RR

Snd RC

-------------- --------------

V Rcv RR V

---------- Snd RC ----------

RC-SNT <-------------------- RR-SNT

---------- ----------

Rcv RC Rcv RC

Snd RC

V V

-------------------------------

V

-------

Rcv Any ------> ON ------------------------------

Other ------- Rcv RR

----------

Figure 26 . HAP LINK RESTART STATE DIAGRAM

64

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0 1LB XXXXXXX REASON 3

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 HEADER CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

2 HOST ADDRESS / SITE NUMBER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

3 LINK NUMBER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 27 . RESTART REQUEST

0[15] Message Type = 1 (Control Message).

0[14] Loopback Bit.

0[8-13] Reserved.

0[4-7] Reason. This field is used by the SIMP or the host to

indicate the reason for the restart as follows:

0 = power up

1 = system restart

2 = link restart

3 = link timeout

4 = loopback timeout

0[0-3] Control Message Type = 3 (Restart Request).

1[0-15] Header Checksum. Covers words 0-3.

2[0-15] Host Address / Site Number. The host inserts its

satellite network address in this field. The SIMP

validates that the host address is correct for the port

65

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

being used. When sent by the SIMP, this field will

contain the SIMP site number.

3[0-15] Link Number. This field contains the sender's

identification of the physical link being used. This

information is used to identify the link when reporting

errors to the Network Operations Center (NOC).

66

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0 1LB XXXXXX AR 4

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 HEADER CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

2 HOST ADDRESS / SITE NUMBER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

3 LINK NUMBER

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 28 . RESTART COMPLETE

0[15] Message Type = 1 (Control Message).

0[14] Loopback Bit.

0[5-13] Reserved.

0[4] Acceptance/Refusal Control. This bit is used by the

host to enable or disable the acceptance/refusal

mechanism for all traffic on the link.

0 = Disable acceptance/refusal

1 = Enable acceptance/refusal

0[0-3] Control Message Type = 4 (Restart Complete).

1[0-15] Header Checksum. Covers words 0-3.

2[0-15] Host Address / Site Number.

3[0-15] Link Number.

67

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

9 Loopback Control

The Host Access Protocol provides a Loopback Request control

message which can be used by a SIMP or a host to request the

remote loopback of its HAP messages. Such requests are usually

the result of operator intervention for purposes of system fault

diagnosis. For clarity in the following discussion, the unit

(SIMP or host) requesting the remote loopback is referred to as

the "transmitter" and the unit implementing (or rejecting) the

loopback is referred to as the "receiver". The format of a

Loopback Request control message is illustrated in Figure 29.

When a transmitter is remotely looped, all of its HAP

messages will be returned, unmodified, over the access link by

the receiver. The receiver will not send any of its own messages

to the transmitter while it is implementing the loop. SIMP-

generated messages are distinguished from host-generated messages

by means of the Loopback Bit that is in every HAP message header.

Two types of remote loopback may be requested: loopback at

the receiver's interface hardware and loopback at the receiver's

I/O driver software. HAP does not specify the manner in which

the receiver should implement these loops; additionally, some

receivers may use interface hardware which is incapable of

looping the transmitter's messages, only allowing the receiver to

provide software loops. A receiver may not be able to interpret

the transmitter's messages as it is looping them back. If such

interpretation is possible, however, the receiver will not act on

any of the transmitter's messages other than requests to

reinitialize the SIMP-host link (Restart Request (RR) control

messages; see Section 8.)

When a receiver initiates a loopback condition in response

to a loopback request, it makes an implicit promise to maintain

the condition for the duration specified in the Loopback Request

message. However, if an unanticipated condition such as a system

restart occurs in either the transmitter or the receiver, the

affected unit will try to reinitialize the SIMP-host link by

sending an RR message to the other unit. If the RR message is

recognized by the other unit a link initialization sequence can

be completed. This will restore the link to an unlooped

68

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

condition even if the specified loop duration has not yet

expired. If a receiver cannot interpret a transmitter's RR

messages, and in the absence of operator intervention at the

receiver, the loop will remain in place for its duration.

HAP does not specify the characteristics of any loopback

conditions that may be locally implemented by a given unit. An

example of such a condition is that oBTained when a SIMP commands

its host interface to loop back its own messages. If such local

loop conditions also cause the reflection of messages received

from the remote unit, the remote unit will detect the condition

via the HAP header Loopback Bit.

A specific sequence must be followed for setting up a remote

loopback condition. It begins after the HAP link has been

initialized and a decision is made to request a remote loop. The

transmitter then sends a Loopback Request message to the receiver

and waits for either (1) a 10-second timer to expire, (2) a

"Can't implement loop" Unnumbered Response message from the

receiver, or (3) one of its own reflected messages. If event (1)

or (2) occurs the request has failed and the transmitter may, at

its option, try again with a new Loopback Request message. If

event (3) occurs, the remote loopback condition has been

established. While waiting for one of these events, messages

from the receiver are processed normally. Note that RR messages

arriving from the receiver during this time will terminate the

loopback request.

When a receiver gets a Loopback Request message, it either

implements the requested loop for the specified duration, or

returns a "Can't implement loop" response without changing the

state of the link. The latter response would be returned, for

example, if a receiver is incapable of implementing a requested

hardware loop. A receiver should initiate reinitialization of

the link with an RR message(s) whenever a loopback condition

times out.

There is one asymmetry that is required in the above

sequence to resolve the (unlikely) case where both SIMP and host

request a remote loopback at the same time. If a SIMP receives a

Loopback Request message from a host while it is itself waiting

69

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

for an event of type (1)-(3), it will return a "Can't implement

loop" response to the host and will continue to wait. A host in

the converse situation, however, will abort its loopback request

and will instead act on the SIMP's loopback request.

70

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0 1LBGOPRI XXXXX LOOP TYPE 8

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 HEADER CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

2 LOOP DURATION

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 29 . LOOPBACK REQUEST

0[15] Message Type = 1 (Control Message).

0[14] Loopback Bit.

0[12-13] Go-Priority.

0[8-11] Reserved.

0[4-7] Loop Type. This field indicates the type of loop that

is being requested as follows:

0 = Undefined

1 = Loop at interface (hardware loop)

2 = Loop at driver (software loop)

3-15 = Undefined

0[0-3] Control Message Type = 8 (Loopback Request).

1[0-15] Header Checksum. Covers words 0-2.

2[0-15] Loop Duration. The transmitter of a Loopback

Request message uses this field to specify the number

of seconds that the loop is to be maintained by the

receiver.

71

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

10 Other Control Messages

Before a SIMP or a host voluntarily disables a SIMP-host

link, it should send at least one Link Going Down control message

over that link. The format of such a message is illustrated in

Figure 30. HAP does not define the action(s) that should be

taken by a SIMP or a host when such a message is received;

informing the Network Operations Center (NOC) and/or the network

users of the impending event is a typical course of action. Note

that each Link Going Down message only pertains to the SIMP-host

link that it is sent over; if a host and a SIMP are connected by

multiple links, these links may be selectively disabled.

A No Operation (NOP) control message may be sent at any time

by a SIMP or a host. The format of such a message is illustrated

in Figure 31. A NOP message contains up to 32 words of arbitrary

data which are undefined by HAP. NOP messages may be required in

some cases to clear the state of the SIMP-host link hardware.

72

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0 1LBGOPRI XXXXX REASON 7

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 HEADER CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

2 TIME UNTIL DOWN

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

3 DOWN DURATION

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 30 . LINK GOING DOWN

0[15] Message Type = 1 (Control Message).

0[14] Loopback Bit.

0[12-13] Go-Priority.

0[8-11] Reserved.

0[4-7] Reason. This field is used by the SIMP or the host

to indicate the reason for disabling this SIMP-host

link as follows:

0 = NOT going down: Cancel previous Link

Going Down message

1 = Unspecified reason

2 = Scheduled PM

3 = Scheduled hardware work

4 = Scheduled software work

5 = Emergency restart

6 = Power outage

7 = Software breakpoint

8 = Hardware failure

73

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

9 = Not scheduled up

10 = Last warning: The SIMP or host is disabling

the link in 10 seconds

11-15 = Undefined

0[0-3] Control Message Type = 7 (Link Going Down).

1[0-15] Header Checksum. Covers words 0-3.

2[0-15] Time Until Down. This field specifies the amount of

time remaining until the SIMP or host disables the

link (in minutes). An entry of zero indicates that

there is less than a minute remaining.

3[0-15] Down Duration. This field specifies the amount of

time that the SIMP-host link will be down (in

minutes). An entry of zero indicates that the down

duration will be less than a minute. An entry of -1

(all bits set) indicates an indefinite down duration.

74

RFC907 Host Access Protocol

July 1984 Specification

15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

0 1LB XXXXX 6

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 HEADER CHECKSUM

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

2-N ARBITRARY DATA

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

Figure 31 . NO OPERATION (NOP)

0[15] Message Type = 1 (Control Message).

0[14] Loopback Bit.

0[4-13] Reserved.

0[0-3] Control Message Type = 6 (NOP).

1[0-15] Header Checksum. Covers words 0-N.

2-N Arbitrary Data. Up to 32 words of data may be sent.

The data are undefined by HAP.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有