RFC93 - Initial Connection Protocol

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group A. McKenzie

Request for Comments #93 BBN

Updates RFC's 66, 80 January 1971

Initial Connection Protocol

A review of the Initial Connection Protocol (ICP) first

described in RFC#66 and restated in RFC#80 has revealed an area of

ambiguity, which in turn reflects an ambiguity in the Host-Host

Protocol Document No. 1. This is the definition of the message sent

over the connection from "Server socket #1". In both referenced

RFC's, the message is defined as "exactly an even 32 bit number". It

is not clear, however, whether this 32 bit number is meant to follow

an eight-bit "message data type" code or not, stemming from the fact

that the Host-Host Protocol makes provision for sUCh codes but does

not seem to absolutely demand them.

Only one implementation of an ICP has been documented in the

NWG literature - that at UCSB (RFC#74). The implementers of this ICP

have apparently interpreted the Host-Host Protocol as demanding a

message data type code, and therefore do transmit a code of zero.

Steve Crocker indicates (private communication) that the Host-

Host Protocol was intended to require a message data type code. We

therefore recommend that RFCnumbers 66 and 80 be amended to show that

the "even 32 bit number" is preceded by a message data type code of

zero (zero is the only code currently defined).

[ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]

[ into the online RFCarchives by James Thompson 4/97 ]

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航