RFC252 - Network host status

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group E. Wentheimer

Request for Comments: 252 Bolt, Beranek and Newman

Category: F, G.3 8 October 1971

NIC: 7696

The purpose of this RFCis to report on the recent status of most

Network Hosts. During September 27 through September 29 the BBN

prototype Terminal IMP (Network Address 158) was inAccessible due to

hardware debugging. The Network was, therefore, not examined on

these days.

Three Hosts which were not officially able to act as Server's at the

time of RFC#240 are now able to do so. These Hosts are:

NETWORK SITE COMPUTER

ADDRESS

2 SRI (NIC) PDF-10

6 MIT (Multics) H-645

9 HARVARD PDP-10

The Harvard PDP-10, however, has limited core space. They will,

therefore, run the Telnet program only occasionally.

The following two tables summarize the information on the Host status

for September 30 - October 8.

NETWORK SITE COMPUTER DAY, DATE AND TIME (Eastern)

ADDRESS TH F M Tu W Th F

9/30 10/1 10/4 10/5 10/6 10/7 10/8

1100 1753 1200 1600 1100 1300 1530

1 UCLA SIGMA-7 O T D O #D O O

*65 UCLA IBM-360/91 O O D O D O O

2 SRI(NIC) PDP-10 O #D T #T O T #D

66 SRI(AI) PDP-10 D D D D D D D

3 UCSB IBM-360/75 D O O O O O O

4 UTAH PDP-10 D D D D D D D

69 BBN(TENEX) PDP-10 T T O O O D D

6 MIT(Multics)H-645 O O D T D T T

70 MIT(DM) PDP-10 D H D T D T T

8 SDC IBM-360 D D D D D D D

9 HARVARD PDP-10 T D T D D T T

10 LINCOLN IBM-360 H H H H D T D

where

D = Dead (Destination Host either dead or inaccessible [due to

network partitioning or local IMP failure] from the BBN Terminal

IMP.)

R = Refused (Destination Host returned a CLS to the initial RFC.)

T = Timed out (Destination Host did not respond in any way to the

initial RFC, although not dead.)

H = 1/2 Open (Destination Host opened a connection but then

either immediately closed it, or did not respond any further.)

0 = Opened (Destination Host opened a connection and was

accessible to user.)

* The UCLA IMB-360/91 currently has Remote Job Service (NETRJS),

but has not implemented a full server Telnet System. The BBN

Terminal IMP is not equipped to test NETRJS however, we are

assuming that receipt of the UCLA eXPlanatory message indicates

that NETRJS is also functioning.

# These sites advertise that they may not have their system

available # at these times.

NETWORK SITE COMPUTER STATUS or "STATUS or PREDICTIONS"

ADDRESS PREDICTION OBTAINED FROM

1 UCLA SIGMA-7 Server Jon Postel

65 UCLA IBM-360/91 Remote Job

Service now,

Telnet in April Bob Braden

2 SRI(NIC) PDP-10 Server John Melvin

66 SRI(AI) PDP-10 November Len Chaiten

3 UCSB IBM-360/75 Server Jim White

4 UTAH PDP-10 "Soon" Barry Wessler

5 BBN(NCC) DDP-516 Never Alex McKenzie

69 BBN(TENEX) PDP-10 Server Dan Murphy

6 MIT(Multics)H-645 Server Mike Padliosky

70 MIT(DM) PDP-10 Server Bob Bressler

7 RAND IBM 360/65 User only Eric Harslem

71 RAND PDP-10 January Eric Harslem

8 SDC IBM-360/67 "Soon" Bob Long

9 HARVARD PDP-10 Server Bob Sundberg

73 HARVARD PDP-1 User only Bob Sundberg

10 LINCOLN IBM-360 "Soon" Joel Winnet

74 LINCOLN TX2 Uncertain Tom Barkalow

11 STANFORD PDP-10 November Andy Moorer

12 ILLINOIS PDP-11 User only John Cravits

13 CASE PDP-10 December 15 Charles Rose

14 CARNEGIE PDP-10 January Hal VanZoeren

15 PAOLI B6500 Uncertain John Cravits

16 AMES TIP User only

17 MITRE TIP User only

18 BBN(TIP) Prototype TIP User only

[This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry]

[into the online RFCarchives by Kelly Tardif, Via Genie 10/1999]

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航