RFC302 - Exercising The ARPANET

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

NWG/RFC#302 UCSB Computer

NIC 9074 Research Laboratory

Roland F. Bryan

8 February 1972

EXERCISING THE ARPANET

Questions

---------

1. Can a technically competent person, initially uninformed

as to network operation and naive as to the capabilities

of various time-shared terminal systems attached to the

Network, be able to develop problem solving competence

at server sites on the ARPANET?

2. What inherent user problems exist that complicate such

adaptation?

3. Once proficient in the use, what ASPects of the various

sites limit the usability and what modifications should

be considered at both server and user sites to meet

various needs?

4. Should a user select a given site for composing and

editing all of his files for subsequent transfer to

other sites for processing or should he learn to compose

and edit at each of the sites doing his processing?

5. What are the problems in starting cooperating processes

at several sites? How does a user control such

processes?

[Page 1]

OBTaining the Answers

---------------------

Under the direction of UCSB Professor James Howard, a test

group of 14 graduate students was formed to pursue the questions

above, and any other aspect of ARPANET operation that they might

uncover.

The test group has been given Access to the 16 console On-Line

System classroom in the E.E. Department at UCSB. The 16 consoles

produce graphic and alphanumeric displays and are tied into the

UCSB Host 360-75 which gains them access to the network. Old

style Culler-Fried keyboards are being used which provide a

limited key set Jim White has managed to program around most of

the protocol problems brought about by these keyboards, but some

still remain.

Seminars were given to the test group to familiarize them

with software and hardware aspects of the ARPANET, the local NIC

file has been made available to the group, and the group has been

allowed to sign onto the Network to pursue any available system.

Following the initial period of two weeks, during which the

group developed some familiarity with the network, the test group

has been divided into working groups with emphasis as follows:

Patric Timlick } BBN-TENEX

Dave Stearns } BBN-TENEX B

John Pickens } SRI-ARC (NIC)

Doug Beaubien }

Dave Whittington }

Richard Haraguchi } MIT-Multics

Maria deGraaf } MIT-DMCG

Richard Melton }

Su Sung Won }

Ronald Varekamp }

Jeoff Benson } UCLA-CCN HARV-10

Hasan A. El. Hasan } UCLA-NMC UTAH-10

George Engelberg } RAND-CSG LL-67

Rodney SKINner }

[Page 2]

Some Initial Results

--------------------

The first real encounters with the ARPANET at large produced

a series of questions and comments. Test group comments are

itemized below with additional comments by the author {In braces}.

We plan subsequent reports on a periodic basis.

1. We find that we need further information about access

to the NCPs at various sites. User manuals from the

sites might provide this. {Site response is solicited}

2. We sometimes cannot sign into UCLA-NMC directly from

UCSB, but can do so readily by way of BBN. {Protocol?}

3. After running a Fortran or PL-1 program at some net

location we can only display the results on our consoles

but cannot store them as files. {UCSB programming need?}

4. When communications break down how can a user be

assured that he is logged out of some remote site?

{Need for automatic Log-out?}

5. How do we make contact with programmers at other sites

to develop cooperative programs for file transfer, etc?

{Jim White?}

6. Is there a best time of day for operation at each site?

Should contact be made with the site operator prior to

user sessions? {Server sites please comment}

7. UCLA-NMC has assigned a separate user identification

for test group use. Would other sites prefer to do

likewise? {Comments?}

8. Is there information regarding uses made of the

various time shared systems by internal users at each

site? Does a bibliography exist to allow contact

with such users? {Check the Resource Notebook}

9. MIT-DMCG and BBN provide very good user service,

especially the site survey. Also these sites have

good responses to define events. Can UCSB provide

local users with similar information? {Jim White?}

[ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]

[ into the online RFCarchives by BBN Corp. under the ]

[ direction of Alex McKenzie. 12/96 ]

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航