RFC338 - EBCDIC/ASCII Mapping for Network RJE

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group R.T. Braden

Request for Comments: 338 UCLA/CCN

NIC: 9931 17 May 1972

EBCDIC/ASCII MAPPING FOR NETWORK RJE

A. INTRODUCTION

Under NETRJS [1], CCN's Network rje protocol [2], a virtual remote

batch terminal may be either EBCDIC or ASCII. CCN operates an IBM

360/91 which performs all of its normal processing in EBCDIC. When a

virtual ASCII terminal signs onto NETRJS, CCN translates the "card

reader" stream to EBCDIC and translates the "printer" stream back to

ASCII [3].

In recent months, a number of ASCII hosts (RAND PDP-10, Utah PDP-10,

Illinois PDP-11) have completed user processes for NETRJS. Several

users at these sites have noted deficiencies in the ASCII/EBCDIC

mapping rules originally implemented in NETRJS. Since their

objections were well founded, we have altered the existing mapping

and added a new one.

This RFChas three purposes:

(1) to make all users of NETRJS aware of the changed ASCII mapping

(2) to call this problem to the attention of the Network RJE

Protocol Committee

(3) to knowledge and support Joel Winett's pioneering work [4] in

this area.

THE EBCDIC CHIMERA

A year ago, Joel Winett Published RFC#183, containing the results of

his careful research into just what EBCDIC really means. He sounded

a clarion call for all EBCDIC sites to join in defining a Network

standards mapping. At this time, we at CCN were primarily absorbed

in the timely implementation of the NETRJS protocol to serve an

EBCDIC (!) user site, RAND, so we were not very supportive of his

efforts.

RFC#183 is a valuable document; we hope a copy falls into the hands

of Armonk. It is clear from RFC#183 that EBCDIC consists of a

standard ("basic") set of characters, combined with a number of

overlapping ad-hoc character happenings. Fortunately, if we exclude

special-purpose text composition programs, IBM 360 programs use only

the 89 "basic" EBCDIC graphics [5] shown in RFC#183 as well as in

Figure 1. An IBM 029 "EBCDIC" keypunch can create 63 graphics: the

89 basic EBCDIC graphics less the 26 lower case letters. In fact,

OS/360 requires an even smaller subset of EBCDIC, 60 characters

commonly called the "PL/1 character set". The PL/1 set consists of

the 89 basic graphics, less the 26 lower case letters as well as the

three graphics <cent sign>!" (cent sign, exclamation point, and

quotation).

C. CHARACTER MAPPING IN NETRJS

We consider now the requirements of a ASCII/EBCDIC mapping for NETRJS

or any rje protocol. These requirements are as follows:

Efficiency:

The translation should be character-to-character, so that the CPU

operation "translate" can be used and character scans obviated.

This is important because a significant volume of character data

may be moved during rje operations.

Usability:

(1) All of the 89 EBCDIC graphics should be mapped into

corresponding ASCII characters.

(2) The mapping should be as nearly transparent as possible, i.e.,

whenever the same graphic appears in both sets, it should map

onto itself.

(3) To minimize the adaptation required of an EBCDIC-oriented

programmer, the ASCII graphics should evoke the corresponding

EBCDIC graphic, when they are not identical.

Theses considerations led us to incorporate Winett's rules II (a) and

III (b) (see page 4 of the RFC#183) into NETRJS:

ASCII EBCDIC

----- ------

~ <bent bar>

\ <cent sign>

This defines all 89 basic EBCDIC graphics in terms of ASCII.

However, there is still a question of how to map the 6 "maverick"

ASCII characters ( []{}^` ) which are not in EBCDIC and not in the

list above.

We could (and did) take the view that all CCN users are concerned

only with writing and executing normal 360 programs using EBCDIC and

that they would enter one of the maverick ASCII graphics only in

error. Our original choice, therefore, was to map the mavericks in

the input into EBCDIC question marks. We also assumed that, if a

user needs to Access a larger subset of EBCDIC than the basic 89, he

should do so by doing his rje directly in EBCDIC.

We now realize that there were two deficiencies in the original

mapping rules.

1. The 360 program may be intended to manipulate ASCII text from

the Network. In that case, the Network user needs to have all

ASCII characters, including the mavericks, uniquely mapped

into EBCDIC in some (standard) manner.

2. The present mapping is convenient only if a user at an AT&T

Model 33/35 Teletype (or simulator thereof) needs a different

mapping for ease of use.

For the first case, we have changed the mapping of the 6 maverick

ASCII characters from "?", using instead Winett's rules III (c) and

III (d):

ASCII EBCDIC

----- ------

[ X'AD'

] X'BD'

{ X'8B'

} X'9B'

^ X'71'

` X'79'

For the user with a Model 33/35 Teletype, we have eXPanded the set of

virtual remote batch terminal types, adding "TTY" to "ASCII" and

"EBCDIC". A user establishes his virtual remote batch terminal as

type TTY by either doing his initial ICP to socket 15 (vs. 11 for

EBCDIC, 13 for ASCII), or by doing an ICP to Socket 1 and entering

the command "TTYRJS" (vs. "RJS" for EBCDIC, "ARJS" for ASCII). The

mapping used by NETRJS for a TTY remote is:

Model 33 Corresponding

Graphic ASCII EBCDIC

-------- ------------- ------

\ \ <bent bar>

<up arrow> ^

<left arrow> _ _

[ [ <cent sign>

] ] X'BD'

This is ugly, but it is probably the best we can do.

D. CONCLUSIONS

It is obvious that one pair of translation tables won't do the job;

NETRJS needs (at least) two mappings for each direction. How long

will it be before an important set of users appears with a different

terminal character set, requiring yet a different mapping? [6] An rje

server site needs to be prepared to provide a variety of translation

tables, and perhaps to allow a user to specify his own table(s); this

mini-subset of "Date Reconfiguration Service" might be necessary to

prevent translation-table-proliferation. The tendency in Network

discussions has been to put the burden upon the user sites to adapt

to different conventions. In the real world of users and servers,

the server will often have to do the adapting.

NOTES AND REFERENCES

[1] R.T. Braden, Interim NETRJS Specifications, RFC#189 (NIC

#7133), July 15, 1971.

[2] Please note that "RJS" is the proper name of a particular rje

package written at CCN the generic name for remote batch

service is "rje".

[3] Notice that the mapping question discussed in this RFCis

significant only for the virtual card reader and printer

connections in NETRJS. The punch connection is always

transparent, i.e., never translated. The remote operator

connections use the extended EBCDIC/ASCII mapping including

the maverick characters, but this is not important since

operator commands require only a limited character set.

[4] Joel Winett, "_The_ EBCDIC Codes and their Mapping to ASCII",

RFC#183 (NIC #7127), July 21, 1971.

[5] Winett lists only 88 basic EBCDIC graphics, excluding the

space which he regards as a control character. This is a

matter of taste, but we find it less confusing to include the

space as a graphic.

[6] CCN recently received a new Teletype-replacement terminal.

This machine has a bastardized graphic character set -- mostly

ASCII, with a sprinkling of both (!) EBCDIC and TTY.

+-------------------------------------+

Full ASCII

a b ... z ` ^ { } ~

+-----+-------------------------------------+--------------+

33/35 AT&T TWX

` [ ] (Mod 33/35

tty)

+------+-----+------+-----------------------+

Basic

EBCDIC <SP>

" A B ... Z <left arrow>

! 0 1 ... 9

+ - * / ( ) <up arrow>

. , ' =

$ &

< > : ? % # @

+-----+------+-----------------------+------+--------------+

_

+------+-----------------------+------+

PL/1 <bent bar>

Set

+-----------------------+

<cent sign>

Basic EBCDIC

+-------------------------------------------+

Figure 1. Character Sets Commonly Abused

[This RFCis also available in .PS and .PDF format.]

[This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry]

[into the online RFCarchives by Helene Morin, Viagenie, 12/99]

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航