RFC603 - Response to RFC597: Host status

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group J.D. Burchfiel

RFC# 603 BBN-TENEX

NIC # 21022 31 December, 1973

Response to RFC# 597: Host Status

I have several questions about the November 1973 ARPANET

topographical map:

1. AMES is 4-connected, i.e. four network connections will go down

if the IMP fails. Is there some ASPiration that IMPs should be

no more than three connected?

2. The seven IMPS in the Washington area are arranged into a loop.

This guarantees that local communication can take place even if

one connection fails, and is probably a worthwhile preparation

for area routing. On the other hand, for example, a break

between MIT-IPC and MIT-MAC will require them to communicate

through a 12-hop path through Washington. This can be remedied

by a short (ineXPensive) connection between Harvard and Lincoln

Labs. Is there a plan to pull the Boston area, the San

Francisco area, and the Los Angeles area into loops like the

Washington area?

[ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]

[ into the online RFCarchives by Alex McKenzie with ]

[ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 10/99 ]

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航