RFC567 - Cross Country Network Bandwidth

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group L. Peter Deutsch (PARC-MAXC)

Request for Comments: 567 September 6, 1973

NIC #18970

CROSS-COUNTRY NETWORK BANDWIDTH

The following computation of cross-country network bandwidth was

contributed by Butler Lampson of PARC.

Consider what happens when a TIP user on the West Coast, connected to a

full-duplex Host on the East Coast, strikes a key on his terminal.

The TIP sends a one-character message (1 packet).

The destination IMP sends a RFNM (1 packet).

The destination Host sends an ALLocate - this seems to be the strategy

used by TENEX Hosts, at least (1 packet).

Thc TIP sends a RFNM for the ALLocate (1 packet).

The same sequence repeats itself, with roles interchanged, for the echo

character (4 packets).

This constitutes 4 packets or 4OOO bits in each direction. The current

cross-country transmission capability of the ARPANET is 3 5OKb phone

lines; ergo, it can only support 3*50000/4000=37.5 sUCh characters per

second!

It may be that RFNMs are transmitted between IMPs more efficiently; at

best this can only double the network capacity.

This computation may help eXPlain why cross-country TIP users (e.g. the

substantial West Coast community of BBN-TENEX users) experience such

bad echo response, at least in bursts: the network itself may be

experiencing momentary peak loads.

If this argument is correct, the proposed remote echoing facilities of

the new TELNET protocol could have a major effect on network operation.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航