RFC552 - Single access to standard protocols

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group Buz Owen

RFC# 552 SDAC-TIP

NIC # 17809 13 July, 1973

Single Access to Standard Protocols

Isn't the idea of a single access protocol simple enough that one could

be specified, and a socket reserved for it, before the proposed mail

protocol becomes official? The result would be that MP could be the

first protocol implemented under UULP (or whatever it is to be called),

and the other protocols could be "moved" as soon as any problems in the

official specifications could be worked out, and at the convenience of

implementors.

The single access protocol might have the following commands:

USER

PASS

ACCT

MAIL

FTP

RJS

DRS (?)

HELP (?)

BYE

following Jim White's idea of nested command and reply spaces.

This doesn't address the question of "what is free", or of the

interrelationships between the various protocols, but it doesn't make

those problem any worse, only a little different.

[ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]

[ into the online RFCarchives by Alex McKenzie with ]

[ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 10/99 ]

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航