RFC618 - Few observations on NCP statistics

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group Edward Taft (PARC-MAXC)

Request for Comments: 618 Feb 1974

NIC #21989

A Few Observations on NCP Statistics

The NCP in use at HARV-10, CMU-10A, and CMU-10B collects a number of

operating and error statistics, which may be typed out on demand by

any user by means of the 'IMP ERROR' command, as shown on the sample

typescript.

The figures shown cover the period since the system was last

restarted. They are not logged or recorded in any more permanent

form due to extremely limited on-line storage at HARV-10. where

the software was implemented. However, due to the small size of

the system and infrequent monitor development work, HARV-10 tends

to stay up for periods approaching the interval between hardware

maintenance, which is one week. The attached output was oBTained

after 168 hours system uptime.

There are a few things I would like to point out that may be of

interest to NCP implementers.

First, note that the number of discarded (uneXPected) RFNMs is equal

to the number of simulated (timed out) RFNMs. This has been the case

almost every time I have looked at these statistics. It suggests

that the RFNMs are not being lost but are rather delayed beyond the

NCP timeout interval, which I believe is 30 seconds.

I have heard talk among a few people in the Network community

about "lost RFNMs", and would like to suggest this as a possible

alternative explanation. Perhaps longer timeouts are in order.

Second, the observed ratio of received allocates to transmitted

allocates (on the order of two to one) is also fairly typical. I

believe this reflects differences in allocation strategies among

various hosts.

Many hosts appear to send out an allocate for every data message

received. While this is reasonable for connections sUCh as FTP

data transfer connections, it imposes considerable extra traffic

in the case of the single character messages that seem to be the

most common on the network.

-1-

The strategy used by the Harvard NCP is to assign a "desired level

of allocation" figure to each socket (typically quite small for

Telnet connections and large for FTP data connections; it is a

user program settable parameter). When the actual allocation for

the socket falls below 50% of this level, enough additional

allocation is sent to bring it up to the full "desired level".

The effect of this strategy is to significantly reduce the number

of allocates returned for a given number of small messages

received. This reduces both network traffic and control message

overhead at the other end. The strategy has no effect on FTP data

messages, since each message is usually large enough to reduce

outstanding allocation by at least half at a single blow.

Finally, I should remark on the appallingly large number of NOPs

received (typically 25% of all control messages). Most of these seem

to be piggy-backed onto other control messages, so the situation is

not as awful as the figures would indicate. Nevertheless, I am

forced to wonder why anyone would want to send so many.

TELNET typescript file started at THU 31 JAN 74 428:05

#harv-10 (settings loaded) is complete.#

Harvard 5.06A-18 7:28:38

Type "HELP" if you need it.

.login 62,#

JOB 2 Harvard 5.06A-18 TTY25

Your name please (last name first): Taft

You are logged in as 62,404000

0728 31-Jan-74 Thur

SCHEDULED PM ON THURSDAYS, 0830-1200 EOT

.imp error

NCP version 1573.1604 operating statistics

07:29:02 31-JAN-74

NCP (link 0) message errors:

Socket not found: 2184

-2-

Improper state: 323

Illegal message type: 2

Last discarded allocation from PARC-MAXC (XEROX) link 12

Timed-out exec ICPs: 3

NCP messages:

Type Received Sent

NOP 81850 0

RTS 3688 2507

STR 2388 3562

CLS 6055 6059

ALL 183050 101442

GVB 772 0

RET 0 772

INS 109 0

ECO 7472 15426

ERP 15065 7472

ERR 2 0

RST 2782 226

RRP 162 2782

Received NCP error messages:

Type Count

4 2

Most recent error: type 4 from UCLA-CCN

Data (octal) 4 74 0 10 0 0 74 254 0 200

(decimal) 4 60 0 8 0 0 60 172 0 128

IMP data message faults:

Hardware fault: 2

Link not found: 8

Discarded RFNMs: 10

Simulated (timed out) RFNMs: 10

Received IMP messages:

Regular 590812

Err w/o id 3

NOP 4

RFNM 490095

Dest dead 366

Inc trans 52

IMP reset 2

Histogram of received data message sizes

Bits Count

<1 3

<16 146834

<32 39751

-3-

<64 7044

<128 196983

<256 46099

<512 147609

<1024 534

<2048 1820

<4096 1152

<8192 2979

72 free buffers

7% average buffer utilization

.kjob/k

Job 2, User [62,404000] Logged off TTY25 0729 31-Jan-74

Runtime 0 Min, 03.29 Sec

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航