分享
 
 
 

RFC2965 - HTTP State Management Mechanism

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group D. Kristol

Request for Comments: 2965 Bell Laboratories, LUCent Technologies

Obsoletes: 2109 L. Montulli

Category: Standards Track Epinions.com, Inc.

October 2000

HTTP State Management Mechanism

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the

Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet

Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state

and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.

IESG Note

The IESG notes that this mechanism makes use of the .local top-level

domain (TLD) internally when handling host names that don't contain

any dots, and that this mechanism might not work in the eXPected way

should an actual .local TLD ever be registered.

Abstract

This document specifies a way to create a stateful session with

Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) requests and responses. It

describes three new headers, Cookie, Cookie2, and Set-Cookie2, which

carry state information between participating origin servers and user

agents. The method described here differs from Netscape's Cookie

proposal [Netscape], but it can interoperate with HTTP/1.0 user

agents that use Netscape's method. (See the HISTORICAL section.)

This document reflects implementation experience with RFC2109 and

obsoletes it.

1. TERMINOLOGY

The terms user agent, client, server, proxy, origin server, and

http_URL have the same meaning as in the HTTP/1.1 specification

[RFC2616]. The terms abs_path and absoluteURI have the same meaning

as in the URI Syntax specification [RFC2396].

Host name (HN) means either the host domain name (HDN) or the numeric

Internet Protocol (IP) address of a host. The fully qualified domain

name is preferred; use of numeric IP addresses is strongly

discouraged.

The terms request-host and request-URI refer to the values the client

would send to the server as, respectively, the host (but not port)

and abs_path portions of the absoluteURI (http_URL) of the HTTP

request line. Note that request-host is a HN.

The term effective host name is related to host name. If a host name

contains no dots, the effective host name is that name with the

string .local appended to it. Otherwise the effective host name is

the same as the host name. Note that all effective host names

contain at least one dot.

The term request-port refers to the port portion of the absoluteURI

(http_URL) of the HTTP request line. If the absoluteURI has no

explicit port, the request-port is the HTTP default, 80. The

request-port of a cookie is the request-port of the request in which

a Set-Cookie2 response header was returned to the user agent.

Host names can be specified either as an IP address or a HDN string.

Sometimes we compare one host name with another. (Such comparisons

SHALL be case-insensitive.) Host A's name domain-matches host B's if

* their host name strings string-compare equal; or

* A is a HDN string and has the form NB, where N is a non-empty

name string, B has the form .B', and B' is a HDN string. (So,

x.y.com domain-matches .Y.com but not Y.com.)

Note that domain-match is not a commutative operation: a.b.c.com

domain-matches .c.com, but not the reverse.

The reach R of a host name H is defined as follows:

* If

- H is the host domain name of a host; and,

- H has the form A.B; and

- A has no embedded (that is, interior) dots; and

- B has at least one embedded dot, or B is the string "local".

then the reach of H is .B.

* Otherwise, the reach of H is H.

For two strings that represent paths, P1 and P2, P1 path-matches P2

if P2 is a prefix of P1 (including the case where P1 and P2 string-

compare equal). Thus, the string /tec/waldo path-matches /tec.

Because it was used in Netscape's original implementation of state

management, we will use the term cookie to refer to the state

information that passes between an origin server and user agent, and

that gets stored by the user agent.

1.1 Requirements

The key Words "MAY", "MUST", "MUST NOT", "OPTIONAL", "RECOMMENDED",

"REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT" in this

document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [RFC2119].

2. STATE AND SESSIONS

This document describes a way to create stateful sessions with HTTP

requests and responses. Currently, HTTP servers respond to each

client request without relating that request to previous or

subsequent requests; the state management mechanism allows clients

and servers that wish to exchange state information to place HTTP

requests and responses within a larger context, which we term a

"session". This context might be used to create, for example, a

"shopping cart", in which user selections can be aggregated before

purchase, or a magazine browsing system, in which a user's previous

reading affects which offerings are presented.

Neither clients nor servers are required to support cookies. A

server MAY refuse to provide content to a client that does not return

the cookies it sends.

3. DESCRIPTION

We describe here a way for an origin server to send state information

to the user agent, and for the user agent to return the state

information to the origin server. The goal is to have a minimal

impact on HTTP and user agents.

3.1 Syntax: General

The two state management headers, Set-Cookie2 and Cookie, have common

syntactic properties involving attribute-value pairs. The following

grammar uses the notation, and tokens DIGIT (decimal digits), token

(informally, a sequence of non-special, non-white space characters),

and http_URL from the HTTP/1.1 specification [RFC2616] to describe

their syntax.

av-pairs = av-pair *(";" av-pair)

av-pair = attr ["=" value] ; optional value

attr = token

value = token quoted-string

Attributes (names) (attr) are case-insensitive. White space is

permitted between tokens. Note that while the above syntax

description shows value as optional, most attrs require them.

NOTE: The syntax above allows whitespace between the attribute and

the = sign.

3.2 Origin Server Role

3.2.1 General The origin server initiates a session, if it so

desires. To do so, it returns an extra response header to the

client, Set-Cookie2. (The details follow later.)

A user agent returns a Cookie request header (see below) to the

origin server if it chooses to continue a session. The origin server

MAY ignore it or use it to determine the current state of the

session. It MAY send back to the client a Set-Cookie2 response

header with the same or different information, or it MAY send no

Set-Cookie2 header at all. The origin server effectively ends a

session by sending the client a Set-Cookie2 header with Max-Age=0.

Servers MAY return Set-Cookie2 response headers with any response.

User agents SHOULD send Cookie request headers, subject to other

rules detailed below, with every request.

An origin server MAY include multiple Set-Cookie2 headers in a

response. Note that an intervening gateway could fold multiple such

headers into a single header.

3.2.2 Set-Cookie2 Syntax The syntax for the Set-Cookie2 response

header is

set-cookie = "Set-Cookie2:" cookies

cookies = 1#cookie

cookie = NAME "=" VALUE *(";" set-cookie-av)

NAME = attr

VALUE = value

set-cookie-av = "Comment" "=" value

"CommentURL" "=" <"> http_URL <">

"Discard"

"Domain" "=" value

"Max-Age" "=" value

"Path" "=" value

"Port" [ "=" <"> portlist <"> ]

"Secure"

"Version" "=" 1*DIGIT

portlist = 1#portnum

portnum = 1*DIGIT

Informally, the Set-Cookie2 response header comprises the token Set-

Cookie2:, followed by a comma-separated list of one or more cookies.

Each cookie begins with a NAME=VALUE pair, followed by zero or more

semi-colon-separated attribute-value pairs. The syntax for

attribute-value pairs was shown earlier. The specific attributes and

the semantics of their values follows. The NAME=VALUE attribute-

value pair MUST come first in each cookie. The others, if present,

can occur in any order. If an attribute appears more than once in a

cookie, the client SHALL use only the value associated with the first

appearance of the attribute; a client MUST ignore values after the

first.

The NAME of a cookie MAY be the same as one of the attributes in this

specification. However, because the cookie's NAME must come first in

a Set-Cookie2 response header, the NAME and its VALUE cannot be

confused with an attribute-value pair.

NAME=VALUE

REQUIRED. The name of the state information ("cookie") is NAME,

and its value is VALUE. NAMEs that begin with $ are reserved and

MUST NOT be used by applications.

The VALUE is opaque to the user agent and may be anything the

origin server chooses to send, possibly in a server-selected

printable ASCII encoding. "Opaque" implies that the content is of

interest and relevance only to the origin server. The content

may, in fact, be readable by anyone that examines the Set-Cookie2

header.

Comment=value

OPTIONAL. Because cookies can be used to derive or store private

information about a user, the value of the Comment attribute

allows an origin server to document how it intends to use the

cookie. The user can inspect the information to decide whether to

initiate or continue a session with this cookie. Characters in

value MUST be in UTF-8 encoding. [RFC2279]

CommentURL="http_URL"

OPTIONAL. Because cookies can be used to derive or store private

information about a user, the CommentURL attribute allows an

origin server to document how it intends to use the cookie. The

user can inspect the information identified by the URL to decide

whether to initiate or continue a session with this cookie.

Discard

OPTIONAL. The Discard attribute instructs the user agent to

discard the cookie unconditionally when the user agent terminates.

Domain=value

OPTIONAL. The value of the Domain attribute specifies the domain

for which the cookie is valid. If an explicitly specified value

does not start with a dot, the user agent supplies a leading dot.

Max-Age=value

OPTIONAL. The value of the Max-Age attribute is delta-seconds,

the lifetime of the cookie in seconds, a decimal non-negative

integer. To handle cached cookies correctly, a client SHOULD

calculate the age of the cookie according to the age calculation

rules in the HTTP/1.1 specification [RFC2616]. When the age is

greater than delta-seconds seconds, the client SHOULD discard the

cookie. A value of zero means the cookie SHOULD be discarded

immediately.

Path=value

OPTIONAL. The value of the Path attribute specifies the subset of

URLs on the origin server to which this cookie applies.

Port[="portlist"]

OPTIONAL. The Port attribute restricts the port to which a cookie

may be returned in a Cookie request header. Note that the syntax

REQUIREs quotes around the OPTIONAL portlist even if there is only

one portnum in portlist.

Secure

OPTIONAL. The Secure attribute (with no value) directs the user

agent to use only (unspecified) secure means to contact the origin

server whenever it sends back this cookie, to protect the

confidentially and authenticity of the information in the cookie.

The user agent (possibly with user interaction) MAY determine what

level of security it considers appropriate for "secure" cookies.

The Secure attribute should be considered security advice from the

server to the user agent, indicating that it is in the session's

interest to protect the cookie contents. When it sends a "secure"

cookie back to a server, the user agent SHOULD use no less than

the same level of security as was used when it received the cookie

from the server.

Version=value

REQUIRED. The value of the Version attribute, a decimal integer,

identifies the version of the state management specification to

which the cookie conforms. For this specification, Version=1

applies.

3.2.3 Controlling Caching An origin server must be cognizant of the

effect of possible caching of both the returned resource and the

Set-Cookie2 header. Caching "public" documents is desirable. For

example, if the origin server wants to use a public document such as

a "front door" page as a sentinel to indicate the beginning of a

session for which a Set-Cookie2 response header must be generated,

the page SHOULD be stored in caches "pre-expired" so that the origin

server will see further requests. "Private documents", for example

those that contain information strictly private to a session, SHOULD

NOT be cached in shared caches.

If the cookie is intended for use by a single user, the Set-Cookie2

header SHOULD NOT be cached. A Set-Cookie2 header that is intended

to be shared by multiple users MAY be cached.

The origin server SHOULD send the following additional HTTP/1.1

response headers, depending on circumstances:

* To suppress caching of the Set-Cookie2 header:

Cache-control: no-cache="set-cookie2"

and one of the following:

* To suppress caching of a private document in shared caches:

Cache-control: private

* To allow caching of a document and require that it be validated

before returning it to the client:

Cache-Control: must-revalidate, max-age=0

* To allow caching of a document, but to require that proxy

caches (not user agent caches) validate it before returning it

to the client:

Cache-Control: proxy-revalidate, max-age=0

* To allow caching of a document and request that it be validated

before returning it to the client (by "pre-expiring" it):

Cache-control: max-age=0

Not all caches will revalidate the document in every case.

HTTP/1.1 servers MUST send Expires: old-date (where old-date is a

date long in the past) on responses containing Set-Cookie2 response

headers unless they know for certain (by out of band means) that

there are no HTTP/1.0 proxies in the response chain. HTTP/1.1

servers MAY send other Cache-Control directives that permit caching

by HTTP/1.1 proxies in addition to the Expires: old-date directive;

the Cache-Control directive will override the Expires: old-date for

HTTP/1.1 proxies.

3.3 User Agent Role

3.3.1 Interpreting Set-Cookie2 The user agent keeps separate track

of state information that arrives via Set-Cookie2 response headers

from each origin server (as distinguished by name or IP address and

port). The user agent MUST ignore attribute-value pairs whose

attribute it does not recognize. The user agent applies these

defaults for optional attributes that are missing:

Discard The default behavior is dictated by the presence or absence

of a Max-Age attribute.

Domain Defaults to the effective request-host. (Note that because

there is no dot at the beginning of effective request-host,

the default Domain can only domain-match itself.)

Max-Age The default behavior is to discard the cookie when the user

agent exits.

Path Defaults to the path of the request URL that generated the

Set-Cookie2 response, up to and including the right-most /.

Port The default behavior is that a cookie MAY be returned to any

request-port.

Secure If absent, the user agent MAY send the cookie over an

insecure channel.

3.3.2 Rejecting Cookies To prevent possible security or privacy

violations, a user agent rejects a cookie according to rules below.

The goal of the rules is to try to limit the set of servers for which

a cookie is valid, based on the values of the Path, Domain, and Port

attributes and the request-URI, request-host and request-port.

A user agent rejects (SHALL NOT store its information) if the Version

attribute is missing. Moreover, a user agent rejects (SHALL NOT

store its information) if any of the following is true of the

attributes explicitly present in the Set-Cookie2 response header:

* The value for the Path attribute is not a prefix of the

request-URI.

* The value for the Domain attribute contains no embedded dots,

and the value is not .local.

* The effective host name that derives from the request-host does

not domain-match the Domain attribute.

* The request-host is a HDN (not IP address) and has the form HD,

where D is the value of the Domain attribute, and H is a string

that contains one or more dots.

* The Port attribute has a "port-list", and the request-port was

not in the list.

Examples:

* A Set-Cookie2 from request-host y.x.foo.com for Domain=.foo.com

would be rejected, because H is y.x and contains a dot.

* A Set-Cookie2 from request-host x.foo.com for Domain=.foo.com

would be accepted.

* A Set-Cookie2 with Domain=.com or Domain=.com., will always be

rejected, because there is no embedded dot.

* A Set-Cookie2 with Domain=ajax.com will be accepted, and the

value for Domain will be taken to be .ajax.com, because a dot

gets prepended to the value.

* A Set-Cookie2 with Port="80,8000" will be accepted if the

request was made to port 80 or 8000 and will be rejected

otherwise.

* A Set-Cookie2 from request-host example for Domain=.local will

be accepted, because the effective host name for the request-

host is example.local, and example.local domain-matches .local.

3.3.3 Cookie Management If a user agent receives a Set-Cookie2

response header whose NAME is the same as that of a cookie it has

previously stored, the new cookie supersedes the old when: the old

and new Domain attribute values compare equal, using a case-

insensitive string-compare; and, the old and new Path attribute

values string-compare equal (case-sensitive). However, if the Set-

Cookie2 has a value for Max-Age of zero, the (old and new) cookie is

discarded. Otherwise a cookie persists (resources permitting) until

whichever happens first, then gets discarded: its Max-Age lifetime is

exceeded; or, if the Discard attribute is set, the user agent

terminates the session.

Because user agents have finite space in which to store cookies, they

MAY also discard older cookies to make space for newer ones, using,

for example, a least-recently-used algorithm, along with constraints

on the maximum number of cookies that each origin server may set.

If a Set-Cookie2 response header includes a Comment attribute, the

user agent SHOULD store that information in a human-readable form

with the cookie and SHOULD display the comment text as part of a

cookie inspection user interface.

If a Set-Cookie2 response header includes a CommentURL attribute, the

user agent SHOULD store that information in a human-readable form

with the cookie, or, preferably, SHOULD allow the user to follow the

http_URL link as part of a cookie inspection user interface.

The cookie inspection user interface may include a facility whereby a

user can decide, at the time the user agent receives the Set-Cookie2

response header, whether or not to accept the cookie. A potentially

confusing situation could arise if the following sequence occurs:

* the user agent receives a cookie that contains a CommentURL

attribute;

* the user agent's cookie inspection interface is configured so

that it presents a dialog to the user before the user agent

accepts the cookie;

* the dialog allows the user to follow the CommentURL link when

the user agent receives the cookie; and,

* when the user follows the CommentURL link, the origin server

(or another server, via other links in the returned content)

returns another cookie.

The user agent SHOULD NOT send any cookies in this context. The user

agent MAY discard any cookie it receives in this context that the

user has not, through some user agent mechanism, deemed acceptable.

User agents SHOULD allow the user to control cookie destruction, but

they MUST NOT extend the cookie's lifetime beyond that controlled by

the Discard and Max-Age attributes. An infrequently-used cookie may

function as a "preferences file" for network applications, and a user

may wish to keep it even if it is the least-recently-used cookie. One

possible implementation would be an interface that allows the

permanent storage of a cookie through a checkbox (or, conversely, its

immediate destruction).

Privacy considerations dictate that the user have considerable

control over cookie management. The PRIVACY section contains more

information.

3.3.4 Sending Cookies to the Origin Server When it sends a request

to an origin server, the user agent includes a Cookie request header

if it has stored cookies that are applicable to the request, based on

* the request-host and request-port;

* the request-URI;

* the cookie's age.

The syntax for the header is:

cookie = "Cookie:" cookie-version 1*((";" ",") cookie-value)

cookie-value = NAME "=" VALUE [";" path] [";" domain] [";" port]

cookie-version = "$Version" "=" value

NAME = attr

VALUE = value

path = "$Path" "=" value

domain = "$Domain" "=" value

port = "$Port" [ "=" <"> value <"> ]

The value of the cookie-version attribute MUST be the value from the

Version attribute of the corresponding Set-Cookie2 response header.

Otherwise the value for cookie-version is 0. The value for the path

attribute MUST be the value from the Path attribute, if one was

present, of the corresponding Set-Cookie2 response header. Otherwise

the attribute SHOULD be omitted from the Cookie request header. The

value for the domain attribute MUST be the value from the Domain

attribute, if one was present, of the corresponding Set-Cookie2

response header. Otherwise the attribute SHOULD be omitted from the

Cookie request header.

The port attribute of the Cookie request header MUST mirror the Port

attribute, if one was present, in the corresponding Set-Cookie2

response header. That is, the port attribute MUST be present if the

Port attribute was present in the Set-Cookie2 header, and it MUST

have the same value, if any. Otherwise, if the Port attribute was

absent from the Set-Cookie2 header, the attribute likewise MUST be

omitted from the Cookie request header.

Note that there is neither a Comment nor a CommentURL attribute in

the Cookie request header corresponding to the ones in the Set-

Cookie2 response header. The user agent does not return the comment

information to the origin server.

The user agent applies the following rules to choose applicable

cookie-values to send in Cookie request headers from among all the

cookies it has received.

Domain Selection

The origin server's effective host name MUST domain-match the

Domain attribute of the cookie.

Port Selection

There are three possible behaviors, depending on the Port

attribute in the Set-Cookie2 response header:

1. By default (no Port attribute), the cookie MAY be sent to any

port.

2. If the attribute is present but has no value (e.g., Port), the

cookie MUST only be sent to the request-port it was received

from.

3. If the attribute has a port-list, the cookie MUST only be

returned if the new request-port is one of those listed in

port-list.

Path Selection

The request-URI MUST path-match the Path attribute of the cookie.

Max-Age Selection

Cookies that have expired should have been discarded and thus are

not forwarded to an origin server.

If multiple cookies satisfy the criteria above, they are ordered in

the Cookie header such that those with more specific Path attributes

precede those with less specific. Ordering with respect to other

attributes (e.g., Domain) is unspecified.

Note: For backward compatibility, the separator in the Cookie header

is semi-colon (;) everywhere. A server SHOULD also accept comma (,)

as the separator between cookie-values for future compatibility.

3.3.5 Identifying What Version is Understood: Cookie2 The Cookie2

request header facilitates interoperation between clients and servers

that understand different versions of the cookie specification. When

the client sends one or more cookies to an origin server, if at least

one of those cookies contains a $Version attribute whose value is

different from the version that the client understands, then the

client MUST also send a Cookie2 request header, the syntax for which

is

cookie2 = "Cookie2:" cookie-version

Here the value for cookie-version is the highest version of cookie

specification (currently 1) that the client understands. The client

needs to send at most one such request header per request.

3.3.6 Sending Cookies in Unverifiable Transactions Users MUST have

control over sessions in order to ensure privacy. (See PRIVACY

section below.) To simplify implementation and to prevent an

additional layer of complexity where adequate safeguards exist,

however, this document distinguishes between transactions that are

verifiable and those that are unverifiable. A transaction is

verifiable if the user, or a user-designated agent, has the option to

review the request-URI prior to its use in the transaction. A

transaction is unverifiable if the user does not have that option.

Unverifiable transactions typically arise when a user agent

automatically requests inlined or embedded entities or when it

resolves redirection (3xx) responses from an origin server.

Typically the origin transaction, the transaction that the user

initiates, is verifiable, and that transaction may directly or

indirectly induce the user agent to make unverifiable transactions.

An unverifiable transaction is to a third-party host if its request-

host U does not domain-match the reach R of the request-host O in the

origin transaction.

When it makes an unverifiable transaction, a user agent MUST disable

all cookie processing (i.e., MUST NOT send cookies, and MUST NOT

accept any received cookies) if the transaction is to a third-party

host.

This restriction prevents a malicious service author from using

unverifiable transactions to induce a user agent to start or continue

a session with a server in a different domain. The starting or

continuation of such sessions could be contrary to the privacy

expectations of the user, and could also be a security problem.

User agents MAY offer configurable options that allow the user agent,

or any autonomous programs that the user agent executes, to ignore

the above rule, so long as these override options default to "off".

(N.B. Mechanisms may be proposed that will automate overriding the

third-party restrictions under controlled conditions.)

Many current user agents already provide a review option that would

render many links verifiable. For instance, some user agents display

the URL that would be referenced for a particular link when the mouse

pointer is placed over that link. The user can therefore determine

whether to visit that site before causing the browser to do so.

(Though not implemented on current user agents, a similar technique

could be used for a button used to submit a form -- the user agent

could display the action to be taken if the user were to select that

button.) However, even this would not make all links verifiable; for

example, links to automatically loaded images would not normally be

subject to "mouse pointer" verification.

Many user agents also provide the option for a user to view the Html

source of a document, or to save the source to an external file where

it can be viewed by another application. While such an option does

provide a crude review mechanism, some users might not consider it

acceptable for this purpose.

3.4 How an Origin Server Interprets the Cookie Header

A user agent returns much of the information in the Set-Cookie2

header to the origin server when the request-URI path-matches the

Path attribute of the cookie. When it receives a Cookie header, the

origin server SHOULD treat cookies with NAMEs whose prefix is $

specially, as an attribute for the cookie.

3.5 Caching Proxy Role

One reason for separating state information from both a URL and

document content is to facilitate the scaling that caching permits.

To support cookies, a caching proxy MUST obey these rules already in

the HTTP specification:

* Honor requests from the cache, if possible, based on cache

validity rules.

* Pass along a Cookie request header in any request that the

proxy must make of another server.

* Return the response to the client. Include any Set-Cookie2

response header.

* Cache the received response subject to the control of the usual

headers, such as Expires,

Cache-control: no-cache

and

Cache-control: private

* Cache the Set-Cookie2 subject to the control of the usual

header,

Cache-control: no-cache="set-cookie2"

(The Set-Cookie2 header should usually not be cached.)

Proxies MUST NOT introduce Set-Cookie2 (Cookie) headers of their own

in proxy responses (requests).

4. EXAMPLES

4.1 Example 1

Most detail of request and response headers has been omitted. Assume

the user agent has no stored cookies.

1. User Agent -> Server

POST /acme/login HTTP/1.1

[form data]

User identifies self via a form.

2. Server -> User Agent

HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Set-Cookie2: Customer="WILE_E_COYOTE"; Version="1"; Path="/acme"

Cookie reflects user's identity.

3. User Agent -> Server

POST /acme/pickitem HTTP/1.1

Cookie: $Version="1"; Customer="WILE_E_COYOTE"; $Path="/acme"

[form data]

User selects an item for "shopping basket".

4. Server -> User Agent

HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Set-Cookie2: Part_Number="Rocket_Launcher_0001"; Version="1";

Path="/acme"

Shopping basket contains an item.

5. User Agent -> Server

POST /acme/shipping HTTP/1.1

Cookie: $Version="1";

Customer="WILE_E_COYOTE"; $Path="/acme";

Part_Number="Rocket_Launcher_0001"; $Path="/acme"

[form data]

User selects shipping method from form.

6. Server -> User Agent

HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Set-Cookie2: Shipping="FedEx"; Version="1"; Path="/acme"

New cookie reflects shipping method.

7. User Agent -> Server

POST /acme/process HTTP/1.1

Cookie: $Version="1";

Customer="WILE_E_COYOTE"; $Path="/acme";

Part_Number="Rocket_Launcher_0001"; $Path="/acme";

Shipping="FedEx"; $Path="/acme"

[form data]

User chooses to process order.

8. Server -> User Agent

HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Transaction is complete.

The user agent makes a series of requests on the origin server, after

each of which it receives a new cookie. All the cookies have the

same Path attribute and (default) domain. Because the request-URIs

all path-match /acme, the Path attribute of each cookie, each request

contains all the cookies received so far.

4.2 Example 2

This example illustrates the effect of the Path attribute. All

detail of request and response headers has been omitted. Assume the

user agent has no stored cookies.

Imagine the user agent has received, in response to earlier requests,

the response headers

Set-Cookie2: Part_Number="Rocket_Launcher_0001"; Version="1";

Path="/acme"

and

Set-Cookie2: Part_Number="Riding_Rocket_0023"; Version="1";

Path="/acme/ammo"

A subsequent request by the user agent to the (same) server for URLs

of the form /acme/ammo/... would include the following request

header:

Cookie: $Version="1";

Part_Number="Riding_Rocket_0023"; $Path="/acme/ammo";

Part_Number="Rocket_Launcher_0001"; $Path="/acme"

Note that the NAME=VALUE pair for the cookie with the more specific

Path attribute, /acme/ammo, comes before the one with the less

specific Path attribute, /acme. Further note that the same cookie

name appears more than once.

A subsequent request by the user agent to the (same) server for a URL

of the form /acme/parts/ would include the following request header:

Cookie: $Version="1"; Part_Number="Rocket_Launcher_0001";

$Path="/acme"

Here, the second cookie's Path attribute /acme/ammo is not a prefix

of the request URL, /acme/parts/, so the cookie does not get

forwarded to the server.

5. IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS

Here we provide guidance on likely or desirable details for an origin

server that implements state management.

5.1 Set-Cookie2 Content

An origin server's content should probably be divided into disjoint

application areas, some of which require the use of state

information. The application areas can be distinguished by their

request URLs. The Set-Cookie2 header can incorporate information

about the application areas by setting the Path attribute for each

one.

The session information can obviously be clear or encoded text that

describes state. However, if it grows too large, it can become

unwieldy. Therefore, an implementor might choose for the session

information to be a key to a server-side resource. Of course, using

a database creates some problems that this state management

specification was meant to avoid, namely:

1. keeping real state on the server side;

2. how and when to garbage-collect the database entry, in case the

user agent terminates the session by, for example, exiting.

5.2 Stateless Pages

Caching benefits the scalability of WWW. Therefore it is important

to reduce the number of documents that have state embedded in them

inherently. For example, if a shopping-basket-style application

always displays a user's current basket contents on each page, those

pages cannot be cached, because each user's basket's contents would

be different. On the other hand, if each page contains just a link

that allows the user to "Look at My Shopping Basket", the page can be

cached.

5.3 Implementation Limits

Practical user agent implementations have limits on the number and

size of cookies that they can store. In general, user agents' cookie

support should have no fixed limits. They should strive to store as

many frequently-used cookies as possible. Furthermore, general-use

user agents SHOULD provide each of the following minimum capabilities

individually, although not necessarily simultaneously:

* at least 300 cookies

* at least 4096 bytes per cookie (as measured by the characters

that comprise the cookie non-terminal in the syntax description

of the Set-Cookie2 header, and as received in the Set-Cookie2

header)

* at least 20 cookies per unique host or domain name

User agents created for specific purposes or for limited-capacity

devices SHOULD provide at least 20 cookies of 4096 bytes, to ensure

that the user can interact with a session-based origin server.

The information in a Set-Cookie2 response header MUST be retained in

its entirety. If for some reason there is inadequate space to store

the cookie, it MUST be discarded, not truncated.

Applications should use as few and as small cookies as possible, and

they should cope gracefully with the loss of a cookie.

5.3.1 Denial of Service Attacks User agents MAY choose to set an

upper bound on the number of cookies to be stored from a given host

or domain name or on the size of the cookie information. Otherwise a

malicious server could attempt to flood a user agent with many

cookies, or large cookies, on successive responses, which would force

out cookies the user agent had received from other servers. However,

the minima specified above SHOULD still be supported.

6. PRIVACY

Informed consent should guide the design of systems that use cookies.

A user should be able to find out how a web site plans to use

information in a cookie and should be able to choose whether or not

those policies are acceptable. Both the user agent and the origin

server must assist informed consent.

6.1 User Agent Control

An origin server could create a Set-Cookie2 header to track the path

of a user through the server. Users may object to this behavior as

an intrusive accumulation of information, even if their identity is

not evident. (Identity might become evident, for example, if a user

subsequently fills out a form that contains identifying information.)

This state management specification therefore requires that a user

agent give the user control over such a possible intrusion, although

the interface through which the user is given this control is left

unspecified. However, the control mechanisms provided SHALL at least

allow the user

* to completely disable the sending and saving of cookies.

* to determine whether a stateful session is in progress.

* to control the saving of a cookie on the basis of the cookie's

Domain attribute.

Such control could be provided, for example, by mechanisms

* to notify the user when the user agent is about to send a

cookie to the origin server, to offer the option not to begin a

session.

* to display a visual indication that a stateful session is in

progress.

* to let the user decide which cookies, if any, should be saved

when the user concludes a window or user agent session.

* to let the user examine and delete the contents of a cookie at

any time.

A user agent usually begins execution with no remembered state

information. It SHOULD be possible to configure a user agent never

to send Cookie headers, in which case it can never sustain state with

an origin server. (The user agent would then behave like one that is

unaware of how to handle Set-Cookie2 response headers.)

When the user agent terminates execution, it SHOULD let the user

discard all state information. Alternatively, the user agent MAY ask

the user whether state information should be retained; the default

should be "no". If the user chooses to retain state information, it

would be restored the next time the user agent runs.

NOTE: User agents should probably be cautious about using files to

store cookies long-term. If a user runs more than one instance of

the user agent, the cookies could be commingled or otherwise

corrupted.

6.2 Origin Server Role

An origin server SHOULD promote informed consent by adding CommentURL

or Comment information to the cookies it sends. CommentURL is

preferred because of the opportunity to provide richer information in

a multiplicity of languages.

6.3 Clear Text

The information in the Set-Cookie2 and Cookie headers is unprotected.

As a consequence:

1. Any sensitive information that is conveyed in them is exposed

to intruders.

2. A malicious intermediary could alter the headers as they travel

in either direction, with unpredictable results.

These facts imply that information of a personal and/or financial

nature should only be sent over a secure channel. For less sensitive

information, or when the content of the header is a database key, an

origin server should be vigilant to prevent a bad Cookie value from

causing failures.

A user agent in a shared user environment poses a further risk.

Using a cookie inspection interface, User B could examine the

contents of cookies that were saved when User A used the machine.

7. SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS

7.1 Protocol Design

The restrictions on the value of the Domain attribute, and the rules

concerning unverifiable transactions, are meant to reduce the ways

that cookies can "leak" to the "wrong" site. The intent is to

restrict cookies to one host, or a closely related set of hosts.

Therefore a request-host is limited as to what values it can set for

Domain. We consider it acceptable for hosts host1.foo.com and

host2.foo.com to share cookies, but not a.com and b.com.

Similarly, a server can set a Path only for cookies that are related

to the request-URI.

7.2 Cookie Spoofing

Proper application design can avoid spoofing attacks from related

domains. Consider:

1. User agent makes request to victim.cracker.edu, gets back

cookie session_id="1234" and sets the default domain

victim.cracker.edu.

2. User agent makes request to spoof.cracker.edu, gets back cookie

session-id="1111", with Domain=".cracker.edu".

3. User agent makes request to victim.cracker.edu again, and

passes

Cookie: $Version="1"; session_id="1234",

$Version="1"; session_id="1111"; $Domain=".cracker.edu"

The server at victim.cracker.edu should detect that the second

cookie was not one it originated by noticing that the Domain

attribute is not for itself and ignore it.

7.3 Unexpected Cookie Sharing

A user agent SHOULD make every attempt to prevent the sharing of

session information between hosts that are in different domains.

Embedded or inlined objects may cause particularly severe privacy

problems if they can be used to share cookies between disparate

hosts. For example, a malicious server could embed cookie

information for host a.com in a URI for a CGI on host b.com. User

agent implementors are strongly encouraged to prevent this sort of

exchange whenever possible.

7.4 Cookies For Account Information

While it is common practice to use them this way, cookies are not

designed or intended to be used to hold authentication information,

such as account names and passwords. Unless such cookies are

exchanged over an encrypted path, the account information they

contain is highly vulnerable to perusal and theft.

8. OTHER, SIMILAR, PROPOSALS

Apart from RFC2109, three other proposals have been made to

accomplish similar goals. This specification began as an amalgam of

Kristol's State-Info proposal [DMK95] and Netscape's Cookie proposal

[Netscape].

Brian Behlendorf proposed a Session-ID header that would be user-

agent-initiated and could be used by an origin server to track

"clicktrails". It would not carry any origin-server-defined state,

however. Phillip Hallam-Baker has proposed another client-defined

session ID mechanism for similar purposes.

While both session IDs and cookies can provide a way to sustain

stateful sessions, their intended purpose is different, and,

consequently, the privacy requirements for them are different. A

user initiates session IDs to allow servers to track progress through

them, or to distinguish multiple users on a shared machine. Cookies

are server-initiated, so the cookie mechanism described here gives

users control over something that would otherwise take place without

the users' awareness. Furthermore, cookies convey rich, server-

selected information, whereas session IDs comprise user-selected,

simple information.

9. HISTORICAL

9.1 Compatibility with Existing Implementations

Existing cookie implementations, based on the Netscape specification,

use the Set-Cookie (not Set-Cookie2) header. User agents that

receive in the same response both a Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2

response header for the same cookie MUST discard the Set-Cookie

information and use only the Set-Cookie2 information. Furthermore, a

user agent MUST assume, if it received a Set-Cookie2 response header,

that the sending server complies with this document and will

understand Cookie request headers that also follow this

specification.

New cookies MUST replace both equivalent old- and new-style cookies.

That is, if a user agent that follows both this specification and

Netscape's original specification receives a Set-Cookie2 response

header, and the NAME and the Domain and Path attributes match (per

the Cookie Management section) a Netscape-style cookie, the

Netscape-style cookie MUST be discarded, and the user agent MUST

retain only the cookie adhering to this specification.

Older user agents that do not understand this specification, but that

do understand Netscape's original specification, will not recognize

the Set-Cookie2 response header and will receive and send cookies

according to the older specification.

A user agent that supports both this specification and Netscape-style

cookies SHOULD send a Cookie request header that follows the older

Netscape specification if it received the cookie in a Set-Cookie

response header and not in a Set-Cookie2 response header. However,

it SHOULD send the following request header as well:

Cookie2: $Version="1"

The Cookie2 header advises the server that the user agent understands

new-style cookies. If the server understands new-style cookies, as

well, it SHOULD continue the stateful session by sending a Set-

Cookie2 response header, rather than Set-Cookie. A server that does

not understand new-style cookies will simply ignore the Cookie2

request header.

9.2 Caching and HTTP/1.0

Some caches, such as those conforming to HTTP/1.0, will inevitably

cache the Set-Cookie2 and Set-Cookie headers, because there was no

mechanism to suppress caching of headers prior to HTTP/1.1. This

caching can lead to security problems. Documents transmitted by an

origin server along with Set-Cookie2 and Set-Cookie headers usually

either will be uncachable, or will be "pre-expired". As long as

caches obey instructions not to cache documents (following Expires:

or Pragma: no-cache (HTTP/1.0), or Cache-

control: no-cache (HTTP/1.1)) uncachable documents present no

problem. However, pre-expired documents may be stored in caches.

They require validation (a conditional GET) on each new request, but

some cache operators loosen the rules for their caches, and sometimes

serve expired documents without first validating them. This

combination of factors can lead to cookies meant for one user later

being sent to another user. The Set-Cookie2 and Set-Cookie headers

are stored in the cache, and, although the document is stale

(expired), the cache returns the document in response to later

requests, including cached headers.

10. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This document really represents the collective efforts of the HTTP

Working Group of the IETF and, particularly, the following people, in

addition to the authors: Roy Fielding, Yaron Goland, Marc Hedlund,

Ted Hardie, Koen Holtman, Shel Kaphan, Rohit Khare, Foteos Macrides,

David W. Morris.

11. AUTHORS' ADDRESSES

David M. Kristol

Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies

600 Mountain Ave. Room 2A-333

Murray Hill, NJ 07974

Phone: (908) 582-2250

Fax: (908) 582-1239

EMail: dmk@bell-labs.com

Lou Montulli

Epinions.com, Inc.

2037 Landings Dr.

Mountain View, CA 94301

EMail: lou@montulli.org

12. REFERENCES

[DMK95] Kristol, D.M., "Proposed HTTP State-Info Mechanism",

available at

labs.com/~dmk/state-info.html>, September, 1995.

[Netscape] "Persistent Client State -- HTTP Cookies", available at

<http://www.netscape.com/newsref/std/cookie_spec.html>,

undated.

[RFC2109] Kristol, D. and L. Montulli, "HTTP State Management

Mechanism", RFC2109, February 1997.

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC2119, March 1997.

[RFC2279] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of Unicode

and ISO-10646", RFC2279, January 1998.

[RFC2396] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform

Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC2396,

August 1998.

[RFC2616] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H. and T.

Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1",

RFC2616, June 1999.

13. Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to

others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it

or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published

and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any

kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are

included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this

document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing

the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other

Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of

developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for

copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be

followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than

English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be

revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an

"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING

TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING

BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION

HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFCEditor function is currently provided by the

Internet Society.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有