分享
 
 
 

RFC1490 - Multiprotocol Interconnect over Frame Relay

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group T. Bradley

Request for Comments: 1490 Wellfleet Communications, Inc.

Obsoletes: 1294 C. Brown

Wellfleet Communications, Inc.

A. Malis

Ascom Timeplex, Inc.

July 1993

Multiprotocol Interconnect over Frame Relay

Status of this Memo

This RFCspecifies an IAB standards track protocol for the Internet

community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.

Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol

Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.

Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

This memo describes an encapsulation method for carrying network

interconnect traffic over a Frame Relay backbone. It covers ASPects

of both Bridging and Routing. Additionally, it describes a simple

fragmentation procedure for carrying large frames over a frame relay

network with a smaller MTU.

Systems with the ability to transfer both the encapsulation method

described in this document, and others must have a priori knowledge

of which virtual circuits will carry which encapsulation method and

this encapsulation must only be used over virtual circuits that have

been eXPlicitly configured for its use.

Acknowledgements

Comments and contributions from many sources, especially those from

Ray Samora of Proteon, Ken Rehbehn of Netrix Corporation, Fred Baker

and Charles Carvalho of Advanced Computer Communications and Mostafa

Sherif of AT&T have been incorporated into this document. Special

thanks to Dory Leifer of University of Michigan for his contributions

to the resolution of fragmentation issues and Floyd Backes from DEC

and Laura Bridge from Timeplex for their contributions to the

bridging descriptions. This document could not have been completed

without the expertise of the IP over Large Public Data Networks

working group of the IETF.

1. Conventions and Acronyms

The following language conventions are used in the items of

specification in this document:

o Must, Shall or Mandatory -- the item is an absolute

requirement of the specification.

o Should or Recommended -- the item should generally be

followed for all but exceptional circumstances.

o May or Optional -- the item is truly optional and may be

followed or ignored according to the needs of the

implementor.

All drawings in this document are drawn with the left-most bit as the

high order bit for transmission. For example, the dawings might be

labeled as:

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 bits

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

+---------------------------+

flag (7E hexadecimal)

+---------------------------+

Q.922 Address*

+-- --+

+---------------------------+

: :

: :

+---------------------------+

Drawings that would be too large to fit onto one page if each octet

were presented on a single line are drawn with two octets per line.

These are also drawn with the left-most bit as the high order bit for

transmission. There will be a "+" to distinguish between octets as

in the following example.

--- octet one ------ octet two ---

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

+--------------------------------------------+

Organizationally Unique

+-- +--------------------+

Identifier Protocol

+-----------------------+--------------------+

Identifier

+-----------------------+

The following are common acronyms used throughout this document.

BECN - Backward Explicit Congestion Notification

BPDU - Bridge Protocol Data Unit

C/R - Command/Response bit

DCE - Data Communication Equipment

DE - Discard Eligibility bit

DTE - Data Terminal Equipment

FECN - Forward Explicit Congestion Notification

PDU - Protocol Data Unit

PTT - Postal Telephone & Telegraph

SNAP - Subnetwork Access Protocol

2. IntrodUCtion

The following discussion applies to those devices which serve as end

stations (DTEs) on a public or private Frame Relay network (for

example, provided by a common carrier or PTT. It will not discuss

the behavior of those stations that are considered a part of the

Frame Relay network (DCEs) other than to explain situations in which

the DTE must react.

The Frame Relay network provides a number of virtual circuits that

form the basis for connections between stations attached to the same

Frame Relay network. The resulting set of interconnected devices

forms a private Frame Relay group which may be either fully

interconnected with a complete "mesh" of virtual circuits, or only

partially interconnected. In either case, each virtual circuit is

uniquely identified at each Frame Relay interface by a Data Link

Connection Identifier (DLCI). In most circumstances, DLCIs have

strictly local significance at each Frame Relay interface.

The specifications in this document are intended to apply to both

switched and permanent virtual circuits.

3. Frame Format

All protocols must encapsulate their packets within a Q.922 Annex A

frame [1,2]. Additionally, frames shall contain information

necessary to identify the protocol carried within the protocol data

unit (PDU), thus allowing the receiver to properly process the

incoming packet. The format shall be as follows:

+---------------------------+

flag (7E hexadecimal)

+---------------------------+

Q.922 Address*

+-- --+

+---------------------------+

Control (UI = 0x03)

+---------------------------+

Optional Pad (0x00)

+---------------------------+

NLPID

+---------------------------+

.

.

.

Data

.

.

+---------------------------+

Frame Check Sequence

+-- . --+

(two octets)

+---------------------------+

flag (7E hexadecimal)

+---------------------------+

* Q.922 addresses, as presently defined, are two octets and

contain a 10-bit DLCI. In some networks Q.922 addresses

may optionally be increased to three or four octets.

The control field is the Q.922 control field. The UI (0x03) value is

used unless it is negotiated otherwise. The use of XID (0xAF or

0xBF) is permitted and is discussed later.

The pad field is used to align the remainder of the frame to a two

octet boundary. There may be zero or one pad octet within the pad

field and, if present, must have a value of zero.

The Network Level Protocol ID (NLPID) field is administered by ISO

and CCITT. It contains values for many different protocols including

IP, CLNP and IEEE Subnetwork Access Protocol (SNAP)[10]. This field

tells the receiver what encapsulation or what protocol follows.

Values for this field are defined in ISO/IEC TR 9577 [3]. A NLPID

value of 0x00 is defined within ISO/IEC TR 9577 as the Null Network

Layer or Inactive Set. Since it cannot be distinguished from a pad

field, and because it has no significance within the context of this

encapsulation scheme, a NLPID value of 0x00 is invalid under the

Frame Relay encapsulation. The Appendix contains a list of some of

the more commonly used NLPID values.

There is no commonly implemented minimum maximum frame size for Frame

Relay. A network must, however, support at least a 262 octet

maximum. Generally, the maximum will be greater than or equal to

1600 octets, but each Frame Relay provider will specify an

appropriate value for its network. A Frame Relay DTE, therefore,

must allow the maximum acceptable frame size to be configurable.

The minimum frame size allowed for Frame Relay is five octets between

the opening and closing flags assuming a two octet Q.922 address

field. This minimum increases to six octets for three octet Q.922

address and seven octets for the four octet Q.922 address format.

4. Interconnect Issues

There are two basic types of data packets that travel within the

Frame Relay network: routed packets and bridged packets. These

packets have distinct formats and therefore, must contain an

indicator that the destination may use to correctly interpret the

contents of the frame. This indicator is embedded within the NLPID

and SNAP header information.

For those protocols that do not have a NLPID already assigned, it is

necessary to provide a mechanism to allow easy protocol

identification. There is a NLPID value defined indicating the

presence of a SNAP header.

A SNAP header is of the form:

+--------------------------------------------+

Organizationally Unique

+-- +--------------------+

Identifier Protocol

+-----------------------+--------------------+

Identifier

+-----------------------+

All stations must be able to accept and properly interpret both the

NLPID encapsulation and the SNAP header encapsulation for a routed

packet.

The three-octet Organizationally Unique Identifier (OUI) identifies

an organization which administers the meaning of the Protocol

Identifier (PID) which follows. Together they identify a distinct

protocol. Note that OUI 0x00-00-00 specifies that the following PID

is an Ethertype.

4.1. Routed Frames

Some protocols will have an assigned NLPID, but because the NLPID

numbering space is so limited, not all protocols have specific NLPID

values assigned to them. When packets of such protocols are routed

over Frame Relay networks, they are sent using the NLPID 0x80 (which

indicates a SNAP follows) followed by SNAP. If the protocol has an

Ethertype assigned, the OUI is 0x00-00-00 (which indicates an

Ethertype follows), and PID is the Ethertype of the protocol in use.

There will be one pad octet to align the protocol data on a two octet

boundary as shown below.

Format of Routed Frames

with Ethertypes

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 pad 0x00

+---------------+---------------+

NLPID 0x80 OUI 0x00

+---------------+ --+

OUI 0x00-00

+-------------------------------+

Ethertype

+-------------------------------+

Protocol Data

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

In the few cases when a protocol has an assigned NLPID (see

appendix), 48 bits can be saved using the format below:

Format of Routed NLPID Protocol

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 NLPID

+---------------+---------------+

Protocol Data

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

The NLPID encapsulation does not require a pad octet for alignment,

so none is permitted.

In the case of ISO protocols, the NLPID is considered to be the first

octet of the protocol data. It is unnecessary to repeat the NLPID in

this case. The single octet serves both as the demultiplexing value

and as part of the protocol data (refer to "Other Protocols over

Frame Relay for more details). Other protocols, such as IP, have a

NLPID defined (0xCC), but it is not part of the protocol itself.

Format of Routed IP Datagram

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 NLPID 0xCC

+---------------+---------------+

IP Datagram

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

4.2. Bridged Frames

The second type of Frame Relay traffic is bridged packets. These

packets are encapsulated using the NLPID value of 0x80 indicating

SNAP. As with other SNAP encapsulated protocols, there will be one

pad octet to align the data portion of the encapsulated frame. The

SNAP header which follows the NLPID identifies the format of the

bridged packet. The OUI value used for this encapsulation is the

802.1 organization code 0x00-80-C2. The PID portion of the SNAP

header (the two bytes immediately following the OUI) specifies the

form of the MAC header, which immediately follows the SNAP header.

Additionally, the PID indicates whether the original FCS is preserved

within the bridged frame.

The 802.1 organization has reserved the following values to be used

with Frame Relay:

PID Values for OUI 0x00-80-C2

with preserved FCS w/o preserved FCS Media

------------------ ----------------- ----------------

0x00-01 0x00-07 802.3/Ethernet

0x00-02 0x00-08 802.4

0x00-03 0x00-09 802.5

0x00-04 0x00-0A FDDI

0x00-0B 802.6

In addition, the PID value 0x00-0E, when used with OUI 0x00-80-C2,

identifies bridged protocol data units (BPDUs) as defined by

802.1(d) or 802.1(g) [12].

A packet bridged over Frame Relay will, therefore, have one of the

following formats:

Format of Bridged Ethernet/802.3 Frame

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 pad 0x00

+---------------+---------------+

NLPID 0x80 OUI 0x00

+---------------+ --+

OUI 0x80-C2

+-------------------------------+

PID 0x00-01 or 0x00-07

+-------------------------------+

MAC destination address

: :

+-------------------------------+

(remainder of MAC frame)

+-------------------------------+

LAN FCS (if PID is 0x00-01)

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

Format of Bridged 802.4 Frame

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 pad 0x00

+---------------+---------------+

NLPID 0x80 OUI 0x00

+---------------+ --+

OUI 0x80-C2

+-------------------------------+

PID 0x00-02 or 0x00-08

+---------------+---------------+

pad 0x00 Frame Control

+---------------+---------------+

MAC destination address

: :

+-------------------------------+

(remainder of MAC frame)

+-------------------------------+

LAN FCS (if PID is 0x00-02)

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

Format of Bridged 802.5 Frame

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 pad 0x00

+---------------+---------------+

NLPID 0x80 OUI 0x00

+---------------+ --+

OUI 0x80-C2

+-------------------------------+

PID 0x00-03 or 0x00-09

+---------------+---------------+

pad 0x00 Frame Control

+---------------+---------------+

MAC destination address

: :

+-------------------------------+

(remainder of MAC frame)

+-------------------------------+

LAN FCS (if PID is 0x00-03)

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

Format of Bridged FDDI Frame

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 pad 0x00

+---------------+---------------+

NLPID 0x80 OUI 0x00

+---------------+ --+

OUI 0x80-C2

+-------------------------------+

PID 0x00-04 or 0x00-0A

+---------------+---------------+

pad 0x00 Frame Control

+---------------+---------------+

MAC destination address

: :

+-------------------------------+

(remainder of MAC frame)

+-------------------------------+

LAN FCS (if PID is 0x00-04)

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

Format of Bridged 802.6 Frame

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 pad 0x00

+---------------+---------------+

NLPID 0x80 OUI 0x00

+---------------+ --+

OUI 0x80-C2

+-------------------------------+

PID 0x00-0B

+---------------+---------------+ -------

Reserved BEtag Common

+---------------+---------------+ PDU

BAsize Header

+-------------------------------+ -------

MAC destination address

: :

+-------------------------------+

(remainder of MAC frame)

+-------------------------------+

+- Common PDU Trailer -+

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

Note that in bridge 802.6 PDUs, there is only one choice for the PID

value, since the presence of a CRC-32 is indicated by the CIB bit in

the header of the MAC frame.

The Common Protocol Data Unit (CPDU) Header and Trailer are conveyed

to allow pipelining at the egress bridge to an 802.6 subnetwork.

Specifically, the CPDU Header contains the BAsize field, which

contains the length of the PDU. If this field is not available to

the egress 802.6 bridge, then that bridge cannot begin to transmit

the segmented PDU until it has received the entire PDU, calculated

the length, and inserted the length into the BAsize field. If the

field is available, the egress 802.6 bridge can extract the length

from the BAsize field of the Common PDU Header, insert it into the

corresponding field of the first segment, and immediately transmit

the segment onto the 802.6 subnetwork. Thus, the bridge can begin

transmitting the 802.6 PDU before it has received the complete PDU.

One should note that the Common PDU Header and Trailer of the

encapsulated frame should not be simply copied to the outgoing 802.6

subnetwork because the encapsulated BEtag value may conflict with the

previous BEtag value transmitted by that bridge.

Format of BPDU Frame

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+-------------------------------+

Control 0x03

+-------------------------------+

PAD 0x00

+-------------------------------+

NLPID 0x80

+-------------------------------+

OUI 0x00-80-C2

+-------------------------------+

PID 0x00-0E

+-------------------------------+

BPDU as defined by

802.1(d) or 802.1(g)[12]

+-------------------------------+

4. Data Link Layer Parameter Negotiation

Frame Relay stations may choose to support the Exchange

Identification (XID) specified in Appendix III of Q.922 [1]. This

XID exchange allows the following parameters to be negotiated at the

initialization of a Frame Relay circuit: maximum frame size N201,

retransmission timer T200, and the maximum number of outstanding

Information (I) frames K.

A station may indicate its unwillingness to support acknowledged mode

multiple frame operation by specifying a value of zero for the

maximum window size, K.

If this exchange is not used, these values must be statically

configured by mutual agreement of Data Link Connection (DLC)

endpoints, or must be defaulted to the values specified in Section

5.9 of Q.922:

N201: 260 octets

K: 3 for a 16 Kbps link,

7 for a 64 Kbps link,

32 for a 384 Kbps link,

40 for a 1.536 Mbps or above link

T200: 1.5 seconds [see Q.922 for further details]

If a station supporting XID receives an XID frame, it shall respond

with an XID response. In processing an XID, if the remote maximum

frame size is smaller than the local maximum, the local system shall

reduce the maximum size it uses over this DLC to the remotely

specified value. Note that this shall be done before generating a

response XID.

The following diagram describes the use of XID to specify non-use of

acknowledged mode multiple frame operation.

Non-use of Acknowledged Mode Multiple Frame Operation

+---------------+

Address (2,3 or 4 octets)

+---------------+

Control 0xAF

+---------------+

format 0x82

+---------------+

Group ID 0x80

+---------------+

Group Length (2 octets)

0x00-0E

+---------------+

0x05 PI = Frame Size (transmit)

+---------------+

0x02 PL = 2

+---------------+

Maximum (2 octets)

Frame Size

+---------------+

0x06 PI = Frame Size (receive)

+---------------+

0x02 PL = 2

+---------------+

Maximum (2 octets)

Frame Size

+---------------+

0x07 PI = Window Size

+---------------+

0x01 PL = 1

+---------------+

0x00

+---------------+

0x09 PI = Retransmission Timer

+---------------+

0x01 PL = 1

+---------------+

0x00

+---------------+

FCS (2 octets)

+---------------+

6. Fragmentation Issues

Fragmentation allows the exchange of packets that are greater than

the maximum frame size supported by the underlying network. In the

case of Frame Relay, the network may support a maximum frame size as

small as 262 octets. Because of this small maximum size, it is

recommended, but not required, to support fragmentation and

reassembly.

Unlike IP fragmentation procedures, the scope of Frame Relay

fragmentation procedure is limited to the boundary (or DTEs) of the

Frame Relay network.

The general format of fragmented packets is the same as any other

encapsulated protocol. The most significant difference being that

the fragmented packet will contain the encapsulation header. That

is, a packet is first encapsulated (with the exception of the address

and control fields) as defined above. Large packets are then broken

up into frames appropriate for the given Frame Relay network and are

encapsulated using the Frame Relay fragmentation format. In this

way, a station receiving fragments may reassemble them and then put

the reassembled packet through the same processing path as a packet

that had not been fragmented.

Within Frame Relay fragments are encapsulated using the SNAP format

with an OUI of 0x00-80-C2 and a PID of 0x00-0D. Individual fragments

will, therefore, have the following format:

+---------------+---------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 pad 0x00

+---------------+---------------+

NLPID 0x80 OUI 0x00

+---------------+---------------+

OUI 0x80-C2

+---------------+---------------+

PID 0x00-0D

+---------------+---------------+

sequence number

+-+-------+-----+---------------+

F RSVD offset

+-+-------+-----+---------------+

fragment data

.

.

.

+---------------+---------------+

FCS

+---------------+---------------+

The sequence field is a two octet identifier that is incremented

every time a new complete message is fragmented. It allows detection

of lost frames and is set to a random value at initialization.

The reserved field is 4 bits long and is not currently defined. It

must be set to 0.

The final bit is a one bit field set to 1 on the last fragment and

set to 0 for all other fragments.

The offset field is an 11 bit value representing the logical offset

of this fragment in bytes divided by 32. The first fragment must have

an offset of zero.

The following figure shows how a large IP datagram is fragmented over

Frame Relay. In this example, the complete datagram is fragmented

into two Frame Relay frames.

Frame Relay Fragmentation Example

+-----------+-----------+

Q.922 Address

+-----------+-----------+

Ctrl 0x03 pad 0x00

+-----------+-----------+

NLPID 0x80 OUI 0x00

+-----------+-----------+

OUI 0x80-C2

+-----------+-----------+ +-----------+-----------+

ctrl 0x03 NLPID 0xCC PID 0x00-0D

+-----------+-----------+ +-----------+-----------+

sequence number n

+-+------+--+-----------+

0 RSVD offset (0)

+-+------+--+-----------+

ctrl 0x03 NLPID 0xCC

+-----------+-----------+

first m bytes of

large IP datagram ... IP datagram

+-----------+-----------+

FCS

+-----------+-----------+

+-----------+-----------+

Q.922 Address

+-----------+-----------+

Ctrl 0x03 pad 0x00

+-----------+-----------+ +-----------+-----------+

NLPID 0x80 OUI 0x00

+-----------+-----------+

OUI 0x80-C2

+-----------+-----------+

PID 0x00-0D

+-----------+-----------+

sequence number n

+-+------+--+-----------+

1 RSVD offset (m/32)

+-+------+--+-----------+

remainder of IP

datagram

+-----------+-----------+

FCS

+-----------+-----------+

Fragments must be sent in order starting with a zero offset and

ending with the final fragment. These fragments must not be

interrupted with other packets or information intended for the same

DLC. An end station must be able to re-assemble up to 2K octets and

is suggested to support up to 8K octet re-assembly. If at any time

during this re-assembly process, a fragment is corrupted or a

fragment is missing, the entire message is dropped. The upper layer

protocol is responsible for any retransmission in this case. Note

that there is no reassembly timer, nor is one needed. This is

because the Frame Relay service is required to deliver frames in

order.

This fragmentation algorithm is not intended to reliably handle all

possible failure conditions. As with IP fragmentation, there is a

small possibility of reassembly error and delivery of an erroneous

packet. Inclusion of a higher layer checksum greatly reduces this

risk.

7. Address Resolution

There are situations in which a Frame Relay station may wish to

dynamically resolve a protocol address. Address resolution may be

accomplished using the standard Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) [6]

encapsulated within a SNAP encoded Frame Relay packet as follows:

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

Q.922 Address

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

Control (UI) 0x03 pad 0x00

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

NLPID = 0x80 SNAP Header

+-----------------------+ OUI = 0x00-00-00 + Indicating

ARP

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

PID = 0x0806

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

ARP packet

.

.

.

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

Where the ARP packet has the following format and values:

Data:

ar$hrd 16 bits Hardware type

ar$pro 16 bits Protocol type

ar$hln 8 bits Octet length of hardware address (n)

ar$pln 8 bits Octet length of protocol address (m)

ar$op 16 bits Operation code (request or reply)

ar$sha noctets source hardware address

ar$spa moctets source protocol address

ar$tha noctets target hardware address

ar$tpa moctets target protocol address

ar$hrd - assigned to Frame Relay is 15 decimal

(0x000F) [7].

ar$pro - see assigned numbers for protocol ID number for

the protocol using ARP. (IP is 0x0800).

ar$hln - length in bytes of the address field (2, 3, or 4)

ar$pln - protocol address length is dependent on the

protocol (ar$pro) (for IP ar$pln is 4).

ar$op - 1 for request and 2 for reply.

ar$sha - Q.922 source hardware address, with C/R, FECN,

BECN, and DE set to zero.

ar$tha - Q.922 target hardware address, with C/R, FECN,

BECN, and DE set to zero.

Because DLCIs within most Frame Relay networks have only local

significance, an end station will not have a specific DLCI assigned

to itself. Therefore, such a station does not have an address to put

into the ARP request or reply. Fortunately, the Frame Relay network

does provide a method for oBTaining the correct DLCIs. The solution

proposed for the locally addressed Frame Relay network below will

work equally well for a network where DLCIs have global significance.

The DLCI carried within the Frame Relay header is modified as it

traverses the network. When the packet arrives at its destination,

the DLCI has been set to the value that, from the standpoint of the

receiving station, corresponds to the sending station. For example,

in figure 1 below, if station A were to send a message to station B,

it would place DLCI 50 in the Frame Relay header. When station B

received this message, however, the DLCI would have been modified by

the network and would appear to B as DLCI 70.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

( )

+-----+ ( ) +-----+

-50------(--------------------)---------70-

A ( ) B

-60-----(---------+ )

+-----+ ( ) +-----+

( )

( ) <---Frame Relay

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ network

80

+-----+

C

+-----+

Figure 1

Lines between stations represent data link connections (DLCs).

The numbers indicate the local DLCI associated with each

connection.

DLCI to Q.922 Address Table for Figure 1

DLCI (decimal) Q.922 address (hex)

50 0x0C21

60 0x0CC1

70 0x1061

80 0x1401

If you know about frame relay, you should understand the

correlation between DLCI and Q.922 address. For the uninitiated,

the translation between DLCI and Q.922 address is based on a two

byte address length using the Q.922 encoding format. The format

is:

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

+------------------------+---+--+

DLCI (high order) c/rea

+--------------+----+----+---+--+

DLCI (lower) FECNBECNDE EA

+--------------+----+----+---+--+

For ARP and its variants, the FECN, BECN, C/R and DE bits are

assumed to be 0.

When an ARP message reaches a destination, all hardware addresses

will be invalid. The address found in the frame header will,

however, be correct. Though it does violate the purity of layering,

Frame Relay may use the address in the header as the sender hardware

address. It should also be noted that the target hardware address,

in both ARP request and reply, will also be invalid. This should not

cause problems since ARP does not rely on these fields and in fact,

an implementation may zero fill or ignore the target hardware address

field entirely.

As an example of how this address replacement scheme may work, refer

to figure 1. If station A (protocol address pA) wished to resolve

the address of station B (protocol address pB), it would format an

ARP request with the following values:

ARP request from A

ar$op 1 (request)

ar$sha unknown

ar$spa pA

ar$tha undefined

ar$tpa pB

Because station A will not have a source address associated with it,

the source hardware address field is not valid. Therefore, when the

ARP packet is received, it must extract the correct address from the

Frame Relay header and place it in the source hardware address field.

This way, the ARP request from A will become:

ARP request from A as modified by B

ar$op 1 (request)

ar$sha 0x1061 (DLCI 70) from Frame Relay header

ar$spa pA

ar$tha undefined

ar$tpa pB

Station B's ARP will then be able to store station A's protocol

address and Q.922 address association correctly. Next, station B

will form a reply message. Many implementations simply place the

source addresses from the ARP request into the target addresses and

then fills in the source addresses with its addresses. In this case,

the ARP response would be:

ARP response from B

ar$op 2 (response)

ar$sha unknown

ar$spa pB

ar$tha 0x1061 (DLCI 70)

ar$tpa pA

Again, the source hardware address is unknown and when the request is

received, station A will extract the address from the Frame Relay

header and place it in the source hardware address field. Therefore,

the response will become:

ARP response from B as modified by A

ar$op 2 (response)

ar$sha 0x0C21 (DLCI 50)

ar$spa pB

ar$tha 0x1061 (DLCI 70)

ar$tpa pA

Station A will now correctly recognize station B having protocol

address pB associated with Q.922 address 0x0C21 (DLCI 50).

Reverse ARP (RARP) [8] will work in exactly the same way. Still

using figure 1, if we assume station C is an address server, the

following RARP exchanges will occur:

RARP request from A RARP request as modified by C

ar$op 3 (RARP request) ar$op 3 (RARP request)

ar$sha unknown ar$sha 0x1401 (DLCI 80)

ar$spa undefined ar$spa undefined

ar$tha 0x0CC1 (DLCI 60) ar$tha 0x0CC1 (DLCI 60)

ar$tpa pC ar$tpa pC

Station C will then look up the protocol address corresponding to

Q.922 address 0x1401 (DLCI 80) and send the RARP response.

RARP response from C RARP response as modified by A

ar$op 4 (RARP response) ar$op 4 (RARP response)

ar$sha unknown ar$sha 0x0CC1 (DLCI 60)

ar$spa pC ar$spa pC

ar$tha 0x1401 (DLCI 80) ar$tha 0x1401 (DLCI 80)

ar$tpa pA ar$tpa pA

This means that the Frame Relay interface must only intervene in the

processing of incoming packets.

In the absence of suitable multicast, ARP may still be implemented.

To do this, the end station simply sends a copy of the ARP request

through each relevant DLC, thereby simulating a broadcast.

The use of multicast addresses in a Frame Relay environment is

presently under study by Frame Relay providers. At such time that

the issues surrounding multicasting are resolved, multicast

addressing may become useful in sending ARP requests and other

"broadcast" messages.

Because of the inefficiencies of broadcasting in a Frame Relay

environment, a new address resolution variation was developed. It is

called Inverse ARP [11] and describes a method for resolving a

protocol address when the hardware address is already known. In

Frame Relay's case, the known hardware address is the DLCI. Using

Inverse ARP for Frame Relay follows the same pattern as ARP and RARP

use. That is the source hardware address is inserted at the

receiving station.

In our example, station A may use Inverse ARP to discover the

protocol address of the station associated with its DLCI 50. The

Inverse ARP request would be as follows:

InARP Request from A (DLCI 50)

ar$op 8 (InARP request)

ar$sha unknown

ar$spa pA

ar$tha 0x0C21 (DLCI 50)

ar$tpa unknown

When Station B receives this packet, it will modify the source

hardware address with the Q.922 address from the Frame Relay header.

This way, the InARP request from A will become:

ar$op 8 (InARP request)

ar$sha 0x1061

ar$spa pA

ar$tha 0x0C21

ar$tpa unknown.

Station B will format an Inverse ARP response and send it to station

A as it would for any ARP message.

8. IP over Frame Relay

Internet Protocol [9] (IP) datagrams sent over a Frame Relay network

conform to the encapsulation described previously. Within this

context, IP could be encapsulated in two different ways.

1. NLPID value indicating IP

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

Q.922 Address

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

Control (UI) 0x03 NLPID = 0xCC

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

IP Packet .

.

.

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

2. NLPID value indicating SNAP

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

Q.922 Address

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

Control (UI) 0x03 pad 0x00

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

NLPID = 0x80 SNAP Header

+-----------------------+ OUI = 0x00-00-00 + Indicating

IP

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

PID = 0x0800

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

IP packet

.

.

.

+-----------------------+-----------------------+

Although both of these encapsulations are supported under the given

definitions, it is advantageous to select only one method as the

appropriate mechanism for encapsulating IP data. Therefore, IP data

shall be encapsulated using the NLPID value of 0xCC indicating IP as

shown in option 1 above. This (option 1) is more efficient in

transmission (48 fewer bits), and is consistent with the

encapsulation of IP in X.25.

9. Other Protocols over Frame Relay

As with IP encapsulation, there are alternate ways to transmit

various protocols within the scope of this definition. To eliminate

the conflicts, the SNAP encapsulation is only used if no NLPID value

is defined for the given protocol.

As an example of how this works, ISO CLNP has a NLPID defined (0x81).

Therefore, the NLPID field will indicate ISO CLNP and the data packet

will follow immediately. The frame would be as follows:

+---------------------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+----------------------+----------------------+

Control (0x03) NLPID - 0x81 (CLNP)

+----------------------+----------------------+

remainder of CLNP packet

.

.

+---------------------------------------------+

In this example, the NLPID is used to identify the data packet as

CLNP. It is also considered part of the CLNP packet and as such, the

NLPID should not be removed before being sent to the upper layers for

processing. The NLPID is not duplicated.

Other protocols, such as IPX, do not have a NLPID value defined. As

mentioned above, IPX would be encapsulated using the SNAP header. In

this case, the frame would be as follows:

+---------------------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+----------------------+----------------------+

Control 0x03 pad 0x00

+----------------------+----------------------+

NLPID - 0x80 (SNAP) OUI - 0x00 00 00

+----------------------+

+---------------------------------------------+

PID = 0x8137

+---------------------------------------------+

IPX packet

.

.

+---------------------------------------------+

10. Bridging Model for Frame Relay

The model for bridging in a Frame Relay network is identical to the

model for remote bridging as described in IEEE P802.1g "Remote MAC

Bridging" [13] and supports the concept of "Virtual Ports". Remote

bridges with LAN ports receive and transmit MAC frames to and from

the LANS to which they are attached. They may also receive and

transmit MAC frames through virtual ports to and from other remote

bridges. A virtual port may represent an abstraction of a remote

bridge's point of access to one, two or more other remote bridges.

Remote Bridges are statically configured as members of a remote

bridge group by management. All members of a remote bridge group are

connected by one or more virtual ports. The set of remote MAC bridges

in a remote bridge group provides actual or *potential* MAC layer

interconnection between a set of LANs and other remote bridge groups

to which the remote bridges attach.

In a Frame Relay network there must be a full mesh of Frame Relay VCs

between bridges of a remote bridge group. If the frame relay network

is not a full mesh, then the bridge network must be divided into

multiple remote bridge groups.

The frame relay VCs that interconnect the bridges of a remote bridge

group may be combined or used individually to form one or more

virtual bridge ports. This gives flexibility to treat the Frame

Relay interface either as a single virtual bridge port, with all VCs

in a group, or as a collection of bridge ports (individual or grouped

VCs).

When a single virtual bridge port provides the interconnectivity for

all bridges of a given remote bridge group (i.e. all VCs are combined

into a single virtual port), the standard Spanning Tree Algorithm may

be used to determine the state of the virtual port. When more than

one virtual port is configured within a given remote bridge group

then an "extended" Spanning Tree Algorithm is required. Such an

extended algorithm is defined in IEEE 802.1g [13]. The operation of

this algorithm is such that a virtual port is only put into backup if

there is a loop in the network external to the remote bridge group.

The simplest bridge configuration for a Frame Relay network is the

LAN view where all VCs are combined into a single virtual port.

Frames, such as BPDUs, which would be broadcast on a LAN, must be

flooded to each VC (or multicast if the service is developed for

Frame Relay services). Flooding is performed by sending the packet to

each relevant DLC associated with the Frame Relay interface. The VCs

in this environment are generally invisible to the bridge. That is,

the bridge sends a flooded frame to the frame relay interface and

does not "see" that the frame is being forwarded to each VC

individually. If all participating bridges are fully connected (full

mesh) the standard Spanning Tree Algorithm will suffice in this

configuration.

Typically LAN bridges learn which interface a particular end station

may be reached on by associating a MAC address with a bridge port.

In a Frame Relay network configured for the LAN-like single bridge

port (or any set of VCs grouped together to form a single bridge

port), however, the bridge must not only associated a MAC address

with a bridge port, but it must also associate it with a connection

identifier. For Frame Relay networks, this connection identifier is

a DLCI. It is unreasonable and perhaps impossible to require bridges

to statically configure an association of every possible destination

MAC address with a DLC. Therefore, Frame Relay LAN-modeled bridges

must provide a mechanism to allow the Frame Relay bridge port to

dynamically learn the associations. To accomplish this dynamic

learning, a bridged packet shall conform to the encapsulation

described within section 7. In this way, the receiving Frame Relay

interface will know to look into the bridged packet to gather the

appropriate information.

A second Frame Relay bridging approach, the point-to-point view,

treats each Frame Relay VC as a separate bridge port. Flooding and

forwarding packets are significantly less complicated using the

point-to-point approach because each bridge port has only one

destination. There is no need to perform artificial flooding or to

associate DLCIs with destination MAC addresses. Depending upon the

interconnection of the VCs, an extended Spanning Tree algorithm may

be required to permit all virtual ports to remain active as long as

there are no true loops in the topology external to the remote bridge

group.

It is also possible to combine the LAN view and the point-to-point

view on a single Frame Relay interface. To do this, certain VCs are

combined to form a single virtual bridge port while other VCs are

independent bridge ports.

The following drawing illustrates the different possible bridging

configurations. The dashed lines between boxes represent virtual

circuits.

+-------+

------------------- B

/ -------

/ / +-------+

/

+-------+/ \ +-------+

A ------- C

-----------------------

+-------+\ +-------+

\ +-------+

\ D

-------------------

+-------+

Since there is less than a full mesh of VCs between the bridges in

this example, the network must be divided into more than one remote

bridge group. A reasonable configuration is to have bridges A, B,

and C in one group, and have bridges A and D in a second.

Configuration of the first bridge group combines the VCs

interconnection the three bridges (A, B, and C) into a single virtual

port. This is an example of the LAN view configuration. The second

group would also be a single virtual port which simply connects

bridges A and D. In this configuration the standard Spanning Tree

Algorithm is sufficient to detect loops.

An alternative configuration has three individual virtual ports in

the first group corresponding to the VCs interconnecting bridges A, B

and C. Since the application of the standard Spanning Tree Algorithm

to this configuration would detect a loop in the topology, an

extended Spanning Tree Algorithm would have to be used in order for

all virtual ports to be kept active. Note that the second group

would still consist of a single virtual port and the standard

Spanning Tree Algorithm could be used in this group.

Using the same drawing, one could construct a remote bridge scenario

with three bridge groups. This would be an example of the point-to-

point case. Here, the VC connecting A and B, the VC connecting A and

C, and the VC connecting A and D are all bridge groups with a single

virtual port.

11. Appendix A

List of Commonly Used NLPIDs

0x00 Null Network Layer or Inactive Set

(not used with Frame Relay)

0x80 SNAP

0x81 ISO CLNP

0x82 ISO ESIS

0x83 ISO ISIS

0xCC Internet IP

List of PIDs of OUI 00-80-C2

with preserved FCS w/o preserved FCS Media

------------------ ----------------- --------------

0x00-01 0x00-07 802.3/Ethernet

0x00-02 0x00-08 802.4

0x00-03 0x00-09 802.5

0x00-04 0x00-0A FDDI

0x00-0B 802.6

0x00-0D Fragments

0x00-0E BPDUs as defined by

802.1(d) or

802.1(g)[12].

12. Appendix B - Connection Oriented procedures.

This appendix contains additional information and instructions for

using CCITT Q.933 and other CCITT standards for encapsulating data

over frame relay. The information contained here is similar (and in

some cases identical) to that found in Annex F to ANSI T1.617 written

by Rao Cherukuri of IBM. The authoritative source for this

information is in Annex F and is repeated here only for convenience.

The Network Level Protocol ID (NLPID) field is administered by ISO

and CCITT. It contains values for many different protocols including

IP, CLNP (ISO 8473) CCITT Q.933, and ISO 8208. A figure summarizing

a generic encapsulation technique over frame relay networks follows.

The scheme's flexibility consists in the identification of multiple

alternative to identify different protocols used either by

- end-to-end systems or

- LAN to LAN bride and routers or

- a combination of the above.

over frame relay networks.

Q.922 control

--------------------------------------------

UI I Frame

--------------------------------- --------------

0x08 0x81 0xCC 0x80 ..01.... ..10....

Q.933 CLNP IP SNAP ISO 8208 ISO 8208

Modulo 8 Modulo 128

-------------------- OUI

L2 ID L3 ID -------

User

specified

0x70 802.3 802.6

-------------------

0x51 0x4E 0x4C

7776 Q.922 Others 802.2

For those protocols which do not have a NLPID assigned or do not have

a SNAP encapsulation, the NLPID value of 0x08, indicating CCITT

Recommendation Q.933 should be used. The four octets following the

NLPID include both layer 2 and layer 3 protocol identification. The

code points for most protocols are currently defined in ANSI T1.617

low layer compatibility information element. There is also an escape

for defining non-standard protocols.

Format of Other Protocols

using Q.933 NLPID

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 NLPID 0x08

+---------------+---------------+

L2 Protocol ID

octet 1 octet 2

+-------------------------------+

L3 Protocol ID

octet 2 octet 2

+-------------------------------+

Protocol Data

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

ISO 8802/2 with user specified

layer 3

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

Control 0x03 NLPID 0x08

+---------------+---------------+

802/2 0x4C 0x80

+-------------------------------+

User Spec. 0x70 Note 1

+-------------------------------+

DSAP SSAP

+-------------------------------+

Control (Note 2)

+-------------------------------+

Remainder of PDU

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

Note 1: Indicates the code point for user specified

layer 3 protocol.

Note 2: Control field is two octets for I-format and

S-format frames (see 88002/2)

Encapsulations using I frame (layer 2)

The Q.922 I frame is for supporting layer 3 protocols which require

acknowledged data link layer (e.g., ISO 8208). The C/R bit (T1.618

address) will be used for command and response indications.

Format of ISO 8208 frame

Modulo 8

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

....Control I frame

+---------------+---------------+

8208 packet (modulo 8) Note 3

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

Note 3: First octet of 8208 packet also identifies the

NLPID which is "..01....".

Format of ISO 8208 frame

Modulo 128

+-------------------------------+

Q.922 Address

+---------------+---------------+

....Control I frame

+---------------+---------------+

8208 packet (modulo 128)

Note 4

+-------------------------------+

FCS

+-------------------------------+

Note 4: First octet of 8208 packet also identifies the

NLPID which is "..10....".

13. References

[1] International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee,

"ISDN Data Link Layer Specification for Frame Mode Bearer

Services", CCITT Recommendation Q.922, 19 April 1991.

[2] American National Standard For Telecommunications - Integrated

Services Digital Network - Core Aspects of Frame Protocol for Use

with Frame Relay Bearer Service, ANSI T1.618-1991, 18 June 1991.

[3] Information technology - Telecommunications and Information

Exchange between systems - Protocol Identification in the Network

Layer, ISO/IEC TR 9577: 1990 (E) 1990-10-15.

[4] Baker, F., Editor, "Point to Point Protocol Extensions for

Bridging", RFC1220, ACC, April 1991.

[5] International Standard, Information Processing Systems - Local

Area Networks - Logical Link Control, ISO 8802-2: 1989 (E), IEEE

Std 802.2-1989, 1989-12-31.

[6] Plummer, D., "An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol - or -

Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48.bit Ethernet Address

for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware", STD 37, RFC826, MIT,

November 1982.

[7] Reynolds, J. and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD 2, RFC1340,

USC/Information Sciences Institute, July 1992.

[8] Finlayson, R., Mann, R., Mogul, J., and M. Theimer, "A Reverse

Address Resolution Protocol", STD 38, RFC903, Stanford

University, June 1984.

[9] Postel, J. and Reynolds, J., "A Standard for the Transmission of

IP Datagrams over IEEE 802 Networks", RFC1042, USC/Information

Sciences Institute, February 1988.

[10] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks:

Overview and architecture", IEEE Standards 802-1990.

[11] Bradley, T., and C. Brown, "Inverse Address Resolution Protocol",

RFC1293, Wellfleet Communications, Inc., January 1992.

[12] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Networks: Media

Access Control (MAC) Bridges", IEEE Standard 802.1D-1990.

[13] PROJECT 802 - LOCAL AND METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, Draft

Standard 802.1G: Remote MAC Bridging, Draft 6, October 12, 1992.

14. Security Considerations

Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

15. Authors' Addresses

Terry Bradley

Wellfleet Communications, Inc.

15 Crosby Drive

Bedford, MA 01730

Phone: (617) 280-2401

Email: tbradley@wellfleet.com

Caralyn Brown

Wellfleet Communications, Inc.

15 Crosby Drive

Bedford, MA 01730

Phone: (617) 280-2335

Email: cbrown@wellfleet.com

Andrew G. Malis

Ascom Timeplex, Inc.

Advanced Products Business Unit

289 Great Road Suite 205

Acton, MA 01720

Phone: (508) 266-4500

Email: malis_a@timeplex.com

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有