分享
 
 
 

RFC1525 - Definitions of Managed Objects for Source Routing Bridges

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group E. Decker

Request for Comments: 1525 cisco Systems, Inc.

Obsoletes: 1286 K. McCloghrie

Category: Standards Track Hughes LAN Systems, Inc.

P. Langille

DEC

A. Rijsinghani

DEC

September 1993

Definitions of Managed Objects for

Source Routing Bridges

Status of this Memo

This RFCspecifies an Internet standards track protocol for the

Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet

Official Protocol Standards" for the standardization state and status

of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Table of Contents

1. IntrodUCtion ......................................... 2

2. The Network Management Framework ..................... 2

2.1 Object Definitions .................................. 2

3. Overview ............................................. 2

3.1 Structure of MIB .................................... 3

3.1.1 The dot1dSr Group ................................. 4

3.1.2 The dot1dPortPair Group ........................... 4

3.2 Relationship to Other MIBs .......................... 5

3.2.1 Relationship to the Bridge MIB .................... 5

3.2.2 Relationship to the 'system' group ................ 5

3.2.3 Relationship to the 'interfaces' group ............ 5

4. Changes from RFC1286 ................................ 6

5. Definitions .......................................... 7

5.1 Groups in the SR MIB ................................ 7

5.2 The dot1dSr Group Definitions ....................... 7

5.3 The dot1dPortPair Group Definitions ................. 14

6. Acknowledgments ...................................... 16

7. References ........................................... 16

8. Security Considerations .............................. 18

9. Authors' Addresses ................................... 18

1. Introduction

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)

for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP based internets.

In particular, it defines objects for managing source routing and

source routing transparent bridges. These bridges are also required

to implement relevant groups in the Bridge MIB [6].

This MIB supersedes the dot1dSr group of objects published in an

earlier version of the Bridge MIB, RFC1286. Changes have primarily

been made to track changes in the IEEE 802.5M SRT Addendum to the

IEEE 802.1D Standard for MAC Bridges.

2. The Network Management Framework

The Internet-standard Network Management Framework consists of three

components. They are:

o STD 16, RFC1155 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for

describing and naming objects for the purpose of

management. STD 16, RFC1212 defines a more concise description

mechanism, which is wholly consistent with the SMI.

o STD 17, RFC1213 defines MIB-II, the core set of managed objects

for the Internet suite of protocols.

o STD 15, RFC1157 which defines the SNMP, the protocol used for

network Access to managed objects.

The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of

eXPerimentation and evaluation.

2.1. Object Definitions

Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed

the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are

defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)

defined in the SMI. In particular, each object object type is named

by an OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an administratively assigned name. The

object type together with an object instance serves to uniquely

identify a specific instantiation of the object. For human

convenience, we often use a textual string, termed the descriptor, to

refer to the object type.

3. Overview

A common device present in many networks is the Bridge. This device

is used to connect Local Area Network segments below the network

layer. There are two major modes defined for this bridging;

transparent and source route. The transparent method of bridging is

defined in the IEEE 802.1d MAC Bridge specification [11]. Source

route bridging has been defined by I.B.M. and is described in the

Token Ring Architecture Reference [12], as well as the IEEE 802.5M

SRT Bridge Operations Addendum [14] to 802.1d. This memo defines

objects needed for management of a source routing bridge, and is an

extension to the SNMP Bridge MIB [6].

An explicit attempt was made to keep this MIB as simple as possible.

This was accomplished by applying the following criteria to objects

proposed for inclusion:

(1) Start with a small set of essential objects and add only

as further objects are needed.

(2) Require objects be essential for either fault or

configuration management.

(3) Consider evidence of current use and/or utility.

(4) Limit the total of objects.

(5) Exclude objects which are simply derivable from others in

this or other MIBs.

(6) Avoid causing critical sections to be heavily

instrumented. The guideline that was followed is one

counter per critical section per layer.

3.1. Structure of MIB

Objects in this MIB are arranged into groups. Each group is

organized as a set of related objects. The overall structure and

assignment of objects to their groups is shown below. Where

appropriate, the corresponding management object name found in IEEE

802.1d [11] and IEEE 802.5M [14] is also included.

SR Bridge MIB Name IEEE Name

dot1dSr

PortTable

Port

HopCount SourceRoutingPort

.PortHopCount

LocalSegment .SegmentNumber

BridgeNum .BridgeNumber

TargetSegment

LargestFrame .LargestFrameSize

STESpanMode .LimitedBroadcastMode

SpecInFrames BridgePort

.ValidSRFramesReceived

SpecOutFrames .ValidSRForwardedOutbound

ApeInFrames

ApeOutFrames .BroadcastFramesForwarded

SteInFrames

SteOutFrames .BroadcastFramesForwarded

SegmentMismatchDiscards .DiscardInvalidRI

DuplicateSegmentDiscards .LanIdMismatch

HopCountExceededDiscards .FramesDiscardedHopCountExceeded

The following IEEE management objects have not been included in the

SR Bridge MIB for the indicated reasons.

IEEE Object Disposition

SourceRoutingPort

The following objects were NOT

included in this MIB because they

are redundant or not considered

useful.

.LimitedBroadcastEnable

.DiscardLacKOFBuffers

.DiscardErrorDetails

.DiscardTargetLANInoperable

.ValidSRDiscardedInbound

.BroadcastBytesForwarded

.NonBroadcastBytesForwarded

.FramesNotReceivedDueToCongestion

.FramesDiscardedDueToInternalError

3.1.1. The dot1dSr Group

This group contains the objects that describe the entity's state with

respect to source route bridging. If source routing is not

supported, this group will not be implemented. This group is

applicable to source route only, and SRT bridges.

3.1.2. The dot1dPortPair Group

Implementation of this group is optional. This group is implemented

by those bridges that support the port-pair multiport model of the

source route bridging mode as defined in the IEEE 802.5M SRT Addendum

to 802.1d.

3.2. Relationship to Other MIBs

As described above, some IEEE 802.1d management objects have not been

included in this MIB because they overlap with objects in other MIBs

applicable to a bridge implementing this MIB. In particular, it is

assumed that a bridge implementing this MIB will also implement (at

least) the Bridge MIB and the 'system' group and the 'interfaces'

group defined in MIB-II [4].

3.2.1. Relationship to the Bridge MIB

The Bridge MIB [6] must be implemented by all bridges, including

transparent, SR and SRT bridges. The SR bridge MIB is an extension

to the Bridge MIB.

3.2.2. Relationship to the 'system' group

In MIB-II, the 'system' group is defined as being mandatory for all

systems such that each managed entity contains one instance of each

object in the 'system' group. Thus, those objects apply to the

entity as a whole irrespective of whether the entity's sole

functionality is bridging, or whether bridging is only a subset of

the entity's functionality.

3.2.3. Relationship to the 'interfaces' group

In MIB-II, the 'interfaces' group is defined as being mandatory for

all systems and contains information on an entity's interfaces, where

each interface is thought of as being attached to a `subnetwork'.

(Note that this term is not to be confused with `subnet' which refers

to an addressing partitioning scheme used in the Internet suite of

protocols.) The term 'segment' is used in this memo to refer to such

a subnetwork.

Implicit in this MIB is the notion of ports on a bridge. Each of

these ports is associated with one interface of the 'interfaces'

group, and in most situations, each port is associated with a

different interface. However, there are situations in which multiple

ports are associated with the same interface. An example of such a

situation would be several ports, each corresponding one-to-one with

several X.25 virtual circuits, but all on the same interface.

Each port is uniquely identified by a port number. A port number has

no mandatory relationship to an interface number, but in the simple

case, a port number will have the same value as the corresponding

interface's interface number.

Some entities provide other services in addition to bridging with

respect to the data sent and received by their interfaces. In such

situations, only a subset of the data sent/received on an interface

is within the domain of the entity's bridging functionality. This

subset is considered to be delineated according to a set of

protocols, with some protocols being bridged, and other protocols not

being bridged. For example, in an entity which exclusively performed

bridging, all protocols would be considered as being bridged, whereas

in an entity which performed IP routing on IP datagrams and only

bridged other protocols, only the non-IP data would be considered as

being bridged.

Thus, this MIB (and in particular, its counters) are applicable only

to that subset of the data on an entity's interfaces which is

sent/received for a protocol being bridged. All such data is

sent/received via the ports of the bridge.

4. Changes from RFC1286

In addition to being separated from the Bridge MIB into a separate

document, the following changes were implemented as a result of

feedback from IEEE 802.5M:

(1) Changed syntax of dot1dSrPortLargestFrame to INTEGER in

order to allow for having 64 possible values as described

in draft 7 of the SR Addendum. Listed all legal values

in description.

(2) Updated syntax of dot1dSrPort, used to index into

dot1dSrPortTable, to use the range (1..65535).

(3) Added a counter to dot1dSrPortTable to count occurrences

of duplicate LAN IDs or Tree errors.

(4) Added a counter to dot1dSrPortTable to count LAN ID

mismatches.

(5) Added text to dot1dSrPortSpecInFrames and

dot1dSrPortSpecOutFrames clarifying that they are also

referred to as Source Routed Frames.

(6) Added text to dot1dSrPortApeInFrames and

dot1dSrPortApeOutFrames clarifying that they are also

referred to as All Routes Explorer frames.

(7) Added a scalar variable to the dot1dSr group to indicate

whether the bridge uses 3 bit or 6 bit length negotiation

fields.

(8) Added dot1dPortPairGroup to allow representation of port

pairs as defined in the IEEE 802.5M SRT Addendum.

5. Definitions

SOURCE-ROUTING-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS

Counter, Gauge

FROM RFC1155-SMI

dot1dBridge, dot1dSr

FROM BRIDGE-MIB

OBJECT-TYPE

FROM RFC-1212;

-- groups in the SR MIB

-- dot1dSr is imported from the Bridge MIB

dot1dPortPair OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dot1dBridge 10 }

-- the dot1dSr group

-- this group is implemented by those bridges that

-- support the source route bridging mode, including Source

-- Routing and SRT bridges.

dot1dSrPortTable OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF Dot1dSrPortEntry

ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"A table that contains information about every

port that is associated with this source route

bridge."

::= { dot1dSr 1 }

dot1dSrPortEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Dot1dSrPortEntry

ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"A list of information for each port of a source

route bridge."

INDEX { dot1dSrPort }

::= { dot1dSrPortTable 1 }

Dot1dSrPortEntry ::=

SEQUENCE {

dot1dSrPort

INTEGER,

dot1dSrPortHopCount

INTEGER,

dot1dSrPortLocalSegment

INTEGER,

dot1dSrPortBridgeNum

INTEGER,

dot1dSrPortTargetSegment

INTEGER,

dot1dSrPortLargestFrame

INTEGER,

dot1dSrPortSTESpanMode

INTEGER,

dot1dSrPortSpecInFrames

Counter,

dot1dSrPortSpecOutFrames

Counter,

dot1dSrPortApeInFrames

Counter,

dot1dSrPortApeOutFrames

Counter,

dot1dSrPortSteInFrames

Counter,

dot1dSrPortSteOutFrames

Counter,

dot1dSrPortSegmentMismatchDiscards

Counter,

dot1dSrPortDuplicateSegmentDiscards

Counter,

dot1dSrPortHopCountExceededDiscards

Counter,

dot1dSrPortDupLanIdOrTreeErrors

Counter,

dot1dSrPortLanIdMismatches

Counter

}

dot1dSrPort OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER (1..65535)

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The port number of the port for which this entry

contains Source Route management information."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 1 }

dot1dSrPortHopCount OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The maximum number of routing descriptors allowed

in an All Paths or Spanning Tree Explorer frames."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 2 }

dot1dSrPortLocalSegment OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The segment number that uniquely identifies the

segment to which this port is connected. Current

source routing protocols limit this value to the

range: 0 through 4095. (The value 0 is used by

some management applications for special test

cases.) A value of 65535 signifies that no segment

number is assigned to this port."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 3 }

dot1dSrPortBridgeNum OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"A bridge number uniquely identifies a bridge when

more than one bridge is used to span the same two

segments. Current source routing protocols limit

this value to the range: 0 through 15. A value of

65535 signifies that no bridge number is assigned

to this bridge."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 4 }

dot1dSrPortTargetSegment OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The segment number that corresponds to the target

segment this port is considered to be connected to

by the bridge. Current source routing protocols

limit this value to the range: 0 through 4095.

(The value 0 is used by some management

applications for special test cases.) A value of

65535 signifies that no target segment is assigned

to this port."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 5 }

-- It would be nice if we could use ifMtu as the size of the

-- largest frame, but we can't because ifMtu is defined to be

-- the size that the (inter-)network layer can use which can

-- differ from the MAC layer (especially if several layers of

-- encapsulation are used).

dot1dSrPortLargestFrame OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The maximum size of the INFO field (LLC and

above) that this port can send/receive. It does

not include any MAC level (framing) octets. The

value of this object is used by this bridge to

determine whether a modification of the

LargestFrame (LF, see [14]) field of the Routing

Control field of the Routing Information Field is

necessary.

64 valid values are defined by the IEEE 802.5M SRT

Addendum: 516, 635, 754, 873, 993, 1112, 1231,

1350, 1470, 1542, 1615, 1688, 1761, 1833, 1906,

1979, 2052, 2345, 2638, 2932, 3225, 3518, 3812,

4105, 4399, 4865, 5331, 5798, 6264, 6730, 7197,

7663, 8130, 8539, 8949, 9358, 9768, 10178, 10587,

10997, 11407, 12199, 12992, 13785, 14578, 15370,

16163, 16956, 17749, 20730, 23711, 26693, 29674,

32655, 35637, 38618, 41600, 44591, 47583, 50575,

53567, 56559, 59551, and 65535.

An illegal value will not be accepted by the

bridge."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 6 }

dot1dSrPortSTESpanMode OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER {

auto-span(1),

disabled(2),

forced(3)

}

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"Determines how this port behaves when presented

with a Spanning Tree Explorer frame. The value

'disabled(2)' indicates that the port will not

accept or send Spanning Tree Explorer packets; any

STE packets received will be silently discarded.

The value 'forced(3)' indicates the port will

always accept and propagate Spanning Tree Explorer

frames. This allows a manually configured

Spanning Tree for this class of packet to be

configured. Note that unlike transparent

bridging, this is not catastrophic to the network

if there are loops. The value 'auto-span(1)' can

only be returned by a bridge that both implements

the Spanning Tree Protocol and has use of the

protocol enabled on this port. The behavior of the

port for Spanning Tree Explorer frames is

determined by the state of dot1dStpPortState. If

the port is in the 'forwarding' state, the frame

will be accepted or propagated. Otherwise, it

will be silently discarded."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 7 }

dot1dSrPortSpecInFrames OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of Specifically Routed frames, also

referred to as Source Routed Frames, that have

been received from this port's segment."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 8 }

dot1dSrPortSpecOutFrames OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of Specifically Routed frames, also

referred to as Source Routed Frames, that this

port has transmitted on its segment."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 9 }

dot1dSrPortApeInFrames OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of All Paths Explorer frames, also

referred to as All Routes Explorer frames, that

have been received by this port from its segment."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 10 }

dot1dSrPortApeOutFrames OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of all Paths Explorer Frames, also

referred to as All Routes Explorer frames, that

have been transmitted by this port on its

segment."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 11 }

dot1dSrPortSteInFrames OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of spanning tree explorer frames that

have been received by this port from its segment."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 12 }

dot1dSrPortSteOutFrames OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of spanning tree explorer frames that

have been transmitted by this port on its

segment."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 13 }

dot1dSrPortSegmentMismatchDiscards OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of explorer frames that have been

discarded by this port because the routing

descriptor field contained an invalid adjacent

segment value."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 14 }

dot1dSrPortDuplicateSegmentDiscards OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of frames that have been discarded by

this port because the routing descriptor field

contained a duplicate segment identifier."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 15 }

dot1dSrPortHopCountExceededDiscards OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of explorer frames that have been

discarded by this port because the Routing

Information Field has exceeded the maximum route

descriptor length."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 16 }

dot1dSrPortDupLanIdOrTreeErrors OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of duplicate LAN IDs or Tree errors.

This helps in detection of problems in networks

containing older IBM Source Routing Bridges."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 17 }

dot1dSrPortLanIdMismatches OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The number of ARE and STE frames that were

discarded because the last LAN ID in the routing

information field did not equal the LAN-in ID.

This error can occur in implementations which do

only a LAN-in ID and Bridge Number check instead

of a LAN-in ID, Bridge Number, and LAN-out ID

check before they forward broadcast frames."

::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 18 }

-- scalar object in dot1dSr

dot1dSrBridgeLfMode OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER {

mode3(1),

mode6(2)

}

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"Indicates whether the bridge operates using older

3 bit length negotiation fields or the newer 6 bit

length field in its RIF."

::= { dot1dSr 2 }

-- The Port-Pair Database

-- Implementation of this group is optional.

-- This group is implemented by those bridges that support

-- the direct multiport model of the source route bridging

-- mode as defined in the IEEE 802.5 SRT Addendum to

-- 802.1d.

-- Bridges implementing this group may report 65535 for

-- dot1dSrPortBridgeNumber and dot1dSrPortTargetSegment,

-- indicating that those objects are not applicable.

dot1dPortPairTableSize OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Gauge

ACCESS read-only

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The total number of entries in the Bridge Port

Pair Database."

::= { dot1dPortPair 1 }

-- the Bridge Port-Pair table

-- this table represents port pairs within a bridge forming

-- a unique bridge path, as defined in the IEEE 802.5M SRT

-- Addendum.

dot1dPortPairTable OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF Dot1dPortPairEntry

ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"A table that contains information about every

port pair database entity associated with this

source routing bridge."

::= { dot1dPortPair 2 }

dot1dPortPairEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Dot1dPortPairEntry

ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"A list of information for each port pair entity

of a bridge."

INDEX { dot1dPortPairLowPort, dot1dPortPairHighPort }

::= { dot1dPortPairTable 1 }

Dot1dPortPairEntry ::=

SEQUENCE {

dot1dPortPairLowPort

INTEGER,

dot1dPortPairHighPort

INTEGER,

dot1dPortPairBridgeNum

INTEGER,

dot1dPortPairBridgeState

INTEGER

}

dot1dPortPairLowPort OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER (1..65535)

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The port number of the lower numbered port for

which this entry contains port pair database

information."

::= { dot1dPortPairEntry 1 }

dot1dPortPairHighPort OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER (1..65535)

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The port number of the higher numbered port for

which this entry contains port pair database

information."

::= { dot1dPortPairEntry 2 }

dot1dPortPairBridgeNum OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"A bridge number that uniquely identifies the path

provided by this source routing bridge between the

segments connected to dot1dPortPairLowPort and

dot1dPortPairHighPort. The purpose of bridge

number is to disambiguate between multiple paths

connecting the same two LANs."

::= { dot1dPortPairEntry 3 }

dot1dPortPairBridgeState OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER {

enabled(1),

disabled(2),

invalid(3)

}

ACCESS read-write

STATUS mandatory

DESCRIPTION

"The state of dot1dPortPairBridgeNum. Writing

'invalid(3)' to this object removes the

corresponding entry."

::= { dot1dPortPairEntry 4 }

END

6. Acknowledgments

This document was produced on behalf of the Bridge MIB Working Group

in the NM area of the Internet Engineering Task Force.

The authors wish to thank the members of the Bridge MIB Working Group

for their many comments and suggestions which improved this effort.

7. References

[1] Cerf, V., "IAB Recommendations for the Development of Internet

Network Management Standards", RFC1052, NRI, April 1988.

[2] Cerf, V., "Report of the Second Ad Hoc Network Management Review

Group", RFC1109, NRI, August 1989.

[3] Rose M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of

Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets", STD 16, RFC

1155, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN Systems, May

1990.

[4] McCloghrie K., and M. Rose, Editors, "Management Information Base

for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets", STD 17, RFC

1213, Performance Systems International, March 1991.

[5] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "Simple

Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC1157, SNMP Research,

Performance Systems International, Performance Systems

International, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, May 1990.

[6] Decker, E., Langille, P., Rijsinghani, A., and McCloghrie, K.,

"Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges", RFC1493, cisco

Systems, Digital Equipment Corporation, Digital Equipment

Corporation, Hughes LAN Systems, July 1993.

[7] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection -

Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1),

International Organization for Standardization, International

Standard 8824, December 1987.

[8] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection -

Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Notation One

(ASN.1), International Organization for Standardization,

International Standard 8825, December 1987.

[9] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, Editors, "Concise MIB Definitions",

STD 16, RFC1212, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN

Systems, March 1991.

[10] Rose, M., Editor, "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with

the SNMP", RFC1215, Performance Systems International, March

1991.

[11] ANSI/IEEE Standard 802.1D-1990 MAC Bridges, IEEE Project 802

Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, (March 8, 1991).

[12] I.B.M. Token Ring Architecture Reference.

[13] ISO DIS 10038 MAC Bridges.

[14] ANSI/IEEE P802.5M-Draft 7, "Source Routing Transparent Bridge

Operation", IEEE Project 802 (1991).

[15] ANSI/IEEE 802.1y, "Source Routing Tutorial for End System

Operation", (September, 1990).

Security Considerations

Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

Authors' Addresses

Eric B. Decker

cisco Systems, Inc.

1525 O'Brien Dr.

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Phone: (415) 326-1941

Email: cire@cisco.com

Keith McCloghrie

Hughes LAN Systems, Inc.

1225 Charleston Road

Mountain View, CA 94043

Phone: (415) 966-7934

EMail: kzm@hls.com

Paul Langille

Digital Equipment Corporation

Digital Drive, MK02-2/K03

Merrimack, NH 03054

Phone: (603) 884-4045

EMail: langille@edwin.enet.dec.com

Anil Rijsinghani

Digital Equipment Corporation

550 King Street

Littleton, MA 01460

Phone: (508) 486-6786

EMail: anil@levers.enet.dec.com

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有