分享
 
 
 

RFC1763 - The PPP Banyan Vines Control Protocol (BVCP)

王朝vc·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group S. Senum

Request for Comments: 1763 DigiBoard

Category: Standards Track March 1995

The PPP Banyan Vines Control Protocol (BVCP)

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the

Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet

Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state

and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method for

transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links. PPP

defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and proposes a family of

Network Control Protocols for establishing and configuring different

network-layer protocols.

This document defines the Network Control Protocol for establishing

and configuring the Banyan VINES protocol over PPP.

Table of Contents

1. IntrodUCtion .......................................... 2

1.1 Specification of Requirements ................... 2

1.2 Terminology ..................................... 3

2. A PPP Network Control Protocol for VINES .............. 3

2.1 Sending VINES Datagrams ......................... 4

2.2 General Considerations .......................... 4

3. BVCP Configuration Options ............................ 5

3.1 BV-NS-RTP-Link-Type ............................. 5

3.2 BV-FRP .......................................... 6

3.3 BV-RTP .......................................... 7

3.4 BV-Suppress-Broadcast ........................... 8

SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS ...................................... 9

REFERENCES ................................................... 9

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................... 9

CHAIR'S ADDRESS .............................................. 10

AUTHOR'S ADDRESS ............................................. 10

1. Introduction

PPP has three main components:

1. A method for encapsulating multi-protocol datagrams.

2. A Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, configuring,

and testing the data-link connection.

3. A family of Network Control Protocols for establishing and

configuring different network-layer protocols.

In order to establish communications over a point-to-point link, each

end of the PPP link must first send LCP packets to configure and test

the data link. After the link has been established and optional

facilities have been negotiated as needed by the LCP, PPP must send

BVCP packets to choose and configure the VINES network-layer

protocol. Once BVCP has reached the Opened state, VINES datagrams

can be sent over the link.

The link will remain configured for communications until eXPlicit LCP

or BVCP packets close the link down, or until some external event

occurs (an inactivity timer expires or network administrator

intervention).

1.1. Specification of Requirements

In this document, several Words are used to signify the requirements

of the specification. These words are often capitalized.

MUST This word, or the adjective "required", means that the

definition is an absolute requirement of the specification.

MUST NOT This phrase means that the definition is an absolute

prohibition of the specification.

SHOULD This word, or the adjective "recommended", means that there

may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to

ignore this item, but the full implications must be

understood and carefully weighed before choosing a

different course.

MAY This word, or the adjective "optional", means that this

item is one of an allowed set of alternatives. An

implementation which does not include this option MUST be

prepared to interoperate with another implementation which

does include the option.

1.2. Terminology

This document frequently uses the following terms:

datagram The unit of transmission in the network layer (such as IP).

A datagram may be encapsulated in one or more packets

passed to the data link layer.

frame The unit of transmission at the data link layer. A frame

may include a header and/or a trailer, along with some

number of units of data.

packet The basic unit of encapsulation, which is passed across the

interface between the network layer and the data link

layer. A packet is usually mapped to a frame; the

exceptions are when data link layer fragmentation is being

performed, or when multiple packets are incorporated into a

single frame.

peer The other end of the point-to-point link.

silently discard

This means the implementation discards the packet without

further processing. The implementation SHOULD provide the

capability of logging the error, including the contents of

the silently discarded packet, and SHOULD record the event

in a statistics counter.

2. A PPP Network Control Protocol for VINES

The Banyan VINES Control Protocol (BVCP) is responsible for

configuring, enabling, and disabling the VINES protocol modules on

both ends of the point-to-point link. BVCP uses the same packet

exchange mechanism as the Link Control Protocol. BVCP packets may

not be exchanged until PPP has reached the Network-Layer Protocol

phase. BVCP packets received before this phase is reached should be

silently discarded.

The Baynan VINES Control Protocol is exactly the same as the Link

Control Protocol [1] with the following exceptions:

Frame Modifications

The packet may utilize any modifications to the basic frame format

which have been negotiated during the Link Establishment phase.

Data Link Layer Protocol Field

Exactly one BVCP packet is encapsulated in the Information field

of a PPP Data Link Layer frame where the Protocol field indicates

type hex 8035 (Banyan VINES Control Protocol).

Code field

Only Codes 1 through 7 (Configure-Request, Configure-Ack,

Configure-Nak, Configure-Reject, Terminate-Request, Terminate-Ack

and Code-Reject) are used. Other Codes should be treated as

unrecognized and should result in Code-Rejects.

Timeouts

BVCP packets may not be exchanged until PPP has reached the

Network-Layer Protocol phase. An implementation should be

prepared to wait for Authentication and Link Quality Determination

to finish before timing out waiting for a Configure-Ack or other

response. It is suggested that an implementation give up only

after user intervention or a configurable amount of time.

Configuration Option Types

BVCP has a distinct set of Configuration Options.

2.1. Sending VINES Datagrams

Before any VINES datagrams may be communicated, PPP must reach the

Network-Layer Protocol phase, and the Banyan VINES Control Protocol

must reach the Opened state.

Exactly one VINES packet is encapsulated in the Information field of

a PPP Data Link Layer frame where the Protocol field indicates type

hex 0035 (Banyan VINES datagram). The maximum length of a VINES

datagram transmitted over a PPP link is the same as the maximum

length of the Information field of a PPP data link layer frame.

The format of the Information field itself is the same as that

defined in [2].

2.2. General Considerations

VINES supports an Address Resolution Protocol, VINES ARP, primarily

used for address assignment. Since this protocol is part of VINES

IP, it is fully supported over BVCP. VINES also supports a data-link

Echo Protocol (VINES Echo), used to test connectivity to a VINES

Server in a LAN environment, which is not supported over BVCP.

3. BVCP Configuration Options

BVCP Configuration Options allow modifications to the standard

characteristics of the network-layer protocol to be negotiated. If a

Configuration Option is not included in a Configure-Request packet,

the default value for that Configuration Option is assumed.

BVCP uses the same Configuration Option format defined for LCP [1],

with a separate set of Options.

Up-to-date values of the BVCP Option Type field are specified in the

most recent "Assigned Numbers" RFC[3]. Current values are assigned

as follows:

Value Option

1 BV-NS-RTP-Link-Type

2 BV-FRP

3 BV-RTP

4 BV-Suppress-Broadcast

Note: A suggestion was made to combine the BV-NS-RTP-Link-Type option

and the BV-RTP option into a single option that could negotiate one

of four settings (S-RTP, NS-RTP-LAN, NS-RTP-WAN, NO-RTP). This

suggestion has been rejected because VINES must already deal with a

mix of S-RTP and NS-RTP, and that pushing this information down to

the PPP layer is not desirable.

3.1. BV-NS-RTP-Link-Type

Description

This Configuration Option provides a way to negotiate the way the

Non-Sequenced Routing Update Protocol (NS-RTP) (pre-VINES 5.5,

i.e., 4.11 and 5.0) will run on the link. NS-RTP handles updates

differently depending on whether the interface is a LAN type or a

WAN type. For a LAN type, the full routing table is rebroadcast

every update interval (90 seconds). For a WAN type, the full

routing table is only transmitted for the first 3 update intervals

after the link comes up. After that only changes are transmitted

(for 5 update intervals). Note that this has no effect if

Sequenced RTP (VINES 5.5) is being used. More information on this

can be found in [2].

This option negotiates what an implementation is willing to

receive, and is negotiated separately per side of the PPP

connection. The acceptance of this option (by the peer) indicates

that the peer will send NS-RTP updates as if the link was a LAN

type. The rejection (or absence) of this option indicates that

the peer will send NS-RTP updates as if the link was a WAN type.

By default, NS-RTP updates are sent as if the link was a WAN type.

A summary of the BV-NS-RTP-Link-Type Configuration Option format is

shown below. The fields are transmitted from left to right.

0 1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type

1

Length

2

3.2. BV-FRP

Description

This Configuration Option provides a way to negotiate the use of

VINES Fragmentation Protocol (FRP). This protocol is used to

allow fragmentation and reassembly of a VINES packet over the

link. FRP prepends a two octet field to every packet going over

the link that contains a begin and end fragment information and a

sequence number. With PPP's default MRU of 1500, FRP is not

normally needed, and no FRP header would be sent with the VINES

packet. If a MRU of less than 1484 is negotiated, FRP will be

needed to send a full size VINES packet over the link. More

information on this can be found in [2].

This option negotiates what an implementation is willing to

receive, and is negotiated separately per side of the PPP

connection. The acceptance of this option (by the peer) indicates

that the peer will send VINES packets with a FRP header. The

rejection (or absence) of this option indicates that the peer will

send VINES packets without a FRP header.

By default, VINES packets are sent without a FRP header.

A summary of the BV-FRP Configuration Option format is shown below.

The fields are transmitted from left to right.

0 1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type

2

Length

2

3.3. BV-RTP

Description

This Configuration Option provides a way to negotiate whether RTP

is used over the link. If dial-up lines with static routes are

being used, the use of RTP may be totally suppressed to conserve

bandwidth on the link.

This option negotiates what an implementation is willing to

receive, and is negotiated separately per side of the PPP

connection. The acceptance of this option (by the peer) indicates

that the peer will not send RTP packets. The rejection (or

absence) of this option indicates that the peer will send any RTP

packets.

By default, RTP packets are sent over the link.

A summary of the BV-RTP Configuration Option format is shown below.

The fields are transmitted from left to right.

0 1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type

3

Length

2

3.4. BV-Suppress-Broadcast

Description

This Configuration Option provides a way to negotiate the sending

of VINES broadcast packets, i.e., packets with a destination VINES

network address of all ones. This option only affects VINES

packets that are not of type VINES ARP or VINES RTP. This option

can be used by a VINES Client to request that most of the

broadcast packets that would normally be sent to it by a VINES

Server be discarded, in order to conserve link bandwidth. Most of

the broadcast packets sent by a VINES Server are not useful to a

VINES Client.

This option negotiates what an implementation is willing to

receive, and is negotiated separately per side of the PPP

connection. The acceptance of this option (by the peer) indicates

that the peer MUST NOT send any VINES broadcast packets, other

than packets of type VINES ARP or VINES RTP. The rejection (or

absence) of this option indicates that the peer will send all

VINES broadcast packets.

By default, all VINES broadcast packets are sent.

A summary of the BV-Suppress-Broadcast Configuration Option format is

shown below. The fields are transmitted from left to right.

0 1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Type

4

Length

2

Security Considerations

Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

References

[1] Simpson, W., "The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)", STD 51, RFC

1661, Daydreamer, July 1994.

[2] Banyan, "VINES Protocol Definition", June 1993, Order No.

003673.

[3] Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD 2, RFC1700,

USC/Information Sciences Institute, October 1994.

Acknowledgements

Some of the text in this document is taken from previous documents

produced by the Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group of the Internet

Engineering Task Force (IETF).

In particular, Bill Simpson provided the boiler-plate used to create

this document.

Chair's Address

The working group can be contacted via the current chair:

Fred Baker

Cisco Systems

519 Lado Drive

Santa Barbara, California 93111

Phone: (805) 681-0115

EMail: fred@cisco.com

Author's Address

Questions about this memo can also be directed to:

Steven J. Senum

DigiBoard

6400 Flying Cloud Drive

Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344

Phone: (612) 943-9020

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有