RFC1834 - Whois and Network Information Lookup Service, Whois++

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group J. Gargano

Request for Comments: 1834 K. Weiss

Category: Informational University of California, Davis

August 1995

Whois and Network Information Lookup Service

Whois++

Status of this Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo

does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of

this memo is unlimited.

I. IntrodUCtion

As currently defined, NICNAME/WHOIS [HARR85] service is a TCP

transaction based query/response server, running on a few specific

central machines, that provides netwide Directory service to Internet

users. The Network Information Center (NIC) maintains the central

NICNAME database and server, defined in RFC954, providing online

look-up of individuals, network organizations, key host machines, and

other information of interest to users of the Internet. The

usefulness of this service has lead to the development of other

distributed directory information servers and information retrieval

tools and it is anticipated more will be created. Many sites now

maintain local directory servers with information about individuals,

departments and services at that specific site.

Typically these directory servers are network Accessible. Local

development of these services has resulted in wide variations in the

type of data stored, access methods, search schemes, and user

interfaces. The purpose of the Whois and Network Information Lookup

Service Working Group (WNILS) is to eXPand and define the standard

for WHOIS types of services, to resolve issues associated with the

variations in access and provide a consistent and predictable service

across the network. This memo describes new features for WHOIS to

meet these goals.

II. Architecture

The WHOIS service should be provided in a client/server model. There

are no restrictions on the design of the client, provided it is

capable of passing queries to the server in the proper format, and

capturing the server's response in some useful format. Existing

WHOIS specifications call for clients to display responses in human-

readable form. This more general proposal does not impose that

restriction.

This paper acknowledges the existence of many distributed information

servers, and anticipates the creation of many more. To help users

locate WHOIS servers, each server should have a nameserver entry in

the form "whois.domain", i.e. whois.internic.net.

III. Client Design and Behavior

The client provides the user interface to the WHOIS system and a

mechanism for query generation and display of the response. The

client is responsible for providing support for paging of long output

from the server. All clients must provide this service. The server

will not include any special characters, or make any efforts to

control output to a screen.

Special search criteria may be specified by the use of keyWords or

special characters, some of which are defined in RFC954. Clients

should be designed to make support for quoted strings unnecessary.

IV. Server Design and Behavior

The server should return the same information in response to a given

query consistently, regardless of the client software or the hardware

used to originate the query. Queries should be evaluated on a case-

insensitive basis. Spaces should not be considered in searches. A

search for "La Russo" should return both "LaRusso" and "La Russo" as

matches.

There are three types of data records supported in this proposal:

records for people, hosts, and domains.

Individual records

Name Name of the individual required

Organization Name of the organization required

Organization-type Type of organization optional

(university, commercial research)

Work-telephone Work telephone number optional

Fax-telephone Fax telephone number optional

Work-address Work postal address optional

Title Working title or position optional

within an organization

Department Department optional

Email-address Email address in RFC822 optional

format for this individual

Handle A unique identifier for this required

record on the local server

Last-record-update Date this record was last required

updated

Home-telephone Home telephone number optional

Home-address Home postal address optional

Host records

Hostname Full domain name required

IPAddress Address required

Sysadmin-name System administrator name optional

Sysadmin-phone System administrator telephone optional

Sysadmin-address System administrator address optional

Sysadmin-email System admin. e-mail address optional

Machine-type Type of machine optional

OS Operating system optional

MX Mail exchanger optional

Last-update Last update optional

Info Location of additional optional

information (i.e. anonymous FTP)

Domain records

Domain-name Domain name registered with required

the Network Information Center

(NIC)

Network-address Network address associated required

with this domain name

Admin-name Name of the Administrative required

Contact for this domain

Admin-address Postal address of the required

Admintistrative Contact for

this domain

Admin-telephone Telephone number of the required

Admintistrative Contact for

this domain

Admin-email Electronic mail address in required

RFC1822 format for the

Administrative Contact for

this domain

Tech-name Name of the Technical Contact required

for this domain

Tech-address Postal address of the required

Administrative Contact

for this domain

Tech-telephone Telephone number of the required

Technical Contact for this

domain

Tech-email Electronic mail address in required

RFC822 format for the

Administrative Contact

for this domain

Nameservers Primary domain nameservers optional

for this domain

Last-update Last date this record was required

updated

Search Options

A unique handle must be provided for every record in the server

database to target specific records for display. For example, if

there are three individuals named, respectively, A. La Russo, B.

LaRusso, and C. Larusso, then a search for "LA RUSSO" would return

all three as matches. However, each record would have a unique

handle, i.e. LARUSSO1, LARUSSO2, and LARUSSO3. A search for any one

of these handles would return a single match for that particular

individual. This is consistent with the RFC954 query, "whois

!SMITH1"

Other search options which should be supported are:

whois smith exact match on last name

whois smith,j exact match on last name, first name

whois "smith,j" begins with "J"

whois j. Smith

whois "j. Smith"

whois smith, john exact match on last and first names

whois "smith, john"

whois john Smith

whois "john Smith"

whois .john Smith

whois "smith..." all last names beginning

whois smith* with Smith

whois begins smith

whois smith?? all last names beginning with

"Smith" and containing up to two

letters after "Smith", i.e. "Smith",

"Smithy", "Smithey" and "Smithie"

whois ends smith all last names ending in "smith"

whois exact A Martinez exact match for "A Martinez"

whois fuzzy paulson all last names that sound like or

are spelled like "Paulson"

whois first Kazuko exact match on first name "Kazuko"

whois first begins Art all first names beginning with "Art"

whois first fuzzy Kasuko all first names that sound like or are

spelled like "Kasuko"

whois hamlet.ucdavis.edu IP address and other information

whois system hamlet.ucdavis.edu on the computer called

hamlet.ucdavis.edu.Could be served

by a domain name service querytype

(QTYPE) *

whois system hamlet IP address and other

information on the computer called

hamlet with the default domain

appended. Could be served by a

domain name service querytype

(QTYPE) *

whois 128.120.2.9 domain name and other

whois system 128.120.2.9 information on the computer at

specified IP address. Could be served

by a domain name service querytype

(QTYPE) PTR.

whois !ucdavis-dom site contacts and other

whois domain ucdavis.edu information on the site ucdavis

If any keywords are specified in the query, the server will complete

that specific query and return the results, even if 0 matches are

found. If no keywords are specified, the server will interpret the

query based upon the rules above. Optionally, the server may be

configured so that if a search yields no matches, the query will

automatically be run again, but with the keyword begin inserted.

Servers must support multiple levels of detail in response to

queries. A query yielding multiple matches should return a short-

form record for each match. A query yielding a single match should

return a long-form record. A query yielding no matches should return

context-sensitive help on expanding the search criteria.

On-line Help

The client should return a minimal (two line) help message for every

query sent to the server. That message should identify the database

being searched and provide instructions for the user to oBTain more

detailed help screens.

Additional help should be provided in special situations. The server

should recognize queries that return zero matches, and provide a

brief help message explaining how to broaden a search. If a search

returns more than 50 matches, the server should take two actions.

First, the user should get a message explaining how to narrow

searches. Second, the user should be offered the option of re-

specifying the search, or receiving all matching responses. When

multiple matches are found and returned to the client, the server

should add a brief help message explaining how to use handles to

narrow the search to a single record.

If the client queries for "help" or "?" then the server should return

a complete help file. The help file should contain information in

sufficient detail for the user to understand and access all the

features of WHOIS service.

V. Extensibility

This RFCdefines a limited set of data records and fields for

reliable whois queries. Mechanisms exist for whois clients to

discover extended data records and query for fields not defined in

this memo. It is recommended that Whois clients and servers include

this functionality to maximize the extensibility and usefulness of

this service.

VI. References

[Harr85] Harrenstein, K., Stahl, M., and E. Feinler, E.,

"NICNAME/WHOIS", RFC954, SRI, October 1985.

VII. Security Considerations

Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

VIII. Authors' Addresses

Joan Gargano

Information Technology

Distributed Computing Analysis and Support

University of California

Davis, CA 95616

EMail: jcgargano@ucdavis.edu

Ken Weiss

Information Technology

Distributed Computing Analysis and Support

University of California

Davis, CA 95616

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航