分享
 
 
 

RFC2028 - The Organizations Involved in the IETF Standards Process

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group R. Hovey

Request for Comments: 2028 Digital Equipment Corporation

BCP: 11 S. Bradner

Category: Best Current Practice Harvard University

October 1996

The Organizations Involved in the IETF Standards Process

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the

Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

This document describes the individuals and organizations involved in

the IETF. This includes descriptions of the IESG, the IETF Working

Groups and the relationship between the IETF and the Internet

Society.

1. Documents controlling the process

1.1 The IETF Standards Process

The process used by the Internet community for the standardization of

protocols and procedures is described in [B]. That document defines

the stages in the standardization process, the requirements for

moving a document between stages and the types of documents used

during this process. It also addresses the intellectual property

rights and copyright issues associated with the standards process.

2. Key individuals in the Process

2.1 The Request for Comments Editor

The RFCpublication series [B] is managed by an Editor (which may in

practice be one or more individuals) responsible both for the

mechanics of RFCpublication and for upholding the traditionally high

technical and editorial standards of the RFCseries.

The functions of the RFCEditor are performed by one or more

individuals or organizations selected in accordance with the

procedures defined by the RFCEditor charter [G].

2.2 The Working Group Chair

Each IETF Working Group is headed by a chair (or by co-chairs) with

the responsibility for directing the group's activities, presiding

over the group's meetings, and ensuring that the commitments of the

group with respect to its role in the Internet standards process are

met. In particular, the WG chair is the formal point of contact

between the WG and the IESG, via the Area Director of the area to

which the WG is assigned.

The details on the selection and responsibilites of an IETF Working

Group chair can be found in [A].

2.3 The Document Editor

Most IETF Working Groups focus their efforts on a document, or set of

documents, that capture the results of the group's work. A Working

Group generally designates a person or persons to serve as the Editor

for a particular document. The Document Editor is responsible for

ensuring that the contents of the document accurately reflect the

decisions that have been made by the working group.

As a general practice, the Working Group Chair and Document Editor

positions are filled by different individuals to help ensure that the

resulting documents accurately reflect the consensus of the Working

Group and that all processes are followed.

3. Key organizations in the Process

The following organizations and organizational roles are involved in

the Internet standards process. Contact information is contained in

Appendix A.

3.1 Internet Engineering Task Force

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is an open international

community of network designers, operators, vendors and researchers

concerned with the evolution of the Internet architecture and the

smooth operation of the Internet. It is the principal body engaged

in the development of new Internet Standard specifications.

3.2 IETF Working Groups

The technical work of the IETF is done in its Working Groups, which

are organized by topics into several Areas (e.g., routing, network

management, security, etc.) under the coordination of Area Directors.

Working Groups typically have a narrow focus and a lifetime bounded

by completion of a specific task.

For all purposes relevant to the Internet Standards development

process, membership in the IETF and its Working Groups is defined to

be established solely and entirely by individual participation in

IETF and Working Group activities. Participation in the IETF and its

Working Groups is by individual technical contributors rather than by

formal representatives of organizations.

Anyone with the time and interest to do so is entitled and urged to

participate actively in one or more IETF Working Groups and to attend

IETF meetings which are held three times a year. In most cases

active Working Group participation is possible through electronic

mail alone. Internet video conferencing is also being used to allow

for remote participation.

To ensure a fair and open process, participants in the IETF and its

Working Groups must be able to disclose, and must disclose to the

Working Group chairs any relevant current or pending intellectual

property rights that are reasonably and personally known to the

participant if they participate in discussions about a specific

technology.

New Working Groups are established within the IETF by eXPlicit

charter. The guidelines and procedures for the formation and

operation of IETF working groups are described in detail in [A].

A Working Group is managed by one or more Working Group chairs (see

section 2.2). It may also include editors of documents that record

the group's work (see section 2.3). Further details of Working Group

operation are contained in [A]

IETF Working Groups display a spirit of cooperation as well as a high

degree of technical maturity; IETF participants recognize that the

greatest benefit for all members of the Internet community results

from cooperative development of technically superior protocols and

services.

3.3 IETF Secretariat

The administrative functions necessary to support the activities of

the IETF are performed by a Secretariat consisting of the IETF

Executive Director and his or her staff. The IETF Executive Director

is the formal point of contact for matters concerning any and all

ASPects of the Internet standards process, and is responsible for

maintaining the formal public record of the Internet standards

process [B].

3.4 Internet Society

The Internet Society (ISOC) is an international organization

concerned with the growth and evolution of the worldwide Internet and

with the social, political, and technical issues that arise from its

use. The ISOC is an organization with individual and organizational

members. The ISOC is managed by a Board of Trustees elected by the

worldwide individual membership.

Internet standardization is an organized activity of the ISOC, with

the Board of Trustees being responsible for ratifying the procedures

and rules of the Internet standards process [B].

The way in which the members of the ISOC Board of Trustees are

selected, and other matters concerning the operation of the Internet

Society, are described in the ISOC By Laws [C].

3.5 Internet Engineering Steering Group

The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is the part of the

Internet Society responsible for the management of the IETF technical

activities. It administers the Internet Standards process according

to the rules and procedures defined in [B]. The IESG is responsible

for the actions associated with the progression of technical

specification along the "standards track" including the initial

approval of new Working Groups and the final approval of

specifications as Internet Standards. The IESG is composed of the

IETF Area Directors and the chair of the IETF, who also serves as the

chair of the IESG.

The members of the IESG are nominated by a nominations committee (the

Nomcom), and are approved by the IAB. See [E] for a detailed

description of the Nomcom procedures. Other matters concerning its

organization and operation, are described in the IESG charter [does

not yet exist].

3.6 Internet Architecture Board

The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) is chartered by the Internet

Society Trustees to provide oversight of the architecture of the

Internet and its protocols. The IAB appoints the IETF chair and is

responsible for approving other IESG candidates put forward by the

IETF nominating committee. The IAB is also responsible for reviewing

and approving the charters of new Working Groups that are proposed

for the IETF.

The IAB provides oversight of the process used to create Internet

Standards and serves as an appeal board for complaints of improper

execution of the standards process [B]. In general it acts as source

of advice to the IETF, the ISOC and the ISOC Board of Trustees

concerning technical, architectural, procedural, and policy matters

pertaining to the Internet and its enabling technologies.

The members of the IAB are nominated by a nominations committee (the

Nomcom), and are approved by the ISOC board. See [E] for a detailed

description of the Nomcom procedures. The membership of the IAB

consists of members selected by the Nomcom process and the IETF chair

sitting as a ex-officio member. Other matters concerning its

organization and operation, are described in the IAB charter [D].

3.7 Internet Assigned Numbers Authority

Many protocol specifications include numbers, keyWords, and other

parameters that must be uniquely assigned. Examples include version

numbers, protocol numbers, port numbers, and MIB numbers. The

Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is responsible for

assigning the values of these protocol parameters for the Internet.

The IANA publishes tables of all currently assigned numbers and

parameters in RFCs entitled "Assigned Numbers" [E]. The IANA

functions as the "top of the pyramid" for DNS and Internet Address

assignment establishing policies for these functions.

The functions of the IANA are performed by one or more individuals or

organizations selected in accordance with the procedures defined by

the IANA charter [F].

3.8 Internet Research Task Force

The Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) is not directly involved in

the Internet standards process. It investigates topics considered to

be too uncertain, too advanced, or insufficiently well-understood to

be the subject of Internet standardization. When an IRTF activity

generates a specification that is sufficiently stable to be

considered for Internet standardization, the specification is

processed through the IETF using the rules in this document.

The IRTF is composed of individual Working Groups, but its strUCture

and mode of operation is much less formal than that of the IETF, due

in part to the fact that it does not participate directly in the

Internet standards process. The organization and program of work of

the IRTF is overseen by the Internet Research Steering Group (IRSG),

which consists of the chairs of the IRTF Working Groups. Details of

the organization and operation of the IRTF and its Working Groups may

be found in [H].

4. Security Considerations

Security is not addressed in this memo.

5. References

[A] Huizer,E. and D. Crocker, "IETF Working Group Guidelines and

Procedures", RFC1603, March 1994.

[B] Bradner, S., Editor, "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision

3", RFC2026, October 1996.

[C] By - Laws for the Internet Society, as amended:

http://www.cnpaf.net/Class/Rfcen/gopher://info.isoc.org/00/isoc/basic_docs/bylaws.txt

[D] Huitema, C. and the IAB, "Charter of the Internet Architecture

Board (IAB)", RFC1601, March 1994.

[E] Galvin, J (Ed.), "IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and

Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees",

RFC2027, October 1996.

[F] IANA Charter, Work in Progress.

[G] RFCEditor Charter, Work in Progress.

[H] IRTF Charter, RFC2014, October 1996.

5. Authors' Addresses:

Richard Hovey

Digital Equipment Corporation

1401 H Street NW

Washington DC 20005

Phone: +1 202 383 5615

EMail: hovey@wnpv01.enet.dec.com

Scott Bradner

Harvard University

1350 Mass Ave. Rm 813

Cambridge MA 02138

Phone: +1 617 495 3864

EMail: sob@harvard.edu

Appendix A - Contact Information

IETF - ietf@ietf.org, http://www.ietf.org

IESG - iesg@ietf.org, http://www.ietf.org/iesg.Html

IAB - iab@ietf.org, http://www.iab.org/iab

RFCEditor - rfc-ed@isi.edu, http://www.isi.edu/rfc-editor

IANA - iana@iana.org, http://www.iana.org/iana/

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有