RFC2471 - IPv6 Testing Address Allocation

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group R. Hinden

Request for Comments: 2471 Nokia

Obsoletes: 1897 R. Fink

Category: EXPerimental LBNL

J. Postel

ISI

December 1998

IPv6 Testing Address Allocation

Status of this Memo

This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet

community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.

Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.

Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.

1.0 IntrodUCtion

This document describes an allocation plan for IPv6 addresses to be

used in testing IPv6 prototype software. These addresses are

temporary and will be reclaimed in the future. Any IPv6 system using

these addresses will have to renumber at some time in the future.

These addresses will not to be routable in the Internet other than

for IPv6 testing.

The address format for the IPv6 test address is consistent with the

"Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Allocation" [AGGR] and "TLA and

NLA Assignment Rules" [TLAASN].

This document is intended to replace RFC1897 "IPv6 Testing Address

Allocation", January 1996. RFC1897 will become historic.

The addresses described in this document are consistent with the IPv6

Addressing Architecture [ARCH]. They may be assigned to nodes

manually, with IPv6 Auto Address Allocation [AUTO], or with DHCP for

IPv6 [DHCPv6].

The key Words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",

"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this

document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

2.0 Address Format

The Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Allocation format defined in

[AGGR] is as follows:

3 13 32 16 64 bits

+---+-----+-----------+--------+--------------------------------+

FP TLA NLA ID SLA ID Interface ID

ID

+---+-----+-----------+--------+--------------------------------+

where:

FP = 001 = Format Prefix

This is the Format Prefix used to identify aggregatable

global unicast addresses.

TLA = 0x1FFE = Top-Level Aggregation Identifier

This is a TLA ID assigned by the IANA for 6bone testing under

the auspices of the IETF IPng Transition Working Group 6bone

testbed activity. It is to be administered by the chair of

the 6bone activity (currently Bob Fink <rlfink@lbl.gov>).

The use of this TLA ID is temporary. All users of these

addresses in this TLA ID will be required to renumber at some

time in the future.

NLA ID = Next-Level Aggregation Identifier

The NLA ID space will be assigned, by the TLA ID

administrator, in an addressing hierarchy sufficient to

identify transit networks and end user sites consistent with

the architecture and topology of the 6bone. This will provide

a multi-level transit service consistent with the 6bone goals

of fully testing IPv6 technology in real use environments.

SLA ID = Site-Level Aggregation Identifier

The SLA ID field is used by an individual organization to

create its own local addressing hierarchy and to identify

subnets. Assignment of the SLA ID field is the

responsibility of each individual organization.

Interface ID

This is the interface identifier of the interface on the link

as defined in the appropriate IPv6 over <link> document, such

as [ETHER], [FDDI], etc.

4.0 References

[ARCH] Hinden, R., "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture",

RFC2373, July 1998.

[AGGR] Hinden, R., Deering, S., O'Dell, M., "An Aggregatable

Global Unicast Address Format", RFC2374, July 1998.

[AUTO] Thompson, S. and T. Narten, "IPv6 Stateless Address

Autoconfiguration", RFC1971, August 1996.

[DHCP6] Bound, J., "Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6", Work in

Progress.

[ETHER] Crawford, M., "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet

Networks", RFC2464, December 1998.

[FDDI] Crawford, M., "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over FDDI

Networks", RFC2467, December 1998.

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC2119, March 1997.

[TLAASN] Hinden, R., "TLA and NLA Assignment Rules", Work in

Progress.

5.0 Security Considerations

This document defines a test approach for creating aggregatable

address consistent with [AGGR]. It does not have any direct impact

on Internet infrastructure security. Authentication of IPv6 packets

is defined in [AUTH].

6.0 Authors' Addresses

Robert M. Hinden

Nokia

232 Java Drive

Sunnyvale, CA 94089

USA

Phone: +1 408 990-2004

EMail: hinden@iprg.nokia.com

Robert Fink

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

MS 50A-3111

Berkeley, CA 94720

USA

Phone: +1 510 486-5692

EMail: rlfink@lbl.gov

Jon Postel (Deceased)

Information Sciences Institute

4676 Admiralty Way

Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6695

USA

7.0 Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to

others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it

or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published

and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any

kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are

included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this

document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing

the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other

Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of

developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for

copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be

followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than

English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be

revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an

"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING

TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING

BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION

HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航