分享
 
 
 

RFC2605 - Directory Server Monitoring MIB

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group G. Mansfield

Request for Comments: 2605 Cyber Solutions Inc.

Obsoletes: 1567 S. Kille

Category: Standards Track MessagingDirect Ltd.

June 1999

Directory Server Monitoring MIB

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the

Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet

Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state

and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)

for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.

This memo obsoletes RFC1567, "X.500 Directory Monitoring MIB". This

memo extends that specification to a more generic MIB for monitoring

one or more directory servers each of which may support multiple

Access protocols. The MIB defined in this memo will be used in

conjunction with the NETWORK-SERVICES-MIB [19] for monitoring

Directory Servers.

Table of Contents

1. The SNMP Network Management Framework ....................... 2

2. The Directory Services Model ................................ 3

3. MIB Model for Directory Management .......................... 4

4. MIB design .................................................. 5

5. The Directory Server Monitoring MIB ......................... 5

6. Intellectual Property .......................................22

7. Changes from RFC1567 ........................................22

8. Acknowledgements ............................................22

9. References ..................................................23

Security Considerations .........................................24

Authors' Addresses ..............................................25

Full Copyright Statement ........................................26

1. The SNMP Network Management Framework

The SNMP Network Management Framework presently consists of five

major components:

o An overall architecture, described in RFC2571 [1].

o Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for the

purpose of management. The first version of this StrUCture of

Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described in

STD 16, RFC1155 [2], STD 16, RFC1212 [3] and RFC1215 [4]. The

second version, called SMIv2, is described in STD 58, RFC2578

[5], RFC2579 [6] and RFC2580 [7].

o Message protocols for transferring management information. The

first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1 and

described in STD 15, RFC1157 [8]. A second version of the SNMP

message protocol, which is not an Internet standards track

protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described in RFC1901 [9] and

RFC1906 [10]. The third version of the message protocol is

called SNMPv3 and described in RFC1906 [10], RFC2572 [11] and

RFC2574 [12].

o Protocol operations for accessing management information. The

first set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is

described in STD 15, RFC1157 [8]. A second set of protocol

operations and associated PDU formats is described in RFC1905

[13].

o A set of fundamental applications described in RFC2573 [14] and

the view-based access control mechanism described in RFC2575

[15].

Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed

the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are

defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI.

This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2. A

MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through the appropriate

translations. The resulting translated MIB must be semantically

equivalent, except where objects or events are omitted because no

translation is possible (use of Counter64). Some machine readable

information in SMIv2 will be converted into textual descriptions in

SMIv1 during the translation process. However, this loss of machine

readable information is not considered to change the semantics of the

MIB.

2. The Directory Services Model.

The Directory comprises of a set of servers (Directory Servers).

Clients or Directory User Agents (DUA) are provided access to the

Directory which maybe local or distributed, by the Directory Servers.

The server maybe a X.500 Directory System Agent (DSA) [16] running

over the OSI suite of protocols or, a (C)LDAP[17,18] frontend to the

X.500 Directory System Agent or, a native LDAP Directory Server

running directly over TCP or other protocols, or a database acting as

a backend to another server, or any other application protocol, or

any combination of the above. A Directory Server has one or more

application protocol interfaces. Through these interfaces the

Directory Server interacts with the DUA and with the peer Directory

Servers.

Fig. 1 shows the case of a Directory Server that receives requests

and sends back responses in some protocol. Fig. 2 shows one possible

scenario where the Directory Server speaks multiple protocols.

+----------------+

Directory Directory Protocol

Server X-------->

+----------------+

FIG. 1.

+----------------+

DSP <----------X X--------> DAP

Directory

Other Server

Protocol <----------X X--------> LDAP

+----------------+

FIG. 2.

The Directory contains information in the form of entries. An entry

is a collection of attributes and is uniquely identified by a name,

the Distinguished Name (DN). The entries are arranged in a

hierarchical tree-like structure called the Directory Information

Tree (DIT).

A DUA requests a Directory Server to perform some operation on the

Directory. The Directory Server is responsible for performing the

operation and after completing its effort to carry out the request,

returns a response to the DUA.

A Directory Server may use information stored in its local database

or interact with (chain the request to) other Directory Servers to

service the DUA request. Alternatively, a Directory Server may return

a reference to another Directory Server (referral).

The local database of a Directory Server consists of the part of the

Directory that is mastered by the Directory Server, the part of the

Directory for which it keeps slave copies and cached information that

is gathered during the operation of the Directory Server.

In the connection oriented mode a DUA "binds" to a Directory Server

with a particular identification. The Directory Server may

authenticate the identity of the DUA. In the connectionless mode as

is employed in CLDAP no binding and/or authentication is carried out

between the DUA and the Directory Server. The following type of

operations are carried out by the Directory Server : Read, Compare,

Addition of an Entry (AddEntry), Modification of an Entry

(ModifyEntry), Modification of a DN (ModifyRDN), Deletion of an Entry

(RemoveEntry), List, Search, Abandon. Some Directory Servers do not

support some type of operations. For example CLDAP does not support

AddEntry, ModifyEntry, ModifyRDN, RemoveEntry etc. In response to

requests results and/or errors are returned by the Directory Server.

In the distributed Directory data is often replicated to enhance

performance and for other advantages. The data to be replicated is

transferred from the "Supplier" Directory Server to the "Consumer"

Directory Server according to the replication agreement between the

supplier and the receiver.

3. MIB Model for Directory Management.

A Directory manager should be able to monitor all the Directory

Servers in his/her domain of management. The Directory Servers may be

running on one or more hosts and, multiple Directory Servers may be

running on the same host.

The manager may wish to monitor several ASPects of the operational

Directory Servers. He/she may want to know the process related

aspects - the resource utilization of an operational Directory

Server; the network service related aspects e.g. inbound-

associations, outbound-associations, operational status, and finally

the information specific to the Directory Server application - its

operations and performance.

The MIB defined in this document covers the portion which is specific

to Directory services. The network service related part of the MIB,

and the host-resources related part of the MIB, as well as other

parts of interest to a Manager monitoring the Directory services, are

covered in separate documents [19] [20].

The MIB will cover a group of Directory Servers. The grouping will be

done on some logical basis by the administrator/manager. In all

cases, the grouping will be reflected in the pertinent NETWORK-

SERVICES-MIB which will have an entry corresponding to each Directory

Server in the group.

4. MIB design.

The basic principle has been to keep the MIB as simple as possible.

The Managed objects included in the MIB are divided into three tables

- dsTable, dsApplIfOpsTable, and dsIntTable.

- The dsTable contains a list of Directory Servers. The list

contains a description of the Directory Servers as well as

summary statistics on the entries held by and the cache

performance of each Directory Server. The group of servers on

this list is likely to contain a part of, if not all, the

Directory Servers in the management domain.

- The dsApplIfOpsTable provides summary statistics on the

accesses, operations and errors for each application protocol

interface of a Directory Server.

- The dsIntTable provides some useful information on the

interaction of the monitored Directory Servers with peer

Directory Servers.

There are references to the Directory itself for static information

pertaining to the Directory Server. These references are in the form

of "Directory Distinguished Name" [21] of the corresponding object.

It is intended that Directory management applications will use these

references to oBTain further information on the objects of interest.

5. The Directory Server Monitoring MIB.

DIRECTORY-SERVER-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS

MODULE-IDENTITY, Counter32, Gauge32, OBJECT-TYPE

FROM SNMPv2-SMI

mib-2 FROM RFC1213-MIB

DisplayString, TimeStamp

FROM SNMPv2-TC

MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP

FROM SNMPv2-CONF

ZeroBasedCounter32

FROM RMON2-MIB

applIndex, DistinguishedName, URLString

FROM NETWORK-SERVICES-MIB;

dsMIB MODULE-IDENTITY

LAST-UPDATED "9906070000Z"

ORGANIZATION "IETF Mail and Directory Management Working

Group"

CONTACT-INFO

" Glenn Mansfield

Postal: Cyber Solutions Inc.

6-6-3, Minami Yoshinari

Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan 989-3204.

Tel: +81-22-303-4012

Fax: +81-22-303-4015

E-mail: glenn@cysols.com

Working Group E-mail: ietf-madman@innosoft.com

To subscribe: ietf-madman-request@innosoft.com"

DESCRIPTION

" The MIB module for monitoring Directory Services."

-- revision information

REVISION "9906070000Z"

DESCRIPTION

"This revision of this MIB is published in RFC2605.

This revision obsoletes RFC1567. It is incompatible with

the original MIB and so it has been renamed from dsaMIB

to dsMIB."

REVISION "9311250000Z" -- 25th November 1993

DESCRIPTION

"The original version of this MIB was published in RFC1567."

::= { mib-2 66 }

dsTable OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF DsTableEntry

MAX-ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" The table holding information related to the Directory

Servers."

::= {dsMIB 1}

dsTableEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX DsTableEntry

MAX-ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Entry containing summary description for a Directory

Server."

INDEX { applIndex }

::= {dsTable 1}

-- General description of the Directory Server application will be

-- available in the applTable of the NETWORK-SERVICES-MIB indexed by

-- applIndex.

DsTableEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

dsServerType

BITS,

dsServerDescription

DisplayString,

-- Entry statistics/Cache performance

dsMasterEntries

Gauge32,

dsCopyEntries

Gauge32,

dsCacheEntries

Gauge32,

dsCacheHits

Counter32,

dsSlaveHits

Counter32

}

dsServerType OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX BITS {

frontEndDirectoryServer(0),

backEndDirectoryServer(1)

}

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

"This object indicates whether the server is

a frontend or, a backend or, both. If the server

is a frontend, then the frontEndDirectoryServer

bit will be set. Similarly for the backend."

::= {dsTableEntry 1}

dsServerDescription OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX DisplayString

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

"A text description of the application. This information

is intended to identify and briefly describe the

application in a status display."

::= {dsTableEntry 2}

-- A (C)LDAP frontend to the X.500 Directory will not have

-- MasterEntries, CopyEntries; the following counters will

-- be inaccessible for LDAP/CLDAP frontends to the X.500

-- directory: dsMasterEntries, dsCopyEntries, dsSlaveHits.

dsMasterEntries OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Gauge32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of entries mastered in the Directory Server."

::= {dsTableEntry 3}

dsCopyEntries OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Gauge32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of entries for which systematic (slave)

copies are maintained in the Directory Server."

::= {dsTableEntry 4}

dsCacheEntries OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Gauge32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of entries cached (non-systematic copies) in

the Directory Server. This will include the entries that

are cached partially. The negative cache is not counted."

::= {dsTableEntry 5}

dsCacheHits OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of operations that were serviced from

the locally held cache."

::= {dsTableEntry 6}

dsSlaveHits OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of operations that were serviced from

the locally held object replications ( copy-

entries)."

::= {dsTableEntry 7}

dsApplIfOpsTable OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF DsApplIfOpsEntry

MAX-ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" The table holding information related to the

Directory Server operations."

::= {dsMIB 2}

dsApplIfOpsEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX DsApplIfOpsEntry

MAX-ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Entry containing operations related statistics

for a Directory Server."

INDEX { applIndex, dsApplIfProtocolIndex }

::= {dsApplIfOpsTable 1}

DsApplIfOpsEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

dsApplIfProtocolIndex

INTEGER,

dsApplIfProtocol

OBJECT IDENTIFIER,

-- Bindings

dsApplIfUnauthBinds

Counter32,

dsApplIfSimpleAuthBinds

Counter32,

dsApplIfStrongAuthBinds

Counter32,

dsApplIfBindSecurityErrors

Counter32,

-- In-coming operations

dsApplIfInOps

Counter32,

dsApplIfReadOps

Counter32,

dsApplIfCompareOps

Counter32,

dsApplIfAddEntryOps

Counter32,

dsApplIfRemoveEntryOps

Counter32,

dsApplIfModifyEntryOps

Counter32,

dsApplIfModifyRDNOps

Counter32,

dsApplIfListOps

Counter32,

dsApplIfSearchOps

Counter32,

dsApplIfOneLevelSearchOps

Counter32,

dsApplIfWholeSubtreeSearchOps

Counter32,

-- Out going operations

dsApplIfReferrals

Counter32,

dsApplIfChainings

Counter32,

-- Errors

dsApplIfSecurityErrors

Counter32,

dsApplIfErrors

Counter32,

-- replications

dsApplIfReplicationUpdatesIn

Counter32,

dsApplIfReplicationUpdatesOut

Counter32,

-- Traffic Volume

dsApplIfInBytes

Counter32,

dsApplIfOutBytes

Counter32

}

-- CLDAP does not use binds; for the CLDAP interface of a Directory

-- Server the bind related counters will be inaccessible.

--

-- CLDAP and LDAP implement "Read" and "List" operations

-- indirectly via the "search" operation; the following

-- counters will be inaccessible for the CLDAP and LDAP interfaces of

-- Directory Servers: dsApplIfReadOps, dsApplIfListOps

--

-- CLDAP does not implement "Compare", "Add", "Remove",

-- "Modify", "ModifyRDN"; the following counters will be

-- inaccessible for the CLDAP interfaces of Directory Servers:

-- dsApplIfCompareOps, dsApplIfAddEntryOps, dsApplIfRemoveEntryOps,

-- dsApplIfModifyEntryOps, dsApplIfModifyRDNOps.

--

-- CLDAP Directory Servers do not return Referrals

-- the following fields will remain inaccessible for

-- CLDAP interfaces of Directory Servers: dsApplIfReferrals.

dsApplIfProtocolIndex OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER (1..2147483647)

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

"An index to uniquely identify an entry corresponding to a

application-layer protocol interface. This index is used

for lexicographic ordering of the table."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 1}

dsApplIfProtocol OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

"An identification of the protocol being used by the application

on this interface. For an OSI Application, this will be the

Application Context. For Internet applications, the IANA

maintains a registry[22] of the OIDs which correspond to

well-known applications. If the application protocol is

not listed in the registry, an OID value of the form

{applTCPProtoID port} or {applUDProtoID port} are used for

TCP-based and UDP-based protocols, respectively. In either

case 'port' corresponds to the primary port number being

used by the protocol. The OIDs applTCPProtoID and

applUDPProtoID are defined in NETWORK-SERVICES-MIB"

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 2}

dsApplIfUnauthBinds OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of unauthenticated/anonymous bind requests

received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 3}

dsApplIfSimpleAuthBinds OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of bind requests that were authenticated

using simple authentication procedures like passWord

checks. This includes the

password authentication using SASL mechanisms like

CRAM-MD5."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 4}

dsApplIfStrongAuthBinds OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of bind requests that were authenticated

using TLS and X.500 strong authentication procedures.

This includes the binds that were

authenticated using external authentication procedures."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 5}

dsApplIfBindSecurityErrors OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of bind requests that have been rejected

due to inappropriate authentication or

invalid credentials."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 6}

dsApplIfInOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of requests received from DUAs or other

Directory Servers."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 7}

dsApplIfReadOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of read requests received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 8}

dsApplIfCompareOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of compare requests received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 9}

dsApplIfAddEntryOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of addEntry requests received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 10}

dsApplIfRemoveEntryOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of removeEntry requests received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 11}

dsApplIfModifyEntryOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of modifyEntry requests received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 12}

dsApplIfModifyRDNOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of modifyRDN requests received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 13}

dsApplIfListOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of list requests received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 14}

dsApplIfSearchOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of search requests- baseObject searches,

oneLevel searches and whole subtree searches,

received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 15}

dsApplIfOneLevelSearchOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of oneLevel search requests received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 16}

dsApplIfWholeSubtreeSearchOps OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of whole subtree search requests received."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 17}

dsApplIfReferrals OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of referrals returned in response

to requests for operations."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 18}

dsApplIfChainings OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of operations forwarded by this Directory Server

to other Directory Servers."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 19}

dsApplIfSecurityErrors OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of requests received

which did not meet the security requirements. "

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 20}

dsApplIfErrors OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of requests that could not be serviced

due to errors other than security errors, and

referrals.

A partially serviced operation will not be counted

as an error.

The errors include naming-related, update-related,

attribute-related and service-related errors."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 21}

-- Replication operations

dsApplIfReplicationUpdatesIn OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of replication updates fetched or received from

supplier Directory Servers."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 22}

dsApplIfReplicationUpdatesOut OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Number of replication updates sent to or taken by

consumer Directory Servers."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 23}

dsApplIfInBytes OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Incoming traffic, in bytes, on the interface.

This will include requests from DUAs as well

as responses from other Directory Servers."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 24}

dsApplIfOutBytes OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Outgoing traffic in bytes on the interface.

This will include responses to DUAs and Directory

Servers as well as requests to other Directory Servers."

::= {dsApplIfOpsEntry 25}

-- The dsIntTable contains statistical data on the peer

-- Directory Servers with which the monitored Directory

-- Server interacts or, attempts to interact. This table is

-- eXPected to provide a useful insight into the effect of

-- neighbours on the Directory Server's performance.

-- The table keeps track of the last "N" Directory Servers

-- with which the monitored Directory has interacted

-- (attempted to interact), where "N" is a locally-defined

-- constant.

-- For a multiprotocol server, statistics for each protocol

-- are kept separetely.

dsIntTable OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF DsIntEntry

MAX-ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Each row of this table contains some details

related to the history of the interaction

of the monitored Directory Server with its

peer Directory Servers."

::= { dsMIB 3 }

dsIntEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX DsIntEntry

MAX-ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Entry containing interaction details of a Directory

Server with a peer Directory Server."

INDEX { applIndex,dsIntEntIndex, dsApplIfProtocolIndex }

::= { dsIntTable 1 }

DsIntEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

dsIntEntIndex

INTEGER,

dsIntEntDirectoryName

DistinguishedName,

dsIntEntTimeOfCreation

TimeStamp,

dsIntEntTimeOfLastAttempt

TimeStamp,

dsIntEntTimeOfLastSuccess

TimeStamp,

dsIntEntFailuresSinceLastSuccess

Gauge32,

dsIntEntFailures

ZeroBasedCounter32,

dsIntEntSuccesses

ZeroBasedCounter32,

dsIntEntURL

URLString

}

dsIntEntIndex OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER (1..2147483647)

MAX-ACCESS not-accessible

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Together with applIndex and dsApplIfProtocolIndex, this

object forms the unique key to

identify the conceptual row which contains useful info

on the (attempted) interaction between the Directory

Server (referred to by applIndex) and a peer Directory

Server using a particular protocol."

::= {dsIntEntry 1}

dsIntEntDirectoryName OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX DistinguishedName

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Distinguished Name of the peer Directory Server to

which this entry pertains."

::= {dsIntEntry 2}

dsIntEntTimeOfCreation OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX TimeStamp

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" The value of sysUpTime when this row was created.

If the entry was created before the network management

subsystem was initialized, this object will contain

a value of zero."

::= {dsIntEntry 3}

dsIntEntTimeOfLastAttempt OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX TimeStamp

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" The value of sysUpTime when the last attempt was made

to contact the peer Directory Server. If the last attempt

was made before the network management subsystem was

initialized, this object will contain a value of zero."

::= {dsIntEntry 4}

dsIntEntTimeOfLastSuccess OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX TimeStamp

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" The value of sysUpTime when the last attempt made to

contact the peer Directory Server was successful. If there

have been no successful attempts this entry will have a value

of zero. If the last successful attempt was made before

the network management subsystem was initialized, this

object will contain a value of zero."

::= {dsIntEntry 5}

dsIntEntFailuresSinceLastSuccess OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Gauge32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" The number of failures since the last time an

attempt to contact the peer Directory Server was successful.

If there have been no successful attempts, this counter

will contain the number of failures since this entry

was created."

::= {dsIntEntry 6}

-- note this gauge has a maximum value of 4294967295 and,

-- it does not wrap.[5]

dsIntEntFailures OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX ZeroBasedCounter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Cumulative failures in contacting the peer Directory Server

since the creation of this entry."

::= {dsIntEntry 7}

dsIntEntSuccesses OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX ZeroBasedCounter32

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" Cumulative successes in contacting the peer Directory Server

since the creation of this entry."

::= {dsIntEntry 8}

dsIntEntURL OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX URLString

MAX-ACCESS read-only

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" URL of the peer Directory Server."

::= {dsIntEntry 9}

-- Conformance information

dsConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsMIB 4 }

dsGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsConformance 1 }

dsCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsConformance 2 }

-- Compliance statements

dsEntryCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

"The compliance statement for SNMP entities

which implement the DIRECTORY-SERVER-MIB for

a summary overview of the Directory Servers ."

MODULE -- this module

MANDATORY-GROUPS { dsEntryGroup }

::= { dsCompliances 1 }

dsOpsCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

"The compliance statement for SNMP entities

which implement the DIRECTORY-SERVER-MIB for monitoring

Directory Server operations, entry statistics and cache

performance."

MODULE -- this module

MANDATORY-GROUPS { dsEntryGroup, dsOpsGroup }

::= { dsCompliances 2 }

dsIntCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" The compliance statement for SNMP entities

which implement the DIRECTORY-SERVER-MIB for

monitoring Directory Server operations and the

interaction of the Directory Server with peer

Directory Servers."

MODULE -- this module

MANDATORY-GROUPS { dsEntryGroup, dsIntGroup }

::= { dsCompliances 3 }

dsOpsIntCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" The compliance statement for SNMP entities

which implement the DIRECTORY-SERVER-MIB for monitoring

Directory Server operations and the interaction of the

Directory Server with peer Directory Servers."

MODULE -- this module

MANDATORY-GROUPS { dsEntryGroup, dsOpsGroup, dsIntGroup }

::= { dsCompliances 4 }

-- Units of conformance

dsEntryGroup OBJECT-GROUP

OBJECTS {dsServerType, dsServerDescription,

dsMasterEntries, dsCopyEntries,

dsCacheEntries, dsCacheHits,

dsSlaveHits}

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" A collection of objects for a summary overview of the

Directory Servers."

::= { dsGroups 1 }

dsOpsGroup OBJECT-GROUP

OBJECTS {

dsApplIfProtocolIndex, dsApplIfProtocol,

dsApplIfUnauthBinds, dsApplIfSimpleAuthBinds,

dsApplIfStrongAuthBinds, dsApplIfBindSecurityErrors,

dsApplIfInOps, dsApplIfReadOps,

dsApplIfCompareOps, dsApplIfAddEntryOps,

dsApplIfRemoveEntryOps, dsApplIfModifyEntryOps,

dsApplIfModifyRDNOps, dsApplIfListOps,

dsApplIfSearchOps, dsApplIfOneLevelSearchOps,

dsApplIfWholeSubtreeSearchOps, dsApplIfReferrals,

dsApplIfChainings, dsApplIfSecurityErrors,

dsApplIfErrors, dsApplIfReplicationUpdatesIn,

dsApplIfReplicationUpdatesOut, dsApplIfInBytes,

dsApplIfOutBytes }

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" A collection of objects for monitoring the Directory

Server operations."

::= { dsGroups 2 }

dsIntGroup OBJECT-GROUP

OBJECTS {

dsIntEntDirectoryName, dsIntEntTimeOfCreation,

dsIntEntTimeOfLastAttempt, dsIntEntTimeOfLastSuccess,

dsIntEntFailuresSinceLastSuccess, dsIntEntFailures,

dsIntEntSuccesses, dsIntEntURL}

STATUS current

DESCRIPTION

" A collection of objects for monitoring the Directory

Server's interaction with peer Directory Servers."

::= { dsGroups 3 }

END

6. Intellectual Property

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any

intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to

pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in

this document or the extent to which any license under such rights

might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it

has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the

IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and

standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of

claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of

licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to

obtain a general license or permission for the use of such

proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can

be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any

copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary

rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice

this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive

Director.

7. Changes from RFC1567.

A more general Directory model in which, several Directory protocols

coexist, has been adopted for the purpose of the MIB design. The

result is a generic Directory Server Monitoring MIB.

8. Acknowledgements

This memo is the product of discussions and deliberations carried out

in the Mail and Directory Management Working Group (ietf-madman-wg).

References

[1] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for

Describing SNMP Management Frameworks", RFC2571, April 1999.

[2] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of

Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets", STD 16, RFC

1155, May 1990.

[3] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16,

RFC1212, March 1991.

[4] Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the

SNMP", RFC1215, March 1991.

[5] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,

M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information

Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC2578, April 1999.

[6] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,

M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,

RFC2579, April 1999.

[7] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,

M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD

58, RFC2580, April 1999.

[8] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "Simple

Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC1157, May 1990.

[9] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser,

"Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC1901, January

1996.

[10] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Transport

Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol

(SNMPv2)", RFC1906, January 1996.

[11] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R. and B. Wijnen, "Message

Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management

Protocol (SNMP)", RFC2572, April 1999.

[12] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM)

for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol

(SNMPv3)", RFC2574, April 1999.

[13] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol

Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management

Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC1905, January 1996.

[14] Levi, D., Meyer, P. and B. Stewart, "SNMPv3 Applications", RFC

2573, April 1999.

[15] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access

Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol

(SNMP)", RFC2575, April 1999.

[16] ITU-T Rec. X.501, "The Directory: Models", 1993.

[17] Wahl, M., Howes, T. and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory Access

Protocol (v3)", RFC2251, December 1997.

[18] Young, A., "Connection-less Lightweight X.500 Directory Access

Protocol", RFC1798, June 1995.

[19] Freed N. and Kille, S., "Network Services Monitoring MIB", RFC

2248, January 1998.

[20] Grillo, P. and S. Waldbusser, "Host Resources MIB", RFC1514,

September 1993.

[21] Wahl, W., Kille, S. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory Access

Protocol (v3): UTF-8 String Representation of Distinguished

Names", RFC2253, December 1997.

[22] http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/protocol-numbers

Security Considerations

There are no management objects defined in this MIB that have a MAX-

ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. So, if this MIB is

implemented correctly, then there is no risk that an intruder can

alter or create any management objects of this MIB via direct SNMP

SET operations.

However, the information itself may partly reveal the configuration

of the directory system and passively increase its vulnerability. The

information could also be used to analyze network usage and traffic

patterns.

Therefore, it may be important in some environments to control read

access to these objects and possibly to even encrypt the values of

these object when sending them over the network via SNMP. Not all

versions of SNMP provide features for such a secure environment.

SNMPv1 by itself is such an insecure environment. Even if the

network itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even then,

there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to

access and GET (read) the objects in this MIB.

It is recommended that the implementors consider the security

features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically, the use

of the User-based Security Model RFC2574 [12] and the View-based

Access Control Model RFC2575 [15] is recommended.

It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the SNMP

entity giving access to an instance of this MIB, is properly

configured to give access to those objects only to those principals

(users) that have legitimate rights to access them.

Authors' Addresses

Glenn Mansfield

Cyber Solutions Inc.

6-6-3 Minami Yoshinari

Aoba-ku, Sendai 989-3204

Japan

Phone: +81-22-303-4012

EMail: glenn@cysols.com

Steve E. Kille

MessagingDirect Ltd.

The Dome, The Square

Richmond TW9 1DT

UK

Phone: +44-181-332-9091

EMail: Steve.Kille@MessagingDirect.com

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to

others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it

or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published

and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any

kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are

included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this

document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing

the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other

Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of

developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for

copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be

followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than

English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be

revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an

"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING

TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING

BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION

HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFCEditor function is currently provided by the

Internet Society.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有