分享
 
 
 

RFC3038 - VCID Notification over ATM link for LDP

王朝vc·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group K. Nagami

Request for Comments: 3038 Y. Katsube

Category: Standards Track Toshiba Corp.

N. Demizu

WaterSprings.ORG

H. Esaki

Univ. of Tokyo

P. Doolan

Ennovate Networks

January 2001

VCID Notification over ATM link for LDP

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the

Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet

Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state

and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

The Asynchronous Transfer Mode Label Switching Router (ATM-LSR) is

one of the major applications of label switching. Because the ATM

layer labels (VPI and VCI) associated with a VC rewritten with new

value at every ATM switch nodes, it is not possible to use them to

identify a VC in label mapping messages. The concept of Virtual

Connection Identifier (VCID) is introdUCed to solve this problem.

VCID has the same value at both ends of a VC. This document

specifies the procedures for the communication of VCID values between

neighboring ATM-LSRs that must occur in order to ensure this

property.

1. Introduction

Several label switching schemes have been proposed to integrate Layer

2 and Layer 3. The ATM Label Switching Router (ATM-LSR) is one of

the major applications of label switching.

In the case of ATM VCs, the VPI and VCI labels are, in the general

case, rewritten with new values at every switch node through which

the VC passes and cannot be used to provide end to end identification

of a VC.

In the context of MPLS 'stream', which are classes of packets that

have some common characteristic that may be deduced by examination of

the layer 3 header in the packets, are bound to layer 2 'labels'. We

speak of stream being 'bound' to labels. These bindings are conveyed

between peer LSRs by means of a Label Distribution Protocol [LDP].

In order to apply MPLS to ATM links, we need some way to identify ATM

VCs in LDP mapping messages. An identifier called a Virtual

Connection ID (VCID) is introduced. VCID has the same value at both

ends of a VC. This document specifies the procedures for the

communication of VCID values between neighboring ATM-LSRs that must

occur in order to ensure this property.

2. Overview of VCID Notification Procedures

2.1 VCID Notification procedures

The ATM has several types of VCs (transparent point-to-point

link/VP/PVC/SVC). A transparent point-to-point link is defined as

one that has the same VPI/VCI label at both ends of a VC. For

example, two nodes are directly connected (i.e., without intervening

ATM switches) or are connected through a VP with the same VPI value

at both ends of the VP.

There are two broad categories of VCID notification procedures;

inband and outband. The categorization refers to the connection over

which the messages of the VCID notification procedure are forwarded.

In the case of the inband procedures, those messages are forwarded

over the VC to which they refer. In contrast the out of band

procedures transmit the messages over some other connection (than the

VC to which they refer).

We list below the various types of link and briefly mention the VCID

notification procedures employed and the rational for that choice.

The procedures themselves are discussed in detail in later sections.

Transparent point-to-point link : no VCID notification

VCID notification procedure is not necessary because the label

(i.e., VPI/VCI) is the same at each end of the VC.

VP : inband notification or VPID notification or no notification

- Inband notification

VCID notification is needed because the VPI at each end of the VC

may not be the same. Inband VCID notification is used in this

case.

- VPID notification

VCID notification is needed because the VPI at each end of the VC

may not be the same. VPID notification is used in this case.

- No notification

If a node has only one VP to a neighboring node, VCID notification

procedure is not mandatory. The VCI can be used as the VCID.

This is because the VCI value is the same at each end of the VP.

PVC : inband notification

Inband VCID notification is used in this case because the labels

at each end of the VC may not be the same.

SVC : there are three possibilities

- Outband notification

If a signaling message has a field which is large enough to carry

a VCID value (e.g., GIT [GIT]), then the VCID is carried directly

in it.

- Outband notification using a small-sized field

If a signaling message has a field which is not large enough to

carry a VCID value, this procedure is used.

- Inband notification

If a signaling message can not carry user information, this

procedure is used.

When an LSP is a point-to-multipoint VC and an ATM switch in an

LSR is not capable of VC merge, it may cause problems in

performance and quality of service. When the LSR wants to add a

new leaf to the LSP, it needs to split the active LSP temporarily

to send an inband notification message.

2.2 VC direction

A VC has a directionality. The VCID procedure for a VC is always

triggered from the upstream node of the VC, i.e., the upstream node

notifies the downstream node of the VCID.

If bidirectional use of a label switched VC is allowed, the label

switched VC is said to be bidirectional. In this case, two VCID

procedures are taken, one for each direction.

If bidirectional use of a label switched VC is not allowed, the label

switched VC is said to be unidirectional. In this case, only one

VCID procedure is taken for the allowed direction.

VC directionality is communicated through LDP.

3. VCID Notification Procedures

3.1 Inband Notification Procedures

3.1.1 Inband Notification for Point-to-point VC

VCID notification is performed by transmitting a control message

through the VC newly established (by signalling or management) for

use as an label switched path (LSP). The procedure for VCID

notification between two nodes A and B is detailed below.

0. The node A establishes a VC to the destination node B (by

signalling or management).

1. The node A selects a VCID value.

2. The node A sends a VCID PROPOSE message which contains the VCID

value and a message ID through the newly established VC to the

node B.

3. The node A establishes an association between the outgoing label

(VPI/VCI) for the VC and the VCID value.

4. The node B receives the message from the VC and establishes an

association between the VCID in the message and the incoming

label(VPI/VCI) for the VC. Until the node B receives the LDP

Request message, the node B discards any packet received over the

VC other than the VCID PROPOSE message.

5. The node B sends an ACK message to the node A. This message

contains the same VCID and message ID as specified in the received

message. This message is sent through the VC for LDP.

6. When node A receives the ACK message, it checks whether the VCID

and the message ID in the message are the same as the registered

ones. If they are the same, node A regards that node B has

established the association between the VC and VCID. Otherwise,

the message is ignored. If the node A does not receive the ACK

message with the eXPected message ID and VCID during a given

period, the node A resends the VCID PROPOSE message to the node B.

7. After receiving the proposer ACK message, the node A sends an LDP

REQUEST message to the node B. It contains the message ID used

for VCID PROPOSE. When the node B receives the LDP REQUEST

message, it regards that the node A has received the ACK

correctly. The message exchange using VCID PROPOSE, VCID ACK, and

LDP REQUEST messages constitutes a 3-way handshake. The 3-way

handshake mechanism is required since the transmission of VCID

PROPOSE message is unreliable. Once the 3-way handshake

completes, the node B ignores all VCID PROPOSE messages received

over the VC. The node B sends an LDP Mapping message, which

contains the VCID value in the label TLV.

Node A Node B

---------------> VCID PROPOSE

<--------------- VCID ACK

---------------> LDP Label Request

<--------------- LDP Label Mapping

3.1.2 Inband notification for point-to-multipoint VC

Current LDP specification does not support multicast. But the VCID

notification procedure is defined for future use. VCID notification

is performed by sending a control message through the VC to be used

as an LSP. The upstream node assigns the VCID value. The procedure

by which it notifies the downstream node of that value is given

below. The procedure is used when a new VC is created or a new leaf

is added to the VC.

First, the procedure for establishing the first VC is described.

1. The upstream node assigns a VCID value for the VC. When the VCID

value is already assigned to a VC, it is used for VCID.

2. The upstream node sends a message which contains the VCID value

and a message ID through the VC used for an LSP. This message is

transferred to all leaf nodes.

3. The upstream node establishes an association between the outgoing

label for the VC and the VCID value.

4. When the downstream nodes receiving the message already received

the LDP REQUEST message for the VC, the received message is

discarded. Otherwise, the downstream nodes establish an

association between the VCID in the message and the VC from which

the message is received.

5. The downstream nodes send an ACK message to the upstream node.

6. After the upstream node receives the ACK messages, the upstream

node and the downstream nodes share the VCID. The upstream node

sends the LDP REQUEST message in order to make a 3-way handshake.

Upstream Downstream 1 Downstream 2

-----------+---> VCID PROPOSE

+------------------->

<---------------

VCID ACK

<------------------------------- VCID ACK

Second, the procedure for adding a leaf to the existing point-to-

multipoint VC is described.

0. The upstream node adds the downstream node, using the ATM

signaling.

1. The VCID value which already assigned to the VC is used.

2. The upstream node sends a message which contains the VCID value

and a message ID through the VC used for an LSP. This message is

transferred to all leaf nodes.

3. When the downstream nodes receiving the message already received

the LDP REQUEST message for the VC, the received message is

discarded. Otherwise, the downstream nodes establish an

association between the VCID in the message and the VC from which

the message is received.

4. After the upstream node receives the ACK messages, the upstream

node and the downstream nodes share the VCID. The upstream node

sends the LDP REQUEST message in order to make a 3-way handshake.

3.2 Outband Notification using a small-sized field

This method can be applied when a VC is established using an ATM

signaling message and the message has a field which is not large

enough to carry a VCID value.

SETUP message of the ATM Forum UNI 3.1/4.0 has a 7-bit mandatory

field for the user. This is a user specific field in the Layer 3

protocol field in the BLLI IE (Broadband Low Layer Information

Information Element).

The BLLI value is used as a temporary identifier for a VC during a

VCID notification procedure. This mechanism is defined as "Outband

Notification using a small-sized field". The BLLI value of a new VC

must not be assigned to other VCs during the procedure to avoid

identifier conflict. When the association among the BLLI value, a

VCID value, and the corresponding VC is established, the BLLI value

can be reused for a new VC. VCID values can be assigned

independently from BLLI values.

Node A Node B

---------------> ATM Signaling with BLLI

<---------------

---------------> VCID PROPOSE with BLLI

<--------------- VCID ACK

---------------> LDP Label Request

<--------------- LDP Label Mapping

A point-to-multipoint VC can also be established using ADD_PARTY of

the ATM Forum Signaling. ADD_PARTY adds a new VC leaf to an existing

VC or an existing VC tree. In this procedure, the BLLI value of

ADD_PARTY has to be the same value as that used to establish the

first point-to-point VC of the tree. The same BLLI value can be used

in different VC trees only when these VC trees can not add a leaf at

the same time. As a result, the BLLI value used in the signaling

must be determined by the root node of the multicast tree.

[note]

BLLI value is unique at the sender node. But BLLI value is not

unique at the receiver node because multiple sender nodes may

allocate the same BLLI value. So, the receiver node must

recognize BLLI value and the sender address. ATM Signaling

messages (SETUP and ADD_PARTY) carry both the BLLI and the sender

ATM address. The receiver node can realize which node sends the

BLLI message.

3.2.1 Outband notification using a small-sized field for

point-to-point VC

This subsection describes procedures for establishing a VC and for

notification of its VCID between neighboring LSRs for unicast

traffic.

The procedure employed when the upstream LSR assigns a VCID is as

follows.

1. An upstream LSR establishes a VC to the downstream LSR using ATM

signaling and supplies a value in the BLLI field that it is not

currently using for any other (incomplete) VCID notification

transaction with this peer.

2. The upstream LSR sends the VCID PROPOSE message through the VC for

LDP to notify the downstream LSR of the association between the

BLLI and VCID values.

3. The downstream LSR establishes the association between the VC with

the BLLI value and the VCID and sends an ACK message to the

upstream LSR.

4. After the upstream LSR receives the ACK message, it establishes

the association between the VC and the VCID. The VC is ready to

be used. At this time the BLLI value employed in this transaction

is free for reuse.

5. After VCID notification, the upstream node sends the LDP REQUEST

message to the downstream node. The downstream node sends the LDP

mapping message, which contains the VCID value in the label TLV of

LDP.

3.2.2 Outband notification using a small-sized field

for point-to-multipoint VC

This subsection describes procedures for establishing the first VC

for a multicast tree and for adding a new VC leaf to an existing VC

tree including the notification of its VCID for a multicast stream

using point-to-multipoint VCs.

In this procedure, an upstream LSR determines both the VCID and BLLI

value in the multicast case. The reason that the BLLI value is

determined by an upstream LSR is described above.

First, the procedure for establishing the first VC is described.

1. An upstream LSR establishes a VC by the ATM Forum Signaling

between the downstream LSR with a unique BLLI value at this time.

2. The upstream LSR notifies the downstream LSR of a paired BLLI

value and VCID using a message dedicated for this purpose.

3. The downstream LSR establishes the association between the VC with

the BLLI value and the VCID and sends an ACK message to the

upstream LSR. If the VCID is used by some other VC between the

upstream and downstream LSRs, the old VC is discarded.

4. After the upstream LSR receives the ACK message, the VC is ready

to be used and the BLLI value can be used for another VC.

Second, the procedure for adding a leaf to the existing point-to-

multipoint VC is described.

1. The upstream LSR establishes a VC by the ATM Forum Signaling

between its downstream LSR with the BLLI value that was used

during the first signaling procedure. If another VC is using the

BLLI value at the same time, the upstream waits for the completion

of the signaling procedure that is using this BLLI value.

2. Go to step 2 of the procedure for the first VC.

3.3 Outband notification

This method can be applied when a VC is established using a ATM

signaling message and the message has a field (e.g., GIT [GIT]) which

is large enough to carry a VCID value. Message format is described

in [GIT]. After the VCID notification, the node A sends the LDP

request message is sent to the node B. Then, the node B sends the

LDP mapping message to the node A.

Node A Node B

---------------> ATM signaling with VCID

<---------------

---------------> LDP Label Request

<--------------- LDP Label Mapping

4 VPID Notification Procedure

The approach that is used for the VCID notification procedure is also

applicable to share the same identifier between both ends for a VP.

VPID notification procedure is defined for this purpose.

A distinct VPID notification procedure is performed for each

direction of each VP.

After the VPID notification is finished for a VP, a VCID of a VC in

the VP is constructed with the VPID(MSB) and VCI(LSB) of the VC. The

VCID can be used by LDP without performing VCID notification

procedure. The message sequence is given below.

1. An upstream node sends the VPID PROPOSE message. In the case of

bidirectional label switched VC, both the upstream and downstream

nodes use VCI=33. In the case of unidirectional label switched

VC, the node which has larger LDP Identifier uses VCI=33 and the

other node uses VCI=34. Note that VCI=32, which is used for

unlabeled packet transfer, is not used for VPID notification

procedure so that the same encapsulation method can be applied for

both VPID procedure and inband VCID procedure.

2. The downstream node sends the VPID ACK message.

3. The upstream node sends the LDP Label Request message.

4. The downstream node sends the LDP Label Mapping message.

5 VCID Message Format

5.1 VCID Messages

An LDP VCID message consists of the LDP [LDP] fixed header followed

by one or more TLV. A VCID PROPOSE inband message and a VPID PROPOSE

message are sent as a null encapsulation packet through a VC to be

used as an LSP. There is only the label stack header before the LDP

VCID PDU. A label value in the label stack entry [ENCAPS] for the

VCID PROPOSE inband message and the VPID PROPOSE message are 4.

Other messages are sent as TCP packets. This is the same as LDP.

The VCID message type field is as follows:

VCID Propose inband Message = 0x0501

VCID Propose Message = 0x0502

VCID ACK Message = 0x0503

VCID NACK Message = 0x0504

VPID Propose inband Message = 0x0505

VPID ACK Message = 0x0506

VPID NACK Message = 0x0507

5.1.1 VCID Propose inband Message

This message is sent as a null encapsulation packet with LDP header

and label stack header through a VC to be used as an LSP. The label

value is 4. The reserved label value is required because the

downstream node may receive this message after receiving the LDP

Label Request message in the case of point-to-multipoint VC. The

downstream node must distinguish the VCID PROPOSE message from other

messages and ignore the VCID PROPOSE message when the node already

received the LDP Label Request message for the VC.

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

UVCID Inband Propose (0x0501) Message Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Label TLV

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Optional Parameters

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message Id

Four octet integer used to identify this message.

Label TLV

Label TLV contains VCID value. Type of label TLV is VCID(0x0203).

5.1.2 VCID Propose Message

An LSR uses the VCID PROPOSE message for the VCID notification

procedure of the outband notification using a small-sized field.

This message is sent through the VC for the LDP.

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

U VCID Propose (0x0502) Message Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Label TLV

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Temporary ID TLV

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Optional Parameters

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

Four octet integer used to identify this message.

Label TLV

Label TLV contains VCID value. Type of label TLV is VCID(0x0203).

Temporary ID TLV

The value carried in the user specific field in the layer 3

protocol field in the BLLI ID in the ATM Forum UNI 3.1/4.0 Type of

label TLV is VCID temporary ID(0x0702).

5.1.3 VCID ACK Message

An LSR send the VCID ACK message when the LSR accepts the VCID

PROPOSE message.

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

U VCID ACK (0x0503) Message Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Label TLV

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VCID Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Optional Parameters

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

Four octet integer used to identify this message.

Label TLV

The label TLV contains the VCID value of the received VCID PROPOSE

message. Type of label TLV is VCID(0x0203).

VCID Message ID

This value is the same as that of received VCID PROPOSE message.

5.1.4 VCID NACK Message

An LSR send the VCID NACK message when the LSR does not accept the

VCID PROPOSE message.

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

U VCID NACK (0x0504) Message Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Label TLV

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VCID Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Optional Parameters

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

Four octet integer used to identify this message.

Label TLV

The label TLV contains the VCID value of the received VCID PROPOSE

message. Type of label TLV is VCID(0x0203).

VCID Message ID

This value is the same as that of received VCID PROPOSE message.

5.1.5 VPID Propose inband Message

This message is sent as a null encapsulation packet with LDP header

and label stack header through a VC to be used as an LSP. The label

value is 4. The downstream node must distinguish the VPID PROPOSE

message from other messages and ignore the VPID PROPOSE message when

the node already received the LDP Label Request message for the VC.

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

UVPID Inband Propose (0x0505) Message Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VPID TLV

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Optional Parameters

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message Id

Four octet integer used to identify this message.

VPID TLV

VPID TLV contains VPID value. Type of label TLV is VPID(0x0703).

5.1.6 VPID ACK Message

An LSR send the VPID ACK message when the LSR accepts the VPID

PROPOSE message.

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

U VPID ACK (0x0506) Message Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VPID TLV

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VCID Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Optional Parameters

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

Four octet integer used to identify this message.

VPID TLV

The VPID TLV contains the VPID value of the received VPID PROPOSE

message.

VCID Message ID

This value is the same as that of received VCID PROPOSE message.

5.1.7 VPID NACK Message

An LSR send the VPID NACK message when the LSR accepts the VPID

PROPOSE message.

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

U VPID NACK (0x0507) Message Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VPID TLV

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VCID Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Optional Parameters

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Message ID

Four octet integer used to identify this message.

VPID TLV

The VPID TLV contains the VPID value of the received VPID PROPOSE

message.

VCID Message ID

This value is the same as that of received VCID PROPOSE message.

5.2 Objects

5.2.1 VCID Label TLV

An LSR uses VCID Label TLV to encode labels for use on the link which

does not have the same data link label at both ends of a VC.

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

UFVCID Label (0x0203) Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VCID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VCID

This is 4 byte VCID value.

5.2.2 VCID Message ID TLV

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

UFVCID Message ID(0x0701) Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VCID Message ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VCID Message ID

This is 4 byte VCID Message ID

5.2.3 VCID Temporary ID TLV

An LSR uses the VCID temporary ID TLV for the VCID notification

procedure of the outband notification using a small-sized field.

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

UF VCID Temporary ID (0x0702) Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Temporary ID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Temporary ID:

The value carried in the user specific field in the layer 3

protocol field in the BLLI ID in the ATM Forum UNI 3.1/4.0

5.2.4 VPID Label TLV

An LSR uses VPID TLV for the VPID notification procedure.

0 1 2 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

UF VPID (0x0703) Length

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VPID

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

VPID

This is 2 byte VPID value.

Security Considerations

This document does not introduce new security issues other than those

present in the LDP and may use the same mechanisms proposed for this

technology.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable technical comments

of Yoshihiro Ohba, Shigeo Matsuzawa, Akiyoshi Mogi, Muneyoshi Suzuki,

George Swallow and members of the LAST-WG of the WIDE Project.

References

[LDP] Andersson, L., Doolan, P., Feldman, N., Fredette, A. and B.

Thomas, "LDP Specification", RFC3036, January 2001.

[GIT] Suzuki, M., "The Assignment of the Information Field and

Protocol Identifier in the Q.2941 Generic Identifier and

Q.2957 User-to-user Signaling for the Internet Protocol",

RFC3033, January 2001.

[ENCAPS] Rosen, E., Viswanathan, A. and R. Callon, "MPLS Label Stack

Encoding", RFC3032, January 2001.

Authors' Addresses

Ken-ichi Nagami

Computer & Network Development Center, Toshiba Corporation,

1, Toshiba-cho, Fuchu-shi,

Tokyo, 183-8511, Japan

Phone: +81-42-333-2884

EMail: ken.nagami@toshiba.co.jp

Noritoshi Demizu

WaterSprings.ORG

1-6-11-501, Honjo, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, 130-0004, Japan

EMail: demizu@dd.iij4u.or.jp

Hiroshi Esaki

Computer Center, University of Tokyo,

2-11-16 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku,

Tokyo, 113-8658, Japan

Phone: +81-3-3812-1111

EMail: hiroshi@wide.ad.jp

Yasuhiro Katsube

Computer & Network Development Center, Toshiba Corporation,

1, Toshiba-cho, Fuchu-shi,

Tokyo, 183-8511, Japan

Phone: +81-42-333-2844

EMail: yasuhiro.katsube@toshiba.co.jp

Paul Doolan

Ennovate Networks

60 Codman Hill Road

Boxborough, MA

Phone: 978-263-2002 x103

EMail: pdoolan@ennovatenetworks.com

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to

others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it

or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published

and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any

kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are

included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this

document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing

the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other

Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of

developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for

copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be

followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than

English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be

revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an

"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING

TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING

BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION

HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFCEditor function is currently provided by the

Internet Society.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有