分享
 
 
 

RFC3062 - LDAP Password Modify Extended Operation

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group K. Zeilenga

Request for Comments: 3062 OpenLDAP Foundation

Category: Standards Track February 2001

LDAP PassWord Modify Extended Operation

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the

Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet

Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state

and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

The integration of the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)

and external authentication services has introdUCed non-DN

authentication identities and allowed for non-directory storage of

passwords. As such, mechanisms which update the directory (e.g.,

Modify) cannot be used to change a user's password. This document

describes an LDAP extended operation to allow modification of user

passwords which is not dependent upon the form of the authentication

identity nor the password storage mechanism used.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",

"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", and "MAY" in this document are

to be interpreted as described in RFC2119.

1. Background and Intent of Use

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC2251] is designed to

support an number of authentication mechanisms including simple user

name/password pairs. Traditionally, LDAP users where identified by

the Distinguished Name [RFC2253] of a directory entry and this entry

contained a userPassword [RFC2256] attribute containing one or more

passwords.

The protocol does not mandate that passwords associated with a user

be stored in the directory server. The server may use any attribute

suitable for password storage (e.g., userPassword), or use non-

directory storage.

The integration [RFC2829] of application neutral SASL [RFC2222]

services which support simple username/password mechanisms (such as

DIGEST-MD5) has introduced non-LDAP DN authentication identity forms

and made storage of passwords the responsibility of the SASL service

provider.

LDAP update operations are designed to act upon attributes of an

entry within the directory. LDAP update operations cannot be used to

modify a user's password when the user is not represented by a DN,

does not have a entry, or when that password used by the server is

not stored as an attribute of an entry. An alternative mechanism is

needed.

This document describes an LDAP Extended Operation intended to allow

directory clients to update user passwords. The user may or may not

be associated with a directory entry. The user may or may not be

represented as an LDAP DN. The user's password may or may not be

stored in the directory.

The operation SHOULD NOT be used without adequate security protection

as the operation affords no privacy or integrity protect itself.

This operation SHALL NOT be used anonymously.

2. Password Modify Request and Response

The Password Modify operation is an LDAPv3 Extended Operation

[RFC2251, Section 4.12] and is identified by the OBJECT IDENTIFIER

passwdModifyOID. This section details the syntax of the protocol

request and response.

passwdModifyOID OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.11.1

PasswdModifyRequestValue ::= SEQUENCE {

userIdentity [0] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL

oldPasswd [1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL

newPasswd [2] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL }

PasswdModifyResponseValue ::= SEQUENCE {

genPasswd [0] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL }

2.1. Password Modify Request

A Password Modify request is an ExtendedRequest with the requestName

field containing passwdModifyOID OID and optionally provides a

requestValue field. If the requestValue field is provided, it SHALL

contain a PasswdModifyRequestValue with one or more fields present.

The userIdentity field, if present, SHALL contain an octet string

representation of the user associated with the request. This string

may or may not be an LDAPDN [RFC2253]. If no userIdentity field is

present, the request acts up upon the password of the user currently

associated with the LDAP session.

The oldPasswd field, if present, SHALL contain the user's current

password.

The newPasswd field, if present, SHALL contain the desired password

for this user.

2.2. Password Modify Response

A Password Modify response is an ExtendedResponse where the

responseName field is absent and the response field is optional. The

response field, if present, SHALL contain a PasswdModifyResponseValue

with genPasswd field present.

The genPasswd field, if present, SHALL contain a generated password

for the user.

If an resultCode other than success (0) is indicated in the response,

the response field MUST be absent.

3. Operation Requirements

Clients SHOULD NOT submit a Password Modification request without

ensuring adequate security safeguards are in place. Servers SHOULD

return a non-success resultCode if sufficient security protection are

not in place.

Servers SHOULD indicate their support for this extended operation by

providing PasswdModifyOID as a value of the supportedExtension

attribute type in their root DSE. A server MAY choose to advertise

this extension only when the client is authorized and/or has

established the necessary security protections to use this operation.

Clients SHOULD verify the server implements this extended operation

prior to attempting the operation by asserting the supportedExtension

attribute contains a value of PasswdModifyOID.

The server SHALL only return success upon successfully changing the

user's password. The server SHALL leave the password unmodified and

return a non-success resultCode otherwise.

If the server does not recognize provided fields or does not support

the combination of fields provided, it SHALL NOT change the user

password.

If oldPasswd is present and the provided value cannot be verified or

is incorrect, the server SHALL NOT change the user password. If

oldPasswd is not present, the server MAY use other policy to

determine whether or not to change the password.

The server SHALL NOT generate a password on behalf of the client if

the client has provided a newPasswd. In absence of a client provided

newPasswd, the server SHALL either generate a password on behalf of

the client or return a non-success result code. The server MUST

provide the generated password upon success as the value of the

genPasswd field.

The server MAY return adminLimitExceeded, busy,

confidentialityRequired, operationsError, unavailable,

unwillingToPerform, or other non-success resultCode as appropriate to

indicate that it was unable to successfully complete the operation.

Servers MAY implement administrative policies which restrict this

operation.

4. Security Considerations

This operation is used to modify user passwords. The operation

itself does not provide any security protection to ensure integrity

and/or confidentiality of the information. Use of this operation is

strongly discouraged when privacy protections are not in place to

guarantee confidentiality and may result in the disclosure of the

password to unauthorized parties. This extension MUST be used with

confidentiality protection, such as Start TLS [RFC2830]. The NULL

cipher suite MUST NOT be used.

5. Bibliography

[RFC2219] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC2119, March 1997.

[RFC2222] Myers, J., "Simple Authentication and Security Layer

(SASL)", RFC2222, October 1997.

[RFC2251] Wahl, M., Howes, T. and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory

Access Protocol (v3)", RFC2251, December 1997.

[RFC2252] Wahl, M., Coulbeck, A., Howes, T. and S. Kille,

"Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): Attribute

Syntax Definitions", RFC2252, December 1997.

[RFC2253] Wahl, M., Kille,S. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory

Access Protocol (v3): UTF-8 String Representation of

Distinguished Names", RFC2253, December 1997.

[RFC2256] Wahl, M., "A Summary of the X.500(96) User Schema for use

with LDAPv3", RFC2256, December 1997.

[RFC2829] Wahl, M., Alvestrand, H., Hodges, J. and R. Morgan,

"Authentication Methods for LDAP", RFC2829, May 2000.

[RFC2830] Hodges, J., Morgan, R. and M. Wahl, "Lightweight Directory

Access Protocol (v3): Extension for Transport Layer

Security", RFC2830, May 2000.

6. Acknowledgment

This document borrows from a number of IETF documents and is based

upon input from the IETF LDAPext working group.

7. Author's Address

Kurt D. Zeilenga

OpenLDAP Foundation

EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org

8. Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to

others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise eXPlain it

or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published

and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any

kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are

included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this

document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing

the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other

Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of

developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for

copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be

followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than

English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be

revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an

"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING

TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING

BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION

HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFCEditor function is currently provided by the

Internet Society.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有