RFC3138 - Extended Assignments in 233/8

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group D. Meyer

Request for Comments: 3138 Sprint

Category: Informational June 2001

Extended Assignments in 233/8

Status of this Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does

not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this

memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

This memo provides describes the mapping of the GLOP addresses

corresponding to the private AS space.

1. IntrodUCtion

RFC2770 [RFC2770] describes an eXPerimental policy for use of the

class D address space using 233/8. The technique described there

maps 16 bits of Autonomous System number (AS) into the middle two

octets of 233/8 to yield a /24. While this technique has been

successful, the assignments are inefficient in those cases in which a

/24 is too small or the user doesn't have its own AS.

RFC1930 [RFC1930] defines the private AS space to be 64512 through

65535. This memo expands on RFC2770 to allow routing registries to

assign multicast addresses from the GLOP space corresponding to the

RFC1930 private AS space. This space will be referred to as the

EGLOP (Extended GLOP) address space.

This memo is a product of the Multicast Deployment Working Group

(MBONED) in the Operations and Management Area of the Internet

Engineering Task Force. Submit comments to <mboned@ns.uoregon.edu>

or the authors.

The terms "Specification Required", "Expert Review", "IESG Approval",

"IETF Consensus", and "Standards Action", are used in this memo to

refer to the processes described in [RFC2434]. The keyWords MUST,

MUST NOT, MAY, OPTIONAL, REQUIRED, RECOMMENDED, SHALL, SHALL NOT,

SHOULD, SHOULD NOT are to be interpreted as defined in RFC2119

[RFC2119].

2. Overview

http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses defines a

mechanism for assignment of multicast addresses that are generally

for use in network control applications. It is envisioned that those

addresses assigned from the EGLOP space (233.252.0.0 -

233.255.255.255) will be used by applications that cannot use

Administratively Scoped Addressing [RFC2365], GLOP Addressing

[RFC2770], or Source Specific Multicast (Source Specific Multicast,

or SSM, is an extension of IP Multicast in which traffic is forwarded

to receivers from only those multicast sources for which the

receivers have explicitly expressed interest, and is primarily

targeted at one-to-many (broadcast) applications).

3. Assignment Criteria

Globally scoped IPv4 multicast addresses in the EGLOP space are

assigned by a Regional Registry (RIR). An applicant MUST, as per

[IANA], show that the request cannot be satisfied using

Administratively Scoped addressing [RFC2365], GLOP addressing

[RFC2770], or SSM. The fine-grained assignment policy is left to the

assigning RIR.

4. Security Considerations

The assignment scheme described in this document does not effect the

security properties of the the single source or any source multicast

service models.

5. Acknowledgments

Kurt Kayser, Mirjam Kuehne, Michelle Schipper and Randy Bush provided

many insightful comments on earlier versions of this document.

6. Author's Address

David Meyer

Sprint

12502 Sunrise Valley Dr

Reston VA, 20191

EMail: dmm@sprint.net

7. References

[IANA] http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses

[RFC1930] Hawkinson J. and T. Bates, "Guidelines for

creation, selection, and registration of an

Autonomous System (AS)", RFC1930, March 1996.

[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process --

Revision 3", BCP 9, RFC2026, October 1996.

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to

Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC2119,

March 1997.

[RFC2365] Meyer, D., "Administratively Scoped IP Multicast",

RFC2365, July 1998.

[RFC2770] Meyer, D. and P. Lothberg, "GLOP Addressing in

233/8", RFC2770, February 2000.

[RFC2780] Bradner, S. and V. Paxson, "IANA Allocation

Guidelines For Values In the Internet Protocol

and Related Headers", BCP 37, RFC2780, March

2000.

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to

others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it

or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published

and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any

kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are

included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this

document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing

the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other

Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of

developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for

copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be

followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than

English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be

revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an

"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING

TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING

BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION

HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFCEditor function is currently provided by the

Internet Society.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航