分享
 
 
 

RFC3975-OMA-IETF Standardization Collaboration

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group G. Huston, Ed.

Request for Comments: 3975 IAB

Category: Informational I. LeUCa, Ed.

OMA

January 2005

OMA-IETF Standardization Collaboration

Status of This Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does

not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this

memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

Abstract

This document describes the standardization collaboration between the

Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) and the Internet Engineering Task Force

(IETF).

1. Introduction

This document contains a set of principles and guidelines that serves

as the basis for establishing a cooperation framework between the

Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) and the Internet Engineering Task Force

(IETF). This cooperation is intended to secure timely development of

technical specifications that facilitate maximum interoperability

with existing (fixed and mobile) Internet systems, devices, and

protocols.

Within the OMA, specific activities are undertaken through OMA

working groups, each with an area of responsibility. These

activities are authorized, and their output is approved by, the OMA

Technical Plenary. The list of OMA working groups, OMA

Specifications for public comment, the OMA work program, and publicly

available working group drafts can be found at the OMA web site,

.

Within the IETF, activities are undertaken within a framework of

Areas, with specific activities being undertaken by working groups

that are chartered within each Area. Working group output is

reviewed by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) and

published by the RFC-Editor. IETF activities are based on a

principle of open contribution and participation by any interested

party. Information on IETF working groups, current work item drafts,

meeting schedules, and mailing lists are published on the IETF web

site, .

The IETF and the OMA, are cooperating with a mutual desire to support

the integrity of specifications and standards developed by each body.

The preferred approach is that the OMA uses the Internet standards

unchanged, if feasible, and communicates requirements for change to

the IETF, as needed. The parties intend to work together in an

effort to avoid duplication of work.

Each organization will operate according to its own rules and

procedures, including rules governing Intellectual Property Rights

(IPR), specification elaboration, approval, and maintenance.

This cooperation framework is intended to guide collaborative

efforts, and should be put into use in as much as it is applicable to

these efforts. If either party finds this framework inapplicable,

then it may notify the other party so that this framework may be

modified or withdrawn, as appropriate.

2. Basis of Collaboration

In the further development of OMA specifications, the benefit of

adopting Internet specifications has been identified.

Although this document recognizes the importance of interoperability

of OMA specifications with the existing Internet and hence the use of

IETF standards, the OMA recognizes that additions or modifications

might be needed in order to make the IETF Internet specifications

meet the needs of the OMA. In such cases, the OMA will take its

concerns directly to the appropriate IETF working groups for

resolution. When no appropriate working group can be found or it is

not known where to direct the communication, or in the case of

resolution of consequent matters, the issue will be raised through

the OMA's designated liaison to the IETF.

The IETF may also need to ask questions of the OMA in order to refine

its understanding of OMA requirements or may wish to offer guidance

to OMA on the effective use of Internet specifications. Where

possible, these communications will occur in the context of a

discussion between OMA and an IETF working group. In the event that

a working group level discussion is deemed inappropriate for the

desired communication, the matter will be raised through the IETF's

designated liaison to the OMA.

3. Document Sharing

Both the OMA and the IETF encourage the sharing of draft documents

that are of mutual interest.

All IETF documents are publicly available from the IETF web site, and

discussion of documents is hosted on open mailing lists.

OMA documents intended for public consumption, including working

drafts, are published for open Access on the OMA web site,

. Technical contributions to OMA

by its members are also encouraged to make publicly available.

The OMA and the IETF will work to update and exchange, on a regular

basis, a list of dependencies between each organization's

specifications and work in progress.

4. Participation in the IETF Process

Participation in the IETF process is completely open. This allows

OMA delegates to participate to whatever extent the OMA considers

appropriate in IETF meetings and mailing list discussions to assist

the IETF in refining its understanding of OMA requirements and in

meeting requirements that the IETF deems appropriate. This close

working relationship also offers an Excellent opportunity for OMA

delegates to receive informal guidance from IETF on OMA's use of

Internet specifications.

The vast majority of technical discussions and decision making within

the IETF is undertaken by using open mailing lists. It is

recommended that interested individuals subscribe to and participate

on these lists.

The OMA is to be notified of new work to be undertaken by the IETF

via a nominated IETF liaison notification mechanism.

5. Designated Liaisons

When the informal working group level of interaction is insufficient,

matters can be raised through a liaison channel. The OMA and the

IETF shall each establish liaison functions for communication with

the other organization and shall appoint one or more individuals to

those functions.

5.1. IETF Liaison to OMA

The preferred way for organizations to work with IETF is through the

working groups. However, IETF has a limited number of individual

liaison roles with other organizations when conditions warrant the

appointment of a specific person.

The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) shall appoint a specific person

to serve as the OMA Liaison. The role of the IETF's OMA Liaison is

to act as an initial contact point in IETF for administrative ASPects

of this collaboration that cannot easily be handled in other ways

(e.g., at a technical level by interactions with IETF Working Groups

or Area Directors). It is agreed that the role does not carry the

eXPectation of attendance at OMA meetings or participation in OMA

administrative processes, and it is anticipated that all liaison

efforts assigned to this individual will be carried out by electronic

mail. It is understood that the liaison does not have the ability to

make exceptions to, or special provisions for, IETF policies and

procedures.

It is expected that the individual appointed to this role would:

o be informed by the OMA of OMA activities on behalf of the IETF,

including new work proposals, and be able to report those using

appropriate channels within the IETF,

o convey liaisons statements from the OMA to the IETF, and be

responsible for shepherding the OMA communication to the relevant

parts of the IETF,

o report to the OMA on progress with IETF consideration of OMA

liaison statements, and

o have direct access to the OMA technical leadership as well as

direct access to the IAB and IETF Area Directors, as required.

OMA meetings are normally only open to delegates from OMA member

organizations. To assist the information flow between the

organizations, the IETF may, by prior written invitation from the OMA

on a per-case basis, send a representative to participate in and

represent the IETF at an OMA Technical Plenary and working group

meeting under conditions set forth by the OMA. The representative

could be the IETF liaison or, in the event that the liaison cannot

attend, some other designated individual.

5.2. OMA Liaison to IETF

The OMA Technical Plenary shall establish an IETF liaison to be the

initial contact point in the OMA for matters pertaining to the OMA-

IETF cooperation. The OMA-IETF liaison function, therefore, is

expected to work with the concerned IETF and OMA working groups and

to support the interaction between the OMA and the IETF.

6. Formal Liaison Statements

Whenever possible, and as the preferred primary method of

communication and coordination of activity, communication at the

working group level is strongly encouraged.

When deemed necessary, formal communication between OMA and IETF is

also permitted. These communications are to be recorded in the form

of Liaison Statements, and the IETF will use the OMA liaison role to

convey these statements between the IETF and the OMA. All liaison

statements made by the IETF or directed to the IETF shall be

published by the IETF as public documents. All liaison statements

made by the IETF will comply with the IETF IPR policy as documented

in RFC 3667 [1] and RFC 3668 [2].

7. Contributions

OMA members may make contributions to the IETF in their capacity as

IETF participants, under the IETF's IPR policy, as documented in RFC

3667 [1] and RFC3668 [2].

IETF participants who are also members of the OMA may make

contributions to the OMA only in their capacity as OMA members, under

the OMA's membership rules, including its IPR policy.

OMA mailing lists are not open to the general public. It is

recommended that work of mutual interest be discussed on the relevant

IETF mailing lists.

The OMA may make normative references to the IETF Proposed Standard,

Draft Standard, Standard, Best Common Practice and Informational

specifications that are published as part of the "Request for

Comments" (RFC) document series.

8. Co-development of Documents

The IETF and the OMA will not co-develop any documents or material.

9. Terms of Agreement

9.1. Limitation of Liability

Neither the IETF or the OMA makes any representations with respect to

and does not warrant the accuracy of any information or any document.

Without limiting the foregoing, each party agrees to accept the terms

of and reproduce any warranty disclaimers or limitations of liability

that are included in any reproduction of published material made

available to it under this cooperation framework.

9.2. General

a. Neither the OMA or the IETF acquires any intellectual or

industrial property rights under this cooperation framework or

through any disclosure. No license to any patent, trademark,

copyright, or other proprietary right is granted here.

b. There is no obligation for either the OMA or the IETF to

incorporate the materials presented by the other party.

c. This cooperation framework and the relationship between the IETF

and the OMA does not constitute a partnership, joint venture,

agency, or contract of employment between the IETF and the OMA.

10. Acknowledgments

The editors acknowledge the extensive efforts of Jorge Contreras,

Leslie Daigle, Ted Hardie, Allison Mankin, Thomas Narten, Isabelle

Valet-Harper, and Dean Willis in contributing to this document.

This memo took guidance from and borrowed text from RFC 3113 [3] and

RFC 3131 [4].

11. References

11.1. Normative References

[1] Bradner, S., "IETF Rights in Contributions", BCP 78, RFC 3667,

February 2004.

[2] Bradner, S., "Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology",

BCP 79, RFC 3668, February 2004.

11.2. Informative References

[3] Rosenbrock, K., Sanmugam, R., Bradner, S., and J. Klensin,

"3GPP-IETF Standardization Collaboration", RFC 3113, June 2001.

[4] Bradner, S., Calhoun, P., Cuschieri, H., Dennett, S., Flynn, G.,

Lipford, M., and M. McPheters, "3GPP2-IETF Standardization

Collaboration", RFC 3131, June 2001.

Appendix A. Work Areas

The areas of common interest between the IETF and the OMA include the

following:

o Instant Messaging based on SIP/SIMPLE

o Presence and availability

o Privacy

o SIP Event Notification

o Location services, such as geographic location

o Device management

o Multimedia messaging, including email interconnectivity and

mapping

o Group management

o Telephone number mapping (ENUM)

Authors' Addresses

Geoff Huston (editor)

Internet Architecture Board

EMail: execd@iab.org

URI: http://www.iab.org

Ileana Leuca (editor)

Open Mobile Alliance

EMail: ileana.leuca@Cingular.com

URI: http://www.openmobilealliance.org

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions

contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors

retain all their rights.

This document and the information contained herein are provided on an

"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS

OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET

ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,

INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE

INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED

WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any

Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to

pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in

this document or the extent to which any license under such rights

might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has

made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information

on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in IETF Documents can

be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any

assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an

attempt made to oBTain a general license or permission for the use of

such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this

specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at

http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any

copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary

rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement

this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-

ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the

Internet Society.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有