对美国政府电子安全官员宣称的所谓“GOVnet”安全网络分析

对美国政府电子安全官员宣称的所谓“GOVnet”安全网络分析原始地址： http://chutium.top263.net/docs/govnet.htm

中文部分由阿新(Seraph Chutium) 补充

http://com.6to23.com/

这里是华盛顿邮报对的相关报道。

鉴于上篇文章大家因为英文就没仔细看，我把我理解的大意写上……

是美国政府的新任电子信息安全官员称他们要为美国政府构建一个能够抵挡任何黑客，恐怖分子攻击以及蠕虫、病毒的GOVnet网络。他们在做决定前想向业内认识询问了构建这样一个网络的花费及难度等等，业内的大部分安全专家认为这向计划很难完成。其中还有一段介绍了前不久白宫遭红色代码等攻击的例子：

This year, the current network has been breached by hackers, computer worms and viruses. In April, government Web sites were manipulated

by Chinese hackers angered by the death of a Chinese pilot in a collision with an American spy plane. 这段话看了比较欣慰！

The system was also roughed up by the "Code Red" computer worm and an attack program called "ILoveYou." The viruses affected thousands of government computers.（先贴到这里，大家先看看）。

文章的后面 Kurtz 说即使有这样的网络，攻击或病毒仍然可以通过软盘和可信任的内部系统中传播。一位现在美国国防部的信息安全项目主管(information-security program director at the Defense Department 不知道是不是这个意思)说，要想在internet上完全阻止一个经验丰富的黑客或者设计精巧的病毒是几乎不可能的。

大意就是这样……

U.S. Seeks to Build Secure Online Network

Telecom Firms Asked for Help in Constructing Private 'Govnet' System

By Krissah Williams

Washington Post Staff Writer

Thursday, October 11, 2001; Page A10

The government's new cyber-security officials yesterday asked telecommunications companies for help building a government computer network that would have "no risk of outside penetration" -- a task some computer security consultants say is nearly impossible.

Plans for the private network, called Govnet, hinge on whether a reliable network infrastructure can be built at an affordable price, officials said. Computer system consultants said they could not estimate how much the network would cost because of the government's enormous size and security needs.

Richard Clarke, who was appointed special adviser to the president for cyberspace security this week, said he believes a more reliable system can be built. Ninety percent of available fiber-optic space is unused and fairly inexpensive to obtain, he said.

Govnet is part of a plan Clarke announced earlier this week "to secure our cyberspace from a range of possible threats, from hackers to criminals to terrorist groups, to foreign nations, which might use cyber-war against us in the future." Govnet would be completely independent from the Internet to help keep out hackers and viruses, according to the government's plan.

The request from the General Services Administration asks that telecommunications companies submit proposals about how the network could be built, how much it would cost, and how long it would take to construct.

"Based upon that we will make a decision. We're waiting to hear from industry right now," Clarke said.

This year, the current network has been breached by hackers, computer worms and viruses. In April, government Web sites were manipulated by Chinese hackers angered by the death of a Chinese pilot in a collision with an American spy plane. The system was also roughed up by the "Code Red" computer worm and an attack program called "ILoveYou." The viruses affected thousands of government computers.

Last year a report by the General Accounting Office, an internal government watchdog, found weaknesses in the computer network that could allow terrorists or hackers to "severly damage or disrupt national defense or vital public operations or steal sensitive data."

Clarke said the government's current virtual private network is vulnerable to viruses and denial of service attacks that Govnet would make more difficult to execute.

George Kurtz, co-author of "Hacking Exposed" and chief executive of security consulting firm Foundstone Inc., said such a network is feasible but would be costly and difficult to build. It is impossible to stave off all attacks, he said.

"The gist of this entire effort is to try to segment critical government computer systems from the rest of the Internet," Kurtz said. "You can't guarantee against these sort of attacks. There is always going to be a flaw with software, a flaw with hardware or the human element."

Even on Govnet, viruses and attacks could still be spread by floppy disks or connections with trusted systems, Kurtz said.

An internal network, such as the Govnet proposal, is worth investigating but will probably fall to sophisticated hackers, said Amit Yoran, chief executive of security-services company Riptech Inc. and a former information-security program director at the Defense Department.

"It is probably more feasible to implement and strongly enforce global security postures and practices rather than go out and purchase new assets," Yoran said. "Once someone is able to get in, they will find a weak link. When you have a network the size of the government's there will be weak links. Someone will get in."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

下面是名为"m4chine"的fucktelus.com组织成员写的一份深入分析。

主要介绍了它的目的、由来、拨号码前缀和最后作者做出的结论。

至于那个“News Article Pertaining to GOVnet”就是上面那篇华盛顿邮报的文章。

==> 'An Insightful Look at the GOVnet Network' <==

==> By: m4chine

==> Date: 10/12/01

==> E-mail: m4chine@fucktelus.com

Description

indeX =>

-> Introduction

-> GOVnet's Purpose

-> GOVnet's Origin

-> Dial-In Prefixes

-> News Article Pertaining to GOVnet

-> Conclusion

<=>

Introduction -

GOVnet is the name given to the network infrastructure which serves government offices in

Montpelier and Waterbury as well as district offices in twelve cities and towns statewide. In

the near future the Whitehouse and the DOD will be adopting this network for nation-wide usage.

The physical backbone consists of fiber optic cable connecting state buildings on the Montpelier

and Waterbury campuses as well as high-bandwidth digital circuits connecting district offices

statewide. The wide-area backbone is divided into OSPF regions with at least one alternative

route for each link. From the backbone nodes, 56 Kbps backfeeds serve other government offices,

schools, and libraries statewide.

In addition there are dial-in sites located in every local calling area of the state facilitating

network access with a local phone call from any school or library in the state that elects to have

dial-in access. SLIP and PPP access, as well as VT100 access, are supported on a dial-in basis.

The network uses the "open" non-proprietary TCP/IP communications protocol which permits connectivity

throughout the state, the nation and the world.

Network services include Internet access, government-wide e-mail, and WWW access to government.

GOVnet's Purpose -

GOVnet was implemented to meet the twofold network challenge of improved access with reduced costs.

The network provides for complete inter-agency and inter-departmental information access through a single

system serving all agencies on a cooperative basis. This eliminates the need for each agency or department

to provide redundant networks involving duplicate costs.

GOVnet's Origin -

The Vermont Information Strategy Plan (VISP) identified the requirement for information sharing and

networking in two of the critical success factors associated with its objectives. The Information Systems

Advisory Council (ISAC), which was created by VISP (now called IRMAC), was commissioned by the Telecommun-

ication Ten-Year Plan to form a network subcommittee to "develop a plan to integrate network services where

such sharing is valuable for information sharing among government agencies (and) where it is designed and

implemented with the participation and unanimous approval of ISAC."

For a detailed analysis of GOVnet, including a chronology, see the Legislative Joint Fiscal Office's GOVnet.

Dial-In Prefixes -

The list below shows the local dial-in site(s) serving each telephone exchange in the State.

For the telephone number of a specific GOVnet dial-in site, wardial the motherfuckin' prefix

or social engineer the technology coordinator of the department.

Dial-In Sites by Telephone Exchange Telephone Exchange Dial-In Site(s):

222 (Bradford) Bradford

223 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville

226 (Proctor) Springfield

228 (Ludlow) South Londonderry

229 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville

234 (Bethel) Randolph, Rutland, Woodstock

235 (Middle Town Springs) Rutland, Wells

241, 244 (Waterbury) Montpelier

247 (Brandon) Middlebury, Rutland

253 (Stowe) Montpelier, Morrisville

254, 257, 258 (Brattleboro) Brattleboro

259 (Mount Holly) Rutland, South Londonderry

263 (Perkinsville) Springfield

265 (Fair Haven) Rutland

266 (Canaan) Canaan

273 (Hubbardton) Rutland

276 (Brookfield) Montpelier, Randolph

277 (Lemington) Canaan

285 (Franklin) St. Albans

287 (Poultney) Rutland, Wells

291 (White River Junction) White River Junction, Woodstock

293 (Danby) Rutland, South Londonderry

295, 296 (White River Junction) White River Junction, Woodstock

325 (Pawlet) Rutland, Wells

326 (Montgomery) St. Albans

328 (Guildhall) Island Pond

333 (Fairlee) Bradford

334 (Newport) Newport

348 (Williamsville) Brattleboro

352 (Salisbury) Middlebury

362 (Manchester) Bennington, South Londonderry

365 (Newfane) Brattleboro

368 (Jacksonville) Brattleboro

371 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville

372 (Grand Isle) Burlington, St. Albans

375 (Arlington) Bennington, Londonderry

387 (Putney) Brattleboro

388 (Middlebury) Middlebury

394 (Rupert) Bennington, Wells

422 (Sherburne) Rutland, Woodstock

423 (Readsboro) Bennington

425 (Charlotte) Burlington

426 (Marshfield) Montpelier

429 (West Newbury) Bradford

433 (Williamstown) Montpelier, Randolph

434 (Richmond) Burlington

436 (Hartland) White River Junction, Woodstock

438 (West Rutland) Rutland

439 (East Corinth) Bradford

442 (Bennington) Bennington

446 (Wallingford) Rutland

447 (Bennington) Bennington

453 (Bristol) Middlebury

454 (Plainfield) Montpelier

456 (East Calais) Montpelier, Morrisville

457 (Woodstock) White River Junction, Woodstock

459 (Proctor) Rutland

462 (Cornwall) Middlebury

463 (Bellows Falls) Bellows Falls, Springfield

464 (Wilmington) Bennington, Brattleboro

467 (West Burke) Island Pond, St. Johnsbury

468 (Castleton) Rutland

472 (Hardwick) Montpelier, Morrisville, St. Johnsbury

475 (Panton) Middlebury

476, 479 (Barre) Montpelier

482 (Hinesburg) Burlington

483 (Pittsford) Rutland

484 (Reading) Woodstock

485 (Northfield) Montpelier, Randolph

492 (Cuttingsville) Rutland

496 (Waitsfield) Middlebury, Montpelier, Randolph

524 (St. Albans) St. Albans

525 (Barton) Island Pond, Newport

527 (St. Albans) St. Albans

533 (Greensboro) Morrisville, St. Johnsbury

537 (Benson) Rutland

545 (Weybridge) Middlebury

546 (Weathersfield) Springfield

563 (Cabot) Montpelier, St. Johnsbury

583 (Waitsfield) Middlebury, Montpelier, Randolph

584 (Groton) Bradford

586 (Craftsbury) Morrisville

586 (Greensboro) Morrisville, St. Johnsbury

592 (Peacham) St. Johnsbury

623 (Whiting) Middlebury

626 (Lyndonville) St. Johnsbury

633 (Barnet) St. Johnsbury

635 (Johnson) Morrisville

644 (Jeffersonville) Morrisville

645 (Wells) Wells

649 (Norwich) White River Junction, Woodstock

651, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 660 (Burlington) Burlington

672 (Bridgewater) Woodstock

674 (Windsor) Springfield, White River Junction, Woodstock

676 (Maidstone) Island Pond

684 (Danville) St. Johnsbury

685 (Chelsea) Randolph

694 (Stamford) Bennington

695 (Concord) St. Johnsbury

722 (Westminster) Bellows Falls

723 (Island Pond) Island Pond, Newport

728 (Randolph) Randolph

744 (Troy) Newport

746 (Pittsfield) Rutland

747 (Rutland) Rutland

748, 751 (St. Johnsbury) St. Johnsbury

754 (Orleans) Island Pond, Newport

755 (Albany) Morrisville, Newport

757 (Wells River) St. Johnsbury

758 (Bridport) Middlebury

759 (Addison) Middlebury

763 (South Royalton) Randolph, White River Junction, Woodstock

765 (South Strafford) White River Junction

766 (Derby) Newport

767 (Rochester) Middlebury, Randolph

769 (Essex Junction) Burlington

770, 772, 773, 775 (Rutland) Rutland

785 (Thetford) White River Junction

786 (Rutland) Rutland

796 (Alburg) St. Albans

822 (Island Pond) Island Pond

822 (Norton) Canaan, Island Pond

823 (Pownal) Bennington

824 (South Londonderry) South Londonderry

827 (East Fairfield) St. Albans

828 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville

843 (Grafton) Bellows Falls, South Londonderry

848 (Richford) St. Albans

849 (Fairfax) St. Albans

860, 862, 863, 864 (Burlington) Burlington

866 (Newbury) Bradford

867 (Dorset) Bennington

868 (Swanton) St. Albans

869 (Saxtons River) Bellows Falls, Springfield

871, 872 (Essex Junction) Burlington

873 (Derby Line) Newport

874 (Jamaica) Brattleboro, South Londonderry

875 (Chester) Bellows Falls, Springfield, South Londonderry

877 (Vergennes) Middlebury

878, 879 (Essex Junction) Burlington

883 (Barre) Montpelier

883 (Washington) Montpelier

885, 886 (Springfield) Bellows Falls, Springfield

888 (Morrisville) Montpelier, Morrisville

889 (Tunbridge) Randolph

899 (Underhill) Burlington

892 (Lunenburg) Guildhall

893 (Milton) Burlington, St. Albans

895 (Morgan) Island Pond, Newport

896 (Wardsboro) Bennington, Brattleboro, South Londonderry

897 (Shoreham) Middlebury

928 (Isle La Motte) St. Albans

933 (Enosburg Falls) St. Albans

948 (Orwell) Middlebury

962 (Bloomfield) Island Pond

988 (North Troy) Newport

Conclusion -

This is what the US Government gets for publically releasing documentation on the Internet about

their so-called "secret" and "private" network... I know you'll have a few good laughs about that one

(I know I did). Love, Peace, And Afro Grease!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

阿新 - Seraph Chutium

http://com.6to23.com/

http://www.cnhack.org/