分享
 
 
 

The road to a science Ph.D.

王朝other·作者佚名  2006-01-10
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

By

Jonathan M. Gitlin

Monday, September 19, 2005

Starting this week, I'm going to take a break from just reporting on

interesting new developments in the world of science to take a look at

the institution itself. I can't count the number of times I've had

young children rush up to me and ask, breathlessly and with hope in

their eyes; "Hey Mr. Science Man, how do we make it big and win the

Nobel Prize?" Actually, I could count the times if it had ever

happened, but I'm going to keep pretending it's an everyday occurrence

and therefore the basis of this piece.

The road to scientific glory and the plaudits it brings is a long

one. I'm going to exempt the earliest stages, from reading books like Charlie Brown's Big Book of Questions

and Answers

(my own start in science) to activities like school science fairs and

work placements in laboratories. I will mention, as a benefit to

younger readers or parents who might want their children to get into

research, that fainting at the first sight of a dissected mouse and

then never coming back to the lab is a bad start to a summer internship.

From here we venture on to university. At this point, transatlantic

differences begin to leap out, and I must ask my US readers to bear

with me should I err. Once at university, you begin to learn that most

of the things you've been taught up until now are wrong, or maybe

they're right, but not for the reasons you've been told. You'll also

learn that staying up late and drinking too much is fun, but getting up

early, wearing a tuxedo and drinking too much is even better.

Depending where you're studying, you might even get your hands dirty

on occasion with an experiment or two. However, budget cutbacks and

increasing class sizes are a limiting factor for gaining hands-on

experience. In recent years in my own field, computer-assisted learning

has been the big thing, and instead of a real piece of guinea pig ileum

twitching away in an organ bath, it'll be a virtual one. Better,

perhaps, for the fluffy rodent, but much less chance for 'accidentally'

poisoning your labmate.

In order to combat the allegations that the universities were

turning out a generation of graduates without a clue when it comes to

working in a lab, most science programs offer an extra-mural year,

wherein the plucky young undergraduate heads off to work in a lab.

Armed with bright notions about just how smart they are and how they'll

be given their own lab, the institutes and companies that receive these

precocious neophytes are just as pleased, knowing that they've got a

source of cheap labor for the next twelve months, and point them in the

direction of the washing up.

Despite the fact that one often gets saddled with the crap jobs, the

extra-mural year is a vital step in the training of a scientist. Away

from the classroom, essential basics such as how to make a serial

dilution, what to do when you spill radioactive things on your jeans

and how dry ice and eppendorfs make good booby traps are learnt through

experience and repetition. Assuming you get a chance to work on more

than one aspect of a project, it's also a good chance to start finding

out which bits of science appeal and which don't. This is important, as

there's a long way to go before you'll be done.

So you head back to Your U. to finish up and gain that precious

B.Sc., delighting the family and surprising your doubting school

teachers. You've learnt some practical experience working in a lab, you

know one end of the forceps from the other and you're not running off

to become an investment banker. So, next stop: Karolinska Institute,

Sweden? Well, not quite. Having a bachelors degree in science is

essential, but only having one can be detrimental, depending upon one's

desired endpoint. If you're happy to work in a lab, have a certain

amount of job security, want a pension and benefits and don't feel like

spending the rest of your life writing grants, then now is a good time

to apply for jobs. I am not going to say anything bad about

technicians—I've worked with some marvelous techs, and they all got

paid more than I did. But if you want to one day run your own lab, or

work with much autonomy, then you're not done yet. Not by a long shot.

Off you go to graduate school!

Sometimes people complete a Masters degree, but this isn't always

necessary, and so we find ourselves as PhD students. Just how you find

that PhD course (or program) isn't always easy, but there are a few

tried and tested methods. Positions are advertised in the back of

Nature, Science, New Scientist and online. Universities let each other

know about positions, and finally the networking that you did in your

extra-mural year might just come in handy too. Choosing a PhD course

wisely is vital. The institute name will follow you around on your CV,

so prestige helps. The work environment is important too. You will be

spending at least three, and maybe as many as seven years there, so

pick one that's not going to have you spending all your time in a damp

and draughty basement. Your mentor/advisor/supervisor/principle

investigator (PI)/boss is the last and most important step, and one I

cannot emphasize enough. This person will likely become the template

for you in future life as a scientist, but if they're a crazed

megalomaniac the next few years could be hell on earth.

So, you've found a PhD course. It's here that cultural differences

begin to become greater, as US graduate students discover another 2+

years of classes and exams, but in the UK, Australia and other parts of

the world, day one involves you, a fresh lab book, and, if you're

particularly unlucky, being locked in the supply closet. Life is much

like it was as an extramural student, with a few differences. When a

new undergrad turns up in the summer, you get to boss them around and

lock them in the supply closet. There's more personal responsibility,

they pay you (slightly) more, and every so often the department head

will ask you something in a lab meeting, giving you the chance to shine

or embarrass yourself. Otherwise things haven't changed much. Techs

still look down on you, postdocs look down on you and the faculty do

too.

Now, a strange thing starts to happen. If you've got this far, it's

safe to say you're probably feeling a little proud. You're very bright,

or at least you think you are, and walk around campus pretending to be

Ice Man. Pretty soon however, it begins to sink in that you're not such

a big fish after all, and the pond can look more like a lake. Not only

are there other people here that are as smart as you, some of them are

actually smarter and others that work twice as hard. This shock can

take some time to overcome, and often infuses a little humility into

ones character. Other times it might contribute to becoming the

aforementioned megalomaniac.

I'm not sure what you do all day if your PhD is in one of the

humanities, or something like maths, but in life science, it means

experiments, but this can mean many things. You could work on a

clinical project. This is good if you don't like working with animals,

but has a few other drawbacks. Firstly, you're at the mercy of the

clinicians who collect the samples. There's sometimes an innate

resentment between scientists and medics. They get to call themselves

Dr without an advanced degree, and yet they're the ones who always get

made department head. You might be strictly cell culture based, which

means you get to spend your days sweating in a cell culture room

playing with plastic flasks and plates full of red/pink liquid. (Always

remember, spray OR flame, never both!) Also, now's the time to switch

to nitrile gloves if you might develop a latex allergy. You might even

do such cool work that you end up in a BSL (biosafety level) room. I

don't know if they let PhD students into BSL4 rooms. I hope not.

You'll probably have to work on animals at some point. Mice and rats

are most common. Some labs use bigger animals, but cost and cuteness

tends to make that more and more uncommon. Other projects could see you

working in the field, chasing antelope or sleeping with meerkats. It

probably doesn't bear saying, seeing as you're reading this, but

proficiency with technology and computing devices is a serious

advantage. The glory that is Pubmed

revolutionized life as we knew it when it came to keeping abreast with

the literature. If you took a series of time lapse photos of the

fellows room (in the US a common room) I spent my time in, you'd see

two old and unreliable PCs running Windows 98 and shared by 12 of us

become a laptop on almost every desk, but expect to see a lot of

two-finger typists.

Knowing your way around Powerpoint is vital. It is not uncommon to

be accosted by a professor shortly before they're due to fly off to an

important meeting, demanding or pleading for someone to fix their

$%^ing laptop. Less common, but out there, are the faculty members who

know a thing or two about technology. If possible, these are people you

want as your boss. The lab will have up to date computers and

technology, and you might get to play with some cool toys. A certain

promiscuity with platforms can be propitious. It's great being a mac

person in a mac lab, but being the sole maclot amongst a sea of Dells

can have its disadvantages. Likewise, the lone start bar in a herd of

apple menus can be a lonely place to be. Expect to frequently come

across antiquated computers connected to important pieces of equipment

that are in all probability aren't even networked. You'll think about

trying to upgrade the hardware and OS. The thought of important data

being captured under OS 8 or Windows 95 is a scary one, but the program

you need will have ceased development, or it'll cost extortionate

amounts for a seat license, or maybe everyone else made do with it and

they want you to suffer too. Some buggers even spend all their time in

front of a screen. The rise in bioinformatics and the sheer mass of

data that comes off a microarray means that database miners will always

be busy at the virtual coalface.

The volume of work one is confronted with also seems up for debate.

Common wisdom is that you'll spend all your time in the lab. Evenings,

nights, weekends. There's another, more controversial school of thought

that says this doesn't have to be true. A lot has to do with the type

of experiment you conduct. Some might take four or five hours over two

days to yield results. Others might involve spending 10 hours at the

bench in one sitting. As you go through your orientation at the

beginning, the importance of planning will be come up. This really is

crucial. With successful planning, it is perfectly possible to have a

productive week in the lab with time replete with late nights out, late

mornings in to work and everyone in the pub by 3 on Friday. Important

things to note: always be in early for lab meetings. Nothing draws

attention from all the wrong people like being late. As I mentioned

earlier, department heads are often clinicians. That means they like

doing things at ohmygoditsearly o'clock. Being a first year PhD student

ensures that, when you go to the pub with your department, they'll

probably buy your drinks. Don't abuse it, and repay the favor as you

move on up the chain. Writing down your results is vital. Knowing where

you've written them even more so.

The next few years are not always plain sailing. Friends who

graduated with you move on to high paying jobs whilst you remain in

relative penury. Experiments don't always work out. There are

assessments and committees to deal with. If you're unlucky enough to

have classes, there will be homework! Although you're researching a

particular niche of your own, you are also being formed in the same

crucible as the scientists who precede you. They all had a tough time

of it, and they'll be damned if they'll let some young upstarts off the

hook easily.

I mentioned earlier the beauty that is Pubmed, and the way it's

transformed the way we can access the literature. Prior to the 1990s,

if you wanted to search for a reference you had to pick up a volume of

Index Medicus and dig through it. Although you can now download PDFs of

journal articles from the comfort of your office chair, it's still

worth getting to know the dusty stacks. Journals will send out e-alerts

and now some are using RSS, but not everything is available online, and

midweek hangovers respond well to an hour or two in the library

catching up on current journals, reading the New Scientist or

Scientific American and making silent pacts with various deities

regarding the wisdom, or lack thereof, of mixing your drinks.

It's about now that conferences start to take on importance. These

come in various shapes and flavors, from small local meetings to the

largest international ones. Conferences serve several functions. You

get to show your work to your peers, some of whom will try and make you

cry with hard questions you can't answer. Sometimes, you get to present

something that's in direct contradiction to the person who was up

before you. Showing your work involves either a poster presentation or

giving a 10-minute talk. Opinions are divided on their merits. Posters

can be less nerve wracking, but you do have to stand by them for

several hours. You might be constantly swarmed, or you might get

ignored and resort to busking to draw attention to your breakthrough

discoveries.

Giving a talk can be somewhat terrifying, especially if you lack

confidence in your work or your abilities. It is over much faster

though, and has more opportunity for guts and glory. The thing is,

giving presentations is part of the territory, so the more you do now,

the easier you will cope in future. In my lab, our boss looked down on

posters as an easy way out, and therefore each abstract we submitted

was marked (T). By number 9 I had found most of my fear at being in

front of my peers and having my work ripped to shreds had evaporated.

But conferences are more than just about 10 minutes of sheer terror

or 3 hours of sheer boredom. First, it's time off from the lab. It's a

chance to meet up with old friends and make new ones. Networking is

important, and I'm not talking about wifi. Just like in every other

industry, this is how the best jobs are found - word of mouth. You'll

also get a chance to meet the opposite sex, and odds are they're going

to be dressed up and showing off like peacocks. Conferences are also an

opportunity to meet other people working on similar problems to you.

Finding out that everyone has the same problems with a particular

assay, or developing a collaboration with a lab that can complement

your work are ways in which a boring meeting can become a great success.

OK, you've beavered away in the lab for a few years now. You've

transformed from a swaggering, cocky upstart to an overworked,

underpaid cynic. You may have endured a crisis of confidence, bouts of

depression or maybe even turned vegan. Experiments work now. Data

begins to build up and you start putting together a picture of your

thesis. Writing up affects people in different ways. Some do it

quickly, over a matter of several weeks. Others find it a much more

drawn out process. This author obviously enjoys the act of writing, or

you'd not be reading this, and so I found it true for my PhD. Sitting

down and surveying the body of work you've produced over the preceding

years lets you appreciate the scope of your work, and you can show off

and use long words. Different mentors will encourage their young

charges to approach the writing in different orders.

A thesis will consist of the following: A general introduction,

methods, results chapters and a discussion. Word and Endnote will take

care of the references for you. I'd start with the methods. This

describes what you've been doing everyday in the lab, and ought to be

the easiest part. It is safe to say that if you struggle here, you're

going to have bigger problems further down the line. You can even start

to write this as you work your way through grad school. The general

introduction is where you get to read over all the important papers,

and many more too, in the field, in order to put your work in context.

The thing is, this will be read by your examiners, probably quite

carefully, so for god's sake make sure that the papers you quote

actually say what you think they say. Next up come the results

chapters. Each of these should tell an individual part of the story,

and each one might make a paper in and of itself. Be consistent with

your graphs and figures. It's here that those IT skills will begin to

shine again, and you can fill your thesis with schematics and diagrams

while you laugh at your colleagues, brows deeply furrowed, hunting and

pecking away at their keyboards. The discussion will be the last part

you write, wherein you explain the greater ramifications of your work,

and make wild statements about how you think it will transform the

world, without having to actually back it up too much. I had great fun

writing mine, and was thoroughly looking forward to discussing what I

saw as brilliant thinking and writing. Boy was I in for a surprise.

Next week, we look at the ordeal that is getting your PhD, and the excitement to follow.

In other news:

The Guardian takes a look at bad science and bad science reporting.

One of the things that poor science education results in a public who

don't have the ability to tell when a journalist is misunderstanding or

misrepresenting the truth. This is more and more important given the

concerted political attempt to muddy the waters in certain fields.Hurricane Katrina has had serious consequences*

for researchers based in New Orleans. The flooding and extended loss of

power meant many -80ûC freezers thawed, and all the animal research

facilities at LSU were lost. In 2001, Tropical Storm Allison caused flooding that drowned all of the research animals at the University of

Texas Medical School in Houston.Has Titan's sea finally been found? Cassini is now sending back images of what ap-pears

to be a distinct shoreline, with a dark region believed to be a sea of liquid methane. In other astronomic news, a gamma ray burst detected at the beginning of the month originated 13 billion light years away. That must have been

a hell of an explosion.Is it too late to actually do anything about climate change? Yes, according to a report in the

Independent,

a leading British newspaper. According to the researchers interviewed,

the melting of the polar ice cap in the Arctic Sea has probably passed

a tipping point. As long as the world's largest polluter continues to

deny or downplay man's role in this slow walking disaster, and it's

most populous nations strive to attain the same kind of industrialized

behavior, then I'd probably agree, it is too late.

* Subscription required

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有