关于账目的起诉状
1.管辖权声明。
2.根据附件中证物A所示的账目，被告应支付原告____________美元。
据此……（同格式1）
COMPLAINT ON AN ACCOUNT
1.Allegation of jurisdiction.
2.Defendant owes plaintiff ___________ dollars according to the account hereto annexed as Exhibit A.
Wherefore（ etc .as in Form1）
关于已出售和交付货物的起诉状
1.管辖权声明。
2.在1936年6月1日至1936年12月1日期间，原告出售并交付被告一批货物，应由被告向原千偿付该货物款项_____________美元。
据此……（同格式1）
COMPLAINT FOR GOODS SOLD AND DELIVERED
1.Allegation of jurisdiction.
2.Defendant owes plaintiff _________ dollars for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant between June 1,1936 and December 1,1936.
Wherefore (etc .as in Form1).
关于金钱借贷的起诉状
1.管辖权声明。
2.原告于1936年6月1日借给被告___________美元，被告应予偿还。
据此……（同格式1）
COMPLAINT FOR MONEY LENT
1.Allegation of jurisdiction.
2.Defendant owes plaintiff ___________ dollars for money lent by plaintiff to defendant on June 1,1936.
Wherefore（ etc .as in Form1）
关于金钱误付的起诉状
1.管辖权声明。
2.1936年6月1日，原告在下列情形下错付被告__________美元[在此处详细陈述这些情形]，被告应予偿还。
据此……（同格式1）
COMPLAINT FOR MONEY PAID BY MISTAKE
1.Allegation of jurisdiction.
2.Defendant owes plaintiff __________ dollars for money paid by plaintiff to defendant by mistake on June 1,1936, under the following circumstances:[here state the circumstances with particularity].
Wherefore ( etc .as in Form1).
关于已得款项的起诉状
1.管辖权声明。
2.被告于1936年6月1日从G.H.处得到应支付给原告的一笔款项 ___________ 美元，被告应将该款项偿付原告。
据此……（同格式1）
COMPLAINT FOR MONEY HAD AND RECEIVED
1.Allegation of jurisdiction.
2.Defendant owes p0laintiff __________ dollars for money had and received from one G.H. on June 1, 1936, to be paid by defendant to plaintiff.
Wherefore ( etc .as in Form1).
要求偿还债务并宣告欺诈性财产转让为无效的起诉状
A.B.，原告
诉 起诉状
C.D.及E.F.，被告
1.管辖权声明。
2.被告C.D.在或大约在______________签发给原告一张本票[以下述文字与数字作成：（在此逐字抄录）]；[该本票副本见附件证据A]；[在该本票中被告C.D.承诺或指示在__________支付原告5000美元并附加年利息率为_____%的利息]。
1.被告C.D.欠原告该本票所载款项及利息。
2.被告C.D.于或大约于____________将其所有财产，包括动产和不动产（或者详列）转让给被告E.F.以欺骗原告并妨碍、拖延原告取得由上述本票所证明的欠款。
因此，原告要求：
(1)判决被告C.D.支付原告___________美元及利息；
(2)宣告向E.F.转让财产的行为无效，判决对该财产的留置权；
(3)判决被告支付诉讼费用。
COMPLAINT ON CLAIM FOR DEBT AND TO SET ASIDE
FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE
A.B.，Plaintiff
v. Complaint
C.D. and E.F.，Defendants
1.Allegation of jurisdiction.
2.Defendant C.D. on or about ___________ executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note [ in the following words and figures（here set out the note verbatim）];[ a copy of which is hereto annexed as Exhibit A];[whereby defendant C.D. promised to pay to plaintiff or order on __________ the sum of five thousand dollars with interest thereon at the rate of _________ percent, per annum].
3.Defendant C.D. owes to plaintiff the amount of said note and interest .
4.Defendant C.D. on or about ____________ conveyed all his property , real and personal [or specify and describe]to defendant E.F. for the purpose of defrauding plaintiff and hindering and delaying the collection of the indebtedness evidenced by the note above referred to .
Wherefore plaintiff demands:
(1) That plaintiff have judgment against defendant C.D. for ___________ dollars and interest;
(2) That the aforesaid conveyance to defendant E.F. be declared void and the judgment herein be declared a lien on said property;
(3) That plaintiff have judgment against the defendants for costs.
关于过失的起诉状
1.管辖权声明。
2.1936年6月1日，被告在马萨诸塞州波士顿市一条名为波依斯顿街的公路上，疏于驾驶而将正步行跨越公路的原告撞倒。
3.于被告撞击造成的腿部骨折及其他伤害，使原告不能工作，并遭受了身体和精神的巨大痛苦原告还为此支出医疗护理费和住院费共1000美元。
据此，原告请求判决被告支付 __________ 美元的赔偿金并支付诉讼费用。
（注：因共同过失为积极抗辩，故起诉书无需包含关于原告应有注意的声明。）
COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE
1.Allegation of jurisdiction.
2.On June 1, 1936, in a public highway called Boylston Street in Boston, Massachusetts, defendant negligently drove a motor vehicle against p0laintiff who was then crossing said highway.
3.As a result plaintiff was thrown down and had his leg broken and was otherwise injured, was prevented from transacting his business, suffered great pain of body and mind , and incurred expenses for medical attention and hospitalization in the sum of one thousand dollars.
Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against defendant in the sum of __________ dollars and costs.
(NOTE: Since contributory negligence is an affirmative defense ,the complaint need contain no allegation of due care of plaintiff.)
