《科学美国人》(Scientific American )[PDF]

王朝资源·作者佚名  2010-05-07
 说明  因可能的版权问题本站不提供该资源的存贮、播放、下载或推送,本文仅为内容简介。

中文名: 科学美国人

英文名: Scientific American

资源格式: PDF

发行时间: 2010年

地区: 美国

语言: 英文

简介:

《Scientific American》是美国发行的知名科学类刊物。始创于1845年。在其后这近160年的发展过程中,《Scientific American》的文章多出自世界着名科学家之手,内容涉及所有当前重大科学主题。至今已有120多位诺贝尔奖得主在上面发表过文章。《Scientific American》杂志科学与人文精神并举、强调科学对人类社会和经济生活影响、密切关注科学敏感问题对人类伦理、恐怖主义、战争和人类未来的争论,使不同科学观点发表意见的平台。

时至今日,该刊物每月都会以英语、德语、波兰语、法语、意大利语、日语、汉语、中文二十多种语言在全球同步发行,我国发行的《科学美国人(中文版)》(《Scientific American(Chinese Edition)》)这些年来也正在获得越来越多人的喜爱。

Product Description

This magazine is designed for technically educated professionals and managers who have a positive predisposition to read about, get involved with and act on a broad range of the physical and social sciences. Its articles and features anticipate what the breakthroughs and the news will be in a society increasingly dependent upon scientific and technological advances.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Product Details

Format: Magazine

Shipping: Currently, item can be shipped only within the U.S.

Publisher: Scientific American

ASIN: B00008DP07

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

Scientific American was once a great magazine, but now it is just a good magazine. I read Scientific American as a teenager in the 80's, I read it as a student and as an engineer in the 90's and I am still reading Scientific American and subscribing to it. Even today I enjoy reading Scientific American very much, but I am not pleased with the fact that the depth of the articles has decreased.

In the olden days the writers for Scientific American were not afraid of putting mathematical formulas, algorithms, in depth analysis, and statistics as well as references to research articles in their articles. Today's Scientific American is not written by scientists, but by journalists and free lancers.

It used to be that scientists and engineers interested in fields outside their own areas of expertise were the magazine's target audience. Now, however, Scientific American is aimed at general readers who are interested in science. Scientific American is now looking more like Discover magazine. In my opinion Discover magazine and Scientific American should complement each other (in depth reading vs. light reading) and not be so similar.

Another wrong turn that they have taken is that they have become slightly political with a noticeable left-wing agenda. For example, the attack on Björn Lomborg should never have occurred and would have been unthinkable 15 years ago. Scientific American should be apolitical in my opinion. I understand that these changes were made for business reasons.

However, the illustrations are great, the topics are varied and include, for example, medicine, physics, chemistry, biology, cosmology, artificial intelligence, economics, geology, archeology, and social science. I am interested in all of these subjects, but I enjoy reading about physics, cosmology and artificial intelligence the most. I always find something interesting to read in Scientific American. I highly recommend Scientific American even though I would like them to take one step back with regards to the depth of the content.

Scientific American is a good magazine for those who enjoy reading about modern science, advancement in technology and medicine, economic improvements, and anything else of a scientific nature. Each issue is about 130 pages in length and can be counted on to stimulate your intellectual curiosity.

One thing that makes Scientific American more appealing than other science magazines is the fact that it includes articles on more than just the physical sciences, like physics, chemistry, geology, etc. It also contains timely and informative articles on social sciences, like economics and politics. This adds a lot to the magazine's appeal, and it's one of the main reasons why I choose to read it each month.

One thing that might bother some potential readers of this magazine is that Scientific American does tend to present a mostly pro- government angle on the social and human interest stories that it presents. In almost every instance, the writers of Scientific American draw the immediate conclusion that only the government can possibly solve the pressing issues of the day. They don't even give much consideration to anything else. They immediately concede most any problem to the authority of the state.

In spite of the "liberal" leanings, however, I feel that Scientific American is still a very good publication to read. It includes puzzles that test your knowledge of science, book reviews on recent scientific book releases, and some good, well- written articles about science and how it relates to our day- to- day life. It's a good magazine for those who like to stay informed.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航