Is the Welfare State Justified?福利国家是合理的吗？

　　特别声明：本站仅为商品信息简介，并不出售商品，您可点击文中链接进入淘宝网搜索页搜索该商品，有任何问题请与具体淘宝商家联系。

　　參考價格: 点此进入淘宝搜索页搜索
　　分類: 图书,进口原版书,人文社科 Non Fiction ,

作者： Daniel Shapiro 著

出版社：

出版时间： 2007-7-1字数：版次： 1页数： 323印刷时间： 2007/07/01开本： 16开印次： 1纸张：胶版纸I S B N ： 9780521860659包装：精装编辑推荐

作者介绍：Daniel Shapiro

Daniel Shapiro is Associate Professor of Philosophy at West Virginia University. A specialist in political philosophy and public policy, he has published in Public Affairs Quarterly, Social Philosophy and Policy, Journal of Political Philosophy, and Law and Philosophy. In the spring of 2003, he was a Distinguished Visiting Humphrey Lecturer at the University of Waterloo.

内容简介

In this book, Daniel Shapiro argues that the dominant positions in contemporary political philosophy - egalitarianism, positive rights theory, communitarianism, and many forms of liberalism - should converge in a rejection of central welfare state institutions. He examines how major welfare institutions, such as government-financed and -administered retirement pensions, national health insurance, and programs for the needy, actually work. Comparing them to compulsory private insurance and private charities, Shapiro argues that the dominant perspectives in political philosophy mistakenly think that their principles support the welfare state. Instead, egalitarians, positive rights theorists, communitarians, and liberals have misunderstood the implications of their own principles, which in fact support more market-based or libertarian institutional conclusions than they may realize. Shapiro's book is unusual in its combination of political philosophy with social science. Its focus is not limited to any particular country; rather it examines welfare states in affluent democracies and their market alternatives.

• Argues that supporters of the welfare state should, following their own premises, actually oppose it

• Does comparative institutional analysis: compares real welfare state institutions with real market-based alternatives

• Combines focus on basic principles in political philosophy with social science analysis of institutions

Preface

1. Introduction;

1.1Justification in Political Philosophy

1.2Internal Versus External Arguments

1.3Clarifying the Institutional Alternatives

1.4Coming Attractions

2 Central Perspectives in Political Philosophy

2.1Justice, Equality, and Fairness

2.2Basic Rights, Liberty, and Well-Being

2.3Community and Solidarity

2.4Public Justification and Epistemic Accessibility

3 Health Insurance, Part I

3.1The Topic's Importance

3.2The Institutional Alternatives

3.3Egalitarianism and NHI

3.4Risks and Choices: Egalitarian Reasons for MHI

3.5Rationing, Visibility, and Egalitarian Outcomes: Why Market Allocation Is Better

3.6Why the Priority View Agrees with the Egalitarian Support of MHI

2. Central perspectives in political philosophy;

3. Health insurance, part I;

4. Health insurance, part II;

5. Old-age or retirement pensions;

6. Welfare or means-tested benefits, part I;

7. Welfare or means-tested benefits, part II;

8. Conclusion

Select Bibliography

Index