The usual understanding of anarchism as a left wing ideology does not take into account the neo-liberal "anarchism" championed by the likes of Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman and America's Libertarian Party, which couples law of the jungle right-wing economics with liberal positions on most social issues. Often their libertarian impulses stop short of opposition to strong law and order positions, and are more economic in substance (ie no taxes) so they are not as extremely libertarian as they are extremely right wing. On the other hand, the classical libertarian collectivism of anarcho-syndicalism ( libertarian socialism) belongs in the bottom left hand corner.
In our home page we demolished the myth that authoritarianism is necessarily "right wing", with the examples of Robert Mugabe, Pol Pot and Stalin. Similarly Hitler, on an economic scale, was not an extreme right-winger. His economic policies were broadly Keynesian, and to the left of some of today's Labour parties. If you could get Hitler and Stalin to sit down together and avoid economics, the two diehard authoritarians would find plenty of common ground.
參考答案:如一个左边的翼观念学的无政府主义的平常理解不考虑新自由主义者被 Ayn 田边的同类, 密尔顿 Friedman 和美国的自由党保卫的 " 无政府主义 ",这在大部分上加倍丛林的法律和自由主义的位置右派的经济学社会的议题。时常他们的自由意志主义支持者冲动在物质 (ie 没有税) 停止对强烈的治安位置的反对的短, 而且更经济，如此他们是不像他们是极端地正确的翼一样的很自由意志主义支持者。 另一方面, anarcho 的古典自由意志主义支持者集体主义-工会组织主义 ( 自由意志主义支持者社会主义) 在底部的左手角落中属于。
在我们的家中传呼我们破坏神话独裁主义必然地是 " 正确的翼 ",藉由罗勃特 Mugabe ，波布和史达林的例子。 同样地在一个经济的鳞骨片之上的希特勒是不一极端的右派。 他的经济政策宽广凯因斯主义, 和对一些今天的工党左边。 如果你可以争取一起坐下而且避免经济学的希特勒和史达林, 二个顽强抵抗者独裁的会找许多基本共识。
