RFC1438 - Internet Engineering Task Force Statements Of Boredom (SOBs)

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group L. Chapin

Request for Comments: 1438 BBN

C. Huitema

INRIA

1 April 1993

Internet Engineering Task Force

Statements Of Boredom (SOBs)

Status of this Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does

not specify an Internet standard. Distribution of this memo is

unlimited.

Discussion

The current IETF process has two types of RFCs: standards track

documents and other RFCs (e.g., informational, eXPerimental, FYIs).

The intent of the standards track documents is clear, and culminates

in an official Internet Standard. Informational RFCs can be

published on a less formal basis, subject to the reasonable

constraints of the RFCEditor. Informational RFCs are not subject to

peer review and carry no significance whatsoever within the IETF

process.

The IETF currently has no mechanism or means of publishing documents

that express its deep concern about something important, but

otherwise contain absolutely no useful information whatsoever. This

document creates a new subseries of RFCs, entitled, IETF Statements

Of Boredom (SOBs). The SOB process is similar to that of the normal

standards track. The SOB is submitted to the IAB, the IRSG, the

IESG, the SOB Editor (Morpheus), and the Academie Francais for

review, analysis, reprodUCtion in triplicate, translation into ASN.1,

and distribution to Internet insomniacs. However, once everyone has

approved the document by falling asleep over it, the process ends and

the document is discarded. The resulting vacuum is viewed as having

the technical approval of the IETF, but it is not, and cannot become,

an official Internet Standard.

References

[1] Internet Activities Board, "The Internet Standards Process", RFC

1310, IAB, March 1992.

[2] Postel, J., Editor, "IAB OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS", RFC1410,

IAB, March 1993.

Security Considerations

Security issues are not discussed in this memo, but then again, no

other issues of any importance are discussed in this memo either.

Authors' Addresses

A. Lyman Chapin

Bolt, Beranek & Newman

Mail Stop 20/5b

150 Cambridge Park Drive

Cambridge, MA 02140

USA

Phone: 1 617 873 3133

EMail: Lyman@BBN.COM

Christian Huitema

INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis

2004 Route des Lucioles

BP 109

F-06561 Valbonne Cedex

France

Phone: +33 93 65 77 15

EMail: Christian.Huitema@MIRSA.INRIA.FR

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
 
 
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有 導航