分享
 
 
 

RFC2565 - Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Encoding and Transport

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group R. Herriot, Ed.

Request for Comments: 2565 Xerox Corporation

Category: EXPerimental S. Butler

Hewlett-Packard

P. Moore

Microsoft

R. Turner

Sharp Labs

April 1999

Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Encoding and Transport

Status of this Memo

This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet

community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.

Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.

Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.

IESG Note

This document defines an Experimental protocol for the Internet

community. The IESG expects that a revised version of this protocol

will be published as Proposed Standard protocol. The Proposed

Standard, when published, is expected to change from the protocol

defined in this memo. In particular, it is expected that the

standards-track version of the protocol will incorporate strong

authentication and privacy features, and that an "ipp:" URL type will

be defined which supports those security measures. Other changes to

the protocol are also possible. Implementors are warned that future

versions of this protocol may not interoperate with the version of

IPP defined in this document, or if they do interoperate, that some

protocol features may not be available.

The IESG encourages experimentation with this protocol, especially in

combination with Transport Layer Security (TLS) [RFC2246], to help

determine how TLS may effectively be used as a security layer for

IPP.

Abstract

This document is one of a set of documents, which together describe

all ASPects of a new Internet Printing Protocol (IPP). IPP is an

application level protocol that can be used for distributed printing

using Internet tools and technologies. This document defines the

rules for encoding IPP operations and IPP attributes into a new

Internet mime media type called "application/ipp". This document

also defines the rules for transporting over HTTP a message body

whose Content-Type is "application/ipp".

The full set of IPP documents includes:

Design Goals for an Internet Printing Protocol [RFC2567]

Rationale for the StrUCture and Model and Protocol for the

Internet Printing Protocol [RFC2568]

Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Model and Semantics [RFC2566]

Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Encoding and Transport (this

document)

Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Implementer's Guide [ipp-iig]

Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols [RFC2569]

The document, "Design Goals for an Internet Printing Protocol", takes

a broad look at distributed printing functionality, and it enumerates

real-life scenarios that help to clarify the features that need to be

included in a printing protocol for the Internet. It identifies

requirements for three types of users: end users, operators, and

administrators. It calls out a subset of end user requirements that

are satisfied in IPP/1.0. Operator and administrator requirements are

out of scope for version 1.0.

The document, "Rationale for the Structure and Model and Protocol for

the Internet Printing Protocol", describes IPP from a high level

view, defines a roadmap for the various documents that form the suite

of IPP specifications, and gives background and rationale for the

IETF working group's major decisions.

The document, "Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Model and Semantics",

describes a simplified model with abstract objects, their attributes,

and their operations that are independent of encoding and transport.

It introduces a Printer and a Job object. The Job object optionally

supports multiple documents per Job. It also addresses security,

internationalization, and Directory issues.

This document "Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Implementer's Guide",

gives advice to implementers of IPP clients and IPP objects.

The document "Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols" gives some

advice to implementers of gateways between IPP and LPD (Line Printer

Daemon) implementations.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction.....................................................4

2. Conformance Terminology..........................................4

3. Encoding of the Operation Layer.................................4

3.1 Picture of the Encoding.....................................5

3.2 Syntax of Encoding..........................................7

3.3 Version-number..............................................9

3.4 Operation-id................................................9

3.5 Status-code.................................................9

3.6 Request-id..................................................9

3.7 Tags.......................................................10

3.7.1 Delimiter Tags.........................................10

3.7.2 Value Tags.............................................11

3.8 Name-Length................................................13

3.9 (Attribute) Name...........................................13

3.10 Value Length...............................................16

3.11 (Attribute) Value..........................................16

3.12 Data.......................................................18

4. Encoding of Transport Layer.....................................18

5. Security Considerations.........................................19

5.1 Using IPP with SSL3........................................19

6. References......................................................20

7. Authors' Addresses..............................................22

8. Other Participants:.............................................24

9. Appendix A: Protocol Examples...................................25

9.1 Print-Job Request..........................................25

9.2 Print-Job Response (successful)............................26

9.3 Print-Job Response (failure)...............................27

9.4 Print-Job Response (success with attributes ignored).......28

9.5 Print-URI Request..........................................30

9.6 Create-Job Request.........................................31

9.7 Get-Jobs Request...........................................31

9.8 Get-Jobs Response..........................................32

10. Appendix C: Registration of MIME Media Type Information for

"application/ipp"..............................................35

11. Full Copyright Statement.......................................37

1. Introduction

This document contains the rules for encoding IPP operations and

describes two layers: the transport layer and the operation layer.

The transport layer consists of an HTTP/1.1 request or response. RFC

2068 [RFC2068] describes HTTP/1.1. This document specifies the HTTP

headers that an IPP implementation supports.

The operation layer consists of a message body in an HTTP request or

response. The document "Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Model and

Semantics" [RFC2566] defines the semantics of such a message body and

the supported values. This document specifies the encoding of an IPP

operation. The aforementioned document [RFC2566] is henceforth

referred to as the "IPP model document"

2. Conformance Terminology

The key Words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT",

"RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be

interpreted as described in RFC2119 [RFC2119].

3. Encoding of the Operation Layer

The operation layer MUST contain a single operation request or

operation response. Each request or response consists of a sequence

of values and attribute groups. Attribute groups consist of a

sequence of attributes each of which is a name and value. Names and

values are ultimately sequences of octets

The encoding consists of octets as the most primitive type. There are

several types built from octets, but three important types are

integers, character strings and octet strings, on which most other

data types are built. Every character string in this encoding MUST be

a sequence of characters where the characters are associated with

some charset and some natural language. A character string MUST be in

"reading order" with the first character in the value (according to

reading order) being the first character in the encoding. A character

string whose associated charset is US-ASCII whose associated natural

language is US English is henceforth called a US-ASCII-STRING. A

character string whose associated charset and natural language are

specified in a request or response as described in the model document

is henceforth called a LOCALIZED-STRING. An octet string MUST be in

"IPP model document order" with the first octet in the value

(according to the IPP model document order) being the first octet in

the encoding Every integer in this encoding MUST be encoded as a

signed integer using two's-complement binary encoding with big-endian

format (also known as "network order" and "most significant byte

first"). The number of octets for an integer MUST be 1, 2 or 4,

depending on usage in the protocol. Such one-octet integers,

henceforth called SIGNED-BYTE, are used for the version-number and

tag fields. Such two-byte integers, henceforth called SIGNED-SHORT

are used for the operation-id, status-code and length fields. Four

byte integers, henceforth called SIGNED-INTEGER, are used for values

fields and the sequence number.

The following two sections present the operation layer in two ways

- informally through pictures and description

- formally through Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF), as specified

by RFC2234 [RFC2234]

3.1 Picture of the Encoding

The encoding for an operation request or response consists of:

-----------------------------------------------

version-number 2 bytes - required

-----------------------------------------------

operation-id (request)

or 2 bytes - required

status-code (response)

-----------------------------------------------

request-id 4 bytes - required

-----------------------------------------------------------

xxx-attributes-tag 1 byte

----------------------------------------------- -0 or more

xxx-attribute-sequence n bytes

-----------------------------------------------------------

end-of-attributes-tag 1 byte - required

-----------------------------------------------

data q bytes - optional

-----------------------------------------------

The xxx-attributes-tag and xxx-attribute-sequence represents four

different values of "xxx", namely, operation, job, printer and

unsupported. The xxx-attributes-tag and an xxx-attribute-sequence

represent attribute groups in the model document. The xxx-

attributes-tag identifies the attribute group and the xxx-attribute-

sequence contains the attributes.

The expected sequence of xxx-attributes-tag and xxx-attribute-

sequence is specified in the IPP model document for each operation

request and operation response.

A request or response SHOULD contain each xxx-attributes-tag defined

for that request or response even if there are no attributes except

for the unsupported-attributes-tag which SHOULD be present only if

the unsupported-attribute-sequence is non-empty. A receiver of a

request MUST be able to process as equivalent empty attribute groups:

a) an xxx-attributes-tag with an empty xxx-attribute-sequence,

b) an expected but missing xxx-attributes-tag.

The data is omitted from some operations, but the end-of-attributes-

tag is present even when the data is omitted. Note, the xxx-

attributes-tags and end-of-attributes-tag are called 'delimiter-

tags'. Note: the xxx-attribute-sequence, shown above may consist of 0

bytes, according to the rule below.

An xxx-attributes-sequence consists of zero or more compound-

attributes.

-----------------------------------------------

compound-attribute s bytes - 0 or more

-----------------------------------------------

A compound-attribute consists of an attribute with a single value

followed by zero or more additional values.

Note: a 'compound-attribute' represents a single attribute in the

model document. The 'additional value' syntax is for attributes with

2 or more values.

Each attribute consists of:

-----------------------------------------------

value-tag 1 byte

-----------------------------------------------

name-length (value is u) 2 bytes

-----------------------------------------------

name u bytes

-----------------------------------------------

value-length (value is v) 2 bytes

-----------------------------------------------

value v bytes

-----------------------------------------------

An additional value consists of:

-----------------------------------------------------------

value-tag 1 byte

-----------------------------------------------

name-length (value is 0x0000) 2 bytes

----------------------------------------------- -0 or more

value-length (value is w) 2 bytes

-----------------------------------------------

value w bytes

-----------------------------------------------------------

Note: an additional value is like an attribute whose name-length is 0.

From the standpoint of a parsing loop, the encoding consists of:

-----------------------------------------------

version-number 2 bytes - required

-----------------------------------------------

operation-id (request)

or 2 bytes - required

status-code (response)

-----------------------------------------------

request-id 4 bytes - required

-----------------------------------------------------------

tag (delimiter-tag or value-tag) 1 byte

----------------------------------------------- -0 or more

empty or rest of attribute x bytes

-----------------------------------------------------------

end-of-attributes-tag 2 bytes - required

-----------------------------------------------

data y bytes - optional

-----------------------------------------------

The value of the tag determines whether the bytes following the

tag are:

- attributes

- data

- the remainder of a single attribute where the tag specifies the

type of the value.

3.2 Syntax of Encoding

The syntax below is ABNF [RFC2234] except 'strings of literals' MUST

be case sensitive. For example 'a' means lower case 'a' and not

upper case 'A'. In addition, SIGNED-BYTE and SIGNED-SHORT fields

are represented as '%x' values which show their range of values.

ipp-message = ipp-request / ipp-response

ipp-request = version-number operation-id request-id

*(xxx-attributes-tag xxx-attribute-sequence)

end-of-attributes-tag data

ipp-response = version-number status-code request-id

*(xxx-attributes-tag xxx-attribute-sequence)

end-of-attributes-tag data

xxx-attribute-sequence = *compound-attribute

xxx-attributes-tag = operation-attributes-tag / job-attributes-tag /

printer-attributes-tag / unsupported-attributes-tag

version-number = major-version-number minor-version-number

major-version-number = SIGNED-BYTE ; initially %d1

minor-version-number = SIGNED-BYTE ; initially %d0

operation-id = SIGNED-SHORT ; mapping from model defined below

status-code = SIGNED-SHORT ; mapping from model defined below

request-id = SIGNED-INTEGER ; whose value is > 0

compound-attribute = attribute *additional-values

attribute = value-tag name-length name value-length value

additional-values = value-tag zero-name-length value-length value

name-length = SIGNED-SHORT ; number of octets of 'name'

name = LALPHA *( LALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "_" / "." )

value-length = SIGNED-SHORT ; number of octets of 'value'

value = OCTET-STRING

data = OCTET-STRING

zero-name-length = %x00.00 ; name-length of 0

operation-attributes-tag = %x01 ; tag of 1

job-attributes-tag = %x02 ; tag of 2

printer-attributes-tag = %x04 ; tag of 4

unsupported-attributes-tag = %x05 ; tag of 5

end-of-attributes-tag = %x03 ; tag of 3

value-tag = %x10-FF

SIGNED-BYTE = BYTE

SIGNED-SHORT = 2BYTE

SIGNED-INTEGER = 4BYTE

DIGIT = %x30-39 ; "0" to "9"

LALPHA = %x61-7A ; "a" to "z"

BYTE = %x00-FF

OCTET-STRING = *BYTE

The syntax allows an xxx-attributes-tag to be present when the xxx-

attribute-sequence that follows is empty. The syntax is defined this

way to allow for the response of Get-Jobs where no attributes are

returned for some job-objects. Although it is RECOMMENDED that the

sender not send an xxx-attributes-tag if there are no attributes

(except in the Get-Jobs response just mentioned), the receiver MUST

be able to decode such syntax.

3.3 Version-number

The version-number MUST consist of a major and minor version-number,

each of which MUST be represented by a SIGNED-BYTE. The protocol

described in this document MUST have a major version-number of 1

(0x01) and a minor version-number of 0 (0x00). The ABNF for these

two bytes MUST be %x01.00.

3.4 Operation-id

Operation-ids are defined as enums in the model document. An

operation-ids enum value MUST be encoded as a SIGNED-SHORT.

Note: the values 0x4000 to 0xFFFF are reserved for private

extensions.

3.5 Status-code

Status-codes are defined as enums in the model document. A status-

code enum value MUST be encoded as a SIGNED-SHORT.

The status-code is an operation attribute in the model document. In

the protocol, the status-code is in a special position, outside of

the operation attributes.

If an IPP status-code is returned, then the HTTP Status-Code MUST be

200 (successful-ok). With any other HTTP Status-Code value, the HTTP

response MUST NOT contain an IPP message-body, and thus no IPP

status-code is returned.

3.6 Request-id

The request-id allows a client to match a response with a request.

This mechanism is unnecessary in HTTP, but may be useful when

application/ipp entity bodies are used in another context.

The request-id in a response MUST be the value of the request-id

received in the corresponding request. A client can set the

request-id in each request to a unique value or a constant value,

such as 1, depending on what the client does with the request-id

returned in the response. The value of the request-id MUST be greater

than zero.

3.7 Tags

There are two kinds of tags:

- delimiter tags: delimit major sections of the protocol, namely

attributes and data

- value tags: specify the type of each attribute value

3.7.1 Delimiter Tags

The following table specifies the values for the delimiter tags:

Tag Value (Hex) Delimiter

0x00 reserved

0x01 operation-attributes-tag

0x02 job-attributes-tag

0x03 end-of-attributes-tag

0x04 printer-attributes-tag

0x05 unsupported-attributes-tag

0x06-0x0e reserved for future delimiters

0x0F reserved for future chunking-end-of-attributes-

tag

When an xxx-attributes-tag occurs in the protocol, it MUST mean that

zero or more following attributes up to the next delimiter tag are

attributes belonging to group xxx as defined in the model document,

where xxx is operation, job, printer, unsupported.

Doing substitution for xxx in the above paragraph, this means the

following. When an operation-attributes-tag occurs in the protocol,

it MUST mean that the zero or more following attributes up to the

next delimiter tag are operation attributes as defined in the model

document. When an job-attributes-tag occurs in the protocol, it MUST

mean that the zero or more following attributes up to the next

delimiter tag are job attributes or job template attributes as

defined in the model document. When a printer-attributes-tag occurs

in the protocol, it MUST mean that the zero or more following

attributes up to the next delimiter tag are printer attributes as

defined in the model document. When an unsupported-attributes-tag

occurs in the protocol, it MUST mean that the zero or more following

attributes up to the next delimiter tag are unsupported attributes as

defined in the model document.

The operation-attributes-tag and end-of-attributes-tag MUST each

occur exactly once in an operation. The operation-attributes-tag MUST

be the first tag delimiter, and the end-of-attributes-tag MUST be the

last tag delimiter. If the operation has a document-content group,

the document data in that group MUST follow the end-of-attributes-

tag.

Each of the other three xxx-attributes-tags defined above is

OPTIONAL in an operation and each MUST occur at most once in an

operation, except for job-attributes-tag in a Get-Jobs response which

may occur zero or more times.

The order and presence of delimiter tags for each operation request

and each operation response MUST be that defined in the model

document. For further details, see section 3.9 "(Attribute) Name" and

section 9 "Appendix A: Protocol Examples".

A Printer MUST treat the reserved delimiter tags differently from

reserved value tags so that the Printer knows that there is an entire

attribute group that it doesn't understand as opposed to a single

value that it doesn't understand.

3.7.2 Value Tags

The remaining tables show values for the value-tag, which is the

first octet of an attribute. The value-tag specifies the type of the

value of the attribute. The following table specifies the "out-of-

band" values for the value-tag.

Tag Value (Hex) Meaning

0x10 unsupported

0x11 reserved for future 'default'

0x12 unknown

0x13 no-value

Tag Value (Hex) Meaning

0x14-0x1F reserved for future "out-of-band" values.

The "unsupported" value MUST be used in the attribute-sequence of an

error response for those attributes which the printer does not

support. The "default" value is reserved for future use of setting

value back to their default value. The "unknown" value is used for

the value of a supported attribute when its value is temporarily

unknown. The "no-value" value is used for a supported attribute to

which

no value has been assigned, e.g. "job-k-octets-supported" has no

value if an implementation supports this attribute, but an

administrator has not configured the printer to have a limit.

The following table specifies the integer values for the value-tag:

Tag Value (Hex) Meaning

0x20 reserved

0x21 integer

0x22 boolean

0x23 enum

0x24-0x2F reserved for future integer types

NOTE: 0x20 is reserved for "generic integer" if it should ever be

needed.

The following table specifies the octetString values for the value-

tag:

Tag Value (Hex) Meaning

0x30 octetString with an unspecified format

0x31 dateTime

0x32 resolution

0x33 rangeOfInteger

0x34 reserved for collection (in the future)

0x35 textWithLanguage

0x36 nameWithLanguage

0x37-0x3F reserved for future octetString types

The following table specifies the character-string values for the

value-tag:

Tag Value (Hex) Meaning

0x40 reserved

0x41 textWithoutLanguage

0x42 nameWithoutLanguage

0x43 reserved

0x44 keyword

0x45 uri

0x46 uriScheme

0x47 charset

0x48 naturalLanguage

Tag Value (Hex) Meaning

0x49 mimeMediaType

0x4A-0x5F reserved for future character string types

NOTE: 0x40 is reserved for "generic character-string" if it should

ever be needed.

NOTE: an attribute value always has a type, which is explicitly

specified by its tag; one such tag value is "nameWithoutLanguage".

An attribute's name has an implicit type, which is keyword.

The values 0x60-0xFF are reserved for future types. There are no

values allocated for private extensions. A new type MUST be

registered via the type 2 registration process [RFC2566].

The tag 0x7F is reserved for extending types beyond the 255 values

available with a single byte. A tag value of 0x7F MUST signify that

the first 4 bytes of the value field are interpreted as the tag

value. Note, this future extension doesn't affect parsers that are

unaware of this special tag. The tag is like any other unknown tag,

and the value length specifies the length of a value which contains a

value that the parser treats atomically. All these 4 byte tag values

are currently unallocated except that the values 0x40000000-

0x7FFFFFFF are reserved for experimental use.

3.8 Name-Length

The name-length field MUST consist of a SIGNED-SHORT. This field MUST

specify the number of octets in the name field which follows the

name-length field, excluding the two bytes of the name-length field.

If a name-length field has a value of zero, the following name field

MUST be empty, and the following value MUST be treated as an

additional value for the preceding attribute. Within an attribute-

sequence, if two attributes have the same name, the first occurrence

MUST be ignored. The zero-length name is the only mechanism for

multi-valued attributes.

3.9 (Attribute) Name

Some operation elements are called parameters in the model document

[RFC2566]. They MUST be encoded in a special position and they MUST

NOT appear as an operation attributes. These parameters are:

- "version-number": The parameter named "version-number" in the

IPP model document MUST become the "version-number" field in the

operation layer request or response.

- "operation-id": The parameter named "operation-id" in the IPP

model document MUST become the "operation-id" field in the

operation layer request.

- "status-code": The parameter named "status-code" in the IPP

model document MUST become the "status-code" field in the

operation layer response.

- "request-id": The parameter named "request-id" in the IPP model

document MUST become the "request-id" field in the operation

layer request or response.

All Printer and Job objects are identified by a Uniform Resource

Identifier (URI) [RFC2396] so that they can be persistently and

unambiguously referenced. The notion of a URI is a useful concept,

however, until the notion of URI is more stable (i.e., defined more

completely and deployed more widely), it is expected that the URIs

used for IPP objects will actually be URLs [RFC1738] [RFC1808].

Since every URL is a specialized form of a URI, even though the more

generic term URI is used throughout the rest of this document, its

usage is intended to cover the more specific notion of URL as well.

Some operation elements are encoded twice, once as the request-URI on

the HTTP Request-Line and a second time as a REQUIRED operation

attribute in the application/ipp entity. These attributes are the

target URI for the operation:

- "printer-uri": When the target is a printer and the transport is

HTTP or HTTPS (for SSL3 [ssl]), the target printer-uri defined

in each operation in the IPP model document MUST be an operation

attribute called "printer-uri" and it MUST also be specified

outside of the operation layer as the request-URI on the

Request-Line at the HTTP level.

- "job-uri": When the target is a job and the transport is HTTP or

HTTPS (for SSL3), the target job-uri of each operation in the

IPP model document MUST be an operation attribute called "job-

uri" and it MUST also be specified outside of the operation

layer as the request-URI on the Request-Line at the HTTP level.

Note: The target URI is included twice in an operation referencing

the same IPP object, but the two URIs NEED NOT be literally

identical. One can be a relative URI and the other can be an absolute

URI. HTTP/1.1 allows clients to generate and send a relative URI

rather than an absolute URI. A relative URI identifies a resource

with the scope of the HTTP server, but does not include scheme, host

or port. The following statements characterize how URLs should be

used in the mapping of IPP onto HTTP/1.1:

1. Although potentially redundant, a client MUST supply the target

of the operation both as an operation attribute and as a URI at

the HTTP layer. The rationale for this decision is to maintain

a consistent set of rules for mapping application/ipp to

possibly many communication layers, even where URLs are not

used as the addressing mechanism in the transport layer.

2. Even though these two URLs might not be literally identical

(one being relative and the other being absolute), they MUST

both reference the same IPP object.

3. The URI in the HTTP layer is either relative or absolute and is

used by the HTTP server to route the HTTP request to the

correct resource relative to that HTTP server. The HTTP server

need not be aware of the URI within the operation request.

4. Once the HTTP server resource begins to process the HTTP

request, it might get the reference to the appropriate IPP

Printer object from either the HTTP URI (using to the context

of the HTTP server for relative URLs) or from the URI within

the operation request; the choice is up to the implementation.

5. HTTP URIs can be relative or absolute, but the target URI in

the operation MUST be an absolute URI.

The model document arranges the remaining attributes into groups for

each operation request and response. Each such group MUST be

represented in the protocol by an xxx-attribute-sequence preceded by

the appropriate xxx-attributes-tag (See the table below and section 9

"Appendix A: Protocol Examples"). In addition, the order of these

xxx-attributes-tags and xxx-attribute-sequences in the protocol MUST

be the same as in the model document, but the order of attributes

within each xxx-attribute-sequence MUST be unspecified. The table

below maps the model document group name to xxx-attributes-sequence:

Model Document Group xxx-attributes-sequence

Operation Attributes operations-attributes-sequence

Job Template Attributes job-attributes-sequence

Job Object Attributes job-attributes-sequence

Unsupported Attributes unsupported-attributes-sequence

Requested Attributes job-attributes-sequence

Get-Job-Attributes)

Requested Attributes printer-attributes-sequence

Get-Printer-Attributes)

Document Content in a special position as described

above

If an operation contains attributes from more than one job object

(e.g. Get-Jobs response), the attributes from each job object MUST

be in a separate job-attribute-sequence, such that the attributes

from the ith job object are in the ith job-attribute-sequence. See

Section 9 "Appendix A: Protocol Examples" for table showing the

application of the rules above.

3.10 Value Length

Each attribute value MUST be preceded by a SIGNED-SHORT, which MUST

specify the number of octets in the value which follows this length,

exclusive of the two bytes specifying the length.

For any of the types represented by binary signed integers, the

sender MUST encode the value in exactly four octets.

For any of the types represented by character-strings, the sender

MUST encode the value with all the characters of the string and

without any padding characters.

If a value-tag contains an "out-of-band" value, such as

"unsupported", the value-length MUST be 0 and the value empty. The

value has no meaning when the value-tag has an "out-of-band" value.

If a client receives a response with a nonzero value-length in this

case, it MUST ignore the value field. If a printer receives a request

with a nonzero value-length in this case, it MUST reject the request.

3.11 (Attribute) Value

The syntax types and most of the details of their representation are

defined in the IPP model document. The table below augments the

information in the model document, and defines the syntax types from

the model document in terms of the 5 basic types defined in section 3

"Encoding of the Operation Layer". The 5 types are US-ASCII-STRING,

LOCALIZED-STRING, SIGNED-INTEGER, SIGNED-SHORT, SIGNED-BYTE, and

OCTET-STRING.

Syntax of Attribute Encoding

Value

textWithoutLanguage, LOCALIZED-STRING.

nameWithoutLanguage

textWithLanguage OCTET_STRING consisting of 4 fields:

a) a SIGNED-SHORT which is the number of octets

in the following field

b) a value of type natural-language,

c) a SIGNED-SHORT which is the number of octets

in the following field,

d) a value of type textWithoutLanguage.

The length of a textWithLanguage value MUST be 4

+ the value of field a + the value of field c.

nameWithLanguage OCTET_STRING consisting of 4 fields:

a) a SIGNED-SHORT which is the number of octets

in the following field

b) a value of type natural-language,

c) a SIGNED-SHORT which is the number of octets

in the following field

d) a value of type nameWithoutLanguage.

The length of a nameWithLanguage value MUST be 4

+ the value of field a + the value of field c.

charset, US-ASCII-STRING.

naturalLanguage,

mimeMediaType,

keyword, uri, and

uriScheme

boolean SIGNED-BYTE where 0x00 is 'false' and 0x01 is

'true'.

Syntax of Attribute Encoding

Value

integer and enum a SIGNED-INTEGER.

dateTime OCTET-STRING consisting of eleven octets whose

contents are defined by "DateAndTime" in RFC

2579 [RFC2579].

resolution OCTET_STRING consisting of nine octets of 2

SIGNED-INTEGERs followed by a SIGNED-BYTE. The

first SIGNED-INTEGER contains the value of cross

feed direction resolution. The second SIGNED-

INTEGER contains the value of feed direction

resolution. The SIGNED-BYTE contains the units

value.

rangeOfInteger Eight octets consisting of 2 SIGNED-INTEGERs.

The first SIGNED-INTEGER contains the lower

bound and the second SIGNED-INTEGER contains the

upper bound.

1setOf X Encoding according to the rules for an attribute

with more than 1 value. Each value X is encoded

according to the rules for encoding its type.

octetString OCTET-STRING

The type of the value in the model document determines the encoding

in the value and the value of the value-tag.

3.12 Data

The data part MUST include any data required by the operation

4. Encoding of Transport Layer

HTTP/1.1 [RFC2068] is the transport layer for this protocol.

The operation layer has been designed with the assumption that the

transport layer contains the following information:

- the URI of the target job or printer operation

- the total length of the data in the operation layer, either as a

single length or as a sequence of chunks each with a length.

It is REQUIRED that a printer implementation support HTTP over the

IANA assigned Well Known Port 631 (the IPP default port), though a

printer implementation may support HTTP over some other port as well.

In addition, a printer may have to support another port for privacy

(See Section 5 "Security Considerations").

Note: even though port 631 is the IPP default, port 80 remains the

default for an HTTP URI. Thus a URI for a printer using port 631

MUST contain an explicit port, e.g. "http://forest:631/pinetree". An

HTTP URI for IPP with no explicit port implicitly reference port 80,

which is consistent with the rules for HTTP/1.1. Each HTTP operation

MUST use the POST method where the request-URI is the object target

of the operation, and where the "Content-Type" of the message-body in

each request and response MUST be "application/ipp". The message-body

MUST contain the operation layer and MUST have the syntax described

in section 3.2 "Syntax of Encoding". A client implementation MUST

adhere to the rules for a client described for HTTP1.1 [RFC2068]. A

printer (server) implementation MUST adhere the rules for an origin

server described for HTTP1.1 [RFC2068].

An IPP server sends a response for each request that it receives. If

an IPP server detects an error, it MAY send a response before it has

read the entire request. If the HTTP layer of the IPP server

completes processing the HTTP headers successfully, it MAY send an

intermediate response, such as "100 Continue", with no IPP data

before sending the IPP response. A client MUST expect such a variety

of responses from an IPP server. For further information on HTTP/1.1,

consult the HTTP documents [RFC2068].

5. Security Considerations

The IPP Model document defines an IPP implementation with "privacy"

as one that implements Secure Socket Layer Version 3 (SSL3). Note:

SSL3 is not an IETF standards track specification. SSL3 meets the

requirements for IPP security with regards to features such as mutual

authentication and privacy (via encryption). The IPP Model document

also outlines IPP-specific security considerations and should be the

primary reference for security implications with regards to the IPP

protocol itself.

The IPP Model document defines an IPP implementation with

"authentication" as one that implements the standard way for

transporting IPP messages within HTTP 1.1. These include the security

considerations outlined in the HTTP 1.1 standard document [RFC2068]

and Digest Access Authentication extension [RFC2069].

The current HTTP infrastructure supports HTTP over TCP port 80. IPP

server implementations MUST offer IPP services using HTTP over the

IANA assigned Well Known Port 631 (the IPP default port). IPP server

implementations may support other ports, in addition to this port.

See further discussion of IPP security concepts in the model document

[RFC2566].

5.1 Using IPP with SSL3

An assumption is that the URI for a secure IPP Printer object has

been found by means outside the IPP printing protocol, via a

directory service, web site or other means.

IPP provides a transparent connection to SSL by calling the

corresponding URL (a https URI connects by default to port 443).

However, the following functions can be provided to ease the

integration of IPP with SSL during implementation:

connect (URI), returns a status

"connect" makes an https call and returns the immediate status

of the connection as returned by SSL to the user. The status

values are explained in section 5.4.2 of the SSL document

[ssl].

A session-id may also be retained to later resume a session.

The SSL handshake protocol may also require the cipher

specifications supported by the client, key length of the

ciphers, compression methods, certificates, etc. These should

be sent to the server and hence should be available to the IPP

client (although as part of administration features).

disconnect (session)

to disconnect a particular session.

The session-id available from the "connect" could be used.

resume (session)

to reconnect using a previous session-id.

The availability of this information as administration features are

left for implementers, and need not be specified at this time.

6. References

[RFC2278] Freed, N. and J. Postel, "IANA Charset Registration

Procedures", BCP 19, RFC2278, January 1998.

[dpa] ISO/IEC 10175 Document Printing Application (DPA), June

1996.

[iana] IANA Registry of Coded Character Sets:

FTP://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets.

[ipp-iig] Hastings, Tom, et al., "Internet Printing Protocol/1.0:

Implementer's Guide", Work in Progress.

[RFC2569] Herriot, R., Hastings, T., Jacobs, N. and J. Martin,

"Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols", RFC2569, April

1999.

[RFC2566] deBry, R., Hastings, T., Herriot, R., Isaacson, S. and P.

Powell, "Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Model and

Semantics", RFC2566, April 1999.

[RFC2565] Herriot, R., Butler, S., Moore, P., Tuner, R., "Internet

Printing Protocol/1.0: Encoding and Transport", RFC2565,

April 1999.

[RFC2568] Zilles, S., "Rationale for the Structure and Model and

Protocol for the Internet Printing Protocol", RFC2568,

April 1999.

[RFC2567] Wright, D., "Design Goals for an Internet Printing

Protocol", RFC2567, April 1999.

[RFC822] Crocker, D., "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text

Messages", STD 11, RFC822, August 1982.

[RFC1123] Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Application

and Support", STD 3, RFC1123, October 1989.

[RFC1179] McLaughlin, L. III, (editor), "Line Printer Daemon

Protocol" RFC1179, August 1990.

[RFC2223] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Instructions to RFCAuthors",

RFC2223, October 1997.

[RFC1738] Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L. and M. McCahill, "Uniform

Resource Locators (URL)", RFC1738, December 1994.

[RFC1759] Smith, R., Wright, F., Hastings, T., Zilles, S. and J.

Gyllenskog, "Printer MIB", RFC1759, March 1995.

[RFC1766] Alvestrand, H., " Tags for the Identification of

Languages", RFC1766, March 1995.

[RFC1808] Fielding, R., "Relative Uniform Resource Locators", RFC

1808, June 1995.

[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D. and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual

Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC2579, April 1999.

[RFC2046] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, Multipurpose Internet Mail

Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types", RFC2046,

November 1996.

[RFC2048] Freed, N., Klensin J. and J. Postel. Multipurpose Internet

Mail Extension (MIME) Part Four: Registration Procedures",

BCP 13, RFC2048, November 1996.

[RFC2068] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H. and T.

Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC

2068, January 1997.

[RFC2069] Franks, J., Hallam-Baker, P., Hostetler, J., Leach, P.,

Luotonen, A., Sink, E. and L. Stewart, "An Extension to

HTTP: Digest Access Authentication", RFC2069, January

1997.

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC2119, March 1997.

[RFC2184] Freed, N. and K. Moore, "MIME Parameter Value and Encoded

Word Extensions: Character Sets, Languages, and

Continuations", RFC2184, August 1997.

[RFC2234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax

Specifications: ABNF", RFC2234. November 1997.

[RFC2396] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and L. Masinter, "Uniform

Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC2396,

August 1998.

7. Authors' Addresses

Robert Herriot (Editor)

Xerox Corporation

3400 Hillview Ave., Bldg #1

Palo Alto, CA 94304

Phone: 650-813-7696

Fax: 650-813-6860

EMail: rherriot@pahv.xerox.com

Sylvan Butler

Hewlett-Packard

11311 Chinden Blvd.

Boise, ID 83714

Phone: 208-396-6000

Fax: 208-396-3457

EMail: sbutler@boi.hp.com

Paul Moore

Microsoft

One Microsoft Way

Redmond, WA 98053

Phone: 425-936-0908

Fax: 425-93MS-FAX

EMail: paulmo@microsoft.com

Randy Turner

Sharp Laboratories

5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd

Camas, WA 98607

Phone: 360-817-8456

Fax: 360-817-8436

EMail: rturner@sharplabs.com

IPP Mailing List: ipp@pwg.org

IPP Mailing List Subscription: ipp-request@pwg.org

IPP Web Page: http://www.pwg.org/ipp/

8. Other Participants:

Chuck Adams - Tektronix Harry Lewis - IBM

Ron Bergman - Dataproducts Tony Liao - Vivid Image

Keith Carter - IBM David Manchala - Xerox

Angelo Caruso - Xerox Carl-Uno Manros - Xerox

Jeff Copeland - QMS Jay Martin - Underscore

Roger deBry - IBM Larry Masinter - Xerox

Lee Farrell - Canon Ira McDonald - High North Inc.

Sue Gleeson - Digital Bob Pentecost - Hewlett-Packard

Charles Gordon - Osicom Patrick Powell - Astart

Technologies

Brian Grimshaw - Apple Jeff Rackowitz - Intermec

Jerry Hadsell - IBM Xavier Riley - Xerox

Richard Hart - Digital Gary Roberts - Ricoh

Tom Hastings - Xerox Stuart Rowley - Kyocera

Stephen Holmstead Richard Schneider - Epson

Zhi-Hong Huang - Zenographics Shigern Ueda - Canon

Scott Isaacson - Novell Bob Von Andel - Allegro Software

Rich Lomicka - Digital William Wagner - Digital Products

David Kellerman - Northlake Jasper Wong - Xionics

Software

Robert Kline - TrueSpectra Don Wright - Lexmark

Dave Kuntz - Hewlett-Packard Rick Yardumian - Xerox

Takami Kurono - Brother Lloyd Young - Lexmark

Rich Landau - Digital Peter Zehler - Xerox

Greg LeClair - Epson Frank Zhao - Panasonic

Steve Zilles - Adobe

9. Appendix A: Protocol Examples

9.1 Print-Job Request

The following is an example of a Print-Job request with job-name,

copies, and sides specified. The "ipp-attribute-fidelity" attribute

is set to 'true' so that the print request will fail if the "copies"

or the "sides" attribute are not supported or their values are not

supported.

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

0x0100 1.0 version-number

0x0002 Print-Job operation-id

0x00000001 1 request-id

0x01 start operation-attributes operation-attributes-tag

0x47 charset type value-tag

0x0012 name-length

attributes- attributes-charset name

charset

0x0008 value-length

us-ascii US-ASCII value

0x48 natural-language type value-tag

0x001B name-length

attributes- attributes-natural-language name

natural-

language

0x0005 value-length

en-us en-US value

0x45 uri type value-tag

0x000B name-length

printer-uri printer-uri name

0x001A value-length

http://forest: printer pinetree value

631/pinetree

0x42 nameWithoutLanguage type value-tag

0x0008 name-length

job-name job-name name

0x0006 value-length

Foobar foobar value

0x22 boolean type value-tag

0x16 name-length

ipp-attribute- ipp-attribute-fidelity name

fidelity

0x01 value-length

0x01 true value

0x02 start job-attributes job-attributes-tag

0x21 integer type value-tag

0x0006 name-length

copies copies name

0x0004 value-length

0x00000014 20 value

0x44 keyword type value-tag

0x0005 name-length

sides sides name

0x0013 value-length

two-sided- two-sided-long-edge value

long-edge

0x03 end-of-attributes end-of-attributes-tag

%!PS... <PostScript> data

9.2 Print-Job Response (successful)

Here is an example of a successful Print-Job response to the previous

Print-Job request. The printer supported the "copies" and "sides"

attributes and their supplied values. The status code returned is '

successful-ok'.

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

0x0100 1.0 version-number

0x0000 successful-ok status-code

0x00000001 1 request-id

0x01 start operation-attributes operation-attributes-tag

0x47 charset type value-tag

0x0012 name-length

attributes- attributes-charset name

charset

0x0008 value-length

us-ascii US-ASCII value

0x48 natural-language type value-tag

0x001B name-length

attributes- attributes-natural- name

natural-language language

0x0005 value-length

en-us en-US value

0x41 textWithoutLanguage type value-tag

0x000E name-length

status-message status-message name

0x000D value-length

successful-ok successful-ok value

0x02 start job-attributes job-attributes-tag

0x21 integer value-tag

0x0006 name-length

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

job-id job-id name

0x0004 value-length

147 147 value

0x45 uri type value-tag

0x0007 name-length

job-uri job-uri name

0x001E value-length

http://forest:63 job 123 on pinetree value

1/pinetree/123

0x42 nameWithoutLanguage type value-tag

0x0009 name-length

job-state job-state name

0x0004 value-length

0x0003 pending value

0x03 end-of-attributes end-of-attributes-tag

9.3 Print-Job Response (failure)

Here is an example of an unsuccessful Print-Job response to the

previous Print-Job request. It fails because, in this case, the

printer does not support the "sides" attribute and because the value

'20' for the "copies" attribute is not supported. Therefore, no job

is created, and neither a "job-id" nor a "job-uri" operation

attribute is returned. The error code returned is 'client-error-

attributes-or-values-not-supported' (0x040B).

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

0x0100 1.0 version-number

0x040B client-error-attributes-or- status-code

values-not-supported

0x00000001 1 request-id

0x01 start operation-attributes operation-attribute tag

0x47 charset type value-tag

0x0012 name-length

attributes- attributes-charset name

charset

0x0008 value-length

us-ascii US-ASCII value

0x48 natural-language type value-tag

0x001B name-length

attributes- attributes-natural-language name

natural-

language

0x0005 value-length

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

en-us en-US value

0x41 textWithoutLanguage type value-tag

0x000E name-length

status- status-message name

message

0x002F value-length

client-error- client-error-attributes-or- value

attributes- values-not-supported

or-values-

not-supported

0x05 start unsupported-attributes unsupported-attributes tag

0x21 integer type value-tag

0x0006 name-length

copies copies name

0x0004 value-length

0x00000014 20 value

0x10 unsupported (type) value-tag

0x0005 name-length

sides sides name

0x0000 value-length

0x03 end-of-attributes end-of-attributes-tag

9.4 Print-Job Response (success with attributes ignored)

Here is an example of a successful Print-Job response to a Print-Job

request like the previous Print-Job request, except that the value of

'ipp-attribute-fidelity' is false. The print request succeeds, even

though, in this case, the printer supports neither the "sides"

attribute nor the value '20' for the "copies" attribute. Therefore, a

job is created, and both a "job-id" and a "job-uri" operation

attribute are returned. The unsupported attributes are also returned

in an Unsupported Attributes Group. The error code returned is '

successful-ok-ignored-or-substituted-attributes' (0x0001).

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

0x0100 1.0 version-number

0x0001 successful-ok-ignored-or- status-code

substituted-attributes

0x00000001 1 request-id

0x01 start operation-attributes operation-attributes-tag

0x47 charset type value-tag

0x0012 name-length

attributes- attributes-charset name

charset

0x0008 value-length

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

us-ascii US-ASCII value

0x48 natural-language type value-tag

0x001B name-length

attributes- attributes-natural- name

natural-language language

0x0005 value-length

en-us en-US value

0x41 textWithoutLanguage type value-tag

0x000E name-length

status-message status-message name

0x002F value-length

successful-ok- successful-ok-ignored-or- value

ignored-or- substituted-attributes

substituted-

attributes

0x05 start unsupported- unsupported-attributes

attributes tag

0x21 integer type value-tag

0x0006 name-length

copies copies name

0x0004 value-length

0x00000014 20 value

0x10 unsupported (type) value-tag

0x0005 name-length

sides sides name

0x0000 value-length

0x02 start job-attributes job-attributes-tag

0x21 integer value-tag

0x0006 name-length

job-id job-id name

0x0004 value-length

147 147 value

0x45 uri type value-tag

0x0007 name-length

job-uri job-uri name

0x001E value-length

http://forest:63 job 123 on pinetree value

1/pinetree/123

0x42 nameWithoutLanguage type value-tag

0x0009 name-length

job-state job-state name

0x0004 value-length

0x0003 pending value

0x03 end-of-attributes end-of-attributes-tag

9.5 Print-URI Request

The following is an example of Print-URI request with copies and

job-name parameters:

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

0x0100 1.0 version-number

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

0x0003 Print-URI operation-id

0x00000001 1 request-id

0x01 start operation-attributes operation-attributes-tag

0x47 charset type value-tag

0x0012 name-length

attributes- attributes-charset name

charset

0x0008 value-length

us-ascii US-ASCII value

0x48 natural-language type value-tag

0x001B name-length

attributes- attributes-natural-language name

natural-

language

0x0005 value-length

en-us en-US value

0x45 uri type value-tag

0x000B name-length

printer-uri printer-uri name

0x001A value-length

http://forest printer pinetree value

:631/pinetree

0x45 uri type value-tag

0x000C name-length

document-uri document-uri name

0x11 value-length

ftp://foo.com ftp://foo.com/foo value

/foo

0x42 nameWithoutLanguage type value-tag

0x0008 name-length

job-name job-name name

0x0006 value-length

foobar foobar value

0x02 start job-attributes job-attributes-tag

0x21 integer type value-tag

0x0006 name-length

copies copies name

0x0004 value-length

0x00000001 1 value

0x03 end-of-attributes end-of-attributes-tag

9.6 Create-Job Request

The following is an example of Create-Job request with no parameters

and no attributes:

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

0x0100 1.0 version-number

0x0005 Create-Job operation-id

0x00000001 1 request-id

0x01 start operation-attributes operation-attributes-tag

0x47 charset type value-tag

0x0012 name-length

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

attributes- attributes-charset name

charset

0x0008 value-length

us-ascii US-ASCII value

0x48 natural-language type value-tag

0x001B name-length

attributes- attributes-natural-language name

natural-

language

0x0005 value-length

en-us en-US value

0x45 uri type value-tag

0x000B name-length

printer-uri printer-uri name

0x001A value-length

http://forest: printer pinetree value

631/pinetree

0x03 end-of-attributes end-of-attributes-tag

9.7 Get-Jobs Request

The following is an example of Get-Jobs request with parameters but

no attributes:

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

0x0100 1.0 version-number

0x000A Get-Jobs operation-id

0x00000123 0x123 request-id

0x01 start operation-attributes operation-attributes-tag

0x47 charset type value-tag

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

0x0012 name-length

attributes- attributes-charset name

charset

0x0008 value-length

us-ascii US-ASCII value

0x48 natural-language type value-tag

0x001B name-length

attributes- attributes-natural-language name

natural-

language

0x0005 value-length

en-us en-US value

0x45 uri type value-tag

0x000B name-length

printer-uri printer-uri name

0x001A value-length

http://forest:6 printer pinetree value

31/pinetree

0x21 integer type value-tag

0x0005 name-length

limit limit name

0x0004 value-length

0x00000032 50 value

0x44 keyword type value-tag

0x0014 name-length

requested- requested-attributes name

attributes

0x0006 value-length

job-id job-id value

0x44 keyword type value-tag

0x0000 additional value name-length

0x0008 value-length

job-name job-name value

0x44 keyword type value-tag

0x0000 additional value name-length

0x000F value-length

document-format document-format value

0x03 end-of-attributes end-of-attributes-tag

9.8 Get-Jobs Response

The following is an of Get-Jobs response from previous request with 3

jobs. The Printer returns no information about the second job

(because of security reasons):

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

0x0100 1.0 version-number

0x0000 successful-ok status-code

0x00000123 0x123 request-id (echoed

back)

0x01 start operation-attributes operation-attribute-tag

0x47 charset type value-tag

0x0012 name-length

attributes- attributes-charset name

charset

0x000A value-length

ISO-8859-1 ISO-8859-1 value

0x48 natural-language type value-tag

0x001B name-length

attributes- attributes-natural-language name

natural-

language

0x0005 value-length

en-us en-US value

0x41 textWithoutLanguage type value-tag

0x000E name-length

status-message status-message name

0x000D value-length

successful-ok successful-ok value

0x02 start job-attributes (1st job-attributes-tag

object)

0x21 integer type value-tag

0x0006 name-length

job-id job-id name

0x0004 value-length

147 147 value

0x36 nameWithLanguage value-tag

0x0008 name-length

job-name job-name name

0x000C value-length

0x0005 sub-value-length

fr-ca fr-CA value

0x0003 sub-value-length

fou fou name

0x02 start job-attributes (2nd job-attributes-tag

object)

0x02 start job-attributes (3rd job-attributes-tag

object)

0x21 integer type value-tag

0x0006 name-length

job-id job-id name

0x0004 value-length

Octets Symbolic Value Protocol field

148 148 value

0x36 nameWithLanguage value-tag

0x0008 name-length

job-name job-name name

0x0012 value-length

0x0005 sub-value-length

de-CH de-CH value

0x0009 sub-value-length

isch guet isch guet name

0x03 end-of-attributes end-of-attributes-tag

10. Appendix C: Registration of MIME Media Type Information for

"application/ipp"

This appendix contains the information that IANA requires for

registering a MIME media type. The information following this

paragraph will be forwarded to IANA to register application/ipp whose

contents are defined in Section 3 "Encoding of the Operation Layer"

in this document:

MIME type name: application

MIME suBType name: ipp

A Content-Type of "application/ipp" indicates an Internet Printing

Protocol message body (request or response). Currently there is one

version: IPP/1.0, whose syntax is described in Section 3 "Encoding of

the Operation Layer" of [RFC2565], and whose semantics are described

in [RFC2566].

Required parameters: none

Optional parameters: none

Encoding considerations:

IPP/1.0 protocol requests/responses MAY contain long lines and ALWAYS

contain binary data (for example attribute value lengths).

Security considerations:

IPP/1.0 protocol requests/responses do not introduce any security

risks not already inherent in the underlying transport protocols.

Protocol mixed-version interworking rules in [RFC2566] as well as

protocol encoding rules in [RFC2565] are complete and unambiguous.

Interoperability considerations:

IPP/1.0 requests (generated by clients) and responses (generated by

servers) MUST comply with all conformance requirements imposed by the

normative specifications [RFC2566] and [RFC2565]. Protocol encoding

rules specified in [RFC2565] are comprehensive, so that

interoperability between conforming implementations is guaranteed

(although support for specific optional features is not ensured).

Both the "charset" and "natural-language" of all IPP/1.0 attribute

values which are a LOCALIZED-STRING are explicit within IPP protocol

requests/responses (without recourse to any external information in

HTTP, SMTP, or other message transport headers).

Published specification:

[RFC2566] Isaacson, S., deBry, R., Hastings, T., Herriot, R. and P.

Powell, "Internet Printing Protocol/1.0: Model and

Semantics" RFC2566, April 1999.

[RFC2565] Herriot, R., Butler, S., Moore, P., Tuner, R., "Internet

Printing Protocol/1.0: Encoding and Transport", RFC2565,

April 1999.

Applications which use this media type:

Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) print clients and print servers,

communicating using HTTP/1.1 (see [RFC2565]), SMTP/ESMTP, FTP, or

other transport protocol. Messages of type "application/ipp" are

self-contained and transport-independent, including "charset" and

"natural-language" context for any LOCALIZED-STRING value.

Person & email address to contact for further information:

Scott A. Isaacson

Novell, Inc.

122 E 1700 S

Provo, UT 84606

Phone: 801-861-7366

Fax: 801-861-4025

Email: sisaacson@novell.com

or

Robert Herriot (Editor)

Xerox Corporation

3400 Hillview Ave., Bldg #1

Palo Alto, CA 94304

Phone: 650-813-7696

Fax: 650-813-6860

EMail: rherriot@pahv.xerox.com

11. Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to

others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it

or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published

and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any

kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are

included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this

document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing

the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other

Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of

developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for

copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be

followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than

English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be

revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an

"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING

TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING

BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION

HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有