分享
 
 
 

RFC3306 - Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast Addresses

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group B. Haberman

Request for Comments: 3306 Consultant

Category: Standards Track D. Thaler

Microsoft

August 2002

Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast Addresses

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the

Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet

Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state

and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

This specification defines an extension to the multicast addressing

architecture of the IP Version 6 protocol. The extension presented

in this document allows for unicast-prefix-based allocation of

multicast addresses. By delegating multicast addresses at the same

time as unicast prefixes, network operators will be able to identify

their multicast addresses without needing to run an inter-domain

allocation protocol.

Table of Contents

1. IntrodUCtion....................................................2

2. Motivation......................................................2

3. Terminology.....................................................2

4. Multicast Address Format........................................2

5. Address Lifetime................................................4

6. Source-Specific Multicast Addresses.............................4

7. Examples........................................................4

8. Security Considerations.........................................5

9. References......................................................5

Author's Address...................................................6

Full Copyright Statement...........................................7

1. Introduction

This document specifies an extension to the multicast portion of the

IPv6 addressing architecture [ADDRARCH]. The current architecture

does not contain any built-in support for dynamic address allocation.

This proposal introduces encoded information in the multicast address

to allow for dynamic allocation of IPv6 multicast addresses and IPv6

source-specific multicast addresses.

2. Motivation

The current IPv4 multicast address allocation architecture [RFC2908]

is based on a multi-layered, multi-protocol system. The goal of this

proposal is to reduce the number of protocols that need to be

deployed in order to get dynamic multicast address allocation.

The use of unicast prefix-based multicast address allocation will, at

a minimum, remove the need to run the Multicast Address Allocation

Protocol (AAP) [AAP WORK] and the Multicast Address-Set Claim (MASC)

Protocol [RFC2909].

3. Terminology

The key Words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",

"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this

document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

4. Multicast Address Format

Section 2.7 of [ADDRARCH] defines the following operational format of

IPv6 multicast addresses:

8 4 4 112

+--------+----+----+---------------------------------------------+

11111111flgsscop group ID

+--------+----+----+---------------------------------------------+

This document introduces a new format that incorporates unicast

prefix information in the multicast address. The following

illustrates the new format:

8 4 4 8 8 64 32

+--------+----+----+--------+--------+----------------+----------+

11111111flgsscopreserved plen network prefix group ID

+--------+----+----+--------+--------+----------------+----------+

+-+-+-+-+

flgs is a set of 4 flags: 00PT

+-+-+-+-+

o P = 0 indicates a multicast address that is not assigned

based on the network prefix. This indicates a multicast

address as defined in [ADDRARCH].

o P = 1 indicates a multicast address that is assigned based

on the network prefix.

o If P = 1, T MUST be set to 1, otherwise the setting of the T

bit is defined in Section 2.7 of [ADDRARCH].

The reserved field MUST be zero.

plen indicates the actual number of bits in the network prefix field

that identify the subnet when P = 1.

network prefix identifies the network prefix of the unicast subnet

owning the multicast address. If P = 1, this field contains the

unicast network prefix assigned to the domain owning, or allocating,

the multicast address. All non-significant bits of the network

prefix field SHOULD be zero.

It should be noted that the Interface Identifier requirements in

Section 2.5.1 of [ADDRARCH] effectively restrict the length of the

unicast prefix to 64 bits, hence the network prefix portion of the

multicast address will be at most 64 bits.

Group ID is set based on the guidelines outlined in [IPV6 GID].

The scope of the unicast-prefix based multicast address MUST NOT

exceed the scope of the unicast prefix embedded in the multicast

address.

5. Address Lifetime

The lifetime of a unicast prefix-based multicast address SHOULD NOT

exceed the Valid Lifetime field in the Prefix Information option,

corresponding to the unicast prefix being used, contained in the

Neighbor Discovery Router Advertisement message [RFC2461]. The

lifetime of the multicast address is needed to support the Abstract

API for Multicast Address Allocation [RFC2771].

It should be noted that the unicast prefix's Valid Lifetime in the

Router Advertisement message does not indicate that the prefix will

become invalid at the end of the lifetime. Rather, that value is

typically a constant until a renumbering event is scheduled after

which, the prefix does become invalid.

The use of unicast prefix-based multicast addresses after the unicast

prefix has become invalid may lead to operational problems. For

example, routers that perform policy checks comparing the multicast

prefix against the unicast prefix assigned to an AS may discard the

packet.

6. Source-Specific Multicast Addresses

The unicast prefix-based IPv6 multicast address format supports

Source-specific multicast addresses, as defined by [SSM ARCH]. To

accomplish this, a node MUST:

o Set P = 1.

o Set plen = 0.

o Set network prefix = 0.

These settings create an SSM range of FF3x::/32 (where 'x' is any

valid scope value). The source address field in the IPv6 header

identifies the owner of the multicast address.

7. Examples

The following are a few examples of the structure of unicast prefix-

based multicast addresses.

- Global prefixes - A network with a unicast prefix of

3FFE:FFFF:1::/48 would also have a unicast prefix-based

multicast prefix of FF3x:0030:3FFE:FFFF:0001::/96 (where 'x'

is any valid scope).

- SSM - All IPv6 SSM multicast addresses will have the format

FF3x::/96.

8. Security Considerations

It is possible that the embedded unicast prefix can aid in

identifying the allocation domain of a given multicast address,

though an allocation domain choosing to avoid being traced has no

obstacles currently to creating addresses using a prefix not assigned

to it, or using a smaller scope embedded prefix.

Using source-specific multicast addresses can sometimes aid in the

prevention of denial-of-service attacks by arbitrary sources,

although no guarantee is provided. A more in-depth discussion of the

security considerations for SSM can be found in [SSM ARCH].

9. References

[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision

3", BCP 9, RFC2026, October 1996.

[RFC2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6

(IPv6) Specification", RFC2460, December 1998.

[ADDRARCH] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing

Architecture", RFC2373, July 1998.

[RFC2908] Thaler, D., Handley, M. and D. Estrin, "The Internet

Multicast Address Allocation Architecture", RFC2908,

September 2000.

[AAP WORK] Handley, M. and S. Hanna, "Multicast Address Allocation

Protocol (AAP)", Work In Progress.

[RFC2909] Radoslavov, P., Estrin, D., Govindan, R., Handley, M.,

Kumar, S. and D. Thaler, "The Multicast Address-Set Claim

(MASC) Protocol", RFC2909, September 2000.

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC2119, March 1999.

[IPV6 GID] Haberman, B., "Dynamic Allocation Guidelines for IPv6

Multicast Addresses", RFC3307, June 2002.

[RFC2461] Narten, T., Nordmark, E. and W. Simpson, "Neighbor

Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)", RFC2461, December

1998.

[RFC2771] Finlayson, R., "An Abstract API for Multicast Address

Allocation", RFC2771, February 2000.

[SSM ARCH] Holbrook, H. and B. Cain, "Source-Specific Multicast for

IP", Work In Progress.

Author's Address

Brian Haberman

Consultant

Phone: 1-919-949-4828

EMail: bkhabs@nc.rr.com

Dave Thaler

Microsoft Corporation

One Microsoft Way

Redmond, WA 48105-6399

Phone: 1-425-703-8835

EMail: dthaler@microsoft.com

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to

others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise eXPlain it

or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published

and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any

kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are

included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this

document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing

the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other

Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of

developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for

copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be

followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than

English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be

revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an

"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING

TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING

BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION

HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFCEditor function is currently provided by the

Internet Society.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有