分享
 
 
 

RFC3307 - Allocation Guidelines for IPv6 Multicast Addresses

王朝other·作者佚名  2008-05-31
窄屏简体版  字體: |||超大  

Network Working Group B. Haberman

Request for Comments: 3307 Consultant

Category: Standards Track August 2002

Allocation Guidelines for IPv6 Multicast Addresses

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the

Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for

improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet

Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state

and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

This document specifies guidelines that must be implemented by any

entity responsible for allocating IPv6 multicast addresses. This

includes, but is not limited to, any documents or entities wishing to

assign permanent IPv6 multicast addresses, allocate dynamic IPv6

multicast addresses, and define permanent IPv6 multicast group

identifiers. The purpose of these guidelines is to redUCe the

probability of IPv6 multicast address collision, not only at the IPv6

layer, but also at the link-layer of media that encode portions of

the IP layer address into the MAC layer address.

Table of Contents

1. Terminology.....................................................2

2. Introduction....................................................2

3. Applicability...................................................3

4. Group ID Selection Guidelines...................................3

4.1 Permanent IPv6 Multicast Addresses............................4

4.2 Permanent IPv6 Multicast Group Identifiers....................4

4.3 Dynamic IPv6 Multicast Addresses..............................4

4.3.1 Server Allocation............................................5

4.3.2 Host Allocation..............................................5

5. IANA Considerations.............................................5

6. Security Considerations.........................................6

7. Acknowledgements................................................6

8. References......................................................6

Author's Address...................................................7

Full Copyright Statement...........................................8

1. Terminology

The key Words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",

"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this

document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

The term "group ID", throughout this document, conforms to the

definition contained in [UNIMCAST], that is, the low-order 32 bits of

the IPv6 multicast address.

2. Introduction

This document specifies guidelines that MUST be implemented by any

entity responsible for allocating IPv6 multicast addresses. This

includes, but is not limited to, any documents or entities wishing to

assign permanent IPv6 multicast addresses, allocate dynamic IPv6

multicast addresses, and define permanent IPv6 multicast group

identifiers. The purpose of these guidelines is to reduce the

probability of IPv6 multicast address collision, not only at the IPv6

layer, but also at the link-layer of media that encode portions of

the IP layer address into the link-layer address.

With the current IPv6 address architecture [ADDRARCH] and the

extension to the multicast address architecture specified in

[UNIMCAST], a set of guidelines is needed for entities assigning any

flavor of IPv6 multicast addresses.

The current approach of several physical media [RFC2464][RFC2467]

is to map a portion of the IPv6 multicast address into a link-layer

destination address. This is accomplished by taking the low order 32

bits (henceforth called the group ID) of the IPv6 multicast address

and including them in the link-layer destination address. Group IDs,

less than or equal to, 32 bits long will generate unique link-layer

addresses within a given multicast scope.

These guidelines specify how the group ID of the IPv6 multicast

address are chosen and assigned. The guidelines specify several

mechanisms that can be used to determine the group ID of the

multicast address, based on the type of allocation being done.

3. Applicability

These guidelines are designed to be used in any environment in which

IPv6 multicast addresses are delegated, assigned, or selected. These

guidelines are not limited to use by MADCAP [RFC2730] servers. The

following is a non-exhaustive list of applications of these

guidelines:

- Source-specific multicast application servers can generate an

SSM group address by generating a 96-bit multicast prefix, as

defined in [UNIMCAST] (i.e. FF3x::/96) and concatenating that

with a group ID, as defined in this document.

- A MADCAP server allocates IPv6 multicast addresses conforming

to section 2.7 of [ADDRARCH], creating the group ID using the

rules defined in this document.

- Nodes supplying multicast services in a zeroconf environment

generate multicast addresses without the need of centralized

control.

- IANA can assign permanent multicast addresses to fulfill

requests via the protocol standardization process.

4. Group ID Selection Guidelines

The Group ID selection process allows for three types of multicast

address assignments. These are permanent IPv6 multicast addresses,

dynamic IPv6 multicast addresses, and permanent IPv6 multicast group

IDs. The following guidelines assume that the prefix of the

multicast address has been initialized according to [ADDRARCH] or

[UNIMCAST].

4.1 Permanent IPv6 Multicast Addresses

Permanent multicast addresses, like those defined in [RFC2375], are

allocated by IANA. These addresses will be assigned with group ID's,

in the range of 0x00000001 to 0x3FFFFFFF, on an EXPert Review basis.

Multicast addresses assigned by IANA MUST have the T bit set to 0 and

the P bit set to 0.

4.2 Permanent IPv6 Multicast Group Identifiers

Permanent group IDs allow for a global identifier of a particular

service (e.g. Network Time Protocol (NTP) being assigned the group ID

0x40404040). The use of permanent group IDs differs from permanent

multicast addresses in that a permanent group ID offers a global

identifier for a service being offered by numerous servers.

As an example, consider the NTP example group ID of 0x40404040. An

NTP client would be able to Access multiple servers and multiple

scopes. That is, the NTP client will know that the group ID

0x40404040 identifies an NTP multicast stream regardless of the upper

96 bits of the multicast address.

Permanent group IDs are allocated on an Expert Review basis, in the

range 0x40000000 to 0x7FFFFFFF. These permanent group IDs are meant

to be used in IPv6 multicast addresses, defined in [UNIMCAST].

4.3 Dynamic IPv6 Multicast Addresses

Dynamic IPv6 multicast addresses can be allocated by an allocation

server or by an end-host. Regardless of the allocation mechanism,

all dynamically allocated IPv6 multicast addresses MUST have the T

bit set to 1. This will distinguish the dynamically allocated

addresses from the permanently assigned multicast addresses, defined

in [RFC2375], at the link-layer on any media that maps the lower

portion of the IPv6 multicast address into a link-layer address. It

should be noted that the high-order bit of the Group ID will be the

same value as the T flag.

As an example, the permanent IPv6 multicast address FF02::9 maps to

an Ethernet group address of 33-33-00-00-00-09. A dynamically

allocated IPv6 multicast address of FF32::8000:9 would map to the

Ethernet group address 33-33-80-00-00-09.

4.3.1 Server Allocation

The allocation of IPv6 multicast addresses, by a server, is defined

in [RFC2730]. Address management is the responsibility of the

allocation protocol and outside the scope of this document.

Allocation servers MUST use the group ID range 0x80000000 to

0xFFFFFFFF.

4.3.2 Host Allocation

Host-based allocation allows hosts to self-select IPv6 multicast

addresses. One example of host-based allocation is the Zeroconf

Multicast Address Allocation Protocol [ZMAAPDOC]. Issues with

collision detection, claim notification, etc. are outside the scope

of this document and the responsibility of the protocol being used,

such as [ZMAAPDOC].

The group ID portion of the address is created using either a

pseudo-random 32-bit number or a 32-bit number created using the

guidelines in [RFC1750]. The generated group ID MUST fall in the

range 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF. This can be accomplished by setting

the high-order bit of the generated number to 1.

5. IANA Considerations

This document requests the creation of a new registry maintained by

IANA. This new registry will maintain permanent group ID values. The

premise of this new registry is to allow for permanent group IDs to

be used across multiple domains utilizing the multicast address

architecture defined in [UNIMCAST]. The permanent group IDs will

fall in the range 0x40000000 to 0x7FFFFFFF.

In addition, this document also defines rules for the allocation of

permanent IPv6 multicast addresses by IANA. These rules specify

different ranges for multicast addresses that are IPv6-only and for

IPv6 multicast addresses that have corresponding IPv4 multicast

addresses.

Following the policies outlined in [RFC2434]:

- Permanent IPv6 multicast addresses with corresponding IPv4

multicast addresses, like those defined in [RFC2375], are

allocated with group ID's in the range of 1 to 0x3FFFFFFF on an

Expert Review basis, see Section 4.1.

- Permanent IPv6-only multicast addresses are allocated with

group ID's in the range 0x100 to 0x3FFFFFFF on an Expert Review

basis.

- Permanent group ID's are allocated on an Expert Review basis in

the range 0x40000000 to 0x7FFFFFFF, see Section 4.2.

- The range 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF is reserved for use by

dynamic multicast address allocation mechanisms, see Section

4.3.

All approved requests for a permanent IPv6 multicast address will

result in the assignment of a unique group ID which shall be reserved

in all valid IPv6 multicast scopes.

6. Security Considerations

The allocation mechanisms described in this document do not alter the

security properties of either the Any Source or Source Specific

multicast service models of IPv4 and IPv6.

The potential to allocate large blocks of addresses can lead to

Denial-of-Service attacks. A more in-depth discussion of the

security issues surrounding dynamic allocation of multicast addresses

can be found in [RFC2908].

7. Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dave Thaler, Steve Deering, Allison

Mankin, Thomas Narten, and Erik Nordmark for their thorough review of

this document.

8. References

[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision

3", BCP 9, RFC2026, October 1996.

[UNIMCAST] Haberman, B. and D. Thaler, "Unicast Prefix-based IPv6

Multicast Addresses", RFC3306, June 2002.

[ADDRARCH] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing

Architecture", RFC2373, July 1998.

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate

Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC2119, March 1999.

[RFC2730] Hanna, S., Patel, B. and M. Shah, "Multicast Address

Dynamic Client Allocation Protocol (MADCAP)", RFC2730,

December 1999.

[RFC2464] Crawford, M., "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet

Networks", RFC2464, December 1998.

[RFC2467] Crawford, M., "Transmission of IPv6 over FDDI Networks",

RFC2467, December 1998.

[RFC1750] Eastlake, D., Crocker, S. and J. Schiller, "Randomness

Recommendations for Security", RFC1750, December 1994.

[RFC2375] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IPv6 Multicast Address

Assignments", RFC2375, July 1998.

[RFC2908] Thaler, D., Handley, M. and D. Estrin, "The Internet

Multicast Address Allocation Architecture", RFC2908,

September 2000.

[ZMAAPDOC] Catrina, et al, "Zeroconf Multicast Address Allocation

Protocol (ZMAAP)", Work In Progress.

Author's Address

Brian Haberman

Consultant

Phone: 1-919-949-4828

EMail: bkhabs@nc.rr.com

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to

others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it

or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published

and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any

kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are

included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this

document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing

the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other

Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of

developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for

copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be

followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than

English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be

revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an

"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING

TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING

BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION

HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFCEditor function is currently provided by the

Internet Society.

 
 
 
免责声明:本文为网络用户发布,其观点仅代表作者个人观点,与本站无关,本站仅提供信息存储服务。文中陈述内容未经本站证实,其真实性、完整性、及时性本站不作任何保证或承诺,请读者仅作参考,并请自行核实相关内容。
2023年上半年GDP全球前十五强
 百态   2023-10-24
美众议院议长启动对拜登的弹劾调查
 百态   2023-09-13
上海、济南、武汉等多地出现不明坠落物
 探索   2023-09-06
印度或要将国名改为“巴拉特”
 百态   2023-09-06
男子为女友送行,买票不登机被捕
 百态   2023-08-20
手机地震预警功能怎么开?
 干货   2023-08-06
女子4年卖2套房花700多万做美容:不但没变美脸,面部还出现变形
 百态   2023-08-04
住户一楼被水淹 还冲来8头猪
 百态   2023-07-31
女子体内爬出大量瓜子状活虫
 百态   2023-07-25
地球连续35年收到神秘规律性信号,网友:不要回答!
 探索   2023-07-21
全球镓价格本周大涨27%
 探索   2023-07-09
钱都流向了那些不缺钱的人,苦都留给了能吃苦的人
 探索   2023-07-02
倩女手游刀客魅者强控制(强混乱强眩晕强睡眠)和对应控制抗性的关系
 百态   2020-08-20
美国5月9日最新疫情:美国确诊人数突破131万
 百态   2020-05-09
荷兰政府宣布将集体辞职
 干货   2020-04-30
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案逍遥观:鹏程万里
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案神机营:射石饮羽
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案昆仑山:拔刀相助
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案天工阁:鬼斧神工
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案丝路古道:单枪匹马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:与虎谋皮
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:李代桃僵
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案镇郊荒野:指鹿为马
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:小鸟依人
 干货   2019-11-12
倩女幽魂手游师徒任务情义春秋猜成语答案金陵:千金买邻
 干货   2019-11-12
 
推荐阅读
 
 
 
>>返回首頁<<
 
靜靜地坐在廢墟上,四周的荒凉一望無際,忽然覺得,淒涼也很美
© 2005- 王朝網路 版權所有