2010年考研英语阅读200篇
点此进入淘宝搜索页搜索分類: 图书,外语 ,英语考试,考研英语,
作者： 郭庆民主编
出 版 社：
出版时间： 2009-2-1字数：版次： 9页数： 579印刷时间：开本： 16开印次：纸张：I S B N ： 9787300063065包装： 平装编辑推荐
名师经典版本，精读阅读理解全50分。
重点题材与多样题材兼顾，涉及热点问题，帮助了解新知识、新问题、新观点，详析历年教师特点，剖析解题思路，着重训练应试技能与把握作者观点和意图的能力，配套全文翻译，注解疑难长句，透彻理解文章深意，精选核心词汇与词组，筛选词义，帮助考生实质性提高词汇的质与量。
内容简介
《2010年考研英语阅读200篇》第一部分精选100篇涵盖考研常涉及的一些题材的文章，对其中的疑难长句进行了翻译和注解，对其中的90篇文章的“重点词汇”和“非重点词汇”进行了注释。本部分供考生精读文章使用，并利用精读串起对阅读、翻译、完形填空和写作的全面复习。
第二部分是阅读理解Part B部分，包括了大纲要求的三个备选题型，四个样题，分四节分别练习。每节都包括了解题思路指导、模拟试题、模拟试题题解和译文。在阅读题解题时一定要结合所归纳的解题思路，以便对解题思路有更深刻的认识。
第三部分的10套模拟试题主要供学生泛读用，建议考生每套用50-70分钟左右完成。每套题之后是其题解，题解只力求起到画龙点睛的作用，其他留给考生自己去思考和归纳。考生无须精读文章，只作为阅读理解练习来做就够了。当然，考生也应该在难度较大、内容较新的文章上多花一些时间。考生也可以交替阅读第一部分和第三部分。
第四部分是3套自测题与题解，其中包括了阅读理解Part B的备选题型一。在经过精泛读的训练后，考生可以在该部分综合检验一下自己的水平。因此，我们建议考生每次用90分钟左右的时间做完一套题。这样，考生还检验了自己做题的时间是否超出了规定时限。
第五部分详细分析了历年考题阅读理解部分的特点，在此基础上，通过实例讲解和剖析和解题思路，训练考生阅读理解的应试技能、帮助考生把握答题所需的重要信息，培养考生根据上下文理解句子和词义的能力。
作者简介
郭庆民，中国人民大学外语学院副教授，张锦芯教授考研英语辅导小组阅读部分主讲，长期从事考研英语研究和辅导工作，对考研英语阅读理解部分有深入研究，因出题难度与角度接近真题而深受考生欢迎。
目录
第一部分 阅读理解100篇及译文与疑难长句注解和题解
第一节 阅读理解100篇及译文与疑难长句注解
一、经济
二、社会
三、教育
四、网络与计算机
五、医学与健康
六、法律与道德
七、能源与环保
八、政府与政治
九、信息与传媒
十、语言与文化
十一、科学与技术
十二、其他：历史、应用文、人口学、传记、文学艺术
第二节 阅读理解100篇题解
一、经济
二、社会
三、教育
四、网络与计算机
五、医学与健康
六、法律与道德
七、能源与环保
八、政府与政治
九、信息与传媒
十、语言与文化
十一、科学与技术
十二、其他：历史、应用文、人口学、传记、文学艺术
第二部分 阅读理解 Part B选择搭配模拟试题及题解与译文
第一节 备选题型一（Sanlple One）
一、解题思路概述
二、模拟试题
三、模拟试题题解与译文
第二节 备选题型二（Sample Two）
一、解题思路概述
二、模拟试题
三、模拟试题题解与译文
第三节 备选题型三（Sample Three）
一、解题思路概述
二、模拟试题
三、模拟试题题解与译文
第四节 备选题型三（Sample Four）
一、解题思路概述
二、模拟试题
三、模拟试题题解与译文
第三部分 阅读理解模拟试题10套与题解
模拟试题一
模拟试题一题解
模拟试题二
模拟试题二题解
模拟试题三
模拟试题三题解
模拟试题四
模拟试题四题解
模拟试题五
模拟试题五题解
模拟试题六
模拟试题六题解
第四部分 阅读理解自测题3套与题解
自测题一（含Part B）
自测题一题解
自测题二（含Part B）
自测题二题解
自测题三（含Part B）
自测题三题解
第五部分 阅读应试技能指导
第一节 给考生的建议
第二节 文章的阅读
一、什么是正确的阅读方法
二、把握文章的重要信息
三、文章类型
四、阅读中注意运用已有的知识
五、对文章中的举例与引用的理解
第三节 猜测词义
第四节 解题思路训练
书摘插图
第三部分 阅读理解模拟试题10套与题解
模拟试题五
TEXT 1
The destruction of our natural resources and contamination of our food supply continue to occur, largely because of the extreme difficulty in affixing legal responsibility on those who continue to treat our environment with reckless abandon. Attempts to prevent pollution by legislation, economic incentives and friendly persuasion have been met by lawsuits, personal and industrial denial and long delays-not only in accepting responsibility, but more importantly, in doing something about it.
It seems that only when government decides it can afford tax incentives or production sacrifices is there any initiative for change. Where is industry's and our recognition that protecting mankind's great treasure is the single most important responsibility？ If ever there will be time for environmental health professionals to come to the frontlines and provide leadership to solve environmental problems, that time is now.
We are being asked, and, in fact, the public is demanding that we take positive action. It is our responsibility as professionals in environmental health to make the difference. Yes, the ecologists, the environmental activists and the conservationists serve to communicate, stimulate thinking and promote behavioral change. However, it is those of us who are paid to make the decisions to develop, improve and enforce environmental standards, and, I submit, who must lead the change.
We must recognize that environmental health issues do not stop at city limits, county lines, state oreven federal boundaries. We can no longer afford to be tunnel-visioned in our approach. We must visualize issues from every perspective to make the objective decisions. We must express our views clearly to prevent media distortion and public confusion.
I believe we have a three-part mission for the present. First, we must continue to press for improvements in the quality of life that people can make for themselves. Second, we must investigate and understand the link between environment and health. Third, we must be able to communicate technical information in a form that citizens can understand. If we can accomplish these three goals in this decade, maybe we can finally stop environmental degradation, and not merely hold it back. We will then be able to spend pollution dollars truly on prevention rather than on bandages.
1. We can infer from the first two paragraphs that the industrialists disregard environmental protection chiefly because
[A] it is difficult for them to take effective measures
[B] time has not yet come for them to put due emphasis on it
[C] they are reluctant to sacrifice their own economic interest
[D] they are unaware of the consequences of what they are doing
2. The main task now facing ecologists, environmental activists and conservationists is
[A] to arouse public awareness of the importance of environmental protection
[B] to prevent pollution by legislation, economic incentives and persuasion
[C] to improve the quality of life by enforcing environmental standards
[D] to take radical measures to control environmental pollution
3. The word "tunnel-visioned" in Paragraph 4 most probably means __
[A] narrow-minded
[B] short-sighted
[C] able to see only one aspect
[D] blind to the facts
4. Which of the following, according to the author, should play the leading role in the solution of environmental problems？
[A] The cooperation of ecologists, environmental activists and conservationists.
[B] The efforts of environmental health professionals.
[C] The industry's understanding and support.
[D] Legislation and government intervention.
……
